FOOD INSECURITY AND COPING STRATEGIES OF HOUSEHOLDS IN UMUAHIA NORTH AND SOUTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS OF ABIA STATE

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00008150

No of Pages: 89

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦3000

  • $

ABSTRACT

High prevalence of food insecurity experienced by many households in developing countries predisposes them to adopting coping strategies (CSs), some of which may put them at risk of malnutrition. This study assessed the household food insecurity status and Coping Strategies in Umuahia North and South Local Government Areas of Abia State. A cross-sectional study design was adopted. Multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 400 households from eight (8) communities in the aforementioned study location. Interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic data. Household food insecurity (HFI) status and coping strategy were assessed using Household Food Insecurity Access Scale and Coping Strategy index questionnaires. The data was analysed using Statistical Package Service Software (SPSS) version 25.0. Descriptive and Inferential Statistics were computed for the variables with significance judged at (P< 0.05). Findings of the study showed that (81.7%) of the household heads were male while (18.3%) were female. Majority (79.1%) of the respondents were married while 16.5% were widowed. About (48.5%) of the respondents finished secondary education while 15.0% and 25.1% attended tertiary education I and tertiary education II respectively. Majority (97.2%) of the respondents were Christians while 1.3% and 1.6% were Muslims and Traditionalist respectively. About (23.0%) of the respondents estimated monthly income was less than N 30,000, while (22.5%) earn about N 30,000 - N 50,000 monthly, and about (29.2%) earn N 71,000 – N 100,000. About (13.1%) of the respondents rarely worry about food while greater number (40.1%) sometimes worry about food. About (43.4%) sometimes rely on less preferred foods while (32.6%) sometimes limit portion size at meal times and (29.2%) reduced number of meals eaten in a day. Greater number (82.2%) of respondents were food insecure while 16.7% were food secure. About one-fifth (14.2%) were severely food insecure while 36.7%, and 32.3% were moderately and mildly food insecure respectively. A significant association exists between Coping Strategy categories and food insecurity status (P 0.01). However, the result indicated that household income was significantly associated with food insecurity. The result also indicated that sex of household head (AOR=2.60; CL: 1.26, 5.37) and education level of household head (AOR=0.07; CL: 0.01, 0.49) are significant predictors of food coping strategies. The prevalence of food insecurity was high and most households adopted CS that reduced both food quality and quantity and could adversely affect their nutritional status and predisposed them to multiple forms of malnutrition. 






TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE                                                                                                               I

CERTIFICATION                                                                                                      II

DEDICATION                                                                                                            III

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT                                                                                          IV

TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                            V

LIST OF TABLES                                                                                                     VIII

LIST OF FIGURES                                                                                                    IX

ABSTRACT                                                                                                                X

CHAPTER 1                                                                                                              

INTRODUCTION                                                                                                      1

1.0 Background of the study                                                                                       1

1.1 Statement of problem                                                                                           6

1.2 Objectives of the study                                                                                         10

1.3 Significance of the study                                                                                      11


CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW                                                                                           13

2.1 Overview of food insecurity/food security                                                           13

2.2 Determinant of food security                                                                                15

2.2.1 Gender of Household Head                                                                               16

2.2.2 Climate Change                                                                                                 16

2.2.3 Economic Development                                                                                    17

 

2.2.4 Age of Household Head                                                                                     18

2.2.5 Education of Household Head                                                             19

2.3 Pillars of food security                                                                                         19

2.4 Food security at different levels                                                                           22

2.4.1 Food Security at Global Level                                                                           22

2.4.2 Food Security at Household and Individual level                                             23

2.5 Consequences of food insecurity                                                                          23

2.6 Household food insecurity access scale                                                               25

2.7 Overview of coping strategies                                                                              26

2.7.1 Food coping strategy assessment scales                                                            28

2.7.1.1 Coping Strategy Index (CSI)                                                                          28

2.7.1.2 Uses of the CSI                                                                                               29

2.8 Nexus between food insecurity and coping strategies                                         29

2.9 Empirical review of related literatures                                                                 30

CHAPTER 3

MATERIALS AND METHODS                                                                               33

3.1 Study Design                                                                                                        33

