EFFECT OF CORPORATE TAX PLANNING ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF LISTED MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007495

No of Pages: 101

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The study examined the effect of corporate tax planning on the performance of listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria. The specific objectives of the study are; to examine the extent to which effective tax rate reconciliation affect return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria, to determine the effect of tax incentives and exemptions on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria and to determine the effect of debt tax shield on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Ex-post facto research design was adopted. Secondary data was used through the use of annual reports and accounts of the selected manufacturing firms. The population of the study is made up of all the manufacturing firms listed in Nigeria stock exchange, while the sample size is made up of 10 listed manufacturing firms after adopting Taro Yamane formula. Data was analyzed using panel data regression analysis. The finding revealed that corporate tax planning components (effective tax rate, tax incentives, debt tax shields) have a positive but insignificant effect on financial performance of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. The study concludes that though tax planning affects the financial performance but to a minima extent. Hence, there are other factors that can really determine the performance of firms outside corporate tax planning. The study recommends that manufacturing firms should engage in tax planning and at the same time pay attention to other factors that can affect their performance. The study also recommends that manufacturing firms should run an analysis on the effect of debt tax shield on performance before making decision of increasing their debt in the name of increasing performance






TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration page                                                                                                                     ii

Certification                                                                                                                            iii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                                  v

Table of content                                                                                                                      vi

Abstract                                                                                                                                  ix

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background to the Study                                                                                                 1

1.2. Statement of the Problem                                                                                                4

1.3. Objectives of the Problem                                                                                               6

1.4. Research Questions                                                                                              6

1.5. Research Hypotheses                                                                                                    6

1.6. Significance of the Study                                                                                              7

1.7. Scope of the Study                                                                                                           8

1.8. Definition of Terms                                                                                                         8

1.9. Limitation of the Study                                                                                                    9

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Conceptual Framework                                                                                                   10

2.1.1. Taxation                                                                                                                        10

2.1.2. Corporate Tax                                                                                                               11

2.1.2.1. Companies Income Tax Act                                                                                      15

2.1.2.2. Incidence of Corporation Tax                                                                           15

2.1.2.3. Incidence of Tax on Profits                                                                                       16

2.1.3. Corporate Tax Planning and its Measures                                                                    17

2.1.3.1. Measurement of Tax Planning                                                                                  19

2.1.4. Tax Planning and Risk                                                                                      22

2.1.5. Tax planning and financial risk                                                                        25

2.1.6. Tax planning and policy risk                                                                            26

2.1.7. Constraints of Tax Planning                                                                                         29

2.1.8. Level of Tax Planning Activities                                                                                 30

2.1.9. Performance                                                                                                                 31

2.1.10. Tax Planning and Corporate Performance                                                                 32

2.1.11. Tax Shifting                                                                                                                35

             2.2. Theoretical Framework                                                                                                   36

2.2.1. Ability to Pay Theory                                                                                                   36

2.2.2. Political Power Theory                                                                                                 37

2.2.3. Benefit Theory.                                                                                                             38

2.3. Empirical Review                                                                                                                        39

2.4. Summary of Literature Review                                                                                       54

2.5. Gap in Literature                                                                                                             61

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1. Research Design                                                                                                              62

3.2. Area of the Study                                                                                                             62

3.3. Source of Data                                                                                                                 62

3.4. Population of the Study                                                                                                   62

3.5. Sample size of the Study                                                                                                 62

3.6. Techniques of Analysis                                                                                                   63

3.7. Model Specification                                                                                                        63

3.8. Measurement of Variables                                                                                               64

CHAPTER 4: DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS

4.1. Data Presentation                                                                                                 65

4.2. Pre-estimation Tests                                                                                             65

4.2.1. Stationarity/ Unit Root Tests                                                                            65

4.2.2. Cointegration Test Results                                                                                66

4.2.3. Descriptive Statistics                                                                                        67

4.3. Data Analysis                                                                                                       68

4.3.1. Hausman Test                                                                                                   68

4.3.2. Panel Data Test                                                                                                 69

4.4. Test of Hypotheses                                                                                                          70

4.5. Discussion on Results                                                                                          71

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1. Summary of Findings                                                                                                      73

5.2. Conclusion                                                                                                                       73

5.3. Recommendations                                                                                                           74

5.4. Contribution to Knowledge                                                                                 74

5.5. Areas of Further Research                                                                                   75

REFERENCES                                                                                                                       76

APPENDICES                                                                                                                       

 


 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Tax is one of the major instruments of fiscal policy for regulating the economy of any nation. At various times, successive governments in Nigeria have employed the instrument of tax policy to encourage industrial and corporate growth in the private sector (Nwaobia, 2013). On the opposing side, taxation and tax policies in Nigeria do equally act as disincentive to manufacturing firms to create value for stakeholders and enhance the value of the firms. As noted by (Gatsi, Gadzo and Kportorgbi, 2013), taxation, observably, plays a role in the misfortunes of the manufacturing sector because tax policies, apart from generating revenue for the state, serve several other purposes. It can be used as an avenue to protect infant industries, create incentive for investors to invest in certain areas of the economy or to create disincentive for other activities (Gatsi, Gadzo and Kportorgbi, 2013). For example, Nwaobia (2013)  noted that adoption of unfriendly tax policies is one of the many reasons for the slow growth of the underground economy, where law-abiding individuals and corporate citizens seek refuge from wrongs inflicted on them by government.

One of the most important responsibilities for corporate tax manager is to strategize on minimizing a company's overall tax liability. Theoretically, firm’s tax liability is proportionally related to its profitability; attaining firm’s wealth maximization objective through diverse means of increasing profitability poses more challenge on firm’s ability to reduce its tax liability. Effective tax planning is defined by Scholes and Abdul (2012) as strategies that maximize the firm’s expected discounted after-tax cash flows. Apart from being vast in the tax laws, the tax consultants of any organisation should have extensive knowledge of the company, its history and how the organisation operates. It extends to the coordination of parties with diverse interests and information, involving domestic and foreign operations across multiple segments of the business including finance and financial reporting, management and technology (Maydew& Shackelford, 2005). 

According to Morien (2008), in well-organized economies, paying taxes by business is almost unavoidable. Effective tax planning strategies should produce benefits in terms of wealth creation for the company. Hence, tax planning is actually a subset of the overall financial planning of a company which needs to take into account investment, financing and wealth building strategies of the company. Majority of Nigerian firms are highly financed through equity, thus unable to enjoy the benefits of debt tax shield as related to thin capitalization.

Corporate tax planning refers to the legal utilization of the tax laws to one’s own advantage, to minimize the amount of tax payable by means that is within the law (Pastersen& Rico, 2008). According to Tiley (2005), corporate tax planning is what sensible people do in order to reduce their tax liabilities.  Corporate tax planning does not imply any conscious wrong doing, but rather finding loopholes in the tax laws which could result in paying less tax than required. Thus, effective tax planning strategies should produce benefit in terms of wealth maximisation for manufacturing firms.  Hoffman (1961) opines that, firms need to understand the prevailing tax laws and apply the laws in a manner that will reduce their tax burden. Scholes, Wolfson, Erickson, Maydew and Shelvin (2005) support the need for manufacturing firms  to engage in dynamic tax planning by responding to subsequent changes in the tax laws. Traditionally, tax planning is seen as activities that transfer resources which would have gone to government to corporate entities (Wang, 2010).

Tax planning is an integral part of financial planning and the area of financial structure decisions offers a tax manager and the company an opportunity to mitigate the company’s tax liability and improve on the financial performance of the firm.

Corporate tax planning can be measured using effective tax rate, capital allowance and tax shields (Rego, 2003). Effective tax rate (ETR) has been used extensively by prior researchers to measure the extent to which firms take advantage of tax incentives and different rules between financial reporting and tax reporting (Zimmerman, 1983; Rego, 2003; Rohaya et al., 2008). In measuring the outcome of tax planning, ETR could be the appropriate measure because it exhibits the gap of tax burden between "book- reporting-based" and "taxable income-based" (Abdul-Wahab, 2010). Another measure of tax planning is tax shield. A Tax Shield is an allowable deduction from taxable income that results in a reduction of taxes owed. The tax shield is divided into two, debt tax shield and non-debt tax shield. The debt tax shields in debt financing mentioned in the trade-off model is associated with exploiting the tax deductibility of interest expenses, so that firms will increase debt to benefit from tax shields.

Although tax planning is perceived to increase after-tax profit and enhance shareholders wealth, Hundal (2011) argues that, tax planning represents a serious loss of revenue to governments. According to Slemrod (2004), tax planning activities could have negative effect on government revenue needed for the provision of infrastructure and public utilities. In addition, Slemrod points out that, tax planning can also increase compliance cost of collecting taxes. Consequently, the tax planning strategy tends to give a positive impact on a firm's cash flow and its after tax rate of returns; however, tax planning strategies have a negative impact on the government's revenue and further, increase the compliance cost of collecting taxes. This concept is therefore significant for firms listed on the Nigeria stock exchange who may seek to improve on all their tax savings. Given the importance of this concept of tax planning for corporate organizations in Nigeria, there is a gap that the present study seeks to bridge by exploring different tax planning mechanisms available to firms listed on Nigeria stock exchange and the influence of corporate tax management on the financial performance of manufacturing firms quoted on Nigerian Stock Exchange.

However, it is believed that tax reliefs and rebates will influence investment decisions, growth and ultimately the performance of the companies. Thus, many studies on taxation and financial performance reveal that taxes have significant effect on the performance of companies (negative) and few others reveal mixed results that are inconclusive (Teraoui & Kaddour, 2012; Gatsi, Gadzo & Kportorgbi, 2013; Onuorah & Chigbu, 2013; Mucai, Kinya, Noor & James, 2014). It is on this ground that this study intends to examine the effect of corporate tax planning on the performance of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.


1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The major challenge of corporate entities, and in particular manufacturing firms, come in a midst of high corporate tax rates and other taxes that lead to high effective tax rates far above the statutory company income tax rate. With the introduction of the Information Technology tax, there are about forty different taxes levied on companies and individuals (Bammeke, 2012). Many of these taxes from the different levels of government overlap and are forcefully extracted from corporate organizations. The effect of these exactions of course is high cost structure for firms (Nwaobia, 2013). One will not fail to agree with Nnadi&Akpomi (2008) that a tax policy defines the cost structure of firms as it is factored into pricing. In addition, tax costs and eventual payout deplete the disposable income of individuals as well as the distributable profits of corporate organizations. These taxes in fact, do translate to a substantial cost to organizations and if not properly planned and managed can have adverse impact on the bottom line, cash flow and capacity to invest.

The payment of taxes is actually supposed to be according to income earned which ordinarily should not have been a burden, since those that earn higher pay more taxes and the low income earner pay less taxes (Bon, Remotin & Edgar, 2007).  However, the high rate of company income tax has created the problem of tax evasion of firms in Nigeria.  Tax avoidance is the willful and different lawful ways a taxpayer tries to reduce or eliminate his/her tax liabilities while tax evasion is the unlawful act to prevent payment of tax (Mughal & Akram, 2012).  The struggle leaves the government with less revenue and at the same time has brought companies so many unresolved tax issues with the government.  Due to the frustration, firms now employ the services of financial experts who could manipulate tax laws so as to reduce the burden of corporate taxation on them.  This has led to a high profile of tax avoidance for companies who could afford to hire tax consultants to lessen their tax liability by all means.

To mitigate the effect of taxes on liquidity and profitability of corporate bodies and by extension firm value, tax planning becomes imperative. But unfortunately, many companies are ignorant of the strategies they can adopt to legally mitigate their tax burdens.

Most of studies on corporate tax planning are majorly international works. Few studies that were carried out in Nigeria focused only on effective tax rate without considering other tax planning measures. This study intends to fill in the gap by examining the effect of corporate tax planning on financial performance of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

 

1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The main objective of the study is to examine the effect of corporate tax planning on the performance of listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria.

The specific objectives of the study include:

(i)             To examine the extent to which effective tax rate affect return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

(ii)           To determine the effect of tax incentives and exemptions on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

(iii)         To determine the effect of debt tax shield on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.


1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following questions guided the study

(i)             To what extent does effective tax rate affect return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria?

(ii)           What is the effect of tax incentives and exemptions on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria?

(iii)         What is the effect of debt tax shield on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria?


1.5 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

For the purpose of this study, the following hypotheses were stated in null form

H01: Effective tax rate  has no significant effect on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

H02: Tax incentives and exemptions have no significant effect on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

H03: Debt tax shield has no significant effect on return on asset of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

 

1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The study on the effect of corporate tax planning on the performance of manufacturing firms will be of a benefit to different groups of people which includes; government, companies, academic community.

Government: The government would greatly benefit from these research work since taxation is the major source of revenue. The findings of this study will enable them know how to charge and collect tax from manufacturing firms. The findings and recommendations of this study will educate government on policies that will help them collect taxes from companies without any form of tax evasion from the companies. The findings of this study will also help government to know when companies are going outside those tax holidays and tax relief granted to them in order to reduce tax payment illegally.

Companies: companies stands to benefit a great deal from this research work. As pointed earlier the financial manager needs a thorough knowledge of taxation in taking financing investment and decision making. The business manager needs to take advantage of the knowledge of the taxation to avoid excessive taxes and benefit from the initial and capital allowances. However, the findings of this study will help companies to take advantage all the tax relieves and allowances that will make them pay lesser tax while still acting by law. The findings from this study will also educate companies and tax managers on ways to plan their tax to avoid engaging or involving in tax evasion. 

Academic community: This study would help the academic community update their knowledge of the corporate tax planning. In other words, the study will educate students of this noble institution and other institutions on the effect of corporate tax planning on the performance of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

Finally other researchers and scholars in the area of taxation would find this work as a useful tool for further research work in this area.


1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study examined the effect of corporate tax planning on the performance of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria (2014-2018). The period is used because of the recent tax reforms that took place during the period of the study. This study is in the field of taxation which is a branch of accounting.


1.8 DEFINITION OF TERMS

Corporate tax planning: this refers to the legal utilization of the tax laws to one’s own advantage, to minimize the amount of tax payable by means that is within the law

Effective tax rate: effective tax rate for a corporation is the average rate at which its pre-tax profits are taxed.

Tax incentives: Deduction, exclusion, or exemption from a tax liability, offered as an enticement to engage in a specified activity (such as investment in capital goods) for a certain period.
Tax shield: A tax shield is a reduction in taxable income for an individual or corporation achieved through claiming allowable deductions such as interest on debt, mortgage interest, medical expenses, charitable donations, amortization, and depreciation.


1.9 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

The limitation of this study is the unavoidable constraints and problems encountered in the process.

Non-availability of records: This is one of the most important limiting factors in the course of the study. This includes the problems of easily getting the appropriate data due to bureaucracy which hinders the information flow in the country. In spite of this, the researcher is poised to making the best use of the available record to get the job properly done.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment