Title page .............................................................................................
i
Certification............................................................................................................................... ii
Acknowledgement.................................................................................................................... iii
Dedication …………................................................................................................................ iv
Table of Contents....................................................................................................................... v
Table of Cases.......................................................................................................................... vii
Table of Statutes........................................................................................................................ x
Abbreviations............................................................................................................................ xi
Abstract.................................................................................................................................... xii
CHAPTER ONE: BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
1.0 Introduction ………………………………………………. 1
1.1 Concept of Consumer Protection …………………………. 3
1.1.1 Who is a Consumer …….………………………………… 7
1.1.2 Rights of a Consumer
….…………………………………. 9
1.2 Objectives of the Study …………………………………… 13
1.2.1 Scope and Limitations of the Project
……………………… 14
1.2.2 Significance of the Project
…………………………………. 14
1.3 Methodology ………………………………………………. 15
1.4 Conclusion …………………………………………………. 16
CHAPTER TWO: THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK
2.0 Introduction ………………………………………… 17
2.1 Review of the Legal Regulatory Framework ……….. 18
2.1.1
Consumer Protection Council ……………………….. 18
2.1.2 Standards Organisation of Nigeria
……………………. 21
2.1.3
National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control …. 24
2.2 Problems with the Existing Framework ……………… 27
2.3 Conclusion ………………………………………… 30
CHAPTER THREE: CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OF CONSUMER RIGHTS
3.0 Introduction …………………………………………. 32
3.1 Enforcement under Tort ……………………………… 33
3.1.1 Negligence ………………………………………….... 34
3.2 Judicial Approach to Consumer Protection in Nigeria ………. 36
3.3 Enforcement under Contract ……………………….... 43
3.3.1 Express and Implied Terms
………………………….. 43 - Terms Implied by the Court ……………………….. 45
- Terms
Implied by Custom and Usage ………………. 45
- Terms
Implied by Statute …………………………… 46
• Description
…………………………………… 46
• Fitness
for Purpose …………………………... 49
• Merchantable
Quality ………………………… 56
3.3.2
Conditions and Warranties …………………………… 59
3.3.3
Exemption Clauses …………………………………… 61
- Common
Law Rules ………………………………… 62
- Statutory
Provisions …………………………………. 66
3.4 Conclusion ……………………………………………. 67
CHAPTER FOUR: RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
4.1 Recommendations ……………………………………. 69
4.2 Conclusion ……………………………………………. 77
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adeola v. Henry Stephens & Sons Limited
(1975) 12 WACA 462
Allied Bank v. Akabueze (1997) 6 NWLR
(Pt.509) 374
Alphonsus Okonkwo v. Guinness (Nig.) Limited
& Obinma & Sons (Nig.) Limited (1980) 1 P.L.R. 581
Amodu Tijani v. Secretary of Southern
Nigeria, (1921) A.C. 399
Andres Bros (Bournemouth) Limited v. Singer
& Co Ltd. [1934] 1 K.B. 17
Arcos Limited v. Ronaasen & Sons (1933)
A.C. 470
B.S. Brown & Sons Ltd. v. Craiks Ltd.
(1972) A.C. 441 at p. 473
Baldry v. Marshall (1925) 1 K.B. 260
Barnett v. Chelsea and Kensington Hospital
Management Committee [1968] 1 All E.R. 1068
Beale v. Taylor (1967) 3 All E.R. 253
Bernstein v. Pamson Engineering Motors
(Golden Green) Ltd. (1987) 2 All E.R. 200
Black v. Fife Coal Co. Ltd. [1912] A.C. 149
Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co. (1856) 11
Ex Ch. 781
Boshali v. Allied Commercial Exporters Ltd.
(1961) All N.L.R. 917
Bristol Tramways Carriage Co. Ltd. v. Fiat
Motors Ltd (1910) 2 K.B. 831
British & Overseas Credit Ltd. v.
Animashawun (1961) 1 All N.L.R. 343
Cammell Laird & Co. Ltd. v. Manganese
Bronze and Brass Co. Ltd. (1934) A.C. 402
Charthouse Credit Co. Ltd. v. Tolly (1963) 2
Q.B. 683
Christopher Hill Limited v. Ashington
Piggeries (1972) A.C. 441
Constance Ngonadi v. Nigeria Bottling
Company Limited (1985) 1 NWLR (Pt. 4) 739
Curtis v. Chemical Cleaning Company (1951) 1
K.B. 805
D.I.C. Industries v. Jimfat Nigeria Limited
(1975) C.C.H.C.J. 175
Daniels & Daniels v. R. White & Sons
Limited and Anor. [1938] 4 All ER 258
Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) A.C. 562
Finnegan v. Allen (1943) 1 K.B. 425
Frost v. Aylesbury Dairy Co. Ltd. (1905) 1
K.B. 608
Geddling v. Marsh (1920) 1 K.B. 668
Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills (1936)
A.C. 85
Griffiths v. Peter Conway Limited (1939) 1
All E.R. 685
Harbutt’s Plasticine Ltd. v. Wayne Tank
& Pump Co. Ltd. (1970) 1 Q.B. 447
Hardwick Game Farm v. Suffolk Agricultural
Poultry Producers Association (1969) 2 A.C. 31
Harlington & Leinster Enterprises v.
Christopher Hull Fine Art (1991) 1 Q.B. 564
Heil v. Hedges (1951) 1 T.L.R. 512
Henry Kendall v. William Lillico (1969) 2
A.C. 31
Henry Stephens Engineering Ltd. v. Complete
Homes Ent. Ltd. (1987) 1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 47) 40
Hutton v. Warner (1830) 1 M&W, p. 466
James Drummond & Sons v. E. H. Van Ingen
& Co. (1887) 12 A.C. 284
Joseph Travers & Sons Limited v. Longel
Limited (1947) 64 T.L.R. 150 at p. 153.
Karsales (Harrow) Ltd. v. Wallis (1956) 1
W.L.R 936
L’Estrange v. Graucob (1934) 2 K.B. 394
Langridge v. Levy (1837) 150 E.R. 863
Letang v. Cooper [1965] 1 Q.B. 232
Manchester Liners Limited v. Rea Limited
(1922) 2 A.C. 74
Nathaniel Ebelamu v. Guinness (Nig.) Limited
(1983) 1 FNLR 42.
Nigeria Bottling Co. Plc. v. Okwejiminor
& Anor. (1998) 8 NWLR (Pt. 295)
Nigerian Bottling Company Limited v.
Olarewaju (2007) All FWLR (Pt. 364) 360 Ogbidi v. Guinness (Nig.) Limited
(1981) 1 FNLR 67
Ogwu v. Leventis Motors (1963) N.R.N.L.R.
115
Okwejiminor v. Gbakeji and Nigerian Bottling
Co. Plc. (2008) 5 NWLR (Pt. 1079) 172 S.C.
Olajide Odunbo Stores & Sawmill Limited
v. Omotayo Agencies Nig. Limited (1978) 4 C.C.H.C.J. 625
Osemobor v. Niger Biscuits Company Limited
(1973) 7 CCHCJ 71, NCLR 382
Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock
& Engineering Co. Ltd. (The Wagon Mound, No.1) [1961] A.C. 388
Parker v. SE Railway Company (1877) 2 CPD
416)
Peter Darlington Partners Limited v. Gosho
Company Limited (1964) 1 Lloyds Rep. 149
Photo Production Limited v. Securicor
Transport Limited (1980) A.C. 826
Plastic Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Toki of
Nigeria Ltd. (1976) 12 C.C.H.C.J. 2710
Pym v. Campbell (1856) 119 E.R. 903
Simmonds v. Cockell (1920) K.B. 843
Stevenson v. Rogers (1999)1 All E.R. 613
Suisse AtlantiqueSociété d’ Armemente (South
Africa) v. Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale NV [1967] 1 A.C. 361
Teheran-Europe Co. Ltd. v. S. T. Belton
(Tractors) Ltd. [1967] 1 A.C. 361
Usman v. Abubakar (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728)
685
Varley v. Whipp (1900) 1 Q.B. 513
Wilson v. Ricket, Cockerell & Co. Ltd.
(1954) 1 Q.B. 598
Wren v. Holt (1903) 1 K.B. 610
Yeoman Credit Ltd. v. Apps (1962) 2 Q.B. 508
Nigerian Statutes
Constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria, 1999, (as amended), CAP C23, LFN 2004
Consumer Protection Council Act CAP C25,
LFN 2004
Criminal Code (Southern Nigeria) Act, Cap.
C38, LFN 2004
National Agency for Food and Drug
Administration and Control Act CAP N1, LFN 2004
Penal Code (Northern States) Federal
Provisions Act, CAP P3, LFN 1990
Standard Organisation of Nigeria Act CAP
S9, LFN 2004
International Statutes
Consumer Protection Act, No. 68 of 2008
(South Africa)
United Nations Guidelines for Consumer
Protection (as revised in 1999)
A. Nigerian Reports
All N.L.R. All Nigeria Law Reports
C.C.H.C.J. Selected Judgements of the High Court of Lagos State
F.N.L.R. Federal Nigeria Law Reports
N.M.L.R. Nigerian Monthly Law Reports
N.N.L.R. Northern Nigeria Law Reports
N.W.L.R. Nigeria Weekly Law Reports
S.C. Judgements of the Supreme Court
W.A.C.A. Selected Judgements of the West African Court of Appeal
B. Principal United Kingdom Reports
A.C. Appeal Cases
All E.R. Rep All England Law Reports Reprint
|
All E.R.
|
All England Law Reports
|
App. Cases
|
Law Reports, Appeal Cases
|
Ch.
|
Law Reports, Chancery
|
E.R.
|
English Reports
|
K.B
|
Law Reports, King’s Bench
|
L.J. Ch.
|
Law Journal, Chancery
Reports
|
Q.B.
|
Law Reports, Queens Bench
|
W.L.R.
|
Weekly Law Reports
|
Most Nigerian consumers are unaware of
their consumer rights. Out of the few that are aware, an even smaller number
have an idea of how to enforce such rights. The widespread lack of awareness,
coupled with other factors in favour of the manufacturer, results in consumers
getting the shorter end of the stick with regards to adequate protection from
substandard, unsafe or inadequate products and services. The importance of
consumer protection mechanisms is further amplified by global industrialisation
and the recent influx of fake goods into the Nigerian market.
The Government has a duty to protect its
people from unscrupulous acts of sellers and manufacturers in order to uphold
their rights and prevent adverse ripple effects that may arise. In furtherance
of this objective, consumer protection laws have been enacted empowering
government agencies to enforce and protect the rights of its citizens.
Consumers who intend to enforce their
rights are usually faced with various hurdles ranging from ignorance to legal
limitations and difficulties in civil actions. As a result, they are
continuously deprived of their rights which are trampled upon by manufacturers
/ sellers. In Nigeria, it is evident that the consumer is the weaker party.
This research aims to review the existing
statutory framework for consumer protection in a bid to highlighting flaws in
the current system (both legal and non-legal) and proffer feasible
recommendations and solutions to cure the prevalent malady. Furthermore,
Nigerian case law will be examined in looking at the Court’s approach and
attitude towards consumer protection in Nigeria.
The methodology to be employed in carrying
out this study is of a qualitative and descriptive nature. This research will
utilise both primary and secondary sources of information; gathered from
textbooks, journals and articles (both online and published), dictionaries,
paper presentations, public documents, statutes, etc. It is from an examination of these sources
that the writer would address the questions generated by this project.
CHAPTER ONE
BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
“The consumer, in order to
protect himself against the unscrupulous, must be armed with knowledge.”[1]
INTRODUCTION
The deeply rooted maxim of caveat emptor[2]no
longer applies strictly to consumer transactions as it has been whittled down
by decisions of the court.[3]
On the contrary, it is the seller who must be cautious and ensure that goods
and services provided meet up with the reasonable standards required by law.[4]
The saying, “Consumer is King”, is commonly used across the
world to signify the upper-hand consumers have in determining the overall
success or failure of any product or service. This also means that goods and
services should be satisfactorily tailored to meet the needs of the consumer.
As a result, rights accrue to consumers which they can enforce through civil
actions in the event of breach or violation of those rights. These consumer
rights are further enforced through laws promulgated by the National Assembly
and such laws are enforced by government agencies.[5]
Their joint efforts are aimed at furthering the protection of consumer’s
interests.
In Nigeria, a plethora of laws exist for the purpose of
protecting consumer rights. Nevertheless, most Nigerian consumers aren’t able
to receive adequate remedy for injuries suffered due to manufacturer’s products
or services. Therefore, it may be concluded that the profusion of legal
framework is not reflected in the protection afforded to consumers. Although
recent efforts have been made by consumer protection agencies[6]
to strengthen the enforcement of consumer rights and promotion of their
interests, Nigerian consumers are still deemed to be weaker than
manufacturers/producers. The current paradigm calls for a balance of the
competing interests of both sides.
According
to Scott Maynes, consumers are ill-served majorly due to lack of
information.[7]
This, coupled with the lack of awareness and the literacy levels amongst
majority of the Nigerian populace, serves to fetter the enforcement of consumer
rights. In Nigeria, the literacy rate as at December 2013 was placed at 61.3%.[8]
This means that nearly half of the people in Nigeria are illiterate. There even
exists unawareness of consumer rights amongst the educated class. As a result,
most consumers are unable to successfully assert their rights and are exploited
by service providers. The need for an efficient consumer protection mechanism
is further necessitated by modern technological advancements, deceptive
advertising, marketing techniques and the advent of globalisation.
Others factors hampering the rights of consumers include:
overlapping functions of consumer protection agencies and difficulties faced in
enforcing civil rights. Nigeria, being a proconsumer state with a population of
about 170 million people9, must take steps to ensure that its people
have smooth recourse to remedies for breach of their rights. The protection and
advancement of consumer interests have therefore become a major concern to the
government.
This study will examine the existing legal/statutory
framework for consumer protection in Nigeria with a view to proffering the need
for reforms, if any. It will also make recommendations as regards possible
legal and non-legal redress mechanisms for consumers.
1.1 CONCEPT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION
The industrial age witnessed the creation of machines and
more sophisticated devices. The development of rail transport coupled with
widening markets resulted in consumers having diminished rights and privileges
in relation to the quality of products and prices of goods and services. The
English common law principles of negligence were first used and subsequently,
legislation protecting consumers came into being. The Factories Act of 180210
and the Factory and Workshop Act of 189511 in England, are good
examples. Today, consumer protection legislation has developed to cover a
broader spectrum. Modern consumer protection legislation covers goods,
services, labelling, packaging, components and materials used which are likely
to cause injury and/or detriment to the consumer. In the 18th
century, Adam Smith12 pointed out that interests of the consumer
were usually “sacrificed” for those of the producer. He further submitted that
since consumption is the sole purpose of production, consumer rights must be
9 As at December
2013, World Bank Report, available at http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria, accessed on July 22,
2014.
1042 Geo. III
c.73. The Act was established by the Parliament of the United Kingdom to
regulate factory conditions especially in relation to child workers in cotton
mills.
111 Edw. 7
c.37. This Act regulated the safety, health conditions and wages of individuals
working in factories.
12 Adam
Smith, Wealth of Nations (1910).
considered over that of manufacturers. The practice of
placing consumer’s rights second to those of producers continued for quite some
time in that era. However, there has been a paradigm shift in recent times
which has seen strict duties imposed on manufacturers, sellers, brand owners,
producers and other persons in the supply chain. The 20th century
was marked by the prevalence of consumers who play an important role in
determining the overall success or failure of a product or service.
Generally speaking, consumer protection refers to that body
of law that serves to protect buyers against unscrupulous activities of
sellers. It refers to the provision of effective mechanisms to protect the
pecuniary, health, safety and security interests of all legal persons against
misleading, fraudulent and harmful business practices, including manufacturing,
trading, packaging, advertising, distributing and selling of products/goods and
services to the ultimate consumer.[9]
In a broader sense, it governs the liability of not only
manufacturers of goods and services, but also retailers, wholesalers, and other
suppliers of goods and services to persons who use or consume them.[10]
Closely related to
this is the concept of Consumerism. The term consumerism has been used in
different disciplines to mean different things. It may be defined as a
programme to promote consumer interest including protection of the environment
and restraints on abuse by businesses[11].
Definitions by experts in the field also exist. According to Philip Kotler,
consumerism is a social movement that seeks to augment the rights of buyers in
relation to sellers.[12]
Maynes submitted that consumerism represents the voice of consumer
dissatisfaction along with avenues for remedial actions.[13]
It is evident that the nature and extent of consumer
protection regulation in a modern society is a reflection of its socio-economic
values. Various factors influence and determine the stage a country’s consumer
protection framework has reached. These include the quantum of information
available to the consumers; the extent to which the available consumer
protection legislation is efficacious; the degree of consumer education
available for the general public; awareness of the masses to consumer related
issues and rights; and governmental agencies involvement in consumer issues.
Experts such as Kaynak posit that
consumerism is likened to a social movement which goes through its own growth
process or life cycle.[14]
This means that the concept of consumer protection in any given state may go
through its own consumerism life cycle – just like a human being would. He
outlined four integral stages of the life cycle. These are: crystallisation,
organization, institutionalization, and conceptualization. It may be concluded
that Nigeria is currently at the crystallization stage because of the lack of
organised consumer related activities. Majority of the recent consumer related
actions have been carried out by the CPC or non-governmental consumer
protection groups. From the foregoing, it may be concluded that consumerism is
a social movement aimed at protecting consumers.
The need for consumer protection in recent
times is more apparent and has been highlighted by the accelerated
establishment of consumer protection legislation in developing countries like
Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Thailand.[15]
Amongst other factors, industrialisation has resulted in more sophisticated
products being created and distributed across the globe. Modern day consumer
protection laws must be broad based and dynamic enough to safeguard against the
increased risks that consumers are exposed to. Studies have shown that consumer
dissatisfaction is prevalent where sellers are reluctant to resolve justified
consumer grievances and government fails to stand up to defend the interests of
buyers[16][17].
Consumers must also be protected from trade malpractice. Unfair dealings in the
marketplace include but are not limited to misleading advertising, unjust dales
promotions and unfair exclusion clauses.
In Nigeria, Consumer Protection is
regulated by a plethora of legislations. These include the
Standard Organisation of Nigeria (SON) Act[18],
the Foods and Drugs Act[19],
the Consumer
Protection Council (CPC) Act[20],
the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) Act[21],
the Nigerian Communications Act[22]
and the Utilities Charges Commission Act[23]amongst
others. This paper will focus on the CPC, NAFDAC and SON Acts.
References may however be made to other
laws, regulations and legislations subsequently.
1.1.1 WHO IS A CONSUMER?
Like most terminologies, there is no
universally accepted or absolute definition of the term
“consumer”. A consumer may be defined as one who uses goods
made by another.[24]
A consumer may also be described as an individual who purchases, uses,
maintains and disposes of products and services.[25]
According to Ralph Nader, a “consumer” should be equated with a
“citizen” to ensure that consumer rights are regarded as a
civic right.[26]
This submission is however flawed by the fact that it is not definition (or
legislation) that gives rise to rights. Rather, it is the existence of rights
that give rise to legislation. Some consumer protection statutes limit the
scope of persons that qualify as consumers by stipulating that the supplier
acts in the course of a trade or business and that the buyer is a private
individual who acts in a private capacity.[27]
It is pertinent not to restrict the meaning of the term to “contracting
parties”,
as employing such a definition may
preclude an ultimate user of goods and services.[28]
Leon Schiffman and Leslie Kanuk, in
defining the term, distinguished between personal
and organizational consumers. They
posit that a personal consumer is an individual who purchases goods and/or
services for their own use as an end user while an organizational consumer is
an institution that acquires goods and services to further the objectives of
their organisation.[29]Modern
developments in law have imposed stricter duties on suppliers of goods and
services. Suppliers are therefore bestowed with an increased level of
obligations to strangers including those not perceived to be the final users of
such products. As such, the traditional concept of a ‘consumer’ has been
expanded. Today, private individuals who enjoy the services of a non-profit or
non-commercial institution might also be described as consumers.[30]
Statutory definitions of the term exist in various legislations both foreign[31]
and domestic. In Nigeria, the Consumer Protection Council (CPC) Act defines a
consumer as an individual who
purchases, uses, maintains or disposes of product or services.[32]
The definition above restricts such protection to “individuals” i.e. natural
persons only. This poses a problem for juristic persons (such as corporations,
partnerships and businesses) who purchase goods for business purposes. Such
persons will not be able to enforce their consumer rights under the Act. It is
pertinent that the legal framework regarding the classes of person entitled to
consumer rights is expanded to cover the unprotected class. Also, Section 2 of
the Consumer Contracts
(Regulation of Unfair Terms) Bill, 2010, of Nigeria[33] defines
a “consumer” as a natural person who, in making a contract to which the Act
applies, is acting for purposes which are outside his business.[34]
This definition creates the same problem stated above in relation to the class
of persons it covers i.e. ‘non-natural’ persons such as companies and
organisations are not covered.
Under the
South-African Consumer Protection Act,[35]
however, the definition of a consumer successfully covers all juristic persons.
Under this Act, a consumer is defined as a person
to whom those particular goods or services are marketed in the ordinary course
of the supplier’s business, or a franchise.[36]
The use of the word ‘person’ implies
that a consumer is any juristic person, not just an individual. It is
surprising that the recently passed[37]
Consumer Protection Agency Law of Lagos State[38]
does not define the term as the statute could have defined the term and also
expanded its scope to include all juristic persons.
1.1.2 RIGHTS OF A CONSUMER
A right can be defined as a power, privilege or immunity
guaranteed under a constitution, statute or decisional laws, or claimed as a
result of long usage.[39]
Various categories of rights exist. These include but are not limited to
Fundamental Human Rights; Proprietary Rights; Contractual Rights; Social
Rights; Collective Rights; and Political Rights. A particular right may fall
into more than one category. This paper however, focuses on Consumer Rights
which can be deemed to be a more recent development in the corpus of existing
rights. In March 1962, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, whilst delivering a
speech to the United States Congress, stressed the need for consumer rights to be protected. He outlined
certain rights which he believed must be accorded to consumers. These include:
the right to safe products and information about such products, the right to
choose and the right to be heard.[40]
International statutory frameworks also provide for the
existence of consumer rights. For example, the United Nation Guidelines on
Consumer Protection which provides for consumer’s
right to:
1. safety
and protection from hazards;
2. information;
3. consumer
education;
4. effective
redress mechanisms;
5. freedom
to form relevant consumer groups and organisations; and
6. sustainable
consumption patterns.[41]
Chapter IV of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria, 1999[42],
(hereinafter referred to as the “Constitution”) does not directly
make mention of ‘consumer rights’. Nevertheless, this does not mean consumer
rights do not exist in Nigeria.[43]
The Consumer Protection Council (CPC) Act of Nigeria provides for certain
consumer rights similar to those listed above but also includes the right to a
healthy environment.[44]
The various consumer rights will be discussed below.
a. Right to Safety
This right connotes that the general public should be
protected from goods and services that are harmful to their person or property.
For example, food products must be fit for consumption. As a result,
manufacturers have a duty to include best-before dates on labels of goods. In
Nigeria, the CPC, in the first quarter of 2014, initiated a “Best-before Date”
Campaign to stop indiscriminate
storing of goods which may undermine the quality of products available for
consumers.[45]
The need for such labels is important as to ensuring that customers are aware
of the content of goods. This will be discussed more under the Right to
Information. The extent to which a consumer may exercise his right is dependent
on the disclosure made by manufacturers and service providers. This may be in
the form of precautionary measures to be taken by the consumer or the level of
risk they are exposed to. Such information should be communicated to consumers
effectively. For example, dangerous
goods (such as toys for children) usually have clear warning/cautions signs on
the packaging stating the possible hazards or age restrictions.
b. Right to Information
Consumers have a right to know
exactly what they are purchasing. Thus, salient information regarding
characteristics of the product, ingredients used in its production and its
origin must be communicated to the consumer. This right imposes on the
producer/manufacturer the duty of Mandatory Labelling. Labelling is required to
give the consumer access to information relating to the composition and
contents of goods. In Nigeria, regulations created under the National Agency
for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) Act[46]
impose a duty of manufacturers to include nutritional information on labels of
products.[47]
These regulations are flaunted continuously leaving consumers open to health
hazards due to lack of information. For example, under the Bottled Water
(Labelling) Regulations, manufacturers are required to declare the net content
of the water in a metric system of measurement.[48]
The penalty for failure to do so is a fine of N50,000 (Fifty Thousand Naira)
along with other forms of sanctions as the Agency (NAFDAC) may deem fit.[49]
If a person who reacts to high sulphur in water is not put on notice of the
high sulphur content in a particular brand of bottled water, such a person may
suffer damage to their health.
c. Right to Consumer Education
This generally means that consumers
are to be enlightened on their rights, privileges and duties.[50]
The major reason for this is not farfetched. A consumer who is aware of his
rights is in a better position to take steps to enforcing them. As such, this
is a crucial aspect of consumer protection as it largely determines the extent
to which consumer protection will be vibrant in any given state. “Consumer
Education” simply refers to the process of enlightening people about their
rights and duties thereby enabling them to maximize opportunities when buying
or using goods and services.[51]
As mentioned in previous parts of this research paper, lack of awareness of
consumer rights is one of the major causes of poor protection for consumers.
This will be expanded upon in subsequent chapters of this paper.
d. Right to Redress
There must be effective legal
mechanism put in place to help consumers enforce their rights where a breach
occurs. Government agencies are usually vested with the power to help aggrieved
consumers claim remedies form erring manufacturers. Similar actions for redress
are carried out by non-governmental organisations and trade unions saddled with
the mandate to aid affected consumers in obtaining reliefs through litigation,
negotiation and similar means.
e. Right to Form Consumer Organisations
As stated above, various organisations
are established for the sole purpose of helping aggrieved consumers obtain
remedies in the event of violation of their consumer rights. Thus, consumers
must also be given the right to assemble and form groups and organisations
aimed at protecting their economic interests.[52]
Examples of Non-governmental consumer organisations in Nigeria are the Consumer
Organisation of Nigeria (CON); Consumer Protection Organisation of
Nigeria (CPON); Consumer Awareness
Organisation (CAO); and Consumer Rights
Association of Nigeria (CRAN). International bodies also
exist for this purpose. They include the Consumer International[53]
(CI) and the European Union (EU).
f. Right to Sustainable Consumption Patterns
Sustainable consumption patterns can
be defined as consumption practices that do not jeopardise the environment or
threaten the health of consumers at large. Manufacturers must ensure that their
processes, products or services do not pose a danger to the environment as this
may have long term effects and inadvertently rob the ‘countless unborn’[54]
of their interests. Government may also require manufacturers to publish
certain information regarding their activities which may pose a threat to
consumers. Consumer protection legislation must aim to accommodate all the
consumer rights mentioned above.
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The purpose of this paper is to:
1. Examine
the existing legal framework for consumer protection in Nigeria and determine
its impact along with the efficacy of the functions of the Government in
protecting consumers; and
2.
Uncover reasons why consumers are deemed to
be insufficiently protected notwithstanding the existence of various
governmental agencies established for that purpose.
In furtherance of this objective, the
legal framework for consumer protection will be examined so as to make
necessary recommendations.
1.2.1 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE PROJECT
This project will cover consumer protection statutes in
force since the establishment of the CPC Act and thus, will be limited to a
period of 1992-2012. It will also highlight judgments given by Nigerian courts
from 1920-2014 and other relevant decisions of foreign courts that date as far
back as 1914.
In view of this, it would be impracticable to assume that
all necessary facts have been gathered in the process of the study. The
information gathered and resources utilized are limited to those accessed and
made available with the aid of local newspapers, magazines, journals and annual
reports of the Consumer Protection Council (CPC), Standard Organisation of
Nigeria (SON), the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control
(NAFDAC) and other relevant sources from the internet. However, the effect of
this limitation will be reduced to the barest minimum.
1.2.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROJECT
This project is noteworthy as it helps to empower and
educate consumers on their rights thereby allowing them to make informed
decisions regarding how best to enforce their rights and the necessary
procedures in doing so.
It also strives to emphasise the need for manufacturers and
sellers to ensure that goods and services meet up with (and even exceed) the
standards required by consumers. The findings of this project will immensely
affect the way consumers are viewed in Nigeria by the courts, manufacturers and
the Government. It will pave the way for future development in our legal system
and serve as an avenue for promoting efficient trade practices in the country.
1.3 METHODOLOGY
The methodology to be employed in carrying out this study
is mainly doctrinal and essentially literary based. This research will utilise
both primary and secondary sources of information; gathered from textbooks,
journals and articles (both online and published), dictionaries, paper
presentations, public documents, statutes, etc.
It is from an examination of these sources that the writer would address
the questions generated by this project.
The project will be divided into four
chapters. Chapter one will introduce the concept of consumer protection,
consumerism and also examine definitions of the term “consumer” in a bid to
understand who qualifies as a consumer. Definitions of the term under various
legal systems will be compared in order to arrive at the most efficient
approach. Chapter two will explore and interrogate the existing legal framework
for consumer protection in Nigeria and assess the impact of the regulatory
agencies established under these laws. Furthermore, the prevalent demerits of
the current system such as the duplicity and overlap of functions of the
regulators - which slows down the remedial process - will be examined. Chapter
three will explore civil law avenues for enforcement of consumer rights. This
chapter will highlight the age-long forms of civil enforcement of consumer rights
under the law of tort and contract law and also scrutinise the approach of
Nigerian courts to consumer related disputes. These issues will be appraised in
order to understand the extent to which these legal mechanisms have played a
role in the current state of consumer protection in the Country.
Finally, the conclusions in Chapter
four will address the significance of the application of the findings presented
in the previous chapters. Recommendations will be made which, in the opinion of
the author, will possibly improve the attitude of the people to consumer
rights; change the approach of the courts towards consumer-manufacturer
disputes; and enhance the way government agencies carry out their functions
with regard to safeguarding the interests of consumers.
1.4 CONCLUSION
This project will show that the
defunct state of consumer protection in Nigeria is not due to the non-existence
of legal framework governing this area of law. Rather, it is due to the
nonenforcement of the existing laws amongst other reasons. The CPC has recently
taken steps to strengthen the protection given to consumers and ward off any
form of manufacturer ineptitude.
These exploits, however, are not sufficient to cure the
declining malaise. As such, the Government must espouse policies, laws and
regulations that are aboriginal and specifically woven to fit the
idiosyncrasies of the average Nigerian citizen. In Nigeria, a pro-consumer
state, consumer must, in as much as possible, be king.
Login To Comment