ABSTRACT
The study evaluated the microbial contamination of used weavon and hair tools of students within Michael Okpara University Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State. A total of ten (10) MOUAU students were randomly selected within Umudike. The bacteria species isolated include: Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa respectively, while the fungi species are Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Rhodotorula species and Mucor alternaria respectively. The total bacterial mean count recorded in this study was found to be higher in hair brush sample 2.10x105(cfu/g), while the weavon samples recorded the highest fungal counts at 3.14x105(cfu/g). From the findings in this study, it was observed that Staphylococcus aureus had the highest number and percentage of isolates in the samples at 8(44.4%), while Aspergillus flavus and Mucor alternaria 3(33.3 ) were the most predominant and frequently occurring fungal isolates from the samples. From the present study, the antimicrobial susceptibility and resistant patterns of bacterial isolates from the sample cultures revealed that Streptococcus spp and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had the highest (26mm) degree of sensitive to the antibiotics drug Streptomycin (30mcg), while Staphylococcus aureus showed high (0.0mm) degree of resistance to antibiotics drugs Norfloxacin (10mcg), Rifampicin (20mcg), Amoxicillin (30mcg), and Ampiclox (20mcg). It is concluded that the isolation of pathogenic bacteria (designated as objectionable microorganisms) from the weavon and hair brushes indicates that the weavon and hair brushes do not meet the stipulated microbiological quality standards in official monographs and can therefore serve as vehicles for the transmission of the detected pathogenic organisms.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page i
Certification iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgements v
Table
of Contents vi
List
of Tables viii
List
of Figures ix
Abstract x
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Aim
and Objectives 3
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE
REVIEW 4
2.1 Normal
Skin Flora 4
2.2 Skin
Infections 5
2.3 Bacterial Contaminants Associated with
Weavon and Hair Tools 6
2.3.1 Staphylococcus aureus 6
2.3.2 Escherichia
coli 8
2.3.3 Bacillus
species 9
2.3.4 Klebsiella
species 10
2.3.5 Staphylococcus
epidermidis 10
2.3.6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 11
2.4 Scalp Infection 12
2.4.1 Causes of Scalp Infections 13
2.5 Bacterial Scalp Infections 14
2.5.1 Folliculitis 14
2.5.2 Scalp Impetigo 15
2.6 Treatment of Scalp Infection 15
2.7 Infection Control Measures 16
2.7.1 Cleaning 16
2.7.2 Disinfection 17
2.7.3 Sterilization 17
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Materials and Methods 19
3.1 Study Area 19
3.2 Collection of Samples 19
3.3 Sterilization of Materials 19
3.4 Preparation of Culture Media 20
3.4.1 Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) 20
3.4.2 Nutrient Agar (NA) 20
3.4.3 MacConkey Agar (MA) 20
3.4.4 Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) 20
3.5 Bacterial Isolation 21
3.6 Purification of Bacterial Isolates 21
3.7 Identification of the Bacterial Isolates 21
3.8 Subculturing/Purification
and Identification of Fungi Species 21
3.9 Identification of Fungal Isolates 22
3.9.1 Wet Preparation 22
3.9.2 Colonial Morphology 22
3.10 Gram Staining 22
3.11 Biochemical Test 23
3.11.1 Catalase Test 23
3.11.2 Indole Test 23
3.11.3 Citrate Utilization Test 23
3.11.4 Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) Production
Test 23
3.11.5 Motility Test 24
3.11.6 Voges-Proskauer Test 24
3.11.7 Urease Test 24
3.11.8 Methyl Red Test 24
3.11.9 Coagulase Test 25
3.11.10
Oxidase Test 25
3.11.11 Sugar Utilization Test 25
3.12 Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing 26
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Results 27
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Discussion, Conclusion and
Recommendations 43
5.1 Discussion 43
5.2 Conclusion 47
5.3 Recommendations 47
References
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
|
TITLE
|
PAGE NO
|
1
|
Total Viable Microbial Mean Counts of Isolates from the
Weavon and hair brush Samples
|
28
|
2
|
Identification and Characterization of Bacterial Isolates
from the Weavon and hair
brush Samples
|
30
|
3
|
Morphological
Identification of Bacterial Isolates from the Weavon
and hair brush Samples
|
32
|
4
|
Identification and Characterization of Fungal Isolates
from the Weavon and hair
brush Samples
|
34
|
5
|
Distribution
and Percentage Occurrence of Bacterial Isolates from the Weavon
and hair brush Samples
|
36
|
6
|
Distribution and Percentage Occurrence of
Fungal Isolates from the Weavon and hair brush Samples
|
38
|
7
|
Antimicrobial Susceptibility and
Resistant Patterns of Bacterial Isolates from the Sample Cultures
|
40
|
LIST OF FIGURES
FIG.
