• $

THE EFFECT OF SESQUIOXIDES AND ORGANIC CARBON CONTENT ON SOIL STRUCTURAL STABILITY IN DIFFERENT PLANTATION LAND USE IN EDO STATE

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009801

No of Pages: 194

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$20

  • $

ABSTRACT

The effect of sesquioxides and carbon content on soil structural stability was carried out on soil samples collected from four plantation land use systems (cocoa, coconut, oil palm and rubber plantation) at three depths (0-20cm, 20-40cm, 40-60cm) in Edo state. The study also assessed the physicochemical properties of the study soils as well as the relationship between sesquioxides, organic carbon and heavy metals content with depth. Spatial variability of selected properties was assessed with the help of geostatistical map tool and a 4x3 factorial analysis in RCBD was carried on the laboratory data, while FLSD at 5% was used for separation of statistically significant means. The relationships between selected soil properties were assessed by simple linear correlation and multiple linear regression. The result shows that the soils were generally sandy loam, there were no significant differences on percent water stable aggregate (WSA) or mean weight diameter of aggregate for the different land use systems studied. The oil palm land use recorded the highest mean weight diameter of aggregate stability followed by cocoa and rubber while the lowest value was observed in coconut land use but the highest percent water stable aggregate was observed in rubber land use, (85.49%) followed by coconut, (77.41%) oil palm, (76.48%) while the lowest value was observed in cocoa, (74.68%) land use. Both aggregate stability index showed increase with increased soil depth in the different land uses.  Soil pH in H2O and KCl were highly acidic, the value for pH in H2O ranged from 4.75-5.22 while in KCl it ranged from 4.22-4.77, and both were significantly different at p<0.05. Organic carbon was low and differed significantly at p<0.05 in the different land uses, rubber plantation soil recorded the highest mean values of 1.76%, while coconut plantation recorded the lowest mean values of 0.88%. Micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, and B) differed significantly at p<0.05 in the different land uses and also with depth. Oxides of Al and Fe varied from 2.92%- 363% and 4.25%-9.75% at 0-20cm soil depth for Al and Fe respectively. However, Al2O3 increased with increased soil depth, while Fe2Odecreased with increased soil depth except in oil palm land use at 40-60cm soil depth. The Al2O3 and Fe2Ohad a positive significant correlation at p<0.05 with Mg, copper and zinc, while other parameters were not significantly different.  The study showed that sesquioxides and organic carbon had a positive relationship with aggregate stability with coefficient of determination R2=0.35 in cocoa land use, while for coconut, oil palm and rubber plantation, Fe2O3 and organic carbon had a positive relationship with aggregate stability with coefficient of determination R2=0.27, R2=0.44 and R2=0.52 respectively in the different land uses. This shows that organic carbon and oxides of Fe contributed more to aggregate stability than oxides of Al. The Al2O3 and Fe2O3 affected the heavy metal content of the soil as indicated by a high Al2O3 coefficient of determination (R2=0.73) for coconut, R2=0.72 for oil palm and R2=0.64 for rubber on the heavy metal while in cocoa land use, with low coefficient of determination (R2=0.37). The Fe2O3 coefficient of determination was R2=0.80 for cocoa, R2=0.95 for coconut, R2=0.88 for oil palm and R2=0.69 for rubber land use. The result on spatial variability as shown by the Arc- map indicated that, the physicochemical properties vary highly in the different direction, in the different land uses. Therefore, there is a need for precision agriculture in these land uses in Edo State in order to reduce cost of input such as organic and inorganic fertilizer to achieved maximum output.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Declaration                                                                                                                  ii

Certification                                                                                                                iii

Dedication                                                                                                                   iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                      v

Table of Contents                                                                                                        vi

List of Tables                                                                                                              ix

List of Figures                                                                                                             x

Abstract                                                                                                                      xi

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION                                                                            1

1.1       Objectives of the study                                                                                   4

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE                                     5                                                                            

2.1       Plantation crops and their Characteristics                                                      5

2.2       Soil and climate requirement of selected tree crops                                      8

2.3       Effect of land use system on plantation crops                                                11

2.4       Agronomic practices for plantation crops                                                      12

2.5       Spatial variation of physical and chemical properties in soils                        14

2.6       Effects of bulk density on soil properties                                                       15

2.7       Effects of porosity on structural stability                                                       17

2.8       Effects of hydraulic conductivity on soil structure                                        18

2.9       Soil water                                 19

2.10     Effects of macro elements in plantation soils                                                 20

2.11     Effects of Aluminum and Hydrogen to Plantation Crops                              28

2.12     Importance of micro elements to plantation crops                                     29

2.13     Effects of sesquioxides on soil structural stability                                         38

2.14     Effect of soil organic carbon on soil structural stability                                42

 

CHAPTER 3:  MATERIALS AND METHODS                                                   47                                                                

3.1       Description of study area                                                                                47

3.2       Soil Sampling                                                                                                 49

3.3       Laboratory analysis                                                                                        49

3.3.1    Particle size determination                                                                          49

3.3.2    Bulk density                                                                                                50

3.3.3    Soil moisture content                                                                                   51

3.3.4    Saturated hydraulic conductivity                                                                51

3.3.5    Aggregate size determination by wet sieve method                                  52

3.3.6    Organic carbon                                                                                           53

3.3.7    Determination of soil pH                                                                            54

3.3.8    Determination of available phosphorus                                                          55

3.3.9    Determination of exchangeable cations                                                         56 

3.3.10  Percentage base saturation (%BS)                                                                  57

3.3.11  Exchangeable acidity                                                                                     57

3.3.12  Determination of nitrogen                                                                              58

3.3.13  Extraction of micro nutrients                                                                          59

3.3.14  Determination of sesquioxides                                                                       59

3.3.15 Determination of boron                                                                                  60

3.4       Statistical analysis                                                                                          59

 

CHAPTER 4:  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                                            

4.1       Characteristics of soil physical and chemical properties of the

study area                                                                                                        60

4.2       Effect of pH on Different Plantation Land                                                     62

4.3       Percent organic matter and organic carbon content in the different

plantation land uses                                                                                        63                                                                                                   

4.4       Nutrients content in the different plantation land uses                                   64

4.5       Effective cation exchange capacity contents in the different

plantation land uses                                                                                        67   

4.6       Percent base saturation concentration in the different plantation

land uses                                                                                                         68

4.7       Oxides of aluminum content in the different plantation land uses                69

4.8       Oxides of iron content in the different plantation land uses                           70

4.9       Micro nutrients content in the different plantation land uses                         71

4.10     Physical properties of the different land uses                                                 75

4.11     Depth variation of chemical properties of the plantation land uses                 82

4.12     Relationship between aggregate stability, sesquioxides and organic

carbon content in the different land uses                                                        98

4.13     Relationship between oxides of aluminum and heavy metals in the

   different plantation  land uses                                                              107

4.14     Relationship between oxides of iron and heavy metals in the

   different plantation  land uses                                                              115

4 .15    Chemical properties of arc map distribution in the different

land uses                                                                                                         123

4.16     Physical properties of arc map distribution in the different

land uses                                                                                                         142

 

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS                           158

5.1       Conclusion                                                                                                      148

5.2       Recommendations                                                                                          149 References                                                                                                           150

Appendices                                                                                                     176





 

LIST OF TABLES

 

4.1:      Chemical properties of the plantation soils studied                                       61

4.2:      Physical propertied of the different land uses plantation                               75

4.3:      Depth variation of chemical properties of the plantation land use

systems studied                                                                                               81

4.4:      Range values of physical properties of soils                                                  88

4.5:      Correlation coefficient between some chemical properties of the

different land uses                                                                                           95

 

 

 


 

 

LISTS OF FIGURES

                                                                                                                  

 

3.1:      Map Showing the Study Area                                                                        48

4.4:      Relationship between aggregate stability sesquioxides and organic

carbon in plantation land use                                                                          100

 

4.20:    Relationship between oxides of aluminium with heavy metals in

Plantation land uses                                                                                        102                      

4.36:    Relationship between oxides of Iron with heavy metals in plantation

land uses                                                                                                         104

 

4.49:    Arc map showing soil pH in H2O distribution in the different land uses     125

4.50:    Arc map showing organic carbon concentration in the different land uses         127

4.51:    Arc map showing the nitrogen concentration in the different land uses     129

4.52:    Arc map showing the phosphorus concentration in the different land uses         131

4.53:    Arc map showing the potassium concentration in the different land uses         133                                                                           

4.57:    Arc map showing Al2O3 concentration in the different land uses                        141                                                                                    

4.58:    Arc map showing Fe2O3concentration in the different land uses                        143

4.59:    Arc map showing zinc concentration in the different land uses                        145

4.60:    Arc map showing copper concentration in the different land uses                        147                                                                                     

4.63:    Arc map showing bulk density level in the different land uses                    150

4.64:    Arc map showing total porosity level in the different land uses                  152

4.65:    Arc map showing hydraulic conductivity level in the different land uses         154                                                                                              

         

                                          

 

 

                                                        CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Sesquioxides refer to the oxides and hydroxides of iron, aluminium, titanium, manganese and silicon in the soil (Ojo-Atere and Ajunwon, 1985 and Essoka and Esu, 2000). They are crystalline and amorphous in nature, although a small fraction may be present as organic complexes and together they influence several soils physicochemical properties (Hassan et al., 2005). They play significant roles in swelling and aggregate formation, cation exchange capacity, anion adsorption, surface charge, Pspecific surface area, nutrient transformation and pollutant retention in soils (Aghimien et al., 1988; Essoka and Esu, 2000 and Hassan et al., 2005)

 

Sesquioxides, also known as inorganic agent, particularly the amorphous forms are regarded as a main mechanism for stabilizing aggregates (Six et al., 2004 and Kogel–Knabner et al., 2008). They can stabilize organic matter and reduce SOM turnover due to a large specific surface area (Eusterhues et al., 2003 and Wagai and Mayer, 2007). Saidy et al. (2012) reported, the chemical adsorption of SOM onto sesquioxides surface by addition of artificial hydrous oxides. Barthes et al. (2008) reported that Al containing sesquioxides has a more important aggregating role than soil organic matter in tropical soils. The role of sesquioxides in the stabilization of SOM through the organomineral complexes has been also reported (Vanlutzow et al., 2006 and Kogel –Knaber et al., 2008). In Ultisols and oxisoils however, large macro aggregates can be stabilized solely by sesquioxides (Zhang and Horn, 2001and Barthes et al., 2008). Sesquioxides are very important, dense and resistant to soil mechanical stress but are not stable under hydraulic stress (Zhou et al., 2012).

Elliot (1986) reported that carbon concentration increase with increasing aggregate size because large aggregate sizes are composed of micro aggregates and organic binding agents. Hence, soil organic carbon (SOC) associated with aggregate is an important element produced from mineralization because it is less subjected to physical, microbial and enzymatic degradation (Trujilo et al., 1997). Polyvalent Al3+ and Fe3+ cations improve soil structure through cationic bridging and formation of organo-metallic compounds and gels (Amezketa, 1999). In acidic soils with low clay and soil organic carbon contents such as oxisols both the Al3+ and Fe3+ control aggregation (Oades and Waters, 1991). The interaction of Al and Fe oxides with Kaolinite can contribute with soil organic carbon to improve the structural stability of soils (Six et al., 2000). The role of soil organic carbon as an aggregating agent is very much dependent on the soil type and also, when Al and Fe oxides are high, they reduce the effect of soil organic carbon as aggregating agent (Oades, 1984 and Igwe et al., 1995)

Aggregate stability of a soil define the resistant of soil structure against mechanical or physio-chemical destructive force (Duniway et al., 2009). Aggregate stability strongly influences soil structure and has relevant implication on soil organic carbon protection. Chenu (2000) indicated the importance of soil organic carbon and humic compounds in aggregate stabilization in two different mechanisms, first by increasing soil hydrophobility and then reducing its breakdown by slaking. Secondly, organic carbon increases the aggregate under particle cohesion. Soil organic carbon affects porosity and indirectly aggregate stability (Luqato et al., 2009 and Papadopoulos, 2009). A good soil structure is important in sustaining long term crop production on agricultural soils because it influences water status, workability, resistant to erosion, soil nutrients availability, crop growth and development (Piccolo and Mbagwu, 1999 and Eneje et al., 2005).

Land use changes, mostly cultivation of natural lands in tropical areas have led to negative effects on soil organic matter components (Fallahazade and Hajabbasi, 2011). With continuous growing of crop, physical properties and productivity of soils commonly decline due to decrease in organic matter contents and soil pH (Oguike and Mbagwu, 2009). Intensive cropping syetem has also been recorded to lead to disaggregation in surface soil due to decrease in organic matter

The sesquioxides and soil organic carbon in tropical and subtropical soils (eg Ultisols and Oxisols) are widely regarded as the main inorganic and organic binding agents of soil structural stability respectively (Six et al., 2004 and Bronick and Lal, 2005). The two binding agents involve in soil aggregation have been investigated intensively by (Denef et al., 2012; Kogel-knabner et al., 2008 and Pronk et al., 2012). However, their co-existence in the soils makes assessment of their contribution to structural stability difficult. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the effect of the sesquioxides and soil organic matter contents of different plantation land use types on soil structure and fertility status of these soils.

1.1       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The specific objectives include:

i.         To determine the soil physico-chemical properties of four plantation land use system (Oil palm, Rubber, Coco-nut and Cocoa) in Edo state.

ii.         To evaluate the relationship between sesquioxides, organic carbon and soil aggregate stability with depth.

iii.         To evaluate the relationship between heavy metals and sesquioxides with depth.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7968

Total Item

Reviews (31)

  • Anonymous

    2 days ago

    This is so amazing and unbelievable, it’s really good and it’s exactly of what I am looking for

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    Great service

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    This is truly legit, thanks so much for not disappointing

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I was so happy to helping me through my project topic thank you so much

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Just got my material... thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you for your reliability and swift service Order and delivery was within the blink of an eye.

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    It's actually good and it doesn't delay in sending. Thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I got the material without delay. The content too is okay

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you guys for the document, this will really go a long way for me. Kudos to project shelve👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    You guys have a great works here I m really glad to be one of your beneficiary hope for the best from you guys am pleased with the works and content writings it really good

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Excellent user experience and project was delivered very quickly

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    5 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you