THE IMPACT OF GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE ON AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00010057

No of Pages: 58

No of Chapters: 5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

ABSTRACT


The agricultural sector's impact on GDP, food and nutritional supplies, job creation, income and wealth creation, and foreign exchange revenues cannot be overstated. Despite the agricultural sector's enormous contribution to Nigeria's economic growth, it has received less attention since the discovery of oil. As a result, this study investigates how government spending on agriculture has affected agricultural output in Nigeria from 1981 to 2019. e data used for this study was obtained from the Central Bank Statistical Bulletin. Using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach, the results revealed the presence of a long-run link between government agricultural expenditure and agricultural output in Nigeria. Government agricultural capital spending has a negative and statistically insignificant influence on agricultural output in Nigeria in both the short and long run. The findings demonstrate that government recurrent investment in agriculture had a favorable but statistically insignificant impact on agricultural output in Nigeria in the short and long run. Agricultural loan guarantee scheme funds had a negative and statistically negligible long-run influence on agricultural output while having a positive short-run impact. To that end, the government should strengthen monitoring institutions to guarantee that funds provided to the agricultural sector are utilized wisely and effectively in Nigeria. e government should promote the consumption of locally grown farm products to limit the number of resources spent on imported agricultural items, which erode consumers' purchasing power owing to imported inflation.

 

 

 

 

 




 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page                                                                i  

Declaration                                                                                                                                                                                     ii

Approval                                                                                                                                                                                         iii

Table of Contents                                                                                                                                                                            vi

Abstract                                                                                                                                                                                          x

INTROUCTION

1.0       Background to Study                                               5                                                                                                                           

1.1       Problem Statement                                                    10 

1.2       Objectives Of the Study                                           12  

1.3       Study hypotheses                                                       12            

1.4   Research Questions                                                                12

1.5   Significance Of Study                                                13                                                          

1.6       Scope Of Study                                                         13     

1.7       Limitation of the study                                                 14

1.8       Organization of the study                                                      14                                                                                            

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE                                                                                                                                     

2.0     Introduction                                                                    15

2.1    Conceptual Literature                                                        15

2.1.1  Concept of Agriculture                                                       15

2.1.2  Agricultural Productivity                                                     15

2.1.3 Concept of Government Expenditure                                   15                     

2.1.4 Concept of Government Expenditure                                   19

2.1.5 Agricultural Policies in Nigeria                                               21

2.1.6 Government’s Budgetary Allocation and Agriculture in Nigeria 25

2.2    Review of Empirical literature                                                 27

2.3    Theoretical Framework                                                           31

2.3.1  Musgrave Theory of Public Expenditure Growth Musgrave (1997) 31    

2.3.2    The Wagner’s Law/Theory of Increasing State Activities            32

2.3.3 The Neoclassical Growth Theory                                                       32

2.3.4    Erik Lindahl in 1919                                                                           32

2.3.5    Bowen’s Model of Public Expenditure                                            33

 

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.0   Introduction                                                                            34

3.1   Sources of Data                                                                         34

3.2   Data Sources                                                                            34

3.3    Model Specification                                                                                  35

3.4    Research Methodology                                                                            35

3.4.1 Definition of Variables                                                                              36

3.5     Statistical Tests                                                                                          37

 

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

4.1   Introduction                                                                                                  38

4.2   Data Presentation                                                                                         38

4.3     Data Analysis                                                                                                41

4.3.1 Unit Root Test                                                                                               41

4.3.3 Co-Integration Test                                                                                      42

 

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary                                                                                              50

5.2     Conclusion                                                                                      50     

5.3     Recommendations                                                                           51

          REFERENCES                                                                                52

          APPENDIX                                                  56

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION


1.0        Background to the Study

               Agriculture as a sector is a factor for the development of the economy, as it sustains the livelihood of about 75 percent of the population, and according to World Bank estimates, increased instrumental at an annual rate of 2.1 percent in 2021 (Nigeria/World bank development indicators, 2022). The contribution of agricultural sector to the economy cannot be overemphasized when considering its building roles for sustainable development, in terms of employment potentials, export and financial impacts on the economy. Agriculture is an important sector of Nigerian economy. In the world today, agricultural sector acts as the catalyst that accelerates the pace of structural transformation and diversification of the economy, enabling the country to fully utilize its factor endowment, depending less on foreign supply of agricultural product or raw materials for its economic growth, development and sustainability. Apart from laying solid foundation for the economy, it also serves as import substituting sector, providing ready market for raw materials and intermediate goods.

               The agricultural sector contributes significantly to the nation’s economic development by: increasing government revenue through tax; improving the standard of living; infrastructural growth; contribution to Gross National Products (GNP); employment generation; enhance manpower development; It plays a key role by sourcing of food for man and animal and providing raw materials for the industrial sector, provision of employment and foreign exchange to the government, among others. In Nigeria, agriculture used to be the mainstay of the economy in the 1960s producing about 90 percent of the government income and providing up to 70 percent job opportunities to the unemployed youths (Okuneye and Ajayi, 2021). Despite the predominance of the oil and gas sector in Nigeria, the agricultural sector still remains a source of economic resilience.

Economic history shows that agricultural revolution is basic precondition for economic growth, especially in developing countries. Agriculture provides food for the citizens, raw materials for the industries, employment, and income for the farmers, and enhances society’s well-being (Edeh et al., 2020). every industrialized country passed through the agrarian era. The maxim that agriculture is the hub of the Nigerian economy underscores the importance placed on agriculture as the engine for growth. Prior to the discovery of oil, the Nigerian economy was predominantly agriculture with abundance of arable land and water resources to foster agricultural development. As it were, the agricultural sector contributed immensely to the Nigerian economy in provision of food for the increasing population, supply of raw materials to industries, major source of employment and generation of foreign exchange earnings. As such, literature abound that stagnation in agricultural production accounts for the economic failure facing Nigeria, while the acceleration in agricultural productivity is the key explanation to industrialization in the developed countries.

According to Abraham (2020) Consequently, federal government should preserve quality and stability in its agricultural expenditure in order to achieve the significant productivity required. The development of agriculture in every country in the world (both developed and underdeveloped) requires government assistance in recent years, agricultural outputs in other regions have been doubling, while Nigeria has experienced a significant decline in agricultural output. Consequently, following the stunt growth in agricultural output in developing countries, low agricultural investments have been seen as a major contributory factor to this development. As such, government fiscal responsibility has always been seen as a fundamental stability, often viewed as prerequisite to achieving sustainable output growth. Hence, the potential contribution of agriculture to economic development in Nigeria have been marred by poor funding, coupled with misguided government policies.

Nigeria is enthusiastic with strong ambition and immense potential, which has been manifested in various agricultural frameworks and policies. Most of the agricultural frameworks and policies are meant by the government to attain food self-sufficiency and rapid economic development (Yusuf, 2022).

Agricultural sector in the 1960s contributed about 64 percent of the total gross domestic product (GDP) of Nigeria, but gradually declined to 48% in the 1970s during the oil boom. Nigeria, has diverse agro-ecological conditions that can support a variety of farming models, which can create its own agricultural models. However, successive administrations over the years neglected the agricultural sector in favor of the oil industry. Akintunde, Adesope and Okruwa, (2018).

Undoubtedly, Nigeria has immense potentials in agricultural sector, but the problem of continuity of various agricultural policies and programmes remained a great obstacle. Hence, there was an emphasis on strengthening the agriculture sector whereby in 1998, the government paid a meticulous focus on the enhancement of the sector. There was an adoption of agricultural policy that aimed at ensuring food security for the entire population of the country as well as trying to focus on the local or domestic production in order to boost economic growth as literature contends (Emmanuel, Agwale & Usman, 2020).

Public expenditure can be described to mean the cost or expenses the government incurs for its own maintenance and for the society, with expanding state activities. Therefore, Government expenditure on agriculture is the allocation of fund to the agricultural sector in order to boost agricultural production and output thereby promoting economic growth. Government expenditure on agriculture comprises expenses on sector policies and programmes, constructions of flood control, irrigation and drainage system, operation or support of extension services, pest control services, crop inspection services, provision of grant and subsidies to farmers. The objectives and strategies of the federal agricultural expenditure include: creating enabling environment for agricultural activities, government intervention in agricultural sector, increase budgetary allocation on agriculture, etc., (Agbana and Ludo, 2022).