3.2 Area of Study                                                                                                        33

3.3 Population of the Study                                                                                        34

3.4 Sample and Sampling Technique                                                                                     34

3.5 Preliminary activities                                                                                           36

3.6 Data collection                                                                                                     37

3.7 Data analysis                                                                                                         37

3.8 Statistical analysis                                                                                                38


CHAPTER 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                                     40

4.1 Socio-economic Status of the respondents                                                           40

4.2 Household Food security                                                                                      47

4.3 Food Coping Strategies of household                                                                  51

4.4 The Relationship between Food Insecurity and

      Food Coping Strategy of participants correlation.                                               55

4.5 Relationship between socio-economic characteristics,

      Food Insecurity and Food Coping Strategy of participants                                  57


CHAPTER 5

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION                                         60

5.1 Conclusion                                                                                                            60

5.2 Recommendations                                                                                                61

REFERENCES                                                                                                         63

APPENDIX 1                                                                                                            76

APPENDIX II           



                                                                                               

LIST OF TABLES

Table 4.1a: Socio-demographic characteristics of households                                     42

Table 4.1b: Socio-economic characteristics of households                                           45

Table 4.2:     Participant’s response to household food insecurity                                50

                     and access scale question

Table 4.3:     Participant’s response to food coping strategies of households                        54                                                 

Table 4.4:     The Relationship between food insecurity and                                         56

                     food coping strategy of participants using correlation.                           

Table 4.5:     Relationship between socio-economic characteristics,                                       59

                     food insecurity and food coping strategy of participants

                  

 


 

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 4.1: Categorized food security status of households                                       50                                                                                           


 


 

 

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION


1.0 BACKGROUND OF STUDY

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO, 2015), defined food insecurity as a situation in which people lack nutritious food intake necessary for vitality and supplements for full-scale starvation. Benson (2020) also defined food insecurity as a state when one has limited food for existence and healthy livelihood. Food insecurity can also be defined as the situation when people lack secure access to sufficient amounts of safe and nutritious food for growth and development and an active and healthy life. Food insecurity has been described as a condition in which people lack basic food intake to provide them with the energy and nutrient for fully productive lives (Umar, 2014). It may also result in severe social, psychological and behavioural consequences. Food insecurity can be also be defined as a situation where people experience limited or uncertain physical, social and economic access to safe, enough and nutritious food to meet their dietary desires or food preferences for healthy and active life (Keino et al., 2014). FAO (2010) defined food insecurity as the consequences of inadequate consumption of nutrition, considering the physiological use of food by the body as being within the domain of nutrition and health.

Food insecurity can be chronic or transitory, which is highly dependent on duration of the hunger or the span. Chronic food insecurity, sometimes referred to as perpetual hunger, resulted into starvation vulnerability (Godfray et al., 2010). Chronic hunger has a direct relationship with the level of poverty among the society, especially among rural communities located in developing countries of the World that were seriously affected by conflicts and food insecurity challenges (Blattman and Miguel, 2010). Chronic food insecurity is a long term or persistent situation where people can no longer meet their minimum food requirement over a sustained period of time while transitory food insecurity is commonly short term or temporary and it relates to short periods of extreme scarcity of food availability and access (Hart, 2009; Afolabi et al., 2018). Some identified causes of food insecurity include unpredictable rise in global food price, shift in global food harvests to biofuel among the major food exporting countries, persistent government neglect of agricultural areas particularly in infrastructural facilities and lack of investment in most of the developing countries, continuous conflict in some part of the world and the approaching danger of climate changes and its antagonistic impact on food production (FAO, 2012).

The indications of food insecurity as asserted by Amaka, (2007) are reduction in both capacity and attitude to work, poverty, and corruption, and low life expectancy, high rate of crime, infant mortality, maternal mortality, hunger and malnutrition. Essentially, among farming household in Nigeria, the causes of food insecurity are low productivity in agriculture combined with fluctuation in food supply and low income. The above scenario is exacerbating by the failure of food production to keep pace with our rapid population growth (Guo, 2010).

Food security can be defined as a situation “when people, at all times, have physical and economic access, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life (Benson, 2020; FAO, 2008). By this definition, four important components of food security exist; availability, accessibility, affordability and utilization. Food security can occur at the national, community and household levels phrase ‘at all times’ in the food security definition (FAO, 2008).

A Household is defined as an institutional unit consisting of an individual or a group of individuals (System of National Accounts (SNA, 2008). Republic of mali (2007) defined household as a group of people who normally live and eat their meals together, in the household members acknowledge the authority of one person as head of the household and that person must actually live with the rest of the household members.

Household food insecurity is defined as the inability to provide enough food for a healthy and active lifestyle for all household members (Coleman et al., 2011). Food insecurity is measured as a household concept that refers to uncertain, insufficient or unacceptable availability, access or utilization of food. Ihaba et al., (2015) revealed several factors that related to food insecurity in household level which includes poverty, low income, level of education, household size, employment status, age, the type of household head (gender) and food price. A household is said to be food insecure when the per capital monthly food expenditure is less than 2/3 of the mean per capital monthly food expenditure of all the households (Omonona and Agoi, 2007). According to Aguayo, (2016) the presence of food insecurity at the household level implies a high level of vulnerability to broad consequences, including psychosocial dysfunction among household members, especially children, social economic predicament and poor overall health status.

 Household food security means access by all members at all time to enough food for an active, healthy life. Food security includes a minimum of the ready availability of nutritious adequate and safe foods in socially acceptable ways, that’s without resorting emergency food supplies, scavenging, stealing or other coping strategies (USDA, 2008).

Coping Strategies are activities undertaken in order to maintain food security or combat food insecurity that has occurred at the household level. Coping strategies are directly attributed to household activities rather than external factors and varies among households, nations and regions. Households adopt both ex ante and ex post coping strategies in their endeavour to be food insecure (Ogundari and Ojo, 2006; FAO, 2009). Food insecure households often uses four groups of coping strategies to deal with food insecurity such as rationing and managing the shortfall strategies by limiting portion size of meal time; skip meal and restrict consumption of adult so small children can eat ,purchasing less preferred food are the most common; Decreasing number of household member (sent household members to eat elsewhere);Dietary changes (rely on less expensive food) and increasingshort-term household availability of food which includes borrow food from friend or relative; purchase food on credit, send household members to beg; gather wild food, hunt, or harvest immature crops, consume seed stock held for next season, make handicrafts to raise money for food, the household head migrates to work (Maxwell and Cardwell, 2008; Gupta et al., 2015; Ngidi and Hendriks, 2014; Ehebhamen et al., 2017; Agada and Igokwe, 2014).

In connection to food insecurity adaptation of new techniques alteration of regular behaviour is executed that translate to coping strategies (Fahmida et al., 2017). Food insecurity comes with unpleasant conditions with consequences detrimental to human health, well-being and productivity (Ifeoma and Agwu, 2014). In phase of idiosyncratic shocks such as food price hike or natural disasters, households may employ food or non-food based coping strategies or a combination of both to provide their basic needs(Ruel et al., 2010).Generally, households employ different coping strategies in the early stages of food insecurity, which however vary based on cultural and geographical differences (Maxwell, 2008). Household suffering from moderate and severe food insecurity is more likely to adopt both financial and food compromising coping strategies (Fahmida et al., 2017).

However, the purpose of this study is, therefore, to identify the strategies used by various households to cope with their food insecurity and to gain insight into the process they must go through toward making ends meet.

 

1.1   STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

 The state of food insecurity in the world has been on the increase. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nation reported that about 7.1 million people are now severely food insecure across four countries including Cameroon, Chad, Niger and Nigeria (FAO, 2016). Globally, the most vulnerable groups to food insecurity are victims of conflicts (refugees and internally displaced people), migrant workers, marginal population (school dropouts, unemployed people and orphans) and dependent population (elderly, children under five years, women of reproductive age and low illiterate household the situation has degenerated to epidemic and social vices. Nigeria has an estimated 25.5% of its total population (170 million) classified as having serious food insecurity (FAO, 2016; World Bank, 2015).

Global Agricultural Production has recorded incredible increase even though a large number of people remain hungry and malnourished (Ibok et al., 2014; Ambali et al., 2015). Around the world more than enough food is produced to feed the global population FAO (2015) estimated that about 780 million people continue to suffer hunger, despite the fact that enough food is produced to feed everyone; this is due to food wastage. Globally, 30% - 40% of all food is wasted (Erdman, 2018). In less developed countries Erdman ( 2018), reported that this wastage is due to lack of infrastructure and knowledge to keep foods fresh, climate change affects food production and availability, access, quality, utilization and stability of food system (Rupa, 2019; Erdman, 2018; Nam, 2016 ), lack of adequate and effective storage facilities is also responsible for food insecurity (Wambui, 2019). In discussing the problem of food insecurity in Nigeria, Adegbola et al, (2011) posited that adequate food preservation and storage will promote food security through reduction in wastage and seasonal scarcity. With201 million population in the country, nearly accounting for 2.35% of West African population (World Bank, 2019), food insecurity issues will continue to be a predicament in the country. The fact that many households continue to experience food insecurity is an indication that the problem is not food shortage but rather a problem of inadequate access to food by the vulnerable group in the country

According to Brock (2013), over 62% of the Nigerian population was trapped in extreme poverty and 80% were located in rural areas. Currently the level of poverty in Nigeria has taken a different level, especially with current recession that the country found itself. More and more households are finding it difficult to feed their households. However, Otekunrin et al (2019); World Poverty Clock, (2020) reported close to half (48% - 96 million) of the world population live in extreme poverty.

Unemployment has a significant effect on food security; it is one of the factors that are responsible for food insecurity (Nam, 2016).Inflation and high level of unemployment is also impacting negatively on the food security status of households (Mustapha, 2019). Despite begin an overall rich country with oil assets, Nigeria’s economy has not created many more job opportunities and only a few people benefit from the GDP growth (World Bank, 2019). Agriculture serves as a main source of employment among the rural households, which is characterized by low productivity due to traditional mode of farming and low government interventions in the area of agriculture (Omanukwue, 2005).Similarly, about 1.2 billion people cannot meet their most basic need for sufficient food every day especially poor people living in rural environment in developing countries who are subsistence farmers (IFAD, 2009).

Food insecurity at the household or individual level increases the risk of developing various forms of malnutrition (FAO, 2017). Malnutrition ranges from severe undernutrition to overweight and obesity. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that about 815 million people of 7.6 billion people or 10.7% were suffering from chronic malnutrition in 2016. About 11 million people are undernourished in developing countries (FAO, 2015). More than one-fifth (22.8%) of the population are undernourished in Sub-Saharan Africa (FAO, 2018). Moreover, more than 70% of these undernourished people live in rural areas where agriculture is directly or indirectly reliant upon (Bashir et al., 2012). Consequently, Nigeria has been listed among the 55 low income food deficits countries due to high prevalence of undernourished people living among agricultural households (Ambali et al., 2015).

COVID-19 Pandemic as an external stressor affected income, employment and food security. The number of people with severe food insecurity has been rising globally since 2014 and the COVID-19 pandemic reduced food security even further (FAO et al., 2020; Balana et al., 2020). Bureau of Labour Statistics reported that effect of COVID-19 has led to a sharp rise in unemployment rates, from 3.5% to 14.7%, the unemployment rate stands at 11.1%. Job losses over this period have been concentrated among people living in low income households, and resulting to drops in income have made many individuals and families vulnerable to food insecurity (Dunn et al.,2020; Despard et al., 2020). The effect of COVID-19 on food insecurity is well documented in literature Laborde et al., (2020); FAO et al., 2020) by worsening the availability, accessibility of safe and nutritious food. COVID-19 lockdown has contributed to 40%-80% decline in the earning capacity of families in developing countries (Farzana et al., 2020; Marthiew and Celine, 2020; Thurlow, 2020; Hossain and Imran, 2020).

In previous studies (Ayieko and Midikile, 2010; Ahamad and Khondker, 2010; Shariff and Khor, 2008) several coping strategies were found to be associated with household food insecurity, food consumption at household and individual level. Poverty measures such as income and expenditure and seasonal variation of staple food production are also related to coping strategies. During idiosyncratic shocks such as food price hike, poor household adopt a series of coping strategies which can be differentiated as food or non-food based techniques, purchasing less preferred food, reducing meal size, consuming only rice, skipping meal an selling of assets were the frequently reported responses at the time of food shortage(Nordet al., 2005;Fintracinc.2014; USAID, 2015; Gupta et al., 2015).Coping strategies pertaining to compromising quality and quantity of food consumption were observed to be the first step taken in order to mitigate the adverse effect of food shortage in household level (Helen Keller International (HKI), 2013).

Previous studies (Ironkwe, 2012; Anidi et al, 2017) on food insecurity in Abia State, Nigeria focused only on assessing household food insecurity and coping strategies, without identifying the key determinants of household food insecurity and coping strategies. In addition to the existing body of knowledge on household food insecurity and coping strategies, particularly in Abia State, this study will further expose the key determinant of household food insecurity and coping strategies.

Thus, the basic problem this study seeks to address is to identify the food insecurity and coping strategies of households in Abia State, Nigeria.


1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

1.2.1 General Objective of the study

The general objective of this study is to assess the food insecurity among household and coping strategies adopted by households in Umuahia North and South Local Government Areas in Abia state.

1.2.2 Specific Objectives of the study

The specific Objectives are to;

1.     assess household socio-economic characteristics.

2.     determine the Household food insecurity status.

3.     assess the coping strategies adopted by the households.

4.     examine the association between food insecurity and coping strategies.

5.     identify the socio-economic determinants of household food insecurity and coping strategies.


1.3   SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

This research work will be of benefit to the entire populace by providing them with the information on the food insecurity status and different valid copying strategies to adopt. The knowledge of this research will facilitate efforts to influence public policies and to improve the situation of household’s food insecurity among urban areas in Nigeria. This study would provide findings on status of food insecurity and coping strategies of household. Identifying and understanding factors that cause food insecurity would afford information for policymakers, planners, governmental and nongovernmental organizations which are working in the areas of food security program in order to modify and re-plan food security program interventions and take measurements on causes of food insecurity. In addition, it indicates gaps to be filled by further studies.

 This study will also be of benefits to nutrition educators to encourage households to eat from different varieties of foods and locally available foods in their area. It will help encourage farmers to increase their production level. This research study will be beneficial to Ministry of Agriculture to draw out a long-lasting food aid to tackle hunger and to help with deeper long-term hunger alleviation and achieve food security. This study will also help Government to develop capacity building program (empowerment for reliance) among rural people in order to create employment opportunities which they will earn income to improve on their food security status.

Furthermore, this study will provide the agricultural sector with information on the level of food insecurity thereby encouraging them to impact appropriate and improved technology to the farmers for a rapid adoption for high yield. The study will provide information for researchers to create opportunities for social and technology innovation which will lead to social and economic change. The findings will also help scientist to develop technologies within the control of social, market, global trends to achieve food and nutrition security, to reduce food loss and waste and recover produce that are currently wasting to make new products. It will also help to create new knowledge to tackle challenges of food insecurity.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment