INFLUENCE OF X-RAY IRRADIATION ON FIELD PERFORMANCE, NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION AND DNA POLYMORPHISM IN FLUTED PUMPKIN (TELFAIRIA OCCIDENTALIS. HOOK F)

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009753

No of Pages: 105

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦10000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of x-ray doses on the germination, survival, growth, yield, proximate, mineral, vitamin compositions and DNA sequence characterization of the fluted pumpkin (Telfairia occidentalis Hook F.) in M1 and M2 generations. The treatments include 0.00 mGy, 6.75 mGy, 10.08 mGy, 14.08 mGy and 18.75mGy. The experiment was set up in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with five replications. Treated seeds were planted and data obtained in both generations revealed a reduction in germination and survival percentages with increase in x-ray doses. The result showed that there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in germination percentage during M1 generation whereas in M2 generation, germination percentage was highly different when compared to the control.  Observation on the survival percentages also revealed a highly significant difference between the treated plants when compared to the control in M1 and M2 generations. The result of the analysis of variance showed that the effect of the mutagen doses on the leaf area during M1 and M2 generation was not significantly different (P>0.05) when compared to the control. The effect of the x-ray doses on the number of leaves per plant, number of branches and vine length was highly significant (P<0.05). Data obtained on the yield parameters showed that the mutagen significantly enhanced the yield of fluted pumpkin. The result showed that treatment 14.08 mGy significant enhanced all the yield traits studied. The proximate composition of fluted pumpkin was affected by the mutagen treatments during M1 and M2 generations.  Crude protein, moisture and carbohydrate contents showed a significant decrease effect (P<0.05) in both generations whereas crude fibre, ash and fat contents were not significantly different but showed increase greater than the control at different treatment concentration levels. Data obtained on the mineral composition showed that the effect of the mutagen doses on the calcium, phosphorus, iron and nitrogen compositions showed significant difference when compared to the control plants during M1 and M2 generations. The result obtained on the vitamin content of the plant showed that there was a gradual reduction and increase at varying treatment concentrations in the vitamins studied during M1 and M2 generations. The aligned DNA sequence of the treated and untreated sequences reveals all kinds of SNP mutation in the form of indels and nucleotide substitutions. However; the indels were the most occurred. A total of 17 indels were recorded with 5 of cytidine and 4 thymidine, adenosine and guanosine respectively. Cytidine, which had the highest indel occurrence were seen at positions 385, 460, 506, 545 and 551. Thymidine indel which had a total of 4 occurrences were at positions 46, 393, 417 and 472 while 4 guanosine indel were seen at positions 360, 339, 453 and 522 respectively. Adenosine indel were seen at positions 371, 423, 529, and 540. Both the transversion and transition occurred in this study and all were in the ratio 4:1 except for G: T transversion and A:G transition at positions 495 and 87 respectively which both had a ratio of 1:1. A total of 7 transversion were recorded among which were the A:C at position  411, A:T at positions 88, 124, and 352, G:C at position 349 and G:T at positions 474 and 495. While only 4 transitions were recorded which were T:C at location 402 and A:G in positions 87, 435 and 530. These variations reveal the effectiveness of physical mutagens. The observed field performance and variation in physiological traits, proximate, mineral and vitamin levels designed by the DNA polymorphism as induced by different doses of x-ray irradiation reveals the effectiveness of physical mutagens. The variation at different treatment levels is linked to more of genetic effects to environmental as this can serve as a useful selection tool. It is therefore recommended that treatment 14.08 mGy of x-ray should be employed in mutation breeding of fluted pumpkin for improved agronomic traits.







TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Declaration                                                                                                                 ii

Certification                                                                                                               iii

Dedication                                                                                                                  iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                    v

Table of Contents                                                                                                       vi

List of Tables                                                                                                              xii

List of Figures                                                                                                             xiii

Abstract                                                                                                                      xiv

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION                                                                            1

 

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                                1

 

1.1       Statement of the Problem                                                                               2

1.3       Justification of the Study                                                                                3

1.4       Objectives of the Study                                                                                  4

 

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW                                                               5

2.1       Botanical Classification of Telfairia occidentalis                                          5

2.2       Description of the Plant                                                                                  5

2.3       Structure of the Plant                                                                                      6

2.4       Nutritional Composition                                                                                 7

2.5       Cultivation                                                                                                      8

2.6       Storage                                                                                                            8

2.7       Pest and Pathogens                                                                                         9

2.8       Uses Fluted Pumpkin                                                                                      9

2.8.1    Anti-microbial activities                                                                                9

2.8.2    Anti-diabetic activity                                                                                      9

2.8.3    Treatment of infertility                                                                                   10

2.8.4    Hematological properties                                                                               10

2.8.5    Anti-malaria properties                                                                                  10

2.9       Crop Improvement through Mutagenesis                                                       10

2.10     Types of Mutagens                                                                                         13

2.11     Consequences of Genetic Alteration in Plant Morphology                            14

2.12     Business Interests of Mutation Breeding                                                       16

2.13     X-ray Irradiation                                                                                             18

2.14     X-ray Unit of Measures and Exposure                                                           20

2.15     Measurement of Agronomic Response of Plants Exposed to

X-ray Radiation                                                                                              20

 

CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS                                                    22

3.1       Study Area                                                                                                      22

3.2       Collection of Research Material                                                                     22

3.3       Seed Treatments                                                                                             22

3.4       Land Preparation and Planting Dates                                                             22

3.5       Experimental Design                                                                                      23

3.6       Data Collection                                                                                               23

3.6.1    Germination percentage                                                                                 23

3.6.2    Survival percentage                                                                                        23

3.7       Data on Growth Parameters                                                                           23

3.7.1    Vine length per treatment                                                                               23

3.7.2    Number of secondary branches per treatment                                                23

3.7.3    Number of leaves per vine per treatment                                                       24

3.7.4    Leaf area per treatment                                                                                  24

3.8       Data on Yield Parameters                                                                               24

3.8.1    Size of pods per treatment                                                                              24

3.8.2      Number of pods per treatment                                                                       24

3.8.3    Number of seeds per pod per treatment                                                         24

3.9       Molecular Assay                                                                                             24

3.9.1      DNA extraction                                                                                              24

3.9.2    Extraction of buffer components                                                                    25

3.9.3    DNA quantification                                                                                        25

3.9.4    SNP-PCR gene amplification                                                                       26

3.9.4.1 PCR Mix component                                                                                      26

3.9.4.2 Primer sequences                                                                                            26

3.9.4.3 Cycling conditions                                                                                          26

3.9.4.4 Electrophoresis for PCR                                                                                 27

3.9.4.5 Tracing of DNA polymorphism along sequenced regions                             27

3.10     Proximate Analysis                                                                                         27

3.10.1  Crude protein percentage                                                                               27

3.10.2  Crude fibre percentage                                                                                   28

3.10.3  Fat percentage                                                                                                29

3.10.4  Ash content                                                                                                     29

3.10.5   Moisture content percentage                                                                          30

3.10.6   Carbohydrate percentage                                                                                30

3.11     Mineral Analysis                                                                                            31

3.11.1   Calcium determination                                                                                   31

3.11.2   Phosphorus determination                                                                              32

3.11.3  Determination of total nitrogen (Kjeldahl method)                                       33

3.11.4  Iron determination by orthophenantroline method                                        33

3.12     Vitamin Analysis                                                                                            33

3.12.1  Determination of vitamins                                                                              34

3.12.2  Riboflavin (vit B2) determination (Okwu and Ndu.,2005)                             34

3.12.3  Vitamin B3 (niacin) content determination (Okwu and Ndu., 2005)                        35

3.12.4  Determination of vitamin C (Okwu and Ndu., 2005)                                     36

3.13     Field Maintenance                                                                                          36

3.14     Harvest                                                                                                            37

3.15     Data Analysis                                                                                                  37

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                                      38

4.1       Results                                                                                                            38

4.1.1    Effect of x-ray doses on the germination percentage during

M1 and M2 generations                                                                                   40

 

4.1.2    Effect of x-ray doses on survival percentage in M1 and M2 generations     41

4.1.3    Effect x-ray does on the growth parameters of fluted pumpkin during

M1 and M2 generations                                                                                   42

4.1.3.1. Leaf area                                                                                                        42

4.1.3.2 Number of branches per vine                                                                         43

4.1.3.3. Number of leaves per vine                                                                             44

4.1.3.4. Vine length                                                                                                    45

4.1.4    Effect different of x-ray doses on the yield parameters of fluted pumpkin

during M1 and M2 generations                                                                       47

4.1.4.1 Number of pods per plant                                                                               47

4.1.4.2 Number of pods per plant                                                                               48

4.1.4.3. Pod diameter                                                                                                  49

4.1.4.4. Pod length                                                                                                      50

4.1.4.5. Pod weight                                                                                                     51

4.1.5    Effect of different x-ray doses on the proximate composition of fluted

pumpkin during M1 and M2 generations                                                        52

4.1.5.1 Crude protein                                                                                                  52

4.1.5.2. Crude fiber                                                                                                     53

4.1.5.3. Fat                                                                                                                  53

4.1.5.4. Ash                                                                                                                 54

4.1.5.5. Moisture content                                                                                            54

4.1.5.6. Carbohydrate percentage                                                                               55

4.1.6    Effect of different x-ray doses with mineral composition of fluted

pumpkin during M1 and M2 generations                                                        56

4.1.6.1 Calcium level                                                                                                  56

4.1.6.2 Phosphorus level                                                                                            56

4.1.6.3. Iron                                                                                                                57

4.1.6.4. Nitrogen                                                                                                         57

4.1.7    Effect of different x-ray doses on the vitamin content during M1 and M2

generations                                                                                                     58

4.1.7.1. Thiamin (vitamin B1)                                                                                     58

4.1.7.2. Riboflavin (vitamin B2)                                                                                 59

4.1.7.3. Niacin (vitamin B3)                                                                                       59

4.1.7.4. Vitamin C.                                                                                                     60

4.1.8.   Effects of different doses of x-ray irradiation on the DNA sequence

of fluted pumpkin                                                                                           61

4.1.8.1 Sequence alignment of the treated samples                                                    62

4.1.8.2 The positions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP’s) mutations

along the ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RBCL) sequence regions 63

 

4.1.8.3 Influence of mutation along the amplified sequence                                     64

4.2       Discussion                                                                                                      66

4.2.1    Effect of x-ray doses on the germination and survival percentages

of fluted pumpkin                                                                                           66

4.2.2    Effect of X-ray doses on the growth yield parameters, and proximate

composition during m1 and m2 generations                                                   68

 

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS                           70

5.1       Conclusion                                                                                                      70

5.2       Recommendations                                                                                          71

References                                                                                                      72

Appendices                                                                                                     80

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

                                                                                      PAGE

4.1:      The positions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP’s) mutations

            Along the ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcl) sequence regions.       64

 

4.2:      Influence of the mutations along the amplified sequence as investigated

            in the treated samples and examined with a phylogenetic analysis                  66

 

 

 


 

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

                                                                               PAGE

2.1:      Fluted pumpkin guard                                                                                    6

2.2:      Fluted pumpkin leaves                                                                                   7

4.1:      Research study area, two weeks after planting                                              38

4.2:      Research study area, six weeks after planting                                                39

4.3       Research study area, thirty-three weeks after planting                                  39

4.4:      Effect of X-ray doses on the germination percentage                                    41

4.5:      Effect of X-ray doses on the survival percentage                                          42

4.6       Effect of different x-ray doses on the leaf area                                              43

4.7:      Effect of different x-ray doses on the number of branches produced

per vine                                                                                                           44

4.8:      Effect of different x-ray doses on the number of leaves produced

per vine                                                                                                           45

4.9:      Effect of different x-ray doses on the vine length                                          46

4.10:    Effect of different x-ray doses on the number of pods produced

per plant                                                                                                          48

4.11:    Effect of different x-ray doses on the number of seeds produced

per pod                                                                                                            49

4.12:    Effect of different x-ray doses on the pod diameter of fluted pumpkin          50

4.13:    Effect of different x-ray doses on the pod length of fluted pumpkin                        51

4.14     Effect of different x-ray doses on the pod weight of fluted pumpkin                        52

4.15     Effect of different x-ray doses on the proximate levels of fluted pumpkin          55

4.16:    Effect of different x-ray doses on the mineral levels of fluted pumpkin          58

4.17:    Effect of different x-ray doses on the vitamin levels of fluted pumpkin          60

4.18     The DNA amplification result                                                                        61

4.19:     Sequence alignment of treated samples                                                         63

4.20:     A dendogram representing the morphological variation among the

different treatments                                                                                       65








CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

 

1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

The essence of natural evolution (land race) and induced mutation has been the notable sources for competitive and improved plant stock for farmers and plant breeders. Despite the fact that nature has been playing its role in evolving desirable crop species, the constraint of time cannot be overlooked in the speed of producing results. Induced mutation technique is used to breach the vacuum created by nature. This have been found to successfully create variability and produce new desirable mutants which are multiplied and put to use after vigorous selection and breeding to homozygosity. The frequency of induced mutation is 10-3 gametes against 10-6 gametes in the case of spontaneous mutation and this has made the induced mutation preferable to spontaneous mutation (Muller, 1927). Due to its applications in agriculture, medicine, pharmaceutical usage, and numerous technical innovations, findings on the fundamental interaction of ionizing radiation with biological processes has made a significant contribution to human society. Between the initial absorption of energy and the most relevant target, the water molecule, which is ubiquitous in organisms, the prevalence of such biological systems to ionizing radiation resuscitates a lot of physical and chemical reactions. The fundamental process of excitation and ionization produces the ionized water molecule (H2O+) as well as the radicals H+ and OH-. Chain reaction which produce free radicals (H+ and e-aq) that are trapped occurs due to the consequences of ionization on living tissues (Esnault et al., 2010). These radicals have the potential to destroy or change essential parts of plant cells, as well as physiological and biochemical processes that are important for surviving of organism.

X-ray and gamma which are mutagenic sources have been used to induce plant traits such as nutritional attributes, disease resistance, yields, and height (Iwo et al., 2013). It allows for the induction of the desired characteristics that are either not exhibited naturally or lost during the evolutionary passage. Previous studies (Akpaniwo et al., 2015) revealed that the seed of fluted pumpkin when exposed to high doses of X-rays reduced germination and survival rates of pumpkin. Also, (Al-Enezi et al. 2012) revealed significant retardation in seed germination and survival rate in date palm. Hameed et al. (2008) and Al-Salhi et al. (2004) has found that high exposure to gamma rays disrupt protein synthesis, leaf gas exchange, hormonal balance, and activities of enzymes in seeds. The process of Induced mutation has long been used to improve cultivars, and it has proven to be a powerful tool for expanding the resources in genetics, particularly for odd plants, and for selecting mutants with favorable agronomic features (Taheri et al., 2014). Induced mutation of about 170 different plant species have given rise to above 2700 improved varieties (Luo et al., 2013). Induced mutations increase DNA polymorphism, which contributes to genetic diversity (Dhakshanamoorthy et al., 2010). Maize (Rustikawati et al., 2012), faba bean (Mejri et al., 2012), Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep (Taheri et al., 2014), and Acorus calamus (Taheri et al, 2014) are only a few examples of plants.

 

1.2       STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

 Ensuring that crop production meets the anticipated population increase to more than 9 billion by 2050 is an astounding challenge for the plant scientist/breeder as reported by the United Nations department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (UNDESAPD). This objective is confronting generally on the account that the numerical mean rate of crop production increase is only 1.3 % per year, and it cannot keep tread with population growth. Breeding by the process of mutation is one of the plant breeding approaches used to create the genetic variety in yield giving traits and to boost crop output, according to Ahloowalia et al. (2000). Induced mutation, primarily using x-ray irradiation, has been acknowledged as a useful addition to traditional breeding in crop development. The genetic variability from mutagenesis complements that from germplasm collection as well as from the crossing and the demand for improved varieties of cowpea that integrate good quality, high yield and disease resistance can be achieved through initiation of gainful mutation in pumpkin through X-ray.

 

1.3       JUSTIFICATION OF RESEARCH

With the recent global food crisis occasioned by the scarce supply of food crops, especially vegetables, which includes fluted Pumpkin, there is an urgent need to increase its production through adequate research, bearing in mind the high economic benefits with regards to nutrition and medicine. Improving agricultural sustainability while lowering its environmental impact with the intent of meeting the expanding global population's food need is a major challenge facing humanity (Edmondson et al., 2014). Following the lofty nutritional and economic importance of fluted pumpkin, its production level has always been below demand. The major reason for this has been traced to non-availability of genetically modified varieties for planting; hence farmers have resorted to the use of landraces. Differentiation among T. occidentalis species is low and improved varieties are non-existent (Fayeum and Odiyi, 2012). Hence, crop genetic modification is critical to increasing the yield of this valuable and important vegetable.

 

There is limited research information on the impact of x-ray on the genetic sequence, agronomic performance, proximate, vitamin and mineral concentration on fluted pumpkin.

 

1.4       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The objectives of this research are as follows;

1.     To evaluate the impact of different x-ray doses on the germination and survival percentages of fluted pumpkin during the M1 and the M2 generations.

2.      To determine x-ray irradiation impacts on germination, growth and yield parameters in fluted pumpkin at the M1 and the M2 generations.

3.     To investigate the impact of x-ray treatment on the proximate, vitamin and mineral concentration in T. occidentalis M1 and M2 generations.

4.     To determine an economic profitable x-ray treatment dose in fluted pumpkin.

5.     To investigate the influence of X-ray irradiation on the genetic sequence in the M1 and the M2 generations.

 

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7958

Total Item

Reviews (31)

  • Anonymous

    1 day ago

    This is so amazing and unbelievable, it’s really good and it’s exactly of what I am looking for

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Great service

  • Anonymous

    4 weeks ago

    This is truly legit, thanks so much for not disappointing

  • Anonymous

    4 weeks ago

    I was so happy to helping me through my project topic thank you so much

  • Anonymous

    4 weeks ago

    Just got my material... thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you for your reliability and swift service Order and delivery was within the blink of an eye.

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    It's actually good and it doesn't delay in sending. Thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I got the material without delay. The content too is okay

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you guys for the document, this will really go a long way for me. Kudos to project shelve👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    You guys have a great works here I m really glad to be one of your beneficiary hope for the best from you guys am pleased with the works and content writings it really good

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Excellent user experience and project was delivered very quickly

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    5 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you