Agriculture is the catalyst or base through which the growth and development of any economy like Nigeria must rely on. Nigeria being an agrarian economy is naturally blessed with various resources such as good atmospheric conditions, adequate rainfall, sufficient sunlight, a fertile and large land area of 910,770km and a population of 206,139,589.  Over 50% the population lives in the rural areas that form the population responsible for these agricultural activities (Worldometer, 2020). The expected significant contribution was made towards the attainment of several national economic and social goals. The resultant effect is the huge importation of food, made possible by the enhanced crude oil export earnings, but which served as a disincentive to serious domestic farming. In line with the anticipated contribution agriculture makes to the overall development of the Nigerian economy, several measures were designed in the years preceding the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) to stimulate the growth and development of the sector. Such measures included subsidized/low interest rate policies of the 1970s and early 1980’s, establishment of specialized institutions to lend solely to the sector, funding agricultural production directly through budgetary allocation and by 3 establishing agricultural oriented institutions and programs  such as Nigerian Agricultural Credit Bank (NACB), Agricultural Credit Guarantee Scheme Fund (ACGSF), Agricultural Development Programmes (ADPS), River Basin Development Scheme (RBDS) and Operation Feed the Nation (OFN).

Following the adoption of Anchor Borrowers’ Programme, (ABP) in 2015 and is intended to create a linkage between anchor companies involved in the process of selecting key agricultural commodities and small holder farmers. The focus of (ABP) is to provide seed to farmers and cash to grow the crops. This will help to boost production of the select commodities and make sure there is constant supply of the commodities to the agro-processors. The programme targets farmers who produce cereals (Rice, Maize, wheat etc.); Roots and Tubers (Cassava, Potatoes, Yam, Ginger etc.); Tree crops (Oil palm, Cocoa, Rubber etc.); Legumes (Soybean, Sesame seed, Cow pea etc.); Livestock (Fish, Poultry, Ruminants etc.). Others include: Cotton, Sugarcane, Tomato, etc. The fund given to the farmers are loans. The participating banks, which work with the CBN lend to Anchors at 9% per annum for onward disbursement to the farmers. The loan is repaid by the farmers after the crops have been harvested with the harvested crops which must cover the loan principal and interest, in all to poster agricultural productivity in Nigeria.

Despite decade of public sector contribution to agriculture, there were evidences of unstable or fluctuating trends. In this research, efforts have been made to find out what is responsible for the downward trend in the contribution of agriculture to food supply, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), foreign exchange earnings and raw materials. Also, why there has been mixed result from the financing policies and programmes of government for agriculture in Nigeria.

In recent decades, the potential contribution of agriculture as one of the drivers of economic growth has been a subject of much controversy among development economists. While some contend that agricultural development is a precondition for industrialization, others strongly disagree and argue for a different path. While agriculture may no longer serve as the leading foreign exchange earner due to phenomenal growth in the petroleum sector of the economy as observed; still, it is the dominant economic activity in terms of employment, leading contributor to Nigeria’s gross national product and linkages with the rest of the economy. While accounting for one-third of the GDP, it remains the leading employment sector of the vast majority of the Nigerian population as it employs two-third of the labor force. The Economic development decline in Nigeria with GDP of about 45billion, 32.953 billion and 55.5billion dollars in 2019, 2020and 2021 respectively and per-capita income of about $300 a year according to the CBN Annual Report of 2022 notwithstanding oil production has confirmed the need to pay attention to agriculture.

Transformation agenda of the president Goodlock which was sets out to create over 3.5 million jobs in the agricultural sector, from rice, cassava, sorghum, cocoa and cotton value chains, with many more jobs to come from other value chains under implementation. The agenda aims to provide over 300 billion Naira (US$ 2 billion) of additional income in the hands of Nigerian farmers.

Over 60 billion Naira (US$ 380 million) is to be injected into the economy from the substitution of 20% of bread wheat flour with cassava flour. In total, the agricultural transformation agenda will add 20 million metric tons to domestic food supply by 2015, including rice (2 million metric tons), cassava (17 million metric tons) and Sorghum (1 million metric tons).

Under President Buhari's administration many programs were introduced to boost the agricultural productivity in the economy like Anchor Borrower's Programme lunched by CBN in ,2015, Presidential Fertilizer Initiative (PFI), Youth Farm Lab, Presidential Economic Diversification Initiative (PEDI) and Food Security Council which was launched on Monday, March 26, 2018.

In 2022 agriculture contributed about 23.3 percent of the country GDP, which supports the positive trend of the previous years’ performance of 25.88 percent (2021); 26.21 percent (2020); 25.1 percent (2019); 25.13 percent (2018); 25.08 percent (2017); 24.4 percent (2016) and 23.11 percent (2015).

Despite government professed commitment to developing the agricultural sector, and indeed investment in the sector, agriculture has grown at the weakest rate in 2022, The sector grew at an average of 15 per cent in the past five years, an analysis of the country’s gross domestic products by Statistics, a data analysis platform, shows. By comparison, the sector grew by 133 percent under the Obasanjo administration; 19.1 per cent under President Musa Yar’adua’s short tenure and 22.2 percent under Mr. Jonathan’s government. (Mojeed A., 2022)

Several researchers have investigated on the impact of government expenditure on agricultural productivity, but with conflicting results or findings, and the problem still persists so severely. Thus, there is the need to conduct further investigation on the impact of government agricultural expenditure proxy by agricultural expenditure on the Nigeria’s economy proxy by real GDP from 1990- 2022.


1.1        Problem Statement

               The importance of agriculture to the economic development of Nigeria is enormous owing to the fact that agriculture was the main source of food and employment for a sizable number of the people. Public expenditure, which serves as the bed rock of financing for the sector has consistently fallen short of the public expectation. For instance, a collaborative study carried out by the Food and Agriculture organization (FAO) revealed that Nigeria’s Public expenditure on agriculture is 1.8 percent of total federal annual budget expenditure 1n 2021 This is significantly low compared to other developing countries like Kenya 6 percent, Brazil 18 percent and 10 percent goal set by African leaders’ forum, under the comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP). In spite of poor investment, agriculture has on the average contributed 22.35 percent of the country’s GDP in 2021 (FAO, 2021).

               According to minister of Agriculture and rural development (FMARD) in 2022, agriculture accounted for 23 percent of the nation’s GDP, (The Guardian, 2022) yet it received below 5 percent of the total commercial Bank Loans. Inadequacy of government funding of agricultural projects and programmes has been observed by researchers because lack of strong evidence of growth promotion externalities by deepening food insecurity, social inequality, rural poverty and hunger, are issues of funding (Ogbonna and Osondu, 2015). There is also no available detailed analysis on the returns to agriculture investment in most African countries, and reporting on Plan for the Modernization of Agriculture (PMA) expenditures more broadly is weak.

Most studies focused on the impact of total government expenditure and overall GDP growth in Nigeria. Very few of these studies attempted to link different types of government spending to growth, and even fewer attempted to analyze the impact of government spending at the sector level, especially agriculture (Kenny,2019).

It is difficult to obtain a clear picture of total agricultural expenditure. Budget documents as reported by "Kilick" have tended to be released only on a “need to know basis”, and it is only in recent years that this has begun to change. Implementation bottlenecks still hamper effective use of resources. Ten percent of expenditure is funded through revenues outside the budget. Ministerial budgets and actual expenditures diverge significantly, reflecting frequent use of in-year budget re allocations.

               This study therefore is set to determine the contribution of government funding in terms of expenditure to agricultural productivity in Nigeria between 1999-2022 and compare with some other factors on which agricultural output depends. This will guide policy making for increased agricultural productivity in the nation.

 

 

1.2        Objectives of the study

               The objective of this study is to examine the impact of government expenditure on agricultural production. Specifically, we aim at:

  1. Determining the relationship between government expenditure and agricultural output.
  2. Ascertaining the impact of government expenditure on agricultural production.


1.3        Study hypotheses

               The study developed and formulated for testing the following hypothesis:

H0: There is a relationship between government spending and agricultural productivity in Nigeria.

H1: There is a significant impact of government expenditure on Agricultural productivity in Nigeria.


1.4        Research Questions

 The following research questions were raised in the course of this work:

  1. what is the agricultural budget performance situation in Nigeria?
  2. Has the agricultural public expenditure increased in Nigeria to meet up with Malabo Declaration of 2014.

               This study aims to provide answers to these questions and make recommendations based on the empirical findings. The answers to these questions will guide the policy makers on how to prioritize and allocate public funds to achieve the best outcomes in agricultural sector in Nigeria. It will also throw limelight on which component of spending contributes more to agricultural growth and productivity in Nigeria. The study also helps the policy makers on alignment and harnessing other sources of funding for agriculture in Nigeria.

 


1.5        Significance of the study

The significance of this research lies in the fact that if the impact of government expenditure on agricultural productivity is properly identified, then it provides a pathway to improved foresight in that particular direction, which if properly analyzed will bring about rapid economic growth and improvements would be the end result. The reason for the above postulation is that the agricultural sector is a good source of diversification for an oil-driven economy and also it has proved in recent times to be a resourceful money spinner for the national pocket hitherto the unearthed shift to becoming an oil dependent economy.

Information obtained from this study assist in evaluating and implementing new mechanism for Nigeria’s funding for effective investment by the stake holders for promoting technical assistance for farmers; and support for the agricultural expansion programme while contributing to the existing body of knowledge in agricultural finance policy in Nigeria. The study will also identify implementation constraints to national funding and investment in agricultural sector in the country so as to increase effectiveness of National funding and investment to reduce poverty. The study will help in provision of data to encourage private sector involvement in agriculture under the new proposed private-public-participation. Therefore, this study would be of immense importance to the government and policy makers especially in their efforts to fashion out sound and effective policies and suggestions to improve output in the agricultural sector that will now transpire to economic progress. Therefore, the importance of this study can hardly be over-emphasized. 


1.6        Scope of the Study

The scope of this study is necessarily limited to the period 1999-2022; within this period, some new policies on agriculture has been made. It should therefore be acknowledged that the data used are derived from the Statistical Bulletin, National Bureau of Statistic, Central Bank of Nigeria, Journals, etc., and they are used to portray the significance or importance of government expenditure on agricultural output in Nigeria.

 

1.7        Limitation of the study

This study is limited to investigate government expenditure on agricultural productivity between the years of 1999- 2022. the main constraint faced by the researcher was difficulty in accessing data that will aid the empirical investigation of the study. One of such data is related to deficit financing. Despite all these hitches and setbacks mentioned above, this work will be completed within the speculated frame.

1.8        Organization of the study

               The project is being divided into five chapters. Chapter one introduces the subject matter of the research and clarifies certain basic concepts underlying the research; it further deals with statement of problems, objectives of the study, research questions and hypothesis, the scope/limitation and significance of the study and methodology respectively. The second chapter focuses on the review of different literature ranging from conceptual, theoretical to empirical literature review. In chapter three, the methodology and procedure of the research was discussed detailing the sources of data, method and techniques of data analysis. Chapter four is on data presentation, analysis and interpretation of results. Chapter five, deals with summary, conclusion and recommendations.

 

 

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

DENCITY BOOKS

26

Total Item
Visit Store

Reviews (31)

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    This is so amazing and unbelievable, it’s really good and it’s exactly of what I am looking for

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Great service

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    This is truly legit, thanks so much for not disappointing

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    I was so happy to helping me through my project topic thank you so much

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Just got my material... thanks

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Thank you for your reliability and swift service Order and delivery was within the blink of an eye.

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    It's actually good and it doesn't delay in sending. Thanks

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    I got the material without delay. The content too is okay

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Thank you guys for the document, this will really go a long way for me. Kudos to project shelve👍

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    You guys have a great works here I m really glad to be one of your beneficiary hope for the best from you guys am pleased with the works and content writings it really good

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Excellent user experience and project was delivered very quickly

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    4 months ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    4 months ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    5 months ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    5 months ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    7 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you