FAMILY STRUCTURE AS CORRELATES OF IN-SCHOOL ADOLESCENT DELINQUENT BEHAVIOUR IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN RIVER STATE, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00006954

No of Pages: 154

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT


This study investigated the family structure as correlate of in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools in River State, Nigeria. The study was guided by six research objectives, as six research questions were posed for the study and five null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study adopted the Correlation Research Design. The population of the study was 17,345 Senior Secondary School II in-school adolescents which comprised 10,543 male in-school adolescents and 6802 female in-school adolescents across 187 senior secondary schools from the Twenty Three (23) Local Government Areas (L.G.As) of the three Education Zones that made up River State. The sample of the study was 400 respondents which comprised 187 Male adolescents and  213 female adolescents from 40 Senior Secondary Schools across Six (6) Local Government Areas (L.G.As) selected for the study. The Local Government Areas (L.G.As) were selected using the simple random sampling technique, as the schools and students were selected using the stratified random sampling techniques and simple random sampling techniques.  Two instruments which were the “Family Structure Questionnaire”(FSQ) and Adolescent Delinquent Behaviour Questionnaire”(ADBQ) were developed by the researcher for data collection. The two instruments were validated by three experts which comprised one from the Department of Agricultural Science/Home Science Education, one from Department of Educational Psychology and one from the department of Science Education (Educational Measurement and Evaluation). The internal consistency of the instruments were 0.83 and 0.78 respectively for the FSQ and ADBQ while the stability of the instruments were 0.75 and 0.86 for the FSQ and ADBQ  respectively. The data for the study was collected through the administration of 400 Copies of the “Family Structure Questionnaire”(FSQ) and Adolescent Delinquent Behaviour Questionnaire”(ADBQ). The research questions were answered using frequency, percentages, mean, standard deviation and Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMCC) and the Pvalue of Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMCC) was used to test the 5 null hypotheses at 0.05 level  of significance. Findings of the study revealed that there is a significant high positive correlation between the  nuclear family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviours, as there is a significant high positive correlation between the  extended family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviours, as significant moderate positive correlation  exists between the  single parent family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviours and significant moderate  positive correlation between the foster family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviours. Lastly, there is a significant moderate positive correlation between the polygamous family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviours.   Based on the findings of the study, the study recommended that young couples and youths who are not married yet  should be encouraged to adopt the nuclear family structure since it helps to prevent the adolescent from engaging in adolescent delinquent behaviour. Parents from extended family structure should also try as much as possible to have a close parental monitoring in other to prevent the youths from engaging in adolescent delinquent behaviour. Parents from foster family structure should ensure that the adopted adolescents be given adequate care attention that will discourage them from engaging in adolescent delinquent behaviour.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                              ii

Certification                                                                                                                            iii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                                v

Table of Contents                                                                                                                   vi

List of Tables                                                                                                                          ix

List of Figures                                                                                                                         x

Abstract                                                                                                                                  xi

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1    Background to the Study                                                                                                          1

 

1.2    Statement of the Problem                                                                                              11

 

1.3    Purpose of the Study                                                                                                     13

 

1.4    Research Questions                                                                                                        13

 

1.5    Hypotheses                                                                                                                    14

 

1.6    Significance of the Study                                                                                              15       

 

1.7    Scope of the Study                                                                                                        17

 

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1  Conceptual Framework                                                                                                 18

2.1.1        Concept of adolescence                                                                                              18

2.1.2        Concept of adolescent delinquent behaviours                                                                        21

2.1.3        Concept of family                                                                                                       23

2.1.4        Concept of family structures and adolescent behaviors                                             24

2.1.5        Concept of family structural  instability and adolescent behaviours                          32

2.1.6        Concept of socio-economic status of the family                                                        33

2.1.7        Concept of parenting styles and adolescent behaviours                                             35

2.1.8        Parental attitudes                                                                                                        40

2.1.9        Home environment and adolescent behaviour                                                            42

2.1.10    Parental educational background and adolescent behaviour                                      46                                           

2.2  Theoretical Framework                                                                                                  46

2.2.1        Psychoanalytic Theory By Freud, Erikson and Vvgostsky(1973)                              46

2.2.2        Freud Psychosexual Theory by Freud(1935)                                                              47

2.2.3        Erikson`s Psychosocial Theory by Erikson (1978)                                                      47

2.2.4        Ecological systems theory by bronfenbrenner (1987)                                     49

2.2.5        Applied Behaviour Analysis by Cooper, Heron and Heward(2007)                          52

2.2.6        Social Learning by Bandura(1977)                                                                             52

2.2.7        Functionalism theory by spencer, Durkeim, Parsons and Rosbert Merton(1988)      54

2.3 Review of Empirical studies                                                                                           59

2.4 Summary of Literature Review                                                                                     65

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODS

3.1     Design of the Study                                                                                                      68

3.2    Area of the Study                                                                                                          69

3.3    Population of the Study                                                                                                 70

3.4    Sample and Sampling Techniques                                                                                 70

3.5    Instrument for Data Collection                                                                                      72

3.6    Validation of the Instrument                                                                                         73

3.7    Reliability of the Instrument                                                                                          74

3.8    Method of Data Collection                                                                                            74

3.9    Method of Data Analysis                                                                                              75

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                                                77         

4.1       Summary of Major Findings                                                                                       88

4.2       Discussions of Findings                                                                                              88

 

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Summary                                                                                                                     94

5.2       Conclusions                                                                                                                 96

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                                      97

5.4       Educational Implications to the Study                                                                       98

5.5       Limitations of the Study                                                                                             99

5.6       Suggestions for further Study.                                                                                   100

           REFERENCES

            APPENDIXES

LIST OF TABLES

Table 4.1:

The frequencies and percentages of the various family structures the adolescents   belongs to

77

Table 4.2:

The Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the extent of   correlation between the nuclear family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

78

Table  4.3:  

The Pearson’s  Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the extent of  correlation between the extended family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

79

 

Table  4.4:   

The Pearson’s  Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the extent of  correlation between the Single family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

80

Table   4.5:

The Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the extent of  correlation between the foster family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

81

Table  4.6: 

The Pearson’s  Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the extent of  correlation between the polygamous family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

82

Table 4.7:

The Pearson’s  Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the significant correlation between the nuclear family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

83

Table 4.8:

The Pearson’s Product  Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the significant correlation between the extended family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers Stat

84

Table 4.9: 

The Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the significant correlation between the single parent family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

85

Table 4.10:

The Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the significant correlation between the foster family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

86

Table 4.11:

The Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showing the significant correlation between the polygamous family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in Rivers State

87

                                                                                   

 

 

 

 


 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1  BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

              The family is an institution that is saddled with the responsibility of raising individual in the society for the utmost development of the society. The family thus is an important social element in the society whose rapid socio-economic development will always be anchored on a sound and well mentally developed individual.  For  an  individual to be mentally, emotional and physically  sound  to significantly contribute to his or her society  for rapid socio economic development, that individual must have evolved through the different phases of  human development spanning through childhood to adolescence hood and finally to adulthood. However, one of the most important stages of these different phases of human  development is the adolescent stage of human development which is the period an individual takes action that make or mar his/her life.

The adolescent stage of human development has its own unique features/ characteristics and challenges   which   every individual must go through before getting to the adulthood. Some these unique features of the individuals and challenges at this stages of human development if not properly guided by the parent may lead to the individual getting involved in different social vices. Thus, the extent to which the individual exhibit the characteristics of the adolescent  and also cope with its peculiar challenges depends on the family structure patterns exhibited  at each individual  homes. The peculiar challenges associated with adolescent during the transformation stages may lead the adolescents to get involved in delinquent behaviors if not properly handled.   

Adolescence typically describes the years between ages 13 and 19 and can be considered the transitional stage from childhood to adulthood (Ederson,2004). However, the physical and psychological changes that occur in adolescence can start earlier, during the pre-teen or "tween" years (ages 9 through 12). Adolescence can also be a time of both disorientation and discovery. It is a more challenging period in the life of a child and the family, especially the parents. This transitional period can bring up issues of independence and self-identity. Many adolescents and their peers face tough choices regarding schoolwork, sexuality, drugs, alcohol, and social life. Peer groups, romantic interests, and appearance tend to naturally increase in importance for some time during a teen's journey toward adulthood (Ederson).

            The adolescent is usually confronted with the challenge of growing up within a set down codes of conduct – normally based on moral values – which may constantly clash with emerging desires for exploration. Evan and Broda (2005) observed that the innate characteristics of the adolescent invokes a desire for new things, hence there is a conflict between societal/family moral values and the adolescent’s exploratory aims. Because of the strong desire for exploration and independence which characterize this stage of human development, the adolescent is prone to the exhibition of different behavioural problems. While this stage is significant in the life of a child, it is also significant to note that certain variables such as the family structure in which a child is born and grows, the nature of the home and the internal and external environmental factors around the home influence the child’s developmental processes.

            The discourse on family  and child behaviour attracts great attention when it relates to adolescents. This is because adolescents are a sensitive group of people requiring careful upbringing. Adolescence is a stage in human development that is characterized by daunting challenges both for the adolescent and the older family members, especially parents or caregivers. It is the age of exploration. As adolescents are built into doing new things within their environment, they try to experiment almost everything at their disposal but require informed monitoring to keep them safe from harmful practices. Simone and Bert-Koops (2011) observed that achieving autonomy is one of the key normative psychosocial developmental issues of adolescence, and all perspectives on the development of autonomy emphasize the problematic outcomes that may follow from a lack of appropriate support for autonomy. Adolescent behaviour is usually a major concern to parents. Experimental and risk-taking behavior are part of identity and emotional development during adolescence (Kohnstamm &Kleine, 2009).

            Critical aspects of adolescent behaviours are experimentations with romantic and sexual relations, juvenile delinquency, truancy, school absenteeism, bullying, substance/drug abuse, cultism and internet crimes. For instance, whether or not an adolescent drinks and to what degree he or she drinks may be influenced by a complex array of factors including personal characteristics, family characteristics and interactions, the influence of peers, experience in school, religious attendance and beliefs, perceptions of the benefits and risks of alcohol consumption, and participation in other risky behaviors. While family is an essential component of the social context that shapes an adolescents’ behavior, extra-familial relationships that youth establish with other adults and with peers also have a significant influence on the likelihood of engaging in behaviors that are pro-social or carry some risk to overall well-being (Bearman and Brueckner, 2001; Ryan, 2000).

Poor management of the adolescent in school or the home at the adolescents stage will expose them to delinquent behaviors which is often associated with that stage of human development(Anda, Catalina, Oliver, Ciocani & Enach, 2014). The term delinquency refers to either something that is late in being done, such as making a late credit card payment, or to improper or criminal behavior. In a legal context, delinquency is most often used in reference to the disorderly or illegal actions engaged in by a youth. Delinquency is criminal behavior, or acts that do not conform to the moral or legal standards of society, carried out by a minor. According to  Younan, Tuvblad, Li, wu, Lurmann and Franklin (2016) adolescent delinquent behavior are activities which the adolescent engage in that have adverse effects on the overall development of the wellbeing of the youths or that might prevent them from future successes or developments. This behaviors can cause immediate physical injury(Fighting) as well as behavior with cumulative negative effects(substance use). Some of the most common delinquent behaviors for adolescents include substance use(cigarettes, alcohol, drugs); sexual behaviors (early sexual debut, sex with multiple partners, unprotected sex, teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases); Absentism; aggression and violence; and risky driving. These adolescent risky behaviors can affect the youth by disrupting their normal development or preventing them from participating in the typical experience for their age group.

Over the years in Nigeria the rate of adolescents  involvement in adolescent delinquent behavior such as truancy, smoking, drug abuses, risky sexual behaviors  and excessive alcoholism is increasing at an alarming rate, as more adolescents are now involved in these activities . Today the rate of alcohol intake, truancy, holigalism  e.t.c by the adolescent in Nigerian secondary schools with special case of River state has increased tremendously, this was evident  as Chukwu (2019) reported that alcoholism and truancy  has its onset  during  adolescence for many individuals and tends to increase  and reach its peak between late adolescence  and young adulthood. Also the rate at which the young  adolescent  involve in smoking of  ciggarate and use of marijuana has increased tremendously, as the adolescent are not mindful of the damaging health consequences of smoking and drug abuses. On the bases of these, Chukwu reported that currently 53% of the high school students currently smokes.  In a similar vein the rate at which the adolescents in Nigeria with special case of River state get involved in delinquent behavior is increasing at an alarming rate, as these  delinquent behavior has led to serious waywardness, health damage and contraction of sexually transmitted diseases. To these extent, Okorodudu (2011) and Onyehalu (2003) in separate studies reported that delinquent seems to peak during the adolescent stage as a result of curiosity of the adolescent to be at par with contemporary behavior of their peer. 

The alarming rate at which the adolescent involve in  delinquent  behaviors in Rivers State could be attributed  to its relationship with the parent-child relationship patterns,  adolescents home environment and family structures.  To this  extent Otuadah, (2016) found out that environmental factors such  peer groups and family background significantly correlates adolescent involvement in delinquent  behaviors,  as  Younan Tuvblad, Li, Wu, Lurmann and Franklin, (2016)  also revealed that deviant peer and harsh parenting significantly  correlates adolescent delinquent behaviors.  Since these variables such as peer groups, family background, harsh parenting have been studied in relation to adolescent risky behaviors and the alarming rate of adolescent involvement in delinquent behaviors still persist, it therefore become necessary to investigate the extent of relationship that exists between the  family structure and in-school the adolescent delinquent behavior in secondary schools. 

            The home is the habitation of members of the family. It is characterized by various family variables such as the family structure, educational attainment of the inhabitants, parent-child interactions, social and economic status of members. Children grow up in many different home backgrounds, and for adolescents, the nature of the family in which they live is usually the ‘normal family’ until they begin to mix up with the larger society. It is important to understand the many structures of the family and to realize that different families may have quite different issues, needs, strengths and values which act as correlates of adolescent behaviours.

            Family structures affects  a child’s upbringing, and consequently influence negative and positive behaviours among adolescents who are caught between youthful exuberance and moral obligations to family and society. The definition of family structure can be peculiar to particular societies in which a family is located. For example, the types of family available in countries of the western hemisphere may differ from those in Africa. However, family structure can summarily be defined as the composition, nature or arrangement of the members that make up a family. Greg and Thompson (2004) defined family structure as the combination of relatives that comprise a family in a home. Classification on this variable considers the presence or absence of: legally married spouses or common law partners; children; and, in the case of economic families, other relatives. This definition is essential and strategically relevant to the present study in that, it takes into cognizance, the classification of family structures which are peculiar to a typical African and in particular, Nigerian society.

            Though a lot of classifications of family structures exist such as nuclear families, extended families, single-parent families, reconstituted families and childless families, polygamy, transnational families, migrant families, foster families, co-custody families, bi-racial or multi-racial families and adoptive families (York, 2005; Ikuku, 2007; Barron and Tipa, 2004). This study adopted five typical families that are quite peculiar or common to Nigeria, and River State in particularthe nuclear families, extended families, single-parent families, the foster families and polygamous families. Each of these family structures has significant roles  it plays in shaping the behaviours of adolescents within the home.

            The nuclear family is one of the traditional families within the Nigerian social and family system. It is a family consisting of a married man and woman, and their biological child or children. This family form is the one most reinforced in the dominant society. Children born in the nuclear family have direct impact and influence first from their biological parents, and can face varying challenges as they grow into adults. This type of family can be a vital and ideal environment for child upbringing as long as there is love, time spent with children, emotional support; low stress and a constant and reliable economic atmosphere, as well as adequate education of the parents. This type of family can also be strained by certain variables such as the absence of love and peace between parents, poor time with children, and lack of emotional support, high stress circumstances and a harsh economic circumstance (Glick, 2009). Thus youths from this type of family are give adequate parental monitoring which makes them not to be  involved in delinquent behaviours. Findings from Halpern-Meekin and Tach (2008) revealed that the most  children from the nuclear family are usually exhibit low level of delinquent. It is on these bases, the present study sought to determine the extent to which the nuclear family structure correlates the  adolescent delinquent behavior.

            The extended family is  another type of family structure the present study explored its relationship with adolescent delinquent behaviour. The extended family is composed of the father, mother, and other relatives, either related by blood, or some cases, within the same ‘kindred’. The extended family is very significant in the construction of the African family system, and in the upbringing of a child (Bade & Ikuku, 2009). In Nigeria, it is highly revered and much importance is attached to it, especially with regards to a communal living idea, based on the principle of common brotherhood. The idea of a child’s upbringing ‘is the responsibility of all’ is most observed within the extended family structure. It is a family where grandparents or aunts and uncles play major roles in the children’s upbringing(Ikuku, 2007). This may or may not include those relatives living with the children. However, relationships (Positive or negative ) do exists may exists between the extended family structure and delinquent behaviours. Based on this, findings from Frantz Sixaba and Smith (2015) revealed that there is a strong positive relationship between the extended family structure and adolescent risk behaviors and delinquency. These they are affirmed that children who live with relations, grandparents, aunts and uncle are very vulnerable to be involved in delinquent behaviors. It is on these bases, the present study sought to determine the extent extended family structure correlates the adolescent delinquent behavior.

The single-parent family structure is essential in describing the upbringing and behaviour of adolescents. This type of family structure can be either a father or a mother who is singly responsible for the raising of a child (Glick, 2009). The child can be by birth or adoption. They may be a single parent by choice or by life circumstances. The other parent may have been part of the family at one time or not at all. This family system impacts significantly on the development of the adolescent due to the absence of one parent. Factors such as stress resulting from pressure on family income, parenting challenges other family resources combine to determine the influence of the single-parent family on the behaviour of the adolescent(Ryan, 2000). Findings from Brown (2008) revealed that significant positive relationship exists between single parent (father or mother parenting) and adolescent delinquent behaviour.  Brown went further to state that the single parents hardly have time like the double parents in taking care of their children which makes the children to be vulnerable to indulge in adolescent delinquent behavior. It is on these bases, the present study sought to determine the extent single family structure correlates adolescent delinquent behavior.

Foster family structure is the system in which a child is located in a family other than that of his/her biological parents. It is a family where one or more of the children is legally a temporary member of the household (Olugbenga, 2007). This temporary period may be as short as a few days or as long as the child’s entire childhood. Kinship care families are foster families where there is a legal arrangement for the child to be cared for by relatives of one of the parents (Ikuku, 2007). In this family, which can be a single-parent family, a nuclear or extended family, as well as a childless family, the attention is on the foster child whose upbringing depends on the foster parents. In Nigeria, as in many other African countries, the foster family structure is usually poorly conceptualized, as what is evident is children who are in the care of other parents, who may be related in several ways, hence this influences their adolescent delinquent behaviour. These children face many behavioural and upbringing challenges (Glick, 2009). Meanwhile findings of Ryan(2008)  showed that children who do not live with their biological parents tends to indulge in adolescent delinquent  behaviour as the children will do so for fear of anxiety. To this extent he asserts that there is a strong significant correlation between foster family and adolescent delinquent behaviour.

Polygamy represents expanded family structures that are based on marriages involving a husband with 2 or more wives(Goodwin, 2009). Interestingly, polygamy is legally and widely practiced in many societies across the globe. In the last 2 decades, polygamy has been the focus of a significant growth in public, political, and academic awareness and how it affects child upbringing. Indeed, several quantitative and qualitative research articles and theoretical papers have emerged during this period, particularly concerning the effects of this form of marital structure on behavioral, emotional, and academic adjustment of children. However, to date, no researcher has provided a summary of the extant literature. Thus, this study will summarize findings and discuss implications of empirical studies that have examined whether polygamous marital structures are beneficial or harmful or influences adolescent delinquent behaviours in comparison with children raised in monogamous marital structures. To this extent findings  of Al-Sharfi, Pfeffer &  Miller(2015)  showed that the Polygamous family structure influences adolescent delinquent behavior. Also differences were found between young people from polygynous and monogamous families on a range of social problems such as delinquent behavior differs significantly.

            The relationship between family structure and child upbringing, particularly adolescent behaviour, is a subject of concern to researchers and policy makers alike in the field of human development. Various researches have indicated the relationship between the kind of family a child is born into and the nature of upbringing that is available to such child (Akanbi, Gbadebo, Adekola, Olawole-Isaac, Sowunmi and Godwin, 2015; Acock and Demo, 2004). For example, the family composition has been theorized to have several benefits for children. For example, children have easy access to biological parents, higher parental involvement, more enjoyable parent-child relationship, rare cases of disagreements between children and parents among the in-tact families (Acock and Demo, 2004).The family system is no longer characterized by the traditional two-parent structure due to increasing numbers of single parent household. However, it has been observed that some of the effects of changes in family system may be negative or positive on the development of the adolescent (Glick, 2009).

 Rivers state is also characterized by family structures which include single-parenthood, informal foster system, polygamy. Hence, understanding the structure of the family a child grows in, and the relationship that exist between the different family structures  and  adolescent delinquent behaviour can be significant to finding solutions to address the problem. A study of this magnitude, which examined the extent of relationship between the family structure and adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools Rivers State becomes of utmost importance.


1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

            The adolescent is both a fragile specie and a great prospect to any society if properly groomed and managed. Because of the fragility of the age of adolescence, the adolescent is susceptible to engaging in harmful behaviours which can be injurious to self and the society at large. In the present time, it is common to find young people within the ages of 13 and 20 being involved in certain practices that have become social menaces. In Rivers state for example, most crimes such as drug abuse, thuggery, rapes, cultism, sexual immorality, street hooliganism, school absenteeism which have created some social apprehension are rampant among youths within adolescent ages. It is a common phenomenon to find adolescents who indulge in negative behaviours such as street fights, stealing, alcoholism, truancy, school absenteeism, bullying and even armed robbery. Exposure to hard drugs by younger persons of school age remained a major concern for family members and the larger society. While alcohol use is a significant public health problem many adolescents have been found to be involved in drinking. Secondary school students drink alcohol and engaged in binge drinking (a short period of excessive drinking); some who have access to driving also drive after drinking.

            These behaviours pose immediate risks for adolescents including injuries, accidents, physical and sexual assault, and risky sexual and social behavioras well as long term risks including poor academic performance, physical health problems, changes in brain development, dependency and abuse of other substances. Increased risk for suicide and homicide, and an increased likelihood of alcohol and drug use disorders in adulthood. Negative behaviours by adolescents do not only affect the growth, and even lasting implications for later development for the adolescent, but also is a major concern for families and the society.

It was in view of these that  the present study  sought to investigate through empirical evidences to provide  answers to questions such as;To what extent do the different family structures such as nuclear, extended, single-parent, foster and polygamous  correlates the in-school adolescent delinquent behaviours in secondary schools in Rivers State?

 

1.3 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

            The purpose of this study was to examine the extent family structure correlates in-school adolescent’s delinquent behaviours in secondary schools inRivers state of Nigeria. Specifically, the study sought to

        i.            identify the various family structures the in-school adolescent belongs to Rivers state;

      ii.            determine the extent nuclear family structure correlates  in-school adolescent delinquent behaviours in secondary schools.

    iii.            find out  the extent extended family structure correlates in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools.

    iv.            determine the extent  single-parent family structure correlates in-school adolescent delinquent behaviours in secondary schools.

      v.            determine the extent foster family structure correlates the in-school adolescents delinquent behaviours in secondary schools.

    vi.            find out the extent  polygamous family structure correlates the in-school adolescent delinquent behavior in secondary schools.


1.4RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions were posed for the study

1.      What are the various family structures the in-school adolescents belong to in Rivers State?

2.      To what extent does the nuclear family structure correlates in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools in Rivers State?

3.      To what extent does the extended family structure correlates in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools Rivers State?

4.      To what extent does the single-parent family structure correlates in-school  adolescent delinquent behaviours  in secondary schools Rivers state?

5.      To what extent does the foster family structure correlates in-school adolescents’ delinquent behaviours in secondary schools Rivers state?

6.      To what extent does polygamy family structure correlates  in-school  adolescent delinquent behaviour in  secondary schools Rivers state?


1.5 HYPOTHESES

The following null (H0) hypotheses were tested  at 0.05 level of significance.

1.      There is no significant correlation between the nuclear family structure and in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools Rivers State.

2.      There is no significant difference between the extended family structure and in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools Rivers State.

