CHEMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF FLOUR FROM IMPROVED CASSAVA (MANIHOT ESCULENTUM CRANTZ) VARIETIES, AND QUALITY EVALUATION OF THEIR BREAD COMPOSITES

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009848

No of Pages: 145

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The study evaluated the effects of incorporating flours from a local, and select improved cassava varieties in bread formulation. Tubers of five new, improved cassava varieties, UMUCAS 36, UMUCAS 37 and UMUCAS 38, NR 87184 and TMS 0593 developed by the National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike were obtained from the research institute and local variety, Nwany oji was obtained from the local farmers, and processed into high quality cassava flour. The flours were used in producing 10 – 20% wheat-cassava bread. The flours were analysed for chemical composition and functional properties. The bread were evaluated for proximate composition and physical and sensory properties. The cassava flours had 8.19 – 11.42% moisture, 0.51 – 1.07% protein, 1.63 – 2.84% crude fibre, 1.10 – 2.63% ash, 0.91 – 1.06% fat and 84.11 – 85.09% carbohydrate. The wheat flour had 9.96% protein, 1.56% lipid 1.04% ash and 0.60% crude fibre. The HCN content of the cassava flours was 2.87 – 6.07 mg/kg. The functional properties of the flours were: bulk density 0.76 – 0.96 g/ml, water absorption capacity 1.12 – 1.46 g/g sample, oil absorption capacity 1.42 – 1.60 g/g sample, foam capacity 12.89 – 16.70%, foam stability 2.04 – 3.03%, emulsion capacity 41.02 – 44.40%, swelling capacity 16.12 – 20.43%, gelatinization temperature 58.82 – 65.02 °C and gelatinization time 1.49 – 2.07 min. The bread had 74.70 – 84.92% dry matter, 15.08 – 25.37% moisture, 6.61 – 12.01% protein, 1.26 – 1.91% crude fibre, 1.02 – 2.87% ash, 1.26 – 2.66% fat and 61.28 – 68.16% carbohydrate. The HCN content of the bread was 0.65 mg/kg – 2.58 mg/kg, increasing as the cassava flour portion increased. The physical properties of the bread were 265.50 g to 375.00 g loaf weight, 693.0 – 1445.0ml loaf volume and 2.61 – 3.76 ml/g for specific volume. Generally, there was in every variety an increase in loaf weight but decrease in loaf and specific volumes with increase in the percentage of cassava flour in the composition. The NR 87184 performed best among the improved cassava varieties. The sensory scores, 6.45 – 8.05 (colour), 5.75 – 7.95 (aroma), 5.90 – 8.05 (taste), 6.55 – 8.05 (crust appearance), 6.65 – 8.05 (crumb appearance) and 5.65 – 7.95 (general acceptability), indicated the samples received a minimum of moderate liking by the consumers. Over all, these cassava varieties looked promising for use in bread formulation. The choice of variety would much depend on intended quality goals. However, it may be the necessary to use appropriate improvers to boost the physical properties of the composite breads. This could encourage the adoption of the wheat-cassava bread policy.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page                                                                                                                    i

Declaration                                                                                                                 ii

Certification                                                                                                                iii

Dedication                                                                                                                   iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                    v

Table of Content                                                                                                         vi

List of Tables                                                                                                              xi

List of figures                                                                                                             xii

List of Plates                                                                                                               xiii

Abstract                                                                                                                       xiv

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1   Background of the Study                                                                                                    1

1.2   Statement of Problems                                                                                                       5

1.3   Justification                                                                                                                           6 

1.4   Objective of the Study                                                                                                        6

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Production of Cassava in Nigeria                                                                         8

2.2 Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of Cassava                                     9

2.3 Processing of Cassava                                                                                          10

2.4 Importance of Cassava Roots Processing                                                             12

2.5 Cassava Processing Treatments and Products                                                      14

2.5.1 Cassava processing involving fermentation                                                      14

2.5.2 Processing of cassava into unfermented product                                              15

2.6 Production of High Quality Cassava Flour (HQCF)                                            16

2.6.1 Cassava flour production and quality requirements                                          16

2.6.2 Starch composition of cassava flour and HQCF application                                     17

2.6.3 Functional properties of starch relative to HQCF use                                       19

2.6.4 Starch gelatinization                                                                                          19

2.7 Cassava Flour in Baked Foods – Application and Challenges                                     21

2.7.1 The application of cassava flour in baked food                                                 21

2.7.2 Challenges to the widespread use of cassava flour in baked food                 22

2.8 Wheat flour and its significance in bread making                                                24

2.9 Wheat Flour Substitution Policies in Bread Baking in Nigeria                                     25

2.10 Bread                                                                                                                   26

2.10.1 Baking Procedure                                                                                            28

2.10.2 Shelf life of bread                                                                                            28

2.10.3 Evaluating physical and sensory quality of bread                                           29

CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 Material Procurement                                                                                           31

3.2 Flour and Bread Production                                                                                 31

3.2.1 Cassava flour preparation                                                                                  31

3.2.2 Composite flour formulation                                                                             34

3.2.3 Bread formulation and production                                                                    34

3.3 Proximate Composition of Wheat and Cassava Flours and the Bread Samples            34

3.3.1 Determination of moisture content                                                                    41

3.3.2 Determination of ash content                                                                            41

3.3.3 Determination of crude fibre                                                                             42

3.3.4 Determination of protein content                                                                      42

3.3.5 Determination of fat content                                                                              43

3.3.6 Determination of carbohydrate content                                                                                                             43

3.4 Determination of Energy Value                                                                           44

3.5 Determination of Hydrogen Cyanide Content                                                      44

3.6 Functional Properties of the Flour                                                                        45

3.6.1 Bulk density (BD)                                                                                              45

3.6.2 Water/Oil Absorption Capacity (WAC/OAC)                                                  46

3.6.3 Foam capacity (FC) and foam stability                                                                         46

3.6.4 Emulsification capacity (EC)                                                                            47

3.6.5 Swelling capacity                                                                                              47

3.6.6 Gelatinization temperature and time                                                                 48

3.7 Physical Properties of Bread                                                                                48

3.7.1 Loaf volume determination                                                                               48

3.7.2 Loaf weight determination                                                                                49

3.7.3 Specific volume determination                                                                          49

3.8 Sensory Evaluation                                                                                               50

3.9 Experimental Design                                                                                            50

3.10 Statistical Analysis                                                                                             50

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Proximate Composition and Cyanide Content of Cassava Flour                                     51

4.1.1 Dry Matter and Moisture Contents                                                                    51

4.1.2 Crude protein                                                                                                     54

4.1.3 Crude fibre                                                                                                                     54

4.1.4 Ash                                                                                                                                 55

4.1.5 Crude fat                                                                                                            56

4.1.6 Carbohydrate                                                                                                                 57

4.1.7 Energy                                                                                                                58

4.1.8 Hydrogen cyanide concentration of the cassava flour                                                      59

4.2 Functional Properties of Wheat and Cassava Flour                                             62

4.2.1 Bulk density                                                                                                                   62

4.2.2 Water and oil absorption capacity                                                                                                                     66

4.2.3 Foam capacity and Stability                                                                                                                  70

4.2.4 Emulsion capacity                                                                                             73

4.2.5 Swelling index                                                                                                   74

4.2.6 Gelatinization temperature and time                                                                 75

4.3: Proximate Composition and Cyanide Content of Wheat-cassava Composite bread                                   77

4.3.1 Dry Matter                                                                                                         81

4.3.2 Moisture                                                                                82

4.3.3 Crude protein                                                                       84

4.3.4 Crude fibre                                                                     86

4.3.5 Lipid                                                                              87

4.3.6 Ash                                                                                                                     88

4.3.7 Carbohydrate                                                                                                     89

4.3.8 Energy                                                                                                                90

4.4 Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN) Concentration in the Bread                                       90

4.5 Physical Properties of Wheat-Cassava Bread Samples                                        94

4.5.1 Loaf weight                                                                                                        94

4.5.2 Loaf volume                                                                                                       98

4.5.3 Specific volume                                                                                                 101

4.6 Sensory Analysis of Wheat-Cassava Bread                                                         102

4.6.1 Colour                                                                                                                102

4.6.2 Aroma                                                                                                                107

4.6.3 Taste                                                                                                                  108

4.6.4 Crust and Crumb properties                                                                               108

4.5.5 General acceptability                                                                                         110

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Conclusion                                                                                                            111

5.2 Recommendations                                                                                                113

References                                                                                                                  114                 

 

 




 

LIST OF TABLES

3.1       Recipe for the Production of Wheat-Cassava Bread                                      35

 

4.1       Proximate Composition and Energy Value of Wheat and Cassava Flour 52

 

4.2       Functional Properties of Wheat and Cassava Flour                                       64

 

4.3       Proximate Composition and Cyanide Content of Wheat-Cassava Bread

            baked with 10% Cassava Flour                                                                      78

 

4.4       Proximate Composition and Cyanide Content of Wheat-Cassava Bread

baked with 15% Cassava                                                                                79

 

4.5       Proximate Composition and Cyanide Content of Wheat-Cassava Bread

baked with 20% Cassava Flour                                                                      80

 

4.6       Physical Properties of 10% Wheat-Cassava Bread Samples                                     95

 

4.7       Physical Properties of 15% Wheat-Cassava Bread Samples                                     96

4.8       Physical Properties of 20% Wheat-Cassava Bread Samples                                     97

4.9       Sensory Properties of 10% Wheat-Cassava Bread Samples                                     104

4.10     Sensory Properties of 15% Wheat-Cassava Bread Samples                                     105

 

4.11     Sensory Properties of 20% Wheat-Cassava Bread Samples                                     106

 


 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

3.1  A Flow Chart Demonstrating the Processing of Cassava to High Quality

Cassava Flour (HQCF) (Eriksson, 2013) modified                                        33

 

3.2  Flow Chart for the Production of Wheat-Cassava Bread                                  36

 

 

 


 

 

LIST OF PLATES

3.1       Sample Tubers of the Improved Cassava Varieties                                       37

3.2       Bread from 10 – 20% Wheat-NR 87184 Cassava Flour                                     37

3.3       Bread from 10 – 20% Wheat-TMS 0593 Cassava Flour                                     38

3.4       Bread from 10 – 20% Wheat-UMUCAS 36 Cassava Flour                                     38

3.5       Bread from 10 – 20% Wheat-UMUCAS 37 Cassava Flour                                     39

3.6       Bread from 10 – 20% Wheat-UMUCAS 38 Cassava Flour                                     39

3.7       Bread from 10 – 20% Wheat-Nwanyi Oji Cassava Flour                                     40

 

                                                                         

 

 


 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Bread is one of the oldest prepared and most widely consumed foods, serving as the staple food of several societies and regions (Akobundu, 2007) including Africa and Europe, contrary to the East Asian society where rice is the staple (Komlaga et al., 2012). Bread is defined as a food of any size, shape or form and consists of dough made from flour and water, with or without other ingredients, which have been fermented by yeast or otherwise leavened and subsequently baked or partly baked (Akobundu, 2006; Adeniji, 2013). Due to urbanization, increased wealth and changes in lifestyle, bread and other bakery products’ consumption in Nigeria is increasing. Leavened wheat bread has become a favourite food of many households in developing countries which may be attributed to increasing populations, urbanization and changing food habits (Onabola et al., 2003).

 

Principally, high quality breads in terms of large volume, good crust and crumb texture is produced from wheat flour (Okaka, 1997). Unlike cassava, wheat does not grow well under tropical conditions like in Nigeria. Hence, Nigeria depends Ayo and Nkama, 2004). on foreign countries for the importation of wheat (Ohimain, 2014). Following the high cost of wheat importation, bread becomes expensive in tropical countries, including Nigeria (Akubor and Obiegbuna, 2014).

The increased demand for bread with concomitant high cost of wheat importation has prompted the quest for substitutes for wheat in bread baking (The Nigerian government has evolved policies to curb the expensive wheat importation and the attendant economic losses using the composite flour technology, where most of the studies on wheat flour substitution centered principally on the root crops/tubers, especially cassava (Iwe, 2015). Different root tubers for flour composites perform differently in their functionality, and also favour different bread quality properties differently. Among the different wheat flour substitutes, the federal government policies have only been clearly vocal about the use of cassava flour. The high interest in the use of cassava flour in partial wheat flour replacement is because of its many economic and processing prospects (Nwosu, 2007). The cassava flours incorporated into the bread formulations are referred to as high quality cassava flour (HQCF), a flour produced from wholesome freshly harvested and rapidly processed cassava roots.The different levels of cassava in the partial wheat replacement in the composite flour policies range between 5% and 40% (Adeloye, 2012; Iwe, 2015).

The adoption of high yielding cassava varieties and the resulting increase in yield have shifted the problem of the cassava sector from supply to demand issues, such as finding new uses and markets (Echebiri and Edaba, 2008). This has led to intensive research on the use of its flour/starch in composite with wheat for the development of bread and other bakery products, pastries and confectioneries, and most recently pasta products (Nweke et al., 2002; Oladunmoye et al., 2004; FIIRO, 2006; Nwabueze and Anoruoh, 2009).

Cassava (Manihot esculenta) which is also called manioc, native to South America, is extensively cultivated as an annual crop in the tropical as well as subtropical regions for its edible starchy, tuberous root, a major source of carbohydrates (Clifton and Keogh 2016). Cassava grows well under tropical conditions. Cassava is drought tolerant, requires limited land for cultivation and grows well in poor soils (Aniedu and Omodamiro, 2012). It is a staple food in developing world (FAO, 1995; Agunbiade et al., 2017), the third-largest source of food carbohydrates in the world and one of the most drought-tolerant crops, capable of growing on marginal soils. Nigeria has comparative advantage in the cultivation of cassava. Cassava is vital to the economy of Nigeria, as Nigeria is the world's largest producer of cassava (Agunbiade et al., 2017).

In Nigeria where it is consumed extensively as the major staple food, cassava is known among the Igbo, Yoruba and Hausa tribes as ‘akpu’, ‘ege’ and ‘rogo’ respectively. In Nigeria and several other West African countries, including Ghana, Benin, Togo, Ivory Coast, and Burkina Faso, cassava tuber is converted into different traditional foods such as garri, fufu, lafun and tapioca. Cassava contains anti-nutritional factors and therefore must be properly processed before it is eaten. Improper processing of cassava can leave residual cyanide enough to cause acute cyanide toxicity, goiters, ataxia or partial paralysis (Agunbiade et al., 2017). The fermentation processes involved in these cassava derived foods reduce the level of antinutrients, making cassava safer for human consumption (Agunbiade and Adanlawo, 2007; Oboh and Oladunmoye, 2007).

It is well known in Africa that cassava’s rapid post-harvest deterioration is one of the constraints to its utilization. Once harvested, cassava roots are highly perishable and when stored, rapid physiological and microbiological deterioration occur. Moreover, there is often a considerable stigma against cassava, owing to the glucoside that can be toxic unless detoxified by processing. There is an occasional report of death due to consumption of cassava roots (Sanni et al., 1998). The two major varieties grown in Nigeria are the sweet and bitter varieties, which are classified on the basis of the cyanogenic glucoside contents of their roots (Erhabor and Emokaro, 2007).  The choice of cassava variety for processing into different industrial products also depends on their glycogenic glucoside content. It was also discovered that farmers often prefer the bitter varieties because they deter pests, animals, and thieves (Linley et al., 2002). Often times, the locally grown cassava varieties in the tropics face the challenge of cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and other agronomic challenges. Inspite of these major limitations, the commendable success of cassava as a choice staple root crop by farmers within the sub-region can be largely attributed to the development of varieties with improved characteristics for Africa’s agro-ecologies. Cassava production in Nigeria increased as a result of development of improved varieties by the National Root Crops Research Institute (NRCRI) Umudike and International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, who embarked on extensive research activity on cassava and have developed cassava cultivars that have been adopted and released into villages in Sub Saharan African countries (Kormawa et al., 2003). Thus, cassava cultivars with about 110 different names including the cassava mosaic disease resistant varieties are currently grown in the semiarid zones of West Africa. The CMD-resistant varieties are being said to be those commonly utilized today for processing into vital industrial products, top among which is the high quality cassava flours suitable for baking (Iwe, 2015).

Cassava flour is one of the derivatives from cassava roots whose processing technology is cheaper and easier than cassava starch production, besides its less consumption of water and energy and production of smaller quantity of by-products and waste (Abass et al., 1998; Aristizábal et al., 2017). The suitability of different flours for baking depends on their functional properties. Cassava in the form of starch and flour is increasingly being used as a raw material for processing into a range of food and this is because it has been shown to possess desirable characteristics in the food industry. However, certain properties of cassava flour and starch, such as physical, chemical, functional properties and thermal parameters are important for their being useful in food industry. Some functional characteristics have been reportedly correlated with certain key qualities of the product produced from such flours. For instance, water-binding and absorption capacities, dispersibility, swelling power, and solubility have a bearing on the carbohydrate quality and affect viscosity and gelling ability of flour (Oladunmoye et al., 2004). Therefore, the present study was aimed to assess the functional properties of flours from the improved cassava varieties and their consequent impact in wheat–cassava bread production.


1.2       STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS 

Wheat and corn and their flours imports represent a major burden on the economy of importing countries including trade imbalance, overdependence on foreign foods, loss of foreign exchange, food insecurity, as well as displacement of local food, with detrimental effects on the agricultural and technological development of these regions (Ohimain, 2014). The need for strategic development and use of local resources for producing low cost foods, such as bread and baked foods has been recommended by organizations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and the Federal Institute for Industrial Research Oshodi (FIIRO). Inclusion of cassava flour as composite for production of foods such as noodles, breakfast cereals, cookies, breads, cakes, pastries, muffins and doughnuts among others could reduce costs and increase the production of these products locally (Oyewole, 2002; Falade and Akingbala, 2009; Akinlonu, 2011). Measures to promote the use of cassava flour in tropical countries, particularly cereals importing countries, remain active. However, its implementation and consolidation has been linked to the sufficient availability of suitable locally sourced cultivars.

The breeding program by NRCRI/IITA which resulted in the production of several elite genotypes altered the botanical characteristics of the newly cultivars. This may have also altered the functional properties of the cassava product (flour) processed from these newly improved cultivars. There tend to be less research on this possible change in varieties and variation in the functional properties of each cultivar studied could be of significance in determining their suitability for different products. Thus, this led to the study, functional properties of the newly improved cassava cultivars and its quality in bread production. Furthermore, even though cassava flour has been incorporated in wheat composite for bread, development of new cassava varieties need to be evaluated in bread making and other physical and chemical properties. This is the thrust of this work.


1.3       JUSTIFICATION  

The success of the present study could encourage industrialists and entrepreneurs in using high quality cassava flour in composite bread making. The success of this study will also help restore confidence in the use of increased cassava flour and/or products. This is expected to help reduce the economic burden of wheat flour importation on the shoulders of master bakers. In Nigeria, it is the most important root crop in terms of food security, job creation, and income generation for crop producing households. This will be- of great advantage to rural producers and hence their economic power.


1.4       OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY 

The general objective was to determine the chemical and functional properties of improved cassava varieties and their application in composite bread production.

The specific objectives of the study were to:

1.     Produce flour from five newly improved cassava varieties and a local variety.

2.     Determine the proximate composition, HCN content and functional properties of these cassava flours.

3.     Formulate wheat-cassava composite flours.

4.     Produce bread from the composite flours.

5.     Determine the proximate composition and Hydrogen Cyanide content in the bread samples.

6.     Determine the physical properties of the composite bread samples.

7.     Determine the sensory properties of the bread made from the composite flours.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

8017

Total Item

Reviews (31)

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    This is so amazing and unbelievable, it’s really good and it’s exactly of what I am looking for

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Great service

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    This is truly legit, thanks so much for not disappointing

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I was so happy to helping me through my project topic thank you so much

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Just got my material... thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you for your reliability and swift service Order and delivery was within the blink of an eye.

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    It's actually good and it doesn't delay in sending. Thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I got the material without delay. The content too is okay

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you guys for the document, this will really go a long way for me. Kudos to project shelve👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    You guys have a great works here I m really glad to be one of your beneficiary hope for the best from you guys am pleased with the works and content writings it really good

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Excellent user experience and project was delivered very quickly

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    5 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you