ABSTRACT