|
TITLE
|
PAGE NO
|
1
|
Graphical Representation of the Percentage Occurrence of
the Bacterial Isolates from Used Weavon and Hair tools
|
41
|
2
|
Graphical Representation of the Percentage Occurrence of
the Fungal Isolates from Used Weavon and Hair tools
|
41
|
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The human hair is one part of our
body that is always exposed to environmental pollutants, and also to fungal and
bacterial contamination. Fungal disorders are emerging significant infections
in the world (World Health Organization, 2005). In recent years, they have
become an important clinical condition that deserves public health attention
because of the fact that some of them are potentially harmful to human health (Lee
et al., 2011). Keratinophilic fungi are usually isolated from the soil
and from keratinous tissues such as the skin, hair and nails. This includes the
dermatophyte Microsporum gypseum (Shukia et al, 2003), and some
species of Aspergillus, Fusarium solani, and Bipolarisspicifera.
(Zarrin, 2011) Bacteria, on the other hand were known to reside in the hair
follicles, in which 85% of the bacterial population if found in the superficial
layers of the skin and hair follicles (Lange-Asschenfeldt et al., 2011) Bacteria such as Micrococcaceae represents the
most common isolated specie. (Lange-Asschenfeldt et al., 2011) The human hair is also a reservoir of bacterial
including Staphycoccus intermedius and coagulase-negative Staphylococci,
and Staphylococcus aureus. There were very limited reports on
keratinophilic fungi and bacteria colonization on the hair (Jappe, 2003).
These health risks associated with hair and hair tools vary depending on
the nature of the service, the tools and equipment that are used, the health
status of the clients and service providers as well as the infection control procedures,
such as piercing and hair dressing are clearly associated with bacterial, viral
and fungal infections risks, even non-invasive procedures such as pedicures can
result in infection (Stout et al., 2011). It is believed that any
service with the potential to break the skin’s surface can be associated with
infections and infections can then be transmitted to and between clients if
proper infection control procedures are not implemented. It has observed that
hairdressing operators and their clients are constantly being exposed to
bacterial or fungal contamination during their services.
Microorganisms
are everywhere including skin surfaces and hairs and are continually introduced
into the environment and could therefore easily spread between clients and
operators and transferred by contact with unwashed hands, soiled equipment or
contact with blood and other body substances (De Souza and Shibu, 2004). Infection can occur during hair dressing
procedures since items such as razors, scissors, brushes, combs, clippers and
hairpins can accidentally penetrate the skin. Blood and body fluids do not have
to be visible on instruments, equipment or working surfaces for infection to be
transmitted. Infections that can be spread I hairdressing premises include skin
infections on the scalp, face and neck such as impetigo and fungal infections
such as tinea capitits and ringworm (Barn and Chen, 2011). Burns can
also occur during hair dressing procedures involving hot rollers, tongs and
crimpers and when hair is being washed with contaminated water or when
stationary or hand-held dryers are improperly used. There are reports of people
who have been infected with head lice from direct hair-to-hair contact with
someone who has head lice (Ruddy et al., 2011). Unfortunately, there are
no established regulations, guidelines and best practices for many of these
salons in our environment.
The
skin is an integral and complex part of the human body. While the main function
of the skin is to protect the internal body from infection, the skin itself is
constantly colonized with a variety of microorganisms, which include viruses,
bacteria, fungi, and protozoa (Oluwole et
al., 2013). The typical skin microbiota is usually mutualistic or
commensal; this means that the microbial population is beneficial or has no
effect on the human body (Grice et al.,
2008). However, there are instances where pathogenic microorganisms are present
and can cause infections. Damaged skin is most susceptible to infections from
these microbes. It is in the presence of pathogenic microorganisms that we see
the progression of skin infections, such as acne and dermatitis (Grice et al., 2008). The complex nature of
skin contributes to the microbial population present; these characteristics
include moisture, temperature, pH, sebum content, and hair follicles (Grice et al., 2008). In addition to skin
composition, there are several other factors that influence skin microbiota. These
factors are host demographics, host genetics, transmission of non-resident
microorganisms, environmental characteristics, and behavioral characteristics
(Fredricks, 2001).
1.1 AIM AND
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study is to evaluate the
microbial contamination of used weavon and hair tools of students within
Michael Okpara University
Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, while the specific objectives are;
·
To isolate microorganisms found on used weavon and hair tools of MOUAU
students.
·
To identify the isolated microorganisms from the used weavon and hair
tools
·
To determine the percentage occurrence of various isolate from the used
weavon and hair tools.
·
To determine the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the bacteria isolates.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment