ABSTRACT
The low
productivity of the cowpea (Vigna unguiculata
L. Walp.)
leafy vegetables in smallholder farms in Nigeria is partly attributed to
moisture stress, declining soil fertility and poor leaf harvesting practices.
To increase the productivity and utilization of these crops requires
development of suitable agronomic
practices such as appropriate watering regimes, effective nutrient management,
and best harvesting practices. Pot and field experiments were conducted at the
University of Nairobi's Kabete field station, to determine the effects of water
stress, nutrient management and leaf harvesting method on growth, yield and
nutritional quality of African nightshade and cowpea. In the first objective,
individual plants were grown in10 liter polythene pots containing 10 kg of soil
(a mixture of sand, topsoil and manure in the ratio of 2:4:1) each and watered
daily for two weeks with tap water, to maintain soil at pot capacity, until the
start of the treatments. The treatments, comprising four watering regimes
namely 100% pot capacity (PC), 80% PC, 60% PC and 40% PC, were laid out in a
randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. In the
second objective, the fertilizer treatments comprising 200 kg/ha Di-ammonium
phosphate (DAP) fertilizer, 10 t/ha farmyard manure (FYM), 10 t/ha chicken
manure (CM), 100 kg/ha DAP + 5 t/ha FYM, 100 kg/ha DAP + 5 t/ha CM and no-
fertilizer (control) were tested against two harvesting methods (piecemeal and
wholesome harvesting) in a randomized complete block design, replicated three
times. Growth and yield data collected included leaf number, leaf area, plant
height, number of branches, leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight, leaf yield,
number of pods/fruits, total grain weight, seed weight and grain yield.
Chlorophyll concentration was determined at weekly intervals for four weeks.
Data on leaf vitamin A and C, total anti-oxidant activity and phenolic content
were also collected. All data collected were subjected to analysis of variance
(ANOVA) and means separated, where the F-test was significant, using the least
significant difference test at p≤0.05.
Plant height, leaf
area, number of branches per plant, number of leaves per plant, total grain
weight, leaf yield, number of pods or fruits per plant and chlorophyll
concentration, vitamin A and vitamin C significantly decreased with reduction
in soil moisture levels in both cowpea and African nightshade. Reduction of
moisture level from 100% pot capacity to 40% pot capacity led to decreases in
chlorophyll, leaf yield, vitamin A and vitamin C by 21.1, 65.9, 78.1 and 81.6
%, respectively, in cowpea and 52.5, 85.3, 52% and 55.8%, respectively, in
African nightshade. In cowpea, reduction in soil moisture levels significantly
decreased 100-seed weight, and grain yield. Phenolic content and total anti-oxidant activity significantly
(p≤0.05) increased with reduction in soil moisture levels in both crops.
Reduction of moisture from 100% PC to 40% PC led to increases in phenolics and
total antioxidant by 29.4 and 18.7%, respectively, in cowpea and 34.5 and 45%,
respectively, in African nightshade. Fertilizer application significantly
increased plant height, number of leaves per plant and leaf yield of cowpea and
African nightshade. Compared to the no-fertilizer control, application of DAP,
DAP + CM, DAP + FYM, CM and FYM increased leaf yield by 68.6, 58.3, 56.6, 52.2
and 42.6%, respectively, in
cowpea and 74.9,
63.7, 60.8, 56.4 and 41.1%, respectively, in African nightshade. Fertilizer
application had no significant effect on vitamin A and C, phenolics and
antioxidant activity in both crops. Compared to wholesome harvesting, piecemeal
harvesting significantly increased the number of leaves and leaf yield by 54.1
and 43.9%, respectively, in cowpea and 51.2 and 49.3%, respectively, in African
nightshade.
Water stress reduced
growth, yield and nutritional quality of cowpea and African nightshade, but
increased phenolic content and total antioxidant activity in both crops.
Fertilizer application increased the growth and leaf yield but had no influence
on leaf vitamin A, leaf vitamin C, phenolics and antioxidant activity in both
cowpea and African nightshade. Relative to wholesome harvesting, piecemeal
harvesting enhanced growth and leaf yield of cowpea and African nightshade but
reduced the leaf nutritional quality in both
crops
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background Information
1.2
Statement of the Problem and Justification
1.3
Objectives
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1
Botany of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata
L. Walp.)
2.1.1
Cowpea
2.2
Origin, Distribution and Production of African Nightshade and Cowpea
2.2.1
African Nightshade
2.2.2
Cowpea
2.3
Ecological Requirements of Cowpea
2.3.1
Cowpea
2.4
Importance of Cowpea
2.4.1
Cowpea
2.5
Constraints to Cowpea
2.5.1
Cowpea
2.6
Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production of Cowpea
2.7
Effect of Harvesting Method on Cowpea
2.8
Effect of Water Stress on Cowpea
2.8.1
Adaptation of Plants to Drought
2.8.2
Impact of Water Deficit on Photosynthesis, Plant Growth and Yield
2.9
Effect of Water Stress on Nutritional Quality of African Leafy Vegetables
CHAPTER THREE
INFLUENCE OF WATER STRESS ON GROWTH, YIELD
AND NUTRITIONAL QUALITY OF AFRICAN NIGHTSHADE AND COWPEA
3.1
Abstract
3.2
Introduction
3.3
Materials and Methods
3.3.1
Study Site
3.3.2
Experimental Design, Treatments and Crop Husbandry
3.3.3
Data Collection
3.3.4
Data Analysis
3.4
Results
3.4.1
Nutritional Quality of Cowpea
3.4.1.1
Plant Growth and Chlorophyll Concentration
3.4.1.2
Yield and its Components
3.4.1.3
Nutritional Quality
3.4.2
nutritional quality of African nightshade
3.4.2.1
Plant Growth and Chlorophyll Concentration
3.4.2.2
Yield and its Components
3.4.2.3
Nutritional Quality
3.5
Discussion
3.6
Conclusion
CHAPTER FOUR
EFFECT OF FERTILIZERS AND HARVESTING METHOD
ON GROWTH, YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL QUALITY OF COWPEA AND AFRICAN NIGHTSHADE
4.1
Abstract
4.2
Introduction
4.3
Materials and Methods
4.3.1
Study Site
4.3.2
Soil and Manure Analyses
4.3.3
Experimental Design and Treatments
4.3.4
Land Preparation and Crop Husbandry
4.3.5
Data Collection
4.3.6
Data Analysis
4.4
Results
4.4.1
Chlorophyll concentration, yield and nutritional quality of cowpea and
African nightshade
4.4.1.1 Plant Height
4.4.1.2 Number of Branches/Plant
4.4.1.3 Number of Leaves/Plant
4.4.1.4 Leaf Area/Plant
4.4.1.5 Chlorophyll Concentration
4.4.1.6 Number of Pods/Fruits per Plant
4.4.1.7 Seed WEIGHT
4.4.1.8 Leaf Yield
4.4.1.9 Grain Yield
4.4.1.10
Vitamin A, Vitamin C, Phenolics and total Antioxidant Activity
4.5
Discussion
4.6
Conclusion
CHAPTER FIVE
GENERAL DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1
Discussion
5.2
Conclusion
5.3
Recommendations
REFERENCES
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background Information
African leafy
vegetables (ALVs) constitute a significant source of food in both rural and
urban areas. Their production and consumption are, however, constrained by
declining yields. Callas (1994) noted that there were more than 45,000 species
of plants in Sub- Saharan Africa (SSA) and about 1000 of these species were
consumed as green leafy vegetables. African leafy vegetables are vegetables
which have been consumed over a long period in Africa until they form part of
the cultures and traditions of communities (Maundu, 1999); they could have
originated in that area or were introduced (Abukutsa- Onyango, 2007). These
vegetables include: African nightshades (Solanum
spp), Amaranth (Amaranthus spp),
cowpea leaves (Vigna unguiculata L.),
spider plant (Cleome gynandra L.), African kales (Brassica oleracea), sweet potato leaves (Ipomeas spp), cassava
leaves (Manihot esculenta L.), jute mallow (Corchorus spp) and pumpkin leaves (Curcurbita spp) (Lebotse and Lyatuu, 2010). The leafy parts
comprising flowers, young fruits and young succulent stems are used as
vegetables (Chelang‟a et al., 2013).
There exist
approximated 6,376 important indigenous African plants exist, 397 of which are
vegetables (PROTA, 2004). Africa‟s annual per capita production of vegetables
estimated at 50 kg is lower than the rest of the world, and is declining (Kamga
et al., 2013). Onim and Mwaniki
(2008) found large differences in the amount of vegetables eaten in different
Sub-Saharan African countries. Vegetable consumption is very low in some
countries such as Ethiopia (20 kg/person/year), Malawi, Tanzania and urban
Guinea (40 kg/person/year each) and Ghana (50 kg/person/year) compared to Nigeria
with an average vegetable consumption of 147 kg/person/year in urban areas and
73 kg/person/year in rural areas. In Nigeria, there are about 210 species of
indigenous plants used as leafy vegetables (IPGRI, 2006). A study done in
western Nigeria, (Abukutsa, 2007) reported that leafy vegetable cultivation
continued to face challenges of optimal production. Their cultivation is
limited to subsistence levels, hence their potential for commercial production
has not been tapped into adequately yet the region continues to face high
poverty levels.
Most people in SSA
include ALVs in their diets, though the consumption patterns differ from region
to region among households. For instance, in South Africa, the consumption is
different and varies with poverty status, degree of urbanization, season of the
year and distance to fresh market (Van Rensburg et al., 2007). In Nigeria, the consumption of ALVs increases during
the rainy season, when ALVs are normally plenty and cheap. Besides, ethnicity
also influences preference and consumption of ALVs (Kimiywe et al., 2007). Intake of ALVs,
especially spider plant and African nightshade, which are the most affordable
and available sources of micronutrients, help avert health problems, high
mortality and low economic productivity (WHO-FAO, 2013). African leafy
vegetables have been reported to provide important sources of both
micronutrients and non-nutrient bio-active phyto-chemicals that have been
related to protection against cardiovascular and other degenerative diseases
(Akhtar et al., 2012). These
vegetables are very important component of human diet as they give
indispensable micronutrients that encourage proper development of the human
body and good health (Abukutsa-Onyango, 2007a).
The contribution of
these African leaf vegetables in the Nigerian domestic market is reported to
have risen from 4.3% in 2011 to 5% in 2013 (Abukutsa, 2013). Acreage of
production also increased from 31,864 ha to 40,000 ha in the same time frame,
leading to production increase per unit area from 1 t/ha to 4.5 t/ha (HCDA,
2014), way beneath the optimal range of 20-40 t/ha (Abukutsa-Onyango, 2003).
The ALVs have a significant potential as income earners (Onyango, 2002a).
According to Chelang‟a et al.,
(2013), ALVs would fetch a higher price at supermarkets than in open air
markets (informal markets) given that formal markets are patronized by many
nutritionally vigilant clientele with higher incomes and the supermarkets hire
contemporary retail technology in relation to storage, display and packaging.
The ALVs are better
adapted to widespread environmental conditions and constitute food that is
readily accessible and affordable to the resource challenged consumers
(Keantinge et al., 2011; Ojiewo et al., 2012). Even though vegetables
are commonly cultivated in the country, there are many production challenges
that lead to reduced productivity. The major limiting factors
include: low soil fertility (inadequate N, P, K, Ca. Mg, S and organic matter), plant
nutrient imbalances, low soil moisture content, particularly in drought
periods, poor harvesting methods and the use of unsuitable agronomic practices
(poor land preparation, late and unsuitable weeding and inappropriate plant
population densities and fertilizer application rates). Other constraints
include the perception of these traditional vegetables as crops for the poor,
lack of partnership and networking, low capacity within institutions, poor
policies, undeveloped value chains and markets, and low research attention
(Eyzaguire et al., 2006).
1.2 Statement
of the Problem and Justification
Although the
African nightshade and cowpea are increasingly becoming important vegetables in
Nigeria, their yields in smallholder production systems are far below the
crops‟ potential partly due to inadequate soil fertility, low soil moisture and
poor harvest practices. For example, growers of African nightshades obtain
yields of about 1.5-3.0 t/ha (MOALD and M, 1995) compared to the potential yields
of 20-30 t/ha (Chweya and Mnzava, 1997). Continuous cultivation with limited
external fertilizer inputs leads to nutrient mining and reduced crop
productivity of ALVS. Compared to inorganic fertilizers, the use of organic
fertilizers which comprise farmyard, compost and green manures are cheap and
has been regarded to have long term benefits that include release of nutrients
to plants slowly and for a prolonged period of time in addition to improving
the soil physical properties.
Organic fertilizers
also sustain cropping systems through better nutrient recycling (Gulshan et al., 2013). However, the amount of
farmyard manure and plant biomass (other than crop residues) readily obtainable
to African farmers as organic input is usually inadequate (Tittonel and Giller,
2012). Besides, they have low nutrient content and release nutrients slowly
hence they cannot be used during periods of peak crop nutrient demand. However,
inorganic fertilizers which release nutrients fast and in large quantities are
expensive and therefore out of reach of poor
farmers.
Most smallholder
farmers involved in ALVs production depend on rain-fed agriculture which limits
production to the rainy seasons. However, irrigation during the off-season
presents an opportunity for the farmers to benefit from the low-supply versus
high demand scenario with better returns and good nutritional quality of these
crops. There is need to establish the impact of water stress on leaf yield and
nutritional quality of ALVs. There are various harvesting options used in ALVs
production. Some of the harvesting practices such as wholesome and piecemeal
harvesting may affect the productivity and nutritional quality of ALVs. Thus,
call for studies to establish optimal water, nutrient management and best
harvest practices to realize the yield potential without compromising the
quality attributes of ALVs.
African leafy
vegetables have been regarded as „insignificant crops‟ and excluded from
research attention in favor of major food and cash crops such as maize and tea
even though they have short production cycles, high yields with strong
nutritional quality. Limited studies have been carried out to determine the
impact of fertilizers (organic and inorganic), moisture stress and harvesting
method on yield and nutritional quality of cowpea and African nightshade.
1.3 Objectives
The main
objective of this study was to determine the leaf yield and nutritional quality
of cowpea and African nightshade grown under different fertilizer application,
harvesting methods and water stress levels to alleviate food insecurity,
malnutrition and poverty in Nigeria.
The specific objectives of the study
were:
i.
To
evaluate the effect of inorganic and organic fertilizers on growth, yield and
nutritional quality of African nightshade and cowpea.
ii.
To
evaluate the effect of harvesting method on the yield and nutritional quality
of African nightshade and cowpea.
iii.
To
determine the effect of water stress on growth, yield and nutritional quality
of African nightshade and cowpea.
1.4 Null Hypothesis
i.
Organic and inorganic fertilizers enhance the growth,
yield and nutritional quality of African nightshade and cowpea.
ii.
Piecemeal harvesting enhances the yield and
nutritional quality of African nightshade and
cowpea.
iii.
Water stress reduces the growth, yield and nutritional
quality of African nightshade and cowpea.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment