TABLE OF
CONTENTS
TITLE …………………………………………………………II
CERTIFICATION…………………………………………III
DEDICATION…………………………………….……..IV
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………..…...V
TABLE OF CONTENT …………………………..…..VIII
CHAPTER ONE
1.0
General
Introduction…………………………….1
1.1 A biographical sketch of Aristotle………………3
1.2 The statement of the problem ………………….4
1.3 Purpose of the study…………………………..5
1.4 Scope of the study……………………………….6
1.5 Methodology of study……………………………7
CHAPTER TWO
2.0
Literature
review………………………….….8
2.1 Treatment of feminine in Kantian ethical theory……8
2.2 John Locke’s position of women in his political theory……....12
2.3 Hegel treatment on women and family….….15
2.4. General view on feminism…………………..18
CHAPTER THREE
3.0
Aristotle on gender
perspective…………….….24
3.1 Aristotle on body and soul…………………….24
3.2 Aristotle on women and slaves…………………..26
3.3 Injustice and violence against women…………...28
3.3.1 Economic injustice……………………………….31
3.3.2 Cultural injustice………………………….…...32
3.3.3 Types of violence………………………..….38
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0
The ideology and philosophy of
feminism …..42
4.1 Different types of feminism…………………......44
4.1.1 Liberal feminism and individual Autonomy of women …44
4.1.2 Marxist feminism and socio-Economic Equality …….46
4.1.3 Radical feminism and separatist ideology ………..48
4.2 The strategies of justice on women……………..52
4.2.1 The empowerment of women………………..52
4.2.2 Women and leadership…………………………….54
4.2.3 Advocacy for women right………………………..56
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0
Evaluation and
conclusion…………….….….59
5.1 Critical evaluation………………………………59
5.2 Conclusion……………………………………62
BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………...64
CHAPTER ONE
1.0
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
Since time immemorial, people have
held the view that men are superior to women. This vision of male supremacy is
clearly reflected in all traditional families and societies to an extent that
even women were made to accept that they are inferior nature.
Over centuries, men and women have so
internalized this culture of male supremacy, that even when a woman is known to
be in possession of the actual power, especially in a family where the woman
has the economic power the man would still be expected to assert his authority
proudly as the captain of the family ship and the Lord of the society. From the
above background men by nature cling to authority and learn to lord it over
women.
Meanwhile, the awareness of certain
biological advantages like physical force convinces men that they are endowed with supremacy nature
and the right to control women to their own advantage.
In early time, men used because of
their intellectual capabilities to justify their supremacy. One of the most influential
defence of men is to be found in Aristotle’s writings, where he argues for the
justifiability of slavery and the domination of women. Using the analogy of the
soul and body, Aristotle argued that men are born to rule women, just as the
soul which is superior rules the body and reason rules passion, men should rule
woman. For Aristotle, “the male is by
nature superior; and the female inferior ; and the one rules and the other is
ruled”
Aristotle was making his argument
from the point of ancient biology, he felt free to universalize the inferiority
of women. In another instance he went further saying that women represent a
defaced human nature. The female he argued is “a mutilated male”
The topic “feminists critique on Aristotle’s gender perspective” is really
apt within the global crusade for women liberation and empowerment. This
crusade can be seen both in the civil societies
and among individuals. The core question is should women be treated as
persons with right, dignity and voice within the community? They should be
acknowledged as citizens members of the civil society. In recent times, there
has been an incessant cry on the plight
of women in the society, due to
this cry that some feminists took as a duty to fight for the unhealthy
treatment of women which was traced right from Aristotle’s writings.
1.1 A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF ARISTOTLE
Aristotle was born in Staigeira in
384 B.C His father was a physician and it was no doubt from interest in
biology. At the age of seventeen, Aristotle went to Athens to study and there
he joined Plato’s academy and remained for over twenty years a pupil of Plato,
studying under him in the academy. After
Plato’s death, Aristotle left the academy and began to develop his own philosophy.
He eventually founded his own institution, the lyceum, where he lectured and
carried out a lot of scientific research. The members of this school frequently
help academic discussions while walking up and down on ambulatory, and this
earned them his name peripatetic, and the school became known as the peripatetic
school. Aristotle’s main interest beside philosophy was in the empirical
sciences, especially biology. Aristotle was invited to Macedon in 343 B.C by
Philip, King of Macedon to educate his son Alexander who was then about
thirteen years old. Aristotle thus became the tutor of the Alexander the Great.
Aristotle wrote books on a variety of
subjects, logic, physics, metaphysics, ethics, politics, psychology, biology,
Aesthetics and Rhetoric. His works on logic are collectively known as Organon, those on physics include De Caelo and De Generatione et
corruptione. His works on psychology include the De Anima and biological works
include his History of Animals his famous work metaphysics is a collection 0f
lectures that were considered difficult to understand. His works on Ethics
include the famous Nichomachean Ethics and Magna
Moralia. His politics was based on a study of 158 different constitutions
including the constitution of Athens.
1.2
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Some men up till recent times have
not found the situation of women’s predicament as a problem. They are in most
cases not concerned with the plight of women. Even in learning about women, men
are not interested, they have accepted this situation as normal and any contrary
situation is considered as abnormal. Women are valued in most cases only for
their outward appearances and services they render to men’s passions. It is worthy
noting that the women who suffer this unhealthy treatment are our mothers,
sisters, in-laws, wives and daughters.
1.3
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The courage for this topic came from
two sources, the first is the personal experience of how people ignore women
and regard them as inferior to men and a belief that it is important to
seriously what people have said about women. Women are still in many places treated
as non persons, inferior, second class citizens and weak gender. The second
source was an increasing awareness of and interest in what seemed to be some
central tensions in feminist thinking and in the relationship between these
tension and philosophical theories.
I am to explore some of these
tensions and in particular to look at these which centre on the idea of a
specifically female philosophical perspective.
Women have wanted autonomy and have appealed to philosophical theories to
express this, but some women have also argued that many conceptions of autonomy
are male defined. They have wanted equality with men and have fought against
their exclusion from theories put forward by men and my journey in this topic
is to make necessary effort to identify and discuss what seem to me to be
central tension in feminist thinking and the way in which these have involved
both a use and a critique of philosophical theories against gender equality.
1.4
SCOPE OF STUDY
In this work emphasis will be based
mainly on certain violent practices committed against women especially African
women. Some of the various ways in which women have suffered violence will be
explored both from the societal circle and that of the individual.
1.5
METHODOLOGY
The method to be employed in this
research work be expository, evaluative and practical. On expository part, I
shall expose some of men’s actions that affect women physically and
psychological. It will be evaluative, since
I am going to evaluate certain tensions in the feminists thinking and
the relationship between these tensions and philosophical theories. Finally, it will be practical since some
research work is experimental and deals with the observable facts of our daily
life as Africans.
Meanwhile, this work is divided into
five chapters; in chapter one, general introduction on the nature of the work.
In chapter two, literature review on the topic from different philosophical
theories. In chapter three, Aristotle’s theories on soul and body as an analogy
used in as position of women and men also in his theory of women and slavery, in the subsection of the
chapter, the effect of the above theories on women. In the fourth chapter is
the ideology of feminism and types of feminism, also in the subsection of the
chapter, is strategies for justice on women. Lastly, in the fifth chapter is
the evaluation of the whole work and conclusion of the whole work.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment