FINANCIAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007595

No of Pages: 82

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

 

The study is situated against the backdrop of the sluggish growth rate of output in the economy and the important role the financial sector plays in driving economic growth in Nigeria. The principal objective of the study is to investigate the link between financial sector development and economic growth in Nigeria from 1981-2016. The study, therefore sought to investigate the effect of financial sector development on economic growth as well as investigate the nature of causal relationship between financial sector development and economic growth in Nigeria using cointegration tests to establish the long run relationship and granger causality test to determine the direction of causality between financial sector development and economic growth.Data from Central Bank of Nigeria statistical bulletin were used in the analysis. The study established that there exist a long run relationship between financial sector development and economic growth in Nigeria. The study recommends among other things that: The central bank must liaise with commercial banks and financial institutions in other to arrive at an equilibrium interest rate that clears the market for loanable funds.








TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                             ii

Certification                                                                                                                           iii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                                  v

Table of Contents                                                                                                                   vi

List of Tables                                                                                                                          viii

Abstract                                                                                                                                   ix

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background to the Study                                                                                            1

1.2       Statement of the problem                                                                                           4

1.3       Research Questions                                                                                                    8

1.4       Objectives of the Study                                                                                              8

1.5       Hypothesis of the Study                                                                                              8

1.6       Significance of the Study                                                                                           9

1.7       Scope of the Study                                                                                                      9

 

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1       Conceptual Framework                                                                                              10

2.2       Theoretical Review                                                                                                   14

2.3       Empirical Review                                                                                                       22

2.4       Summary of Empirical Literature                                                                              29

2.5       Gap in Empirical Literature                                                                                       30

 

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1       The method                                                                                                                 32       

3.2       Model Specification                                                                                                   32

3.2.1   Model   one                                                                                                                  32

3.2.2   Model two                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               34                                                                                                                                      3.3      Estimation Technique                                                                                                 35

3.4      Estimation steps in ARDL                                                                                            36

3.5      Other Test                                                                                                                      36

3.6      Model Justification                                                                                                           36

3.7      Source of Data and Econometric Software                                                                     37

                       

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

4.1       Pre Test                                                                                                                       38

4.1.1    Unit root rest                                                                                                                         38

4.2       Co-Integration Test                                                                                                     39

4.3       Error Correction Model                                                                                              40

4.3.1   Dynamic short run error correction model                                                                40

4.3.2   Static long run model                                                                                                     42

4.4      Post Test                                                                                                                      43

4.4.1    Causality test                                                                                                              43                                                                                              4.4.2    Hypothesis testing                                                                                                       44

4.4.3    Test for autocorrelation                                                                                                         45       

4.4.4    Test for heteroscedasticity                                                                                         45

4.4.5    Bounds test                                                                                                                 46       

4.5       Economic Implication                                                                                                47

 

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 

5.1       Summary of Findings                                                                                                 49

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                                  50

5.3       Recommendation                                                                                                       51       

Reference                                                                                                                    53

Appendices                                                                                                                 58








 

LIST OF TABLES

1:      Summary of Empirical Literature                                                                                 29

2:         Unit Root Test                                                                                                            38

3:      Co-integration                                                                                                                39

4:      Dynamic Short run Error Correction Model                                                                 40       

5:     Static Long runs Model                                                                                        42

6:     Granger causality result                                                                                                  44

7:     Breuch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test                                                            45

8:      Heteroskedasticity Test: Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey                                                             46       

9:      Bounds Test                                                                                                                   46                   

 

 

 

  

 

 

                                                           CHAPTER 1

                                                         INTRODUCTION


1.1  BACKGROUND  OF THE STUDY

In Economics, the link between financial development and economic growth has been issue of debate. Many researchers are of the view that the development of the financial sector determines how it will be able to effectively and efficiently discharge its major role of mobilizing fund from

the surplus sector to the deficit sector of the economy, Studies by Shumpeter (1911), Gurley and Shaw (1955) attest to this claim.

Financial development takes place when financial instruments, markets, and intermediaries work together to reduce the costs of information, enforcement and transactions. A solid and well-functioning financial sector is a powerful engine behind economic growth. It generates local savings, which in turn leads to productive investments in local business. The financial sector therefore provides the rudiments for income-growth and job creation.

In recognition of the important role played by the financial sector in  promoting  economic growth, monetary authorities  all over the world in general  and in Nigeria in particular have overtime carried out reforms aimed at strengthening the financial sector to enable it perform its function as a powerful engine behind economic growth. 

Nigeria has witnessed reforms in its financial sector between 1981-2016 going from the deregulation of the financial sector during SAP 1986, the bank consolidation era of 2004/2005 and the 2009/2010 banking reforms of the expanded discount windows through which the CBN provides liquidity to the ailing banks for short term need purposes.

CBN(2017) stated that the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) was adopted in July, 1986 against the crash in the international oil market and the resultant deteriorating economic conditions in the country. It was designed to achieve fiscal balance and balance of payments viability by altering and restructuring the production and consumption patterns of the economy, eliminating price distortions, reducing the heavy dependence on crude oil exports and consumer goods imports, enhancing the non-oil export base and achieving sustainable growth.

Under SAP, monetary policy was aimed at inducing the emergence of a market-oriented financial system for effective mobilization of financial savings and efficient resource allocation.

Ifeanyi (2016) noted that despite the lofty goals and objectives set by the structural adjustment policy of 1986, the policy failed to fundamentally position the financial sectors of the economy to promote sustained economic growth. He opined that financial system remained very weak even after the structural adjustment policy with many  banks having low  capital base and unable to compete globally or finance heavy long term projects. This had a negative impact on the economy.

The operational environment for banks was further liberalized in 2001 with the introduction of universal banking, while the supervisory framework of the financial system was enhanced with the establishment of a new department in CBN to supervise other financial institutions. In 2002, monetary policy implementation was faced with some challenges as the problem of excess liquidity persisted, and the demand pressure in the foreign exchange market intensified,        CBN (2017).

 The 2004/2005 CBN Banks consolidation policy made commercial banks to increase their minimum paid-up capital to N25b, the total number of banks decreased from 85 to 25. The major aim of the consolidation was to promote the growth of larger banks with better capacity to fund markets, Okoronkwo (2016).

Mustapha (2017) noted that the excise yielded fruit by creating some very strong banks that were at least capable of competing in the continent with a capacity to fund long term project. He noted that the policy led to an increase in the number of bank branches nationwide but he also pointed out that its impact on economic growth remained very weak because of the low level of financial inclusion in the country.

 In pursuant of its reform policies in the banking sector, the central bank of Nigeria in the year  2009/2010 introduced the  Expanded Discount Window (EDW). This was a financial support facility through which the CBN provides liquidity to the ailing banks, for short-term fund needs purposes. Unfortunately, some of these banks became regular customers to the EDW, borrowing with reckless abandon, and were unable to pay back the funds because they were in precarious cash positions. This abuse if left unchecked is unsafe for the future and continued existence of the banking industry and will further the perpetration of the little or unregulated lending policies which eventually would have plunged the Nigerian economy into deeper crisis,           Okoronkwo (2016).

The effect of the above reforms however will not be appreciated without relating it with economic growth in light of the conflicting views.

 

The economic growth is a gradual and steady change in the long-run which comes about by a general increase in the rate of savings and population, Adekunle (2013). It has also been described as a positive change in the level of production of goods and services by a country over a certain period of time. Economic growth is measured by the increase in the amount of goods and services produced in a country. An economy is said to be growing when it increases its productive capacity which later yield more in production of more goods and services, Adekunle (2013). Economic growth is usually brought about by technological innovation and positive external forces. It is the yardstick for raising the standard of living of the people. It also mean reduction of inequalities of income distribution.

The causality relationship between economic growth and financial development is a controversial issue. The debate has been centered on whether it is the financial development that leads to economic growth or economic growth that leads to financial development. Several studies have continued to produce conflicting results thus making the topic a great research burden.

Economists such as Mckinnon and Shaw (1973); Greenwood and Jovanovic (1990) and Bencivenga and Smith (1991) have stressed the importance of financial development on economic growth. Lucas (1998), Kuznets (1995), Jung (1986), Ireland (1994) and Robbinson (1952) opined that the importance of financial development on the process of economic growth is overstated and that financial development follows expansion of the real sector economy.

In Nigeria, macro- economic instability has continued to be major problem as reality on ground shows that her macroeconomic objectives have been quite elusive despite the reform policies of government thereby making the economy highly susceptible to general domestic and external shocks, Omofa (2017).  Omofa (2017) citing Nwaogwugwu (2010) stated that the macroeconomic performance in Nigeria over the past three decades has been both unsatisfactory and disappointing because economic growth has been stunted and often accompanied by sharp declines in rates of investment, consistent high fiscal deficits and high rate of inflation. Domestic saving rates have fallen dramatically, thereby contributing to unsustainable external payment position. The study further stated that in attempt to correct external imbalances through reduction in aggregate demand, government has further compressed investment expenditures, completing the vicious circle of sluggish growth, high unemployment rate and declining investment and savings rate.

 This study aims at explaining the relationship between financial development and economic growth in Nigeria in the light of conflicting views.


1.2    STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

 The relationship between financial development and economic growth has been of great interest to policy makers and researchers alike. The interest stems from the perceived importance of the financial systems in the drive towards sustained economic growth and development in any economy. Given the crucial role the financial sector plays in the allocation of resources in any economy, the importance of vibrant and well developed financial sector cannot be overemphasized.

Data from the CBN statistical bulletin shows that over the years credit to the private sector (a major determinant of financial development) as ratio of GDP has fluctuated variously. Standing at about 5.9% in 1981,   the value rose to about 10.1 in1993 before declining to about 7.3 in the year 2000. Credit to the private sector rose after the banking consolidation exercise of 2004- 2006 moving to about 20.1% in the year 2012 by the year 2016 the value stood at about 20.8%.


Credit to the private sector as ratio of GDP and broad money supply as ratio of GDP.


Similarly broad money supply as percentage of GDP (another   indicator of financial development) has risen over the years.  Similar to the private sector credit, its rise became more prominent after the 2004 consolidation exercise reaching about 21.3% in the year 2016. The rise in the value of these financial sector development indicators is testament to the success of the 2004/2005 consolidation exercise.

However, despite rising private sector credit and broad money supply, growth rate of GDP has not been encouraging. Data from CBN statistical bulletin showed that the growth rate of GDP has been on the decline of recent.


Source: author compilation using data, from CBN 

From the above graph it is obvious that the growth rate of GDP has been fluctuating over the years even as credit to the private sector and broad money has been on the rise. This is quite surprising as increases in financial sector development indicators are supposed to be positively correlated to economic growth all things being the same. However, this has not been the case in Nigeria. Various reforms carried out over the years have failed to drive economic growth to an unprecedented level and financial inclusion have remained relatively low with many people still without access to financial services and credit facility which is badly needed in  developing economy such as ours.                                                                                     

There is no shortage of works regarding the relationship between  financial development and economic growth although most of the works in these area has often focused exclusively on developing countries(see Shaw (1973), Singh (1997) ). Of those that have focused on the Nigeria economy, the findings have been conflicting with some of these conflict rising from differences in methodology and estimation techniques employed,  Oriavwote and Eshenake (2012),          Tabi et al (2011)  .

 While Oriavwote and Eshenake (2012) finds that financial sector development has not significantly improved private sector development, Tabi et al (2011) revealed that financial sector development has a positive effect on economic growth in the long-run through efficient collection and allocation of financial resources. They also found a long-run causality to economic growth.

There is also the argument that financial development contributes significantly to the economic development of developed countries while the developing countries have not fared well in this regard, Singh (1997).

According to Adekunle (2013), the real sectors of the economy, which are said to be economic growth drivers are not effectively and efficiently serviced by the financial sector. The banks are declaring billions of profit, yet, the real sectors continue to be weak thereby reducing the productivity level of the economy. Most of the operators in the productive sector are folding up due to the inability to get loan from the financial institutions or the cost of borrowing was too outrageous.

If the nation will achieve any sustainable and inclusive growth, then improvements in the financial sector must translate into improved economic growth. This will entail further improvement to strengthen the financial sector to enable it perform effectively. It is therefore necessary that policy makers in Nigeria must from time to time reevaluate the effect of certain reforms and the overall development in the financial has on general economic growth.

In the light of the above the following research questions will guide this study.

 

1.2  RESEARCH QUESTIONS

1. Is there any long run relationship between financial development and Economic growth?

2. What is the impact of financial development on Economic growth in Nigeria?

3. What is the direction of causality between financial development and Economic growth?


1.4      OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The principal objective of the study is to investigate the link between financial development and economic growth in Nigeria from 1981-2016 marking reforms of the Nigeria financial sector. This study intends to assess the impact of financial development on economic growth in Nigeria bearing in mind the recent reforms that occurred in financial sector of the country. The specific objectives are aligned as follows:

1. To examine the long run relationship between financial development and economic growth    in Nigeria

2. To assess the impact of financial development on economic growth.

3. To determine the direction of causality between financial development and economic growth in Nigeria.


1.5       HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY

Ho1:  There is no long run relationship between financial development and economic growth.

Ho2: There is no significant impact of financial development on economic growth in Nigeria.

Ho3: There is no causality between financial development and Economic growth in Nigeria.


1.6     SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The study will serve as a good source of information for researchers. It will provide insight to know whether financial development is a sufficient condition for economic growth in Nigeria. The study is a valuable source of information for policy makers as the convincing evidence that the financial development influences long-run economic growth will hasten the need for research on regulating and policy determinant of financial development.

The study contributes to empirical literature on financial development and economic growth in Nigeria.


1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study will focus on the financial sector of the economy. Precisely on the financial development indicators to investigate how it   impacts on the Nigerian economic growth.  A time series data covering the period of 1981 to 2016 will be employed. The technique of analysis to be used are: Augmented dickey fuller unit root test to test for stationarity of variables, johansen co-integration test to establish the long run relationship, autoregressive distributed lag model estimation and granger causality test to determine the direction of causality between financial development proxies and Nigeria economic growth.                          

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment