ABSTRACT
Lots of wastes are being generated on daily basis and recently, more emphasis is being laid on waste recycling. To verify the hypothesis of study, which stated that organic wastes, irrespective of the source, will enhance the soil properties and yield of groundnut. A pot trial was conducted at the experimental field of College of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Abia-state. The objectives of the study were to investigate the effect of organic wastes on soil properties, potassium forms, yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and also the best rate of application of the most outstanding treatment among the treatments studied. The treatments comprised of composted goat manure (CGM), composted kitchen residue waste (CKRW), biochar (B), composted goat manure + composted kitchen residue waste (CGM + CKRW),composted goat manure + biochar (CGM +B),composted kitchen residue waste + biochar (CKRW + B) and composted goat manure + composted kitchen residue waste + biochar (CGM + CKRW + B) and the control (no treatment). The treatments were applied at 4tons/ha in the first experiment and 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 tons/ha of CGM + CKRW + B in the second experiment. The treatments were replicated three times in Completely Randomized Design (CRD). The soil for the experiment was collected from Amaoba in Bende Local government area and the test crop was groundnut (Arachis hypogea) Samnut 23. Pre and post treatment soil analyses were carried out and the following soil properties were determined; Soil pH (water), exchangeable acidity, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, organic carbon, exchangeable calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium and different forms of K using standard laboratory procedures. Plant parameters measured included plant height, number of leaves, stem girth at 2, 3 ,4 and 5 weeks after planting (WAP) while number of root branching, root length, number of nodules, number of pods and pod weights were measured at harvest; N, P, K, Mg and Ca uptake of the plant were also calculated. The results obtained showed that CGM + CKRW+ B increased the soil pH in water from 5.7 before treatment application to 6.4 after planting in the first experiment while CGM + CKRW+B applied at 6t kg-1 significantly (P≤0.05) increased the soil pH in water with a value of 5.80 in the second experiment. Available P was significantly increased (P≤0.05) from a value of 23.7mgkg-1 before treatment application to 47.00mgkg-1 ,while exchangeable Ca was increased from initial value of 2.10cmolkg-1 to 4.67cmolkg-1 by CGM+ CKRW +B at the end of the first experiment. Biochar recorded a highest significant (P≤0.05) increase of water soluble K over the other treatments with a value of 0.22cmolkg-1 while CGM+CKRW significantly (p≤0.05) increased the total K with a value of 0.35cmolkg-1 over the other treatments. CGM+CKRW+B increased plant height at 5WAP, N and P uptake of groundnut with values of 0.19mg/g, 0.08mg/g and 0.67mg/g respectively in the first experiment. Application of 4tons/ha of CGM+ CKRW+B gave the highest significant (P≤0.05) value for plant height at 5WAP and dry matter yield over the other rates with values of 23.00cm and 7.4g respectively at the end of the second experiment. From the results obtained in the present study, it will be inferred that composted goat manure (CGM) enhanced or fortified with composted kitchen ash /waste (CKRW) and biochar (B) applied at 4tha-1 significantly improved the productivity of the soil and yield of groundnut in the study area. However a field trial is recommended to ascertain the results.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
References………………………………………………………………………
|
82
|
|
Appendix 1: Preparation of composted goat
manure (CGM)……………………
|
102
|
|
Appendix 2: Preparation of composted
kitchen residue waste (CKRW)………
|
103
|
|
Appendix 3: Laid out of the pot
experiment……………………………………..
|
104
|
|
Appendix 4: Harvesting of the groundnut
pods …………………………………
|
105
|
|
Appendix 5: Laid out of the pot experiment
…………………………………
|
106
|
|
LIST
OF TABLES
|
|
3.1
|
The chemical composition of the
treatments……………………………………..
|
36
|
4.1
|
Soil physical and chemical properties before
treatment application……………..
|
42
|
4.2
|
Effect
of treatments on soil chemical properties after crop harvest in
experiment
one…………………………………………………………………..
|
44
|
4.3
|
Effect
of treatments on nutrient uptake of groundnut after crop harvest in
experiment one…………………………………………………………………...
|
48
|
4.4
|
Effect
of treatments on different forms of Potassium after crop harvest in
experiment one…………………………………………………………………...
|
63
|
4.5
|
Effect
of rates of CGM + CKRW + B on soil chemical properties after crop
harvest in experiment two………………………………………………………..
|
67
|
4.6
|
Correlation
between some soil chemical properties and different forms of
Potassium………………………………………………………………………...
|
77
|
|
List
of Figures
|
|
4.1
|
Effect of
Treatments on Plant Height (cm) at Weeks After Planting in
Experiment Two………………………………………………………………….
|
50
|
4.2
|
Effect of Treatments on
Number of Leaves at Weeks After Planting in
Experiment Two………………………………………………………………….
|
52
|
4.3
|
Effect of Treatments on Stem Girth (cm) at
Weeks After Planting in
Experiment Two………………………………………………………………….
|
54
|
4.4
|
Effect of Treatments on Number of Flowers after
Planting in Experiment Two...
|
55
|
4.5
|
Effect of Treatments on Number of Roots after Crop
Harvest in Experiment Two……………………………………………………………………………….
|
56
|
4.6
|
Effect of Treatments on Number of Root
Nodules after Crop Harvest in
Experiment Two………………………………………………………………….
|
57
|
4.7
|
Effects of Treatments on Root Length after Crop Harvest in Experiment Two…
|
58
|
4.8
|
Effect of Treatments on Dry Matter Yield (g)
after Crop Harvest in Experiment Two………………………………………………………………….
|
5
|
4.9
|
Effect of Treatments on Number of Seeds after Crop Harvest in Experiment
Two……………………………………………………………………………….
|
60
|
4.10
|
Effect of Treatments on Seed Weights (g) after Crop
Harvest in Experiment Two……………………………………………………………………………….
|
61
|
4.11
|
Effect of Rates of CGM + CKRW + B on Number
of Leaves at Weekly intervals after Planting in Experiment
Two…………………………………………………...
|
68
|
4.12
|
Effect of Rates of CGM + CKRW + B on Plant Height
at Weekly intervals after Planting in Experiment Two…………………………………………
|
69
|
4.13
|
Effect of Rates of CGM + CKRW + B on Number of Pods
after Crop Harvest in Experiment Two……………………………………………………………...
|
70
|
4.14
|
Effect of Rates of CGM + CKRW + B on Pod Weights
(g) after Crop Harvest in Experiment Two……………………………………………………………...
|
71
|
4.15
|
Effect of Rates of CGM + CKRW + B on Root
Length after Crop Harvest in
Experiment Two……………………………………………………………….
|
72
|
4.16
|
Effect of Rates of CGM + CKRW + B on Number of
Roots after Crop Harvest in Experiment Two……………………………………………………………..
|
73
|
4.17
|
Effect of Rates of CGM + CKRW + B on Number
of Root Nodules after Crop
Harvest in Experiment Two…………………………………………………….
|
74
|
4.18
|
Effect of Rates of CGM + CKRW+ B on Dry Matter
Yield after Crop Harvest in Experiment
Two……………………………………………………………..
|
75
|
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Soil degradation is increasing
worldwide, especially in countries within the Tropics (Ballayan, 2000). Widespread soil degradation has become a serious threat that is
facing the world including the resource – poor farmers in the Southeast of
Nigeria (Osabuomen and Okogie, 2011). Soil
degradation is taking place at a much faster rate, than it is needed for the
soil to recover and regenerate (Osabuomen and Okogie, 2011; and NCF, 2003).
By definition, soil degradation is the decline in soil inherent capacity
to produce economic crops and perform ecologic functions (Lal, 1993). It is the result of depletive human
activities and the interaction of these activities with natural environment
that causes vital damage to the productive capacity of the soil. The three principal types of soil
degradation are physical, chemical and biological (Lal and Stewart, 1990).
Mismanagement of forests, farms and range
lands cause wide spread degradation of soil quality by erosion that removes the
top soil gradually over time (Shubhrata, 2004).
Other causes of degradation include continuous
cropping on the same piece of land
without a period of fallow; continuous cropping with persistent use of
fertilizers which increases soil acidity (Ojeniyi, 2000). Soil acidity is a
form of chemical land degradation (Nwachukwu and Onwuka, 2011) and this result
in low crop yields. When the soil degrades, nutrient depletion occurs either by the means of crop
uptake or leaching. One of the nutrients that are depleted in the soil is potassium
(Yadvinder et al., 2005). The
intensity of cropping, leaching and introduction of high yielding varieties in
various cropping systems have resulted in considerable drain of soil potassium
reserves (Moshen, 2007; Yadvinder et al.,
2005).
Potassium (K) which is a major
constituent in all living cells is required in large amounts by plants, animals
and humans (Hamdallah, 2004). This is because it plays a major role in plant
nutrition and physiology. The uptake of potassium by plants is frequently
greater than that of nitrogen and phosphorus (Amoakwah and Frimpong, 2013).
Potassium (K) promotes photosynthesis,
controls stomata openings, improves nitrogen utilization, promotes assimilate
and transport of nutrients to increase crop yields. It also influences the
microbial population in the rhizosphere, and plays a key role in the nutrition and
health of man and livestock (Lauchli and Pfluger, 1979; Romheld and Neuman,
2006).
Soil potassium originates from the
disintegration and decomposition of rocks containing potassium bearing
minerals. It occurs in the soil in three
forms: readily available, slowly available and difficulty available or relatively
unavailable K (Udo et
al., 2009). The readily available potassium (K), which constitutes only
1-2% of total potassium, is potassium in soluble and exchangeable forms. The
slowly available form is potassium fixed in biotite mica, illite and
vermiculite. It forms about 2-10% of
total K in mineral soils. The difficulty available or relatively unavailable
potassium (K) constitutes about 95-98% of total potassium (K) and it is the
potassium (K) in primary minerals such as orthoclase, feldspar and muscovite
mica (Udo et al., 2009).
To overcome this problem of soil
degradation and diminishing potassium that has been lost due to crop removal
and leaching, farmers use inorganic fertilizers to replenish potassium (K) in
the soils. Farmers in the recent times have resorted to the use of fertilizer
alternatives due to the increase in fertilizers prices, unavailable and misuse,
which usually led to nutrient imbalance and low crop yields (Morris et al., 2007). These alternatives are
usually organic materials such as agricultural and industrial wastes of which
productions are on the increase in the recent times (Aditya et al., 2013). The use of these
materials as alternative soil amendment is not just an age long practice, but a
good method of wastes disposal which when left, constitutes a nuisance and
health problems to humans. These wastes can be converted into materials such as
compost which is a means of adding value to animal manure and other organic
materials.
Compost can be defined as an organic
multi -fertilizer (Amlinger et al.,
2007), its nutrient content as well as other important chemical properties like
C/N ratio, pH and electrical conductivity (EC) depend on the used of organic
feedstocks and compost processing conditions. Compost contains substantial
portion of total nitrogen in the organic form, and it is also a source of other
macro nutrient such as phosphorus, that may contribute to high yield (Hornick et al., 1984).
Compost not only supplies
nutrients for crop production, but it is also a good source of organic matter.
Soil organic matter is generally known to be among the most important factors
affecting soil fertility, crop production and land protection from
contamination, degradation and erosion (Chen and Avnimelch, 1986, Soane, 1990;
Wilson, 1991; Piccolo, 1996). Lots of wastes can be used to produce compost;
these include farm yard manure, crop residues, agricultural wastes and domestic
wastes with kitchen wastes as example.
Kitchen residue or waste is defined
as left over organic materials from restaurants, hotels and households (Li et al., 2009). Kitchen waste is a
nutrient rich stuff containing high levels of carbohydrates, lipids, proteins
and other organic molecules which can support high populations of
microorganisms (Wang et al., 2009).
Goat manure, which is a
part of farm yard manure, is also needed as a feedstock for compost and the
dung can also be used directly as a soil amendment. Goat manure is an efficient
source of N, P, K, Ca and Mg nutrients for the soil (Awodun et al., 2007; Odedina et al., 2011; Nweke et al., 2013). The application of goat manure increased crop
growth, yield and also improves the ability of plants to tolerate stressful
conditions (Maerere et al., 2001; Awodun et al., 2007; Akanni and Ojeniyi, 2008). The use of goat manure on
crops has been widely reported to increase dry matter production, improve soil
fertility, microbiological activity and water holding capacity as well as a
substitute for part of NPK fertilizer (Duarsa et al., 1996).
Biochar is another way of
adding value to organic materials but this has not being fully exploited in the
Southeast Nigeria as one of the agents of soil fertility restoration. Biochar
is pyrolzed biomass at relatively low temperature (< 7000C) under
conditions of absence or limited supply of oxygen (Bridgewater, 2003). It is
used as a soil amendment (Sohi et al.,
2010) and its application to soil
increases soil fertility, improves crop yield, elevates soil pH, available
phosphorus and exchangeable basic cations (Lehmann et al., 2003). However, Lori and Stanley,
(2013) reported that biochar; due to the pyrolysis method of production does
not increase the nitrogen content of the soil. This is because most of the
nitrogen is lost when heat is applied during the production of biochar.
When these amendments are
added to the soil, they release nutrients which increase crop yields.
Increasing crop yields like groundnut will not only enhance the farmer’s income
but will also enrich the soil nitrogen since it is a leguminous crop.
Groundnut is an annual crop, which
enriches the soil. It is a good source of protein and edible oil for humans as
well as a nutritive feed supplement (as protein cake) for livestock
(Goldsworthy and Fisher, 1987). The consumption of groundnuts in Nigeria in the
recent time has increased because it is a cheap source of protein that can be
easily affordable.
There is a gap in documentation of
the use of biochar, composted goat manure and composted kitchen waste as soil amendment,
to increase the yield of groundnut (Arachis
hypogeae) and effects on forms of potassium in the study area.
It is against this back drop that the
present study was initiated, with the hypothesis that: incorporation of organic
wastes, irrespective of the source, will enhance the soil properties and yield
of groundnut. The broad objective of
the work is to determine the effect of organic wastes on soil properties and
yield of groundnut. The specific objectives are to:
1. Determine
the effect of the treatments on soil chemical properties
2. Ascertain
the effect of the treatments on forms of potassium
3. Evaluate
the effect of the treatments on growth and yield of groundnut.
4. Determine
the effect of the treatments on N, P, and K uptake in groundnut.
5. Determine
the optimal rate of application of the best treatment.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment