ABSTRACT
This study examined the impact of workers’
participation in management decisions on workers’ work attitude, a study of
UBA, Lagos. After going through relevant literature, some objectives were
formulated; some of these are: to discuss the
significant relationship existing between democratic work setting and workers’
commitment; to determine the significant relationship existing between good
labour-management relations and workers’ motivation; to examine the significant
relationship existing between workers’ work involvement and workers’ performance and to evaluate
the significant relationship existing between collective responsibility and
organizational harmony. To
address these objectives the research design was a sample survey, the
population of this study consists of members of staff of UBA Plc Marina Lagos
while the sample size was 106 with 85 responding to the questionnaire. Data
were collected using a structured questionnaire and analysed using frequency
Tables and Percentages. The findings are:
democratic work setting influences workers’ commitment; workers’ participation
fosters responsibility and flexibility; workers’ participation
encourages team spirit and that workers’ participation
facilitates excellent workers’ performance. The researcher has recommended that
the management of UBA Plc should promote democratic work setting that
positively influences workers’ commitment and that the management UBA Plc
should consciously and consistently build good labour-management
relationship in their policies, practices and principles.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGES
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgements iv
Abstract v
Table of Contents vi
CHAPTER
ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the Study 1
1.2
Statement of the Problem 2
1.3
Aim
and Objectives of the Study 3
1.4
Relevant
Research Questions 4
1.5
Relevant
Research Hypotheses 4
1.6
Significance
of the Study 5
1.7
Scope
of the Study 5
1.8
Definition of Terms 5
CHAPTER
TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Preamble
7
2.2 Theoretical
Framework of the Study 7
2.3 Empirical Review of Previous Work in the
Area of Studies 8
References 27
CHAPTER
THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Preamble 29
3.2 Research Design 29
3.3 Population of the Study 29
3.4 Sampling Procedure and Sample Size 29
3.5 Data Collection, Instrument and
Validation 29
3.6 Methods of Data Analysis 30
References 31
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
4.1 Preamble 32
4.2 Analysis
of Data 32
4.3 Test
of Hypothesis 38
4.4 Discussion
of Findings 44
CHAPTER
FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary 44
5.2 Conclusion 45
5.3 Recommendations 45
Bibliography
47
Appendix 50
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
The
human resources are the life blood of any organisation because they
meaningfully contribute to the efficient utilization of all other resources of
the organization (Fagbohungbe and Longe 2009).
As a matter of fact, all other organizational resources are likely going
to remain worthless, useless and of no significance without the indispensable
contributions of the workers who direct all efforts and resources in the right
direction in the interest of the organization.
Kuye
(2008) opines that the implementation of organizational policies do suffer a
lot of set-backs in an organization where the workers are not carried along in
the decision making process. Adeoye
(2012) is of the view that the organization that completely ignores workers
contributions from the decisions making processes is likely going to be
disconnected from its mission and vision statements because two good heads are
always better than one. Of course, workers’
participation in management decision making is necessary if the organization
expects creative and constructive ideas/thinking from the workers (Banjoko,
2006).
Adeoye
(2012) claims that the good plans of the organization will likely walk and
wallow into unimaginable failure because workers tend to frustrate management
policies when they are not permitted to contribute their quota to management
decisions making. Again, the management
of an organization are likely going to make hasty or rigid decisions if workers
on whom these decisions will have impacts are not allowed to make their
contributions in management decision making processes (Fagbohungbe and Longe,
2009). Diversity brings varied
knowledge, abilities, approaches and viewpoints that tend to add value to the
decision made (Fajana, 2006). Of course,
organizational growth, employees’ motivation, workers’ commitment, workers’
loyalty are some of the objectives of every organization, but, the organization
will be far away from all these objectives if organization ignores the workforce
when it comes to making decisions (Banjoko, 2010). There is usually a need for workers to be
permitted to participate in management decisions so that they will not remain
in the dark over issues that will have impact on their direction, destiny and
destination (Adebakin, et al 2012)
Of
course, the prosperity, progress and peace that any organization enjoys through
employees’ participation in management decision are unimaginable because in
unity the organization stands (Adebakin, et al 2012). It is
true that every organization wishes that every worker is glued to the
aspirations of the organisation and equally contribute meaningfully to the
realization of the organization objectives, but, it an indisputable fact that
only organizations that allow workers to take part in management decisions will
enjoy an uninterrupted commitment of these workers (Obisi, 2010). It is true that the management and workers in
an organization will frequently engage into industrial conflict and always see
the negative side of almost everything within the organization is employees’
participation in management decisions is not given a chance.
1.2 Statement
of the Problem
In
a centralized organization, employees are not allowed to participate in
decision making. This is because it is feared that they are not competent and
as a result will not contribute meaningfully in decision of the organization.
There has been a lot of controversy as to whether employees should participate
in management decision making or not. Some writers argued that employees should
contribute in making decision more especially where it affects them or their
jobs. Other views are of the opinion that employees should be seen as human
beings with social and economic needs and as such be allowed to participate in
managerial decision making because it is expected that such participation will
serve as training and testing ground for future members of upper management. It
is rather worrisome that despite the benefits of employees’ participation in
management decisions, some organizations vehemently kick against employees’
participation in management decisions believing that the calibre of the persons
at the managerial levels in the organization who direct the affairs of the
organization are embodiments of knowledge, but they forget that there is
limitation to human knowledge.
There are other views that even view the
workforce as the machine who should only be paid for services rendered and not
to be permitted to meddle into management decisions because it is the sole duty
of the management of the organization to think for the workers and not the
other way round. What an illusion! This study will therefore examine the impact
of employees’ participation on organizational productivity and equally proffer
solutions and recommendations to problems identified in this study.
1.3 Aim and Objectives
of the Study
The
aim of this study is the examination of the impact of impact of workers’
participation in management decisions on workers’ work attitude while the
specific objectives are to:
i.
discuss the
significant relationship existing between democratic work setting and workers’
commitment.
ii.
determine
the significant relationship existing between good labour-management relations
and workers’ motivation.
iii.
examine the
significant relationship existing between workers’ work involvement and
workers’ performance.
iv.
evaluate
the significant relationship existing between collective responsibility and organizational
harmony.
1.4 Relevant
Research Questions
i.
Does any
significant relationship exist between democratic work setting and workers’
commitment?
ii.
Is there
significant relationship existing between good labour-management relations and
workers’ motivation?
iii.
Does any
significant relationship exist between workers’ work involvement and
workers’ performance?
iv.
Does any
significant relationship exist between collective responsibility and
organizational harmony?
1.5 Relevant
Research Hypotheses
Hypothesis I
Ho: There is no significant relationship
existing between democratic work setting and workers’ commitment.
Hypothesis II
Ho: There is no significant relationship
existing between good labour-management relations and workers’ motivation.
Hypothesis III
Ho: There is no significant relationship
existing between workers’ work involvement and
workers’ performance.
Hypothesis IV
Ho: There is no significant relationship
existing between collective responsibility and organizational harmony.
1.6 Significance
of the Study
The
importance of this study can be drawn from the statement of the problems and
purposes above.
1. The
study will educate management of the organization on the necessity of employees’ participation in management decision
making.
2.
The study
will discuss the relationship between employees’ participation and
organizational harmony.
3. The study will also discuss the relationship
between employees’ participation and labour management relations.
1.7 Scope
of the Study
A
defined scope is the hall-mark of a good research. This study will address the impact of
workers’ participation in management decisions on workers’ work attitude;
factors necessitating workers’ participation in management, prerequisites for workers’
participation in management decisions in UBA Plc, Lagos.
1.8 Definition
of Terms
Management:
The process of planning, organizing, coordinating and controlling of both human
and materials resources to achieve set objectives.
Motivation: The
tonic that spurs the workers to go the extra mile for better performance.
Productivity:
The amount of output per unit of input (labour, equipment and capital.
Employee:
An individual who works part time or full time under a contract of employment,
whether oral or written, expressed or implied and has recognized rights and
duties.
Decision: The
choice made out of several alternatives
Decision making:
The process of selecting a choice from among alternative a course of
action.
Employees’ participation:
This is creating an environment in which people have an impact on decisions and
actions that affect their jobs in the organization.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment