ABSTRACT
This study was aimed at investigating
antitrypanosomal activities and haematological profile of crude extract and
fractions of the stem bark of Acacia
nilotica and Khaya senegalensis
plants against Trypanosoma brucei brucei
infected Wistar rats with a view to determining the phytochemical constituents
and LD50 of Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis, antitrypanosomal
activities of crude extract of Acacia
nilotica and Khaya senegalensis
against Trypanosoma brucei brucei
infected Wistar rats, antitrypanosomal activities of the plant fractions
administered to Trypanosoma brucei brucei
infected Wistar rats and haematological profile of Trypanosoma brucei brucei infected Wistar rats, before and after
administration of crude extract and fractions. The phytochemical constituents
and toxicity of the stem bark of both plants were determined by the standard
method and the LD50respectively. The methanolic extracts and fractions of the plants was
administered to the Wistar rats intraperitoneally daily and the parasitaemia
count was determined using the rapid matching method. PCV, WBC and differential
counts were determined before and after the administration to ascertain any
significant differences. The phytochemical constituents of the stem barks of Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis crude extracts and fractions revealed the
following secondary metabolites; Alkaloids, tannins, glycosides, cardiac
glycosides, saponins, triterpene, carbohydrates and flavonoids. The LD50 for the crude extract of the
stem bark of Acacia nilotica was 707.1mg/kg body weight while the LD50 for the fractions (N-hexane,
ethyl acetate and N-butane) was 547.7 mg/kg, 387.3 mg/kg and 707.1 mg/kg body
weight respectively. The LD50 for the crude extract of the stem bark of Khaya senegalensis was 547.7mg/kg body weight while the LD50 for the fractions (N-hexane,
ethyl acetate and N-butane) was 387.3 mg/kg, 547.7 mg/kg and 223.6 mg/kg body
weight respectively. The stem barks of Acacia
nilotica and Khaya senegalensis
crude extracts (100, 200, 300 and 400mg/kg body weight) and fractions (50, 100,
150 and 200mg/kg body weight) had antitrypanosomal activity. Parasites were cleared from circulation
within 12 days of treatment. Haematological indices of Acacia nilotica and Khaya
senegalensis in Trypanosoma brucei
brucei infected Wistar rats showed that there was no statistical significant change in the packed cell
volume, white blood cells and differential counts before and after treatment
with all doses of the crude extracts and fractions. The findings in this study
provide very useful source for biopharmaceutical industries for the development
of antitrypanosomal agents from the stem bark of Acacia nilotica and Khaya
senegalensis for therapeutic intervention in the control of African
trypanosomiasis. There is need for further extensive work on these plants using
different Trypanosoma species in the
management of African trypanosomiasis.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page………………………………………………………………………………………i
Declaration…………………………………………………………………………………….ii
Certification…………………………………………………………………………………..iii
Dedication…………………………………………………………………………………….iv
Acknowledgement……………………………………………………………………………..v
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………….vi
Table of
Contents……………………………………………………………………………viii
List of
Figures………………………………………………………………………………..xii
List of
Tables………………………………………………………………………………..xiii
List of
Plates………………………………………………………………………………….xv
List of
Appendices…………………………………………………………………………..xvi
List of
Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………….xvii
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………1
1.1 Statements of the Research Problem…………………..……………………………3
1.2 Justification…………………………………………………………………………...4
1.3 Aim…………………………………………………………………………………….5
1.4 Objectives……………………………………………………………………………..5
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………………………6
2.1 The Parasite: Trypanosoma brucei…………………………………………………..6
viii
2.2 The vector: Glossina
spp.……………………………………………………………9
2.3 Infection and Symptoms of Trypanosomiasis……………………………………..12
2.4 Disease Management………………………………………………………………..12
2.5 Treatment……………………………………………………………………………13
2.6 Epidemiology and Control………………………………………………………….16
2.7 Taxonomic Classification of Acacia
nilotica……………………………………….16
2.7.1 Plant
description……………………………………………………………………...18
2.7.2 Traditional
claims…………………………………………………………………….20
2.7.3 Medicinal uses of different parts of Acacia nilotica…………………………………20
2.8 Taxonomic Classification of Khaya
senegalensis………………………………….21
2.8.1 Plant
description……………………………………………………………………...23
2.8.2 Medicinal
uses………………………………………………………………………..25
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS…………………………………………………...27
3.1 Collection and Authentication of Plant Materials………………………………...27
3.2 Preliminary Processing and Preparation of Plant Materials…………………….27
3.3 Preparation of Crude Plants Extracts……………………………………………..27
3.4 Preparation of Plant Fractions using Partitioning
Fractionation (Solvent-Solvent Extraction)………………………………………………………..27
3.5 Experimental Animals……………………………………………………………...28
3.6 Trypanosome Stock…………………………………………………………………28
3.7 Phytochemical Screening of Plant Extracts……………………………………….28
3.7.1. Detection
of alkaloids………………………………………………………………...28
3.7.2. Detection
of tannins………………………………………………………………….29
3.7.3. Detection
of glycosides………………………………………………………………29
ix
3.7.4. Detection of cardiac
glycosides………………………………………………………29
3.7.5. Detection
of saponins………………………………………………………………...30
3.7.6. Detection
of steroids………………………………………………………………….30
3.7.7. Detection
of triterpenes………………………………………………………………30
3.7.8. Detection of carbohydrates…………………………………………………………...30
3.7.9. Detection
of flavonoids………………………………………………………………30
3.7.10. Detection of
anthraquinones………………………………………………………….31
3.8. Determination of LD50………………………………………………………………31
3.9. Determination of Antitrypanosomal Activities of the Crude
Extract…………...32
3.10. Determination of the Antitrypanosomal Activities of the Plant Fractions
using Partitioning Fractionation (Solvent-Solvent extraction)…………………………33
3.11. Determination
of Haematological Profile………………………………………….33
3.11.1. Packed Cell Volume
(PCV)………………………………………………………….33
3.11.2. White blood cell
(WBC)……………………………………………………………..34
3.11.3. Differential
count…………………………………………………………………….34
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESULTS……………………………………………………………………………35
4.1 Phytochemical Constituents of Crude and Fractions of Acacia nilotica
(stem bark)and Khaya
senegalensis (stem bark)………………………………...35
4.2 LD50 Crude and Fraction Extracts Analysis of Acacia nilotica and
Khaya
senegalensis…………………………………………………………………..39
4.3 Antitrypanosomal activities of crude extract and
fractions of Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis against Trypanosoma brucei brucei infected
Wistar rats.......39
x
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………………….66
5.1 Phytochemical Constituents of the Crude Extract and Fraction of the
Stem Bark of Acacia
nilotica and Khaya senegalensis…………………………….66
5.2 The LD50 of the Crude Extract and Fraction of the Stem Bark of
Acacia
nilotica and Khaya senegalensis against Adult Wistar
rats………………67
5.3 The Antitrypanosomal activity of the Crude Extract
and Fraction of the Stem Bark of Acacia
nilotica and Khaya senegalensis
against
Trypanosoma
brucei brucei infected Wistar
rats…………………………………..67
5.4 The Haematological profile for the Trypanosoma brucei brucei infected
Wistar before and after crude extract and fraction of stem bark of
Acacia
nilotica and Khaya senegalensis administration…………………………..69
CHAPTER SIX
6.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS………………………………….71
6.1 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………...71
6.2 Recommendations…………………………………………………………………..72
6.3 Contribution to Knowledge………………………………………………………...72
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………...73
APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………………80
xi
|
LIST OF FIGURES
|
|
Figure
|
Title
|
Page
|
2.1
|
The life cycle of Trypanosoma
brucei brucei……………………………….................8
|
2.2
|
Approved Drugs for First and Second Stage of Human
African Trypanosomiasis…..15
|
xii
|
LIST OF TABLES
|
|
Table
|
Title
|
Page
|
2.1
|
Taxonomic classification of Acacia nilotica…………………………………………17
|
2.2
|
Taxonomic classification of Khaya senegalensis…………..………………………...22
|
4.1
|
Phytochemical
Constituents of Crude Extracts of the Stem bark of
|
|
|
Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis……………………………………………..36
|
4.2
|
Phytochemical
Constituents of Fractions (N-hexane, Ethylacetate and N-butane)
|
|
of Stem
Bark of Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis…………………………...37
|
4.3
|
Physical
Characteristics of the Extracts of the Stem Bark of
|
|
|
Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis……………………………………………..38
|
4.4
|
LD50 of crude extract of Acacia
nilotica…………………………………………......40
|
4.5
|
LD50 of N-hexane fraction of Acacia nilotica………………………………………..41
|
4.6
|
LD50 of ethyl acetate fraction of Acacia nilotica……………………………………..42
|
4.7
|
LD50 of N-butane fraction of Acacia nilotica………………………………………...43
|
4.8
|
LD50 of crude extract of Khaya
senegalensis…………………………………….......44
|
4.9
|
LD50 of N-hexane fraction of Khaya senegalensis…………………………………...45
|
4.10
|
LD50 of Ethyl acetate fraction of Khaya senegalensis……………………………......46
|
4.11
|
LD50 of N-butane fraction of Khaya senegalensis…………………………………...47
|
4.12
|
Antitrypanosomal
activity Acacia nilotica (Crude
Extract) on Parasite Count
|
|
in Wistar Rats infected with Trypanosoma brucei brucei……………………………48
|
4.13
|
Antitrypanosomal
activity of Khaya senegelensis
(Crude Extract) on Parasite
|
|
Count in Wistar Rats infected with Trypanosoma brucei brucei…………………….49
|
4.14
|
Effect
of Administration of Stem Bark Crude Extract of
|
|
|
Acacia niloticaon Haematological Indices of Wistar Rats…………………………...50
|
4.15
|
Effect
of Administration of Stem Bark Crude Extract of
|
|
|
Khaya senegalensison
Haematological Indices of Wistar Rats……………………...52
|
4.16
|
Antitrypanosomal
activity Acacia nilotica (N-hexane
fraction) on Parasite
|
|
|
Count in Wistar Rats infected with Trypanosoma brucei brucei…………………….53
|
4.17
|
Antitrypanosomal
activity of Acacia nilotica
(Ethylacetate) on Parasite Count in
|
|
Wistar
Rats…………………………………………………………………………...54
|
4.18
|
Antitrypanosomal
activity Acacia nilotica (N-butane
fraction) on Parasite Count
|
|
in Wistar Rats infected with Trypanosoma brucei brucei……………………………55
|
xiii
4.19 Antitrypanosomal activity t of Khaya senegelensis (N-hexane fraction)
on
Parasite
Count in Wistar Rats infected with Trypanosoma
brucei brucei……...……56
4.20 Antitrypanosomal
activity of Khaya senegelensis
(Ethylacetate fraction) on
Parasite
Count in Wistar Rats infected with Trypanosoma
brucei brucei…………...57
4.21 Antitrypanosomal activity
of Khaya senegelensis (N-butane
fraction) on
Parasite
Count in Wistar Rats infected with Trypanosoma
brucei brucei…………...59
4.22 Effect of
Administration of Stem Bark Extract of Acacia
nilotica N-hexane
fraction on
Haematological Indices of Wistar Rats………………………………….60
4.23 Effect of Administration of Stem Bark Extract of Acacia nilotica Ethylacetate fraction on Haematological Indices of
Wistar Rats……………………………….....61
4.24 Effect of
Administration of Stem Bark Extract of Acacia
nilotica N-butane
fraction
on Haematological Indices of Wistar Rats………………………………….62
4.25 Effect of
Administration of Stem Bark Extract of Khaya
senegalensis
N-hexane
fraction on Haematological Indices of Wistar Rats……………………….63
4.26 Effect of
Administration of Stem Bark Extract of Khaya
senegalensis
Ethylacetate
fraction on Haematological Indices of Wistar Rats…………………….64
4.27 Effect of Administration of Stem Bark Extract of Khaya senegalensis N-butane fraction on Haematological Indices of
Wistar Rats………………………………….65
xiv
LIST OF PLATES
Plate Title Page
I
Photogragh of
Tsetsefly……………………………………………………...............11
II The stem
bark, root, seeds and leaves of Acacia
nilotica…………………………….19
III The stem
bark, flower, fruit, leaves and seeds of Khaya
senegalensis……................24
xv
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Title Page
I
Photograph of Trypanosoma
brucei brucei in blood film of Wistar Rats………….80
II Baseline
for Haematology and Chemistry values for Charles River Wistar Rats.....81
xvi
AAT
WHO
HAT
VSG
NITR
PBS
PCV
rpm
WBC
bw
IUCN
TDR
OECD
-African
Animal Trypanosomosis
-World Health Organization
-Human African Trypanosomiasis
-Variant Surface Glycoprotein
-Nigerian Institute for
Trypanosomiasis Research
-Phosphate
Buffered Solution
-Packed
Cell Volume
-Revolution
per minute
-White blood cell
-Body
weight
-International Union for Conservation of Nature and
Natural Resources
Tropical
Disease Research
Organistion
for Economic Cooperation and Development
CHAPTER
ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
African Trypanosomiasis (African sleeping sickness) is caused by
trypanosomes which is found in Sub-Saharan Africa and is threatening more than
sixty million lives on daily basis (Abdullahi and Emmanuel, 2012). Trypanosomes
are protozoan parasites in the family Trypanosomatidae. Most trypanosomes are
transmitted by the vector, tsetse flies (Glossinia
spp) which are found only in Sub-Saharan Africa, between latitudes 14o N and 20o S (Bernard and Alain, 2012). The
parasites include Trypanosoma brucei
gambiense and Trypanosoma brucei
rhodesiense, (cause Human African Trypanosomiasis). Other trypanosomes primarily affect animals
include Trypanosoma congolense,
Trypanosoma vivax, Trypanosoma brucei
brucei, Trypanosoma simiae and Trypanosoma godfreyi (Bernard and Alain,
2012).
Nigeria‟s natural habitation is made up of both savannah and tropical
rainforest, which falls within the endemic area in Africa i.e. between latitude
150Nand 290 S. The diverse flora offers a wide spectrum of unique medicinal plants.
There are varieties of studies of Nigerian plants used in the traditional
management of trypanosomiasis, indicating significant anti-trypanosomal
activity (in-vitro/in-vivo); some of
which the metabolites responsible have been isolated and reported (Atawodi et al, 2003).
Trypanosoma
brucei brucei are unicellular parasites
transmitted by the tsetse fly. They are
the causative agent of African animal trypanosomosis (AAT), also known as
Nagana. Trypanosoma brucei brucei is
the etiological agent for sleeping sickness which is one of the most serious protozoan diseases in Africa (Antia et al., 2009; Simarro et al., 2011).
1
The disease results in acute, sub acute or chronic disease characterized
by intermittent fever, anaemia, occassional diarrhoea, rapid loss of consciousness
and often terminates in death (Olukunle et
al., 2010). On the basis of mortality, Human African Trypanosomiasis is
ranked ninth among 25 infectious diseases in Africa (Bernard and Alain, 2012).
The current chemotherapy of the human trypanosomiasis relies on six
drugs namely; Suramin, Pentamidine, Melarsoprol, Eflorinithine, Arsobal and Mel
B, five of which were developed over 30 years ago (Steverding and Tyler, 2005).
All of the current therapies are unsatisfactory for various reasons, including
unacceptable toxicity, poor efficacy, undesirable route of administration, drug
resistance and high cost (Fairlamb, 2003). Natural products derived from plants
offer novel possibilities to obtain new drugs that are active against
trypanosomes (Hoet et al., 2004). The
local use of natural plants as primary health remedies is due to their
pharmacological properties. Many plant extracts owe their potency to the
presence of metabolites. These metabolites are usually found in various parts
of the plants like roots, leaves, shoots and barks. Many plants have therefore
become sources of important drugs and as such the pharmaceutical industries
have exploited medicinal plants as a source of bioactive agents that can be
used in the preparation of synthetic medicine (Kinghorn, 1994).
Acacia nilotica belongs to the family Leguminosae. It is called „Bagaruwa‟ in Hausa, „Gaude‟ in Fulfulde and „Kangar‟ in
Kanuri. It is commonly found in Guinea and Sudan savannah. Ethanol extract of
the leaves have been reported to have anticancer and antioxidant activity
(Kalaivani et al., 2010). The plant
parts are commonly used, particularly in the Northern and South-Western
Nigeria, as broad spectrum antimicrobials, especially in the treatment of
dysentery. Khaya senegalensis is a
tree in the Meliaceae family. It is
widely distributed in the Sub-Saharan savannah. It is called “madachi” in
Hausa, “dalechi” in Fulani, “ogonwo” in Yoruba and “ono” in Igbo.
2
The bark is dark-grey to grey-brown. It is used for carpentry and
construction. The bark is used for a variety of medical purposes such as
malaria, stomach complaints and headaches. It is applied externally to skin
rashes, wounds or any abnormality (Keay et
al., 1989).
1.1. Statement of the Research Problem
Trypanosomiasis, a disease of major importance in human and animals has
continued to threaten human health and economical development (Kuzoe, 1993;
WHO, 2014). The population at risk being about 69 million with one third of
this number being at a „very high‟ to „moderate‟ risk and the remaining two
thirds at a „low‟ to „very low‟ risk (WHO, 2014).
Trypanosomiasis is one of the most severe medical problems in Africa,
infecting around 50,000 people every year (Ohaeri, 2010), and also affects
50-70 million animals (Ogbadoyi et al.,
2007). Trypanosomiasis affects millions of people in Sub-Saharan Africa and is
responsible for the death of about half a million patients per year (Barrett,
1999; WHO, 2014).
Anaemia is the most outstanding clinical and laboratory feature of
African trypanosomiasis and also the primary cause of death (Bizimana et al., 2006).
Chemotherapy is the most widely used means of controlling the
trypanosomiasis. The few registered trypanocides are often associated with
severe side effects and required lengthly parenteral administration, lack
efficacy and are unaffordable for most of the patients (Legros et al., 2002). Chemotherapy and
chemoprophylaxis, which form the most important aspect of control and
eradication of trypanosomiasis in African countries, are beset with problems.
These include limited repertoire of compounds, resistance to drugs, drug
toxicity and protracted treatment protocols (TDR, 1984). Poor clinical
3
efficiency, drug resistance and toxicity are some of the limitations
facing programmes targeted at controlling the disease (Onyeyili and Egwu, 1995;
Geerts and Holmes, 1998; Legros et al.,
2000; Kamuanga, 2003).
Previous studies have shown that the crude extracts
of Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis have antitrypanosomal effects (antitypanocidal or
antitrypanostatic). The subject of
this study is to show that fractions of these plant extracts could exhibit
different and indeed more effective results.
1.2. Justification
The high costs and toxicity of synthetic drugs have stimulated renewed
interest in plant substitutes. With the emergence of drug resistant
trypanosomes, cost-effective new drugs in the treatment of sleeping sickness
are required.
Medicinal plants are less expensive and less hazardous to the health
than their synthetic counterpart hence medicinal plants with anti-trypanosomal properties
have paramount importance for the treatment of trypanosomiasis.
It has been known that plant products play an important role in certain
disease control; for example Hoet et al., (2004), stated that
natural products derived from plants offer novel possibilities to obtain new
drugs that are active against trypanosomes.
Chemotherapy is the most widely used means of controlling the
trypanosomiasis. The few registered trypanocides are often associated with
severe side effects (Guttering,
1985) and require lengthy parenteral administration, lack efficacy
and are unaffordable for most of the patients (Legros et al., 2002). Thus there is
the urgent need to source for new, cheap effective non hazardous plants
products that can help control trypanosomiasis.
1.3. Aim
The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-trypanosomal activity
of Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis and the
haematological profile of Trypanosoma
brucei brucei infected Wistar rats.
1.4. Objectives
The
specific objectives were to determine:
1. The
phytochemical constituents and LD50 of Acacia nilotica and Khaya senegalensis.
2.
The antitrypanosomal activities
of crude extract of Acacia nilotica
and Khaya senegalensis against
Trypanosoma brucei brucei infected Wistar rats.
3.
The antitrypanosomal activities
of the plant fractions administered to Trypanosoma
brucei brucei infected Wistar rats.
4.
The haematological profile of Trypanosoma brucei brucei infected
Wistar rats, before and after administration of crude extract and fractions.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Login To Comment