3.      There is no significant difference between the single parent family structure and in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools Rivers State.

4.      There is no significant correlation between the foster family structure and in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools Rivers State.

5.      There is no significant correlation between the polygamous family structure and in-school adolescent delinquent behaviour in secondary schools in Rivers State.

 

1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

            The following are those who may benefit from the findings of this study; they are the families, the society, the adolescent, policy makers and intending researcher.

            The families may not understand the predictors of adolescent wellbeing and behaviour, hence may not be able to manage adolescent outcomes. The findings of this study will provide insights to the world of adolescence - the experiences, determinants of adolescent behaviours, and the impact of the different family structures on the development of the adolescent. The findings will reveal whether significant positive or negative  correlation exists between the  different family structures(nuclear, extended, single parents, foster and polygamous) and adolescent delinquent behaviours. Also, because many adult family members, especially parents, may not understand how adolescents function and react which may lead to negative adolescent outcomes  such as delinquent behaviours. This study will provide information on the varying degrees of challenges that adolescents face. Hence, it will help parents, would-be parents, guardians and other adolescent caregivers to understand the family structures significantly correlates on the delinquent behaviour of the adolescent. These benefit the families will get through religious and other socio-cultural group meetings, seminars organized for families, campaigns, and workshops.

            The society is usually a direct and indirect influence on the family and the adolescent, and vice versa. The findings of the study may benefit the society as it will avail them on the best family structure(s) to adopt which has a significant positive correlation onthe adolescent delinquent behaviour. This is because the society has a role to play in constantly influencing the families structures which  influences adolescent delinquent behaviours. These the society may  benefit from the findings of this study in their responsibility to make the society a better place, through helping families with essential information on proper child upbringing, adolescent behaviours and family structures, with regards to rural and urban dwellers. Through seminars and workshops by relevant agencies such as civil society organizations, non-governmental organizations, the media, the findings of this study will benefit the members of the society. 

            The adolescent is a direct beneficiary of the findings of this study. The findings of the study will make them to be aware of the different family structure the adolescents belongs to and how these family structures  correlates  their adolescent delinquent behaviours. Thus delinquent behaviours exhibited by adolescents such as truancy, school absenteeism, substance abuse, sexual immorality, cultism, bullying, violence, etc have grave effects on the development of the adolescent. Also, many adolescents – urban and rural – lack knowledge of the implications of some of their actions, especially as research has indicated that many families fail in their responsibilities  in ensuring normal adolescent development devoid of deliquency, albeit as a result of circumstances which may overwhelm them. Hence, when communicated to them, the adolescent may understand the implications of these behaviours, and in turn, learn to function positively in any family structure they find themselves. More so, adolescents whose parents or would-be parents have access to the findings of the study through seminars, workshops by churches, media groups etc, may be extricated from the impacts of negative behaviours resulting from particular family structures and failure in parenting. 

To the policy makers the study will be of immense benefit as the findings of the study will reveal to them the different family structures the adolescents belong to and also reveal the relationship that has existed between the different family structure and the adolescent delinquent behaviours, as the findings will also help policy makers to implement the recommendations of the study in bid to  encourage the family structures that correlate positively with the adolescent delinquent behaviour  in a bid to minimise adolescent delinquent behaviours. These they will benefit through revealing the findings and recommendations of the study at different sensitization campaigns, media publicities and awareness programmes on the influence of the parent child relationship patterns on the risky adolescent behaviours.

The findings will also be of immense significance to intending researchers who will carry out studies similar to this study, as it will provide them with adequate reference materials for their study and an adequate justification for further study. It will also availed them adequate opportunity to appraise and constructively criticize the study with a view to finding gaps which their own study will fill up. These they will benefit through by getting first hand information of the research work or through publication of the research work.


1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

            The study was delimited to examining the extent family structure correlates adolescent’s delinquent behaviours in Rivers State of Nigeria. The study identified the different family structures adolescents belong to and determine how the various family structures such as the nuclear family, extended family, single-parent family, polygamy, foster family correlates the adolescent delinquent behaviours. The study was also delimited to the in-school adolescent from the three education zones of Rivers State. Lastly, the study was delimited to senior secondary in-school adolescents in Rivers State, Nigeria.

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment