ABSTRACT
This work is centered on the auditors roles in safeguarding the going concern concept of business organization particularly GTBank Plc. The research is composed of five chapters, each chapter is interrelated with the proceeding chapter. Chapter one consist of introductory part. Where I discusses the relationships between the role of an auditors and the going concern of the company. It also consists of statement of the problems, aim and objectives of the study, background of the study and definition of key terms. Chapter two contains literature review, definition of audit and financial statement, how is responsible for preparing a financial statement, who is an auditor, right, duties and powers of an auditors, objective, types of auditor, regulatory framework of audit, types of audit report, forms of qualified audit report, going concern concept, symptoms of going concern concept problem, auditors responsibilities and duties as regard. Chapter Three deals with research methodology, populations and sample size, method of data collection and analysis. Chapter four was focus on data presentation, analysis and interpretation. While chapter five deals with summary, conclusion, recommendation and reference.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page - - - - - - - - - -i
Declaration - - - - - - - - - -ii
Approval page- - - - - - - - - -iii
Dedication- - - - - - - - - - -iv
Acknowledgement- - - - - - - - - -v
Table of
contents- - - - - - - - - -vi
Abstract- - - - - - - - - - -viii
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study - - - - - - - -1
1.2 Statement of problem - - - - - - - -3
1.3 Aim and Objectives of the
Study - - - - - - -4
1.4 Research Questions - - - - - - - -5
1.5 Research Hypothesis - - - - - - - -5
1.6 Significance of the study- - - - - - - - -5
1.7 Scope of the study - -
- - - - - - -6
1.8 Definition of Terms - - - - - - - -6
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction - - - -8
2.1 Concept of Auditing - - - -8
2.3 Auditing Standards and
Guidelines - - - -21
2.4 Audit Report - - - -23
2.5 The Audit Process - - - -28
2.6 Going Concern Concept - - - -30
2.7
Audit Evidences - - - - - - - - -33
CHAPTER
THREE
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - -39
3.2 Research Design - - - - - - - - -39
3.3 Population
of the Study - - - - - - - -39
3.4 Sampling
Size and Sampling Technique - - - - - -39
3.5 Source and Method of Data Collection - - - - - -40
3.6 Methods Data Analysis - - - - - - - -41
CHAPTER
FOUR
DATA
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - -42
4.2
Data Presentation - - - - - - - - -42
4.3
Analysis of Data - - - - - - - - -42
4.4 Hypothesis
Testing - - - - - - - -47
4.5 Summary of
Findings - - - - - - - -51
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary - - - - - - - - - -53
5.2 Conclusion - - - - - - - - -53
5.3
Recommendations - - - - - - - - -54
References - - - - - - - - - -55
Appendix - - - - - - - - -58
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
of the Study
The historical development of auditing can be
traced back to the 8th century industrial revolution, when our
present day business organization were just evolving hence it is as business
itself, Wolf (1979). Business have grown into a main complex and complicated
network of contracts and activities than what used to be the case in the past.
Directors now run organizations on behalf of the owners (shareholders); this
has brought about stewardship accounting. Stewardship accounting is the process
whereby managers of a business, account or report to the owners on the state of
affairs of the business.
Aguolu (2008:1) defines auditing simply as “the
independent examination of the financial statements of an organization with a
view to expressing an opinion as to whether these statements give a true and
fair view and comply with the relevant statutes and the international financial
Reporting Standards”. The person who carries out such an examination and
expresses the opinion is called an auditor.
Going concern is one of the accounting concepts;
it means that the business unit will operate in perpetuity, i.e. the business
is not expected to be liquidated in the foreseeable future. A business is
considered a going concern if it is capable of earning a reasonable net income
and there is no intention or threat from any source. The directors are mandated
by the companies and allied matter act 1990 (CAMA 1990) to prepare periodic
financial statements that give a summary of the business transaction for the
financial period under question.
According to Millchamp (1996) “Independence is a
means that the auditor meets on to play role in safeguarding the going concept
to ensure that the business continues to exist in the foreseeable future.
The shareholders want reassurance that the
financial transactions the board of directors prepared and represented in the
financial statements/final accounts present a true and fair view of the
company/organization. It is for this reason that the shareholders/investors
appoint auditors to give an attestation to the effect that the account gives a
true and fair view of the state of the affairs of the business transaction for
the period under review.
The financial statements prepared by the directors
include;
- Balance sheet
- The profit and loss
account
- The five years financial
summary
- The cash flow statement
etc.
When a company is formed and is operating, it is
mandatory especially for a limited liability company to prepare a financial
statement on a yearly basis. The responsibility of preparing the financial
statement is being rested on the company’s director by CAMA 1990. The information
derived from the statements not only beneficial to the management of the company
but also to other interested parties which include the owners of the company or
in a public company shareholder.
The management who is entrusted with the
shareholders fund and resources is required as a matter of accountability to
prepare a financial statement, which will show how they have managed the
resources of the company and for proper accountability, there is the need for
the management to keep proper accounting records of all the activities of the
company for the given period.
If management is seen to have carried out this
function objectively, then there would appear to be little or no reason for
having an external auditor to verify and report on its credibility gap existing
between owners and management.
As earlier stated, it is required of all limited
liability companies to have their financial statements audited annually by a
firm of auditors so appointed (CAMA, sect 357(i)). The law compels as above for
the auditors to express an opinion on such financial statements and for the
opinion to be authoritative; the auditor must be seen to be independent.
Section 334 of CAMA as amended to date places the
burden of preparing the financial statement of the company on the directors
while the auditor is required to report on these financial statements. The
auditor comes into considerable contact with the directors in the course of his
work. Legally, the auditor is responsible for the shareholders and not for the
directors.
The important convention is on the level of
confidence being placed or misplaced on the audit report and the ability of the
report to safeguard the going concern of business especially with the series of
ever increasing cases of litigation like, In the case of Enron and its auditor
Arthur Anderson, Cadbury Nigeria plc and its auditor Akintola Williams. Thus,
the manner in which auditors constructed audit in their interest that some of
the major banks were a going concern, yet the banks were on the vague of
collapse is open to conjecture. On January 28th 2008, Lehman brother
received an unqualified audit opinion on its financial statements, accompanied
by a green light on the health of its quarterly accounts on July 10th,
2008, Nonetheless, in the dawn of August 2008 the company was in severe
financial problems and was forced to file bankruptcy on September 14th
2008.
The reviewed ethical standards requires auditors
to carefully analyze threats to their independence (this include the provision
of non-audit services) and to take measures that are necessary for safeguarding
compromise of their independence. This implies that in some cases, the auditor
is required to refuse to provide some non-audit services or even turn down the
appointment, in order to comply with the ethical standards.
1.2 Statement
of Research Problem
Financial scandals around the world and the recent
collapse of major corporate institutions in the USA, South East, Europe
and Nigeria such as Adelphia, Enron, World Com, Commerce Bank and recently XL
Holidays, Polly beck, Xerox, Cadbury, BCCI communication. Most public Nigerian
corporations, such as NITEL, NNSL, and NRC have shaken investors’ faith in the capital markets and on the efficacy of
financial reporting and credibility of audited annual reports of companies.
This has brought renewed attention on the going concern of companies in Nigeria
and International economic environments.
It is noted that a considerable number of
financial enterprises such as Lehman Brothers and non-financial firms such as
Enron have filled for bankruptcy, shortly after receiving unqualified audit
opinion. In addition, auditors have collected large amounts of money in audit
and non-audit fees, which jeopardize auditor independence and objectivity.
These events (inter alia) raise questions about the credibility of external
audits, auditors’ independence, relevance and quality of audit work, and the
use of economic incentives for good audits.
The collapse of Enron represents a pivotal point
in U.S. business history. While many deficiencies in the Nigeria business model
have been highlighted, perhaps the key failure that has become salient is the
failure of our auditing system to create true independence. The independence of
auditors have become questionable as they have failed to exercise the public
watchdog function as evidenced in the collapses of major corporations in
Nigeria, and as a result to safeguard the going concern concept.
It has been observed and acknowledged that nearly
99% of the fortune 1000 public companies have no public accounting rotation
policy. Non-compliance with rotation of audit firms/auditors has resulted in
inferior audit performance, lack of attention to detail due to staleness and
redundancy as well as unnecessary eagerness to please and maintain closeness to
client. As a result auditor have failed to do a proper audit planning ahead for
his audit work, planning for an audit, like in every human endeavours, is
essential for the smooth performance of the audit work and its successful
completion.
Every organization come into existence with the
aim of continuing in the foreseeable future, even with these many businesses go
into liquidation, just few years after establishment. These uneven responses
necessitated this research work. Thus, recent attention has been brought to the
fore Auditors’ vital role in safeguarding the going concern concept in our
National and International economies.
1.3 Aim
and Objectives of the Study
The main aim of this study among other things is
to investigate the relationship that exists between Audit and the going concern
of companies. More specifically, this study is designed to:
- To investigate the
relationship that exists between the role of an auditor(s) and the going
concern of the company.
- To assess the effect of
Auditors beneficial shareholdings on the credibility of audit report.
- To ascertain the effects
of auditors non-audit engagement services on the credibility of external
audits.
- To examine the impact of
non-compliance with audit rotation policy on auditors’ performance
- To examine the effect of
proper audit planning on the sustainability of Nigeria companies.
1.4 Research Questions
The study attempts to find answers to the
following specific questions,
i.
What is the relationship between the role of an
auditor(s) and the going concern of the company?
ii.
To what extent does Auditors beneficial
shareholding affect the credibility of audit report?
iii.
Do Auditors’ engagements in non-audit services
affect the credibility of external audits?
iv.
Does non-compliance with audit rotation policy
boost or impede auditors’ performance?
v.
Does effective audit planning boost or impede
sustainability of Nigerian companies?
1.5 Research Hypotheses
- H0: There is no positive relationship
that exists between the role of an Auditor(s) and the going concern of the
company.
- H0: There is a negative relationship
between Auditors beneficial shareholdings in that firm and the credibility
of audit work
- H0: There is no strong correlation
between Auditors non-audit engagement services and external audit
credibility.
- H0: There is no significant impact of
non-compliance with audit rotation policy on Auditors performance
- H0:
There is a negative relationship between adequate audit planning
and company’s going concern.
1.6 Significance
of the Study
Audits can improve a company’s efficiency and
profitability by helping the management better understand their own working and
financial systems. The management, as well as shareholders, suppliers and
financer, are also assured of risks in their organization are studied, and
effective system are put in place to handle them.
It also helps to uncover inaccuracies and
discrepancies within an organizations record which may be indications of weak
financial organization or even internal fraud, although fraud detection is not
the main purpose of an audit.
Other researchers, who will also want to work on the
same or similar topic, might need a base from which to start their work.
1.6 Scope
of the Study
The research covers auditing firms in Nigeria, as
a result of the wide nature, we were able to constrain this research work to
some auditing firms in (Guaranty Trust Bank Plc. Dutse Branch). and the
researcher goes further to explain variable such as; the role of an auditor,
going concern concept, Auditors beneficial shareholding, Auditors’ non-audit
engagement services, non-compliance with audit rotation policy and Audit
planning.
1.8 Definition of Key Terms
Auditing: The
independent examination of the financial examination of the financial
statements of an organization with a view to expressing an opinion as to
whether these statements give a true and fair view and comply with the relevant
statutes and the international financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor: This is a person appointed to examine the
accuracy of the accounts and records of a business organization and to report
on the financial aspect at a particular time.
Audit report:
This is a statement issued by the auditor of an enterprise at the end of an
audit assignment, in which the auditor expresses his opinion on the financial
statement prepared by the directors of an enterprise.
Bankruptcy: This
is a situation where an unincorporated business i.e. sole proprietorship and
partnership has been legally declared as not being able to meet its short term
obligation as at when due.
Financial report: This is a statement that shows the
summarized business transactions and the financial position of an organization
for the period under consideration.
GAAP: General accepted accounting principle.
Stewardship accounting: Stewardship accounting is the
process whereby managers of a business, account or report to the owners on the
state of affairs of the business.
Login To Comment