DIETARY DIVERSITY SCORE AND NUTRIENT ADEQUACY AMONG ADULTS IN UMUAHIA NORTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF ABIA STATE

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007561

No of Pages: 77

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$12

ABSTRACT

The study assessed the dietary diversity score and nutrient adequacy among adults in Umuahia North Local Government Area of Abia State. This cross - sectional study used simple random sampling techniques to select 429 adults from Afara and Amuzukwu communities in  Umuahia North Local Government Area. The aim of the study was to calculate nutrient adequacy of the participants, determine the dietary diversity scores and to examine the relationship between dietary diversity score and nutrient adequacy ratio. Questionnaire was used to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents. Food frequency questionnaire and 24- hours dietary recall were used to collect information on the nutrient intake and usual dietary pattern of the respondents which was converted into nutrient intake using Nutri-survey software. The anthropometric measurements of the respondents (weight, height, waist circumference and hip circumference) were taken using standard equipments and procedures and waist/hip ratio was calculated. Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) was created using 12-food group model. Nutrient intake was evaluated using Nutrient Adequacy Ratio (NAR). Mean adequacy ratio (MAR) was calculated as an indicator of nutrient intake. Statistical Package for Service solutions (SPSS) ( version 20) software was used for analysis of the data collected. More than half (56.4%) of the respondents had normal body weight, 15.2% were underweight while 21.2% were overweight and 7.2% were obese. Frequency and percentage, mean and standard deviation and correlation was used to analyze the data and level of significance was accepted at p<0.05. . Fruits, eggs and foods from milk and milk products were the least consumed. The mean DDS was 7.31±1.31. Majority (92.5%) of the respondents had high DDS, 7.5% had minimum DDS and 0.0% had low DDS. The MAR was 71.51±10.70; the intake of some nutrients such as carbohydrate(93.9%) vitamin C(70.2%), energy(50.2%), iron(93.1%), zinc(92%), magnesium(49.8%) and protein(76.9%) was above the recommended dietary intake but there was inadequate intake for some nutrients such as fat(51.9%), calcium(67.6%), sodium(79.0%) and potassium(19.5%) among the respondents. Consumption of foods from energy rich groups were found to be significantly related with nutrient intake adequacy as respondents with adequate intake of nutrients consumed more from energy dense food groups. DDS was significantly related With MAR for all nutrients. These results indicate that dietary diversity is  an indicator of nutrient adequacy.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page                                                                                                                     i

Certification                                                                                                                 ii

Dedication                                                                                                                   iii

Acknowledgement                                                                                                      iv

Table of Contents                                                                                                        v

List of Tables                                                                                                               ix

Abstract                                                                                                                       x

CHAPTER 1:

INTRODUCTION                                                                           

1.1        Statement of Problems                                                                                    2

1.2       Objectives of The Study                                                                                  7

1.2.1    General objectives                                                                                           7

1.2.2    The specific objectives                                                                                    7

1.3       Significance of The Study                                                                               8

CHAPTER 2:

LITERATURE REVIEW                                                                                                                          9

2.1        Adults                                                                                                                                                    9

2.2          Nutrient Requirement for Adults                                                                                                      9

2.2.1    Protein                                                                                     10

2.2.2    Carbohydrates                                                                           10

2.2.3    Fats and Oil                                                                                                     10

2.2.4    Vitamins                                                                                                          11

2.2.5    Minerals                                                                                                          11

2.2.6    Water                                                                                                               11

2.3          The Role of Nutrition in Adults                                                                                                        12

2.4       Effect of Inadequate Nutrition in Adults                                                          12

2.5       Socio-economic Parameters                                                                            13

2.5.1    Socio-economic and cultural factors affecting the nutritional status of adult   13

2.5.2    Other factors affecting the nutritional status of adult                           15

2.6       Dietary Related Problems of Adult                                                                  16

2.6.1    Dietary guidelines of adult                                                                              18

2.7        Nutrition and Nutritional Status                                                                                   19

2.7.1    Nutritional assessment                                                               20

2.7.2    Anthropometric measurement                                                             20

2.7.2.1 Height                                                                                                              20

2.7.2.2 Weight                                                                                                             21

2.7.2.3 Body mass index (BMI)                                                                                              21

2.7.2.4 Skin fold measurement                                                                                                22

2.7.2.5   Arm circumference                                                                                          23

2.7.2.6   Waist and hip circumference measurement                                                      23

2.7.2.7   Dietary assessment                                                                                          23

2.7.2.8   24-hour dietary recall                                                                                      24

2.7.2.9   Food frequency questionnaires                                                                        24

2.7.2.10 Dietary diversity score                                                                         24

2.8       Diet                                                                                                                 25

2.8.1    Dietary diversity and food variety score                                                          25

2.8.2    Types of dietary diversity                                                                                28

2.8.3    Measurement of dietary diversity                                                                    39

2.8.4    Importance and relevance of dietary diversity                                     31

2.8.5    Urbanization and diet                                                                                      33

2.8.6    Assessment of dietary diversity score                                                              34

2.8.7    Nutritional Knowledge and Food Choices                                                      36

2.8.8    Food price and diet cost                                                                                  36

2.9       Outstanding Methodological Issues Related to the

            Measurement of Dietary Diversity                                                                  37

CHAPTE 3:

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1       Study Design                                                                                                   42

3.2.      Area of Study                                                                                                  42

3.3       Population of Study                                                                                         43

3.4       Sampling and Sampling Techniques                                                               43

3.4.1    Sample size determination                                                                               43

3.4.2    Sampling procedure                                                                                        43

3.5       Preliminary Activities                                                                                      44

3.5.1   Preliminary Visit                                                                                              44

3.5.2   Training of Research Assistants                                                                       44

3.6       Data Collection                                                                                               44

3.6.1    Questionnaire Administration                                                                          44

3.6.2    Anthropometric Measurement                                                             45

3.7       Data Analysis                                                                                                  48

3.8       Statistical Analysis                                                                                           49

CHAPTER 4:

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Socio-Demographic Characteristics                                                                50

4.1.1    Socio-Demographic Data of Adults                                                                50

CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION

5.1       Conclusion                                                                                                      63

5.2       Recommendations                                                                                           63

REFERENCES

APPENDIX





LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1:   Body Mass Index (BMI) Category                                                                       40

Table 3.2: Waist-hip ratio classification                                                                                   40

Table 3.3: Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI)                                                                    41

Table 3.4 : Categorization of nutrient adequacy ratio of nutrients                                           41

Table 3.5: Dietary diversity score classification                                                                       41

Table 4.1a: Socio-demographic characteristics                                                                        43

Table 4.1b: Socio-demographic characteristics continued                                                       44

Table 4.1c: Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents (continued)                       45

Table 4.2a: Mean anthropometric status of the respondents                                                    46

Table 4.2b: Anthropometric status of the respondents                                                 47

Table 4.3a : Frequency and percentage consumption of food groups                          49

Table 4.3b: Dietary diversity score of the respondents                                                            49

Table 4.3c: Dietary diversity score categorization of respondents                                           50

Table 4.4: Food frequency distribution of the respondents according to the food group         52

Table 4.5a: Nutrient Intake of the respondents                                                                        53

Table 4.5b Nutrient adequacy ratio (NAR) and mean adequacy ratio (MAR) distribution     54

Table 4.5: Relationship between Dietary diversity score and nutrient adequacy                     56

    ratio (NAR) and (MAR)

                                               


 


 

 

CHAPTER 1


1.0      INTRODUCTION

A diet, which is sufficiently diverse, reflects nutrient adequacy (Kennedy et al., 2009). This is because there is no single food which contains all the nutrients required for optimal health. The more varieties of foods from different food groups are included in the daily diet, the greater the likelihood of meeting nutrient requirements (WHO 2010). Since no single food can contains all nutrients, the more food groups included the more it meets nutrient requirements (Labadarios et al., 2011). Dietary diversity score (DDS) is defined as a number of different food or food groups consumed in the previous day (Hatloy et al., 2006). Dietary diversity is a qualitative measure of food consumption that reflects household access to a variety of food and it is a proxy of nutrient adequacy of the diet of individuals. Individual's dietary diversty score aims to reflect nutrient adequacy (Hatloy et al., 2006). .

Nutrient adequacy can be defined as a sufficient intake of essential nutrients needed to fulfil nutritional adequacy. It emerges from the comparison between the nutrient requirement and the intake of certain individual or population. (Ruel., 2003). Variation in an individual's diet is associated with the intake of adequate energy and essential nutrient. That is why increase variety in diets is recommended in most dietary guideline globally (Ruel., 2003). The most common method of measuring dietary diversity for a household or for an individual  is by assessing the varieties of different food groups consumed in specific recall period. Dietary diversity can be measured at either at the household levels or  individual level and higher scores represents a more diverse diet and increased economic access.( Seidell et al., 2011) Household dietary diversity has been shown to be associated with caloric and protein adequacy and household income (Hatloy et al., 2006). The variability of nutrient content within each food group can be another source of inconsistency (La vicchia et al., 2001), despite the problem of standardization dietary diversity is still been validated as a measure of nutritional adequacy .

 Local and international dietary recommendations promote increased dietary diversity but limits saturated fats, refined sugar and salt (Ruel,  2003). Lack of dietary diversity is a major nutritional concern among deprived people from the low income countries. Changing from monotonous diet to one with varied food types has been shown to improve energy and nutrient intakes in people from developing countries. The demographic and economic transition that many developing countries are undergoing is producing important changes in diet and lifestyle behaviors that greatly impact on disease risk. (Jayawardena  et al., 2013)

Despite nutrient deficiencies being major concerns in the developing countries, recent nutrition transition and changes in the physical activity pattern, diet related metabolic problems has emerged as alarming public health problems in many developing countries, especially among urban dwellers. Nutritional status is considered as outcome of biological processes that involve food utilization while dietary diversity ensures adequate nutrient intakes among various social groups ( Steyn et all., 2006).


1.1   STATEMENT OF PROBLEM 

The nutritional status of an adult is considered as a measure of macro and micro nutrient adequacy irrespective of the level of food intake (Theim et al., 1998). Global nutrition transition has shifted dietary habits particularly in urban settings (Bleiberg et al., 2001).  Market system have been infiltrated with modernized convenient food habits leading to excessive consumption of salts, high consumption of these foods coupled with less physical activities greatly contributes to rising lifestyle of chronic disease among adults (Hatloy et al., 2006).

Seasonality is recognized as key element of food availability in many country particularly in Nigeria. Each year rural population in Nigeria face a seasonal food shortage during the period between the depletion of cereal stock and the next harvest, the shortage are particularly harsh in areas where people depend on the annual harvest of the staple crops after a single rainy season. This is also characterized by intense agricultural work (Bleiberg et al., 2001) and increased morbidity (Armonds et al., 1995). The problem of not consuming food from diverse diet is really alarming because a study has shown that over 300 billion people in Africa are malnourished because of non-diverse diet and over 120 millions are micro-nutrient deficient (WHO., 2006). Globally there is evidence that approximately 2billion people are suffering from hidden hunger which has a devastating effect and significantly contributes to global burden of disease (Kraemer, 2010). Adults are faced with multiple challenges and more continues to emerge everyday which includes excess workload, poverty, lack of time etc. This creates some problems to adults like poor nutrients intake, obesity, wrong food choice, poor feeding habit, food insecurity etc. Food affects the level of physical, mental, and social wellbeing of individuals (Ajala,  2006). Recent data worldwide showed an absolute increase in the prevalence of obesity in recent years; about 13% if the world's adult population (11% of men and 15% of women) was obese in 2014 (WHO 2015 and Cabllero, 2007). Studies carried out in developing countries by Natural Nutrition survey (2002) indicates that people from a higher socio class tend to have more diverse diet and more adequate nutrient than those from lower class. One of the clearest intergenerational effect of low diverse diet is weak immune system and higher risk of disease (National Nutrition Survey, 2002). Inadequate nutrient intake or nondiverse diet can lead to reduced learning ability, increases reproductive and maternal health risk and lowers productivity. This situation contributes to an adult's diminished ability to access other assets later in life. People that are undernourished are caught in a vicious cycle of poverty and under nutrition (Teller et al., 2000).

Some dietary related problems that makes dietary diversity score an area of concern are; overweight and obesity, cardiovascular diseases; diabetes milletus; hypertension, diseases of the joint and bones are common afflictions of the elderly. Osteoporosis and osteomalacia are associated with reduction of bone mass in many persons in their middle and later years of life and all these diseases are diet related.

Dietary diversity of Nigeria diet was evaluated in six states representing the three Agro-ecological zones, rural and urban sectors of Nigeria, in the study the mean DDD was 5.81 and 83% of the participants had medium DDS while 16.5% had low DDS which tells us that dietary diversity is poor in Nigeria and effort to improve nutritional status must first address the issue of dietary diversity (Ajania 2010)


1.2      OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

1.2.1    General objectives

The general objective of this study was to determine the relationship between dietary diversity score and nutrient adequacy among adults in Umuahia North Local Government of Abia State.


1.2.2   Specific objectives

The specific objectives of this study are to:

i. access the respondents socio- economic status

ii. calculate nutrient adequacy of the participants.

iii. determine the dietary diversity score using 24hour recall and food frequency questionnaire.

iv. examine the relationship between dietary diversity score and nutrient adequacy.  


1.3                   SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

In Nigeria, due to rapid urbanization, nutrition problems namely undernutrition and overnutrition have been reported. Despite the initiative implemented by the Government and other stakeholders, still nutrition problems have declined only slightly (NBS, 2011). This will help to expose the need for diverse diet and adequate nutrient intakes. The study will provide information that will be relevant to policy makers, teachers, food agencies, government, health professionals and program planners to build a basic and stronger foundation for the design of appropriate and cost effective interventions to improve the nutrient and health situation of the adult. This study will enable the government to know the appropriate and necessary area to channel their project and programmes so as to ensure a sustainable economic and nutritional development of the area.

 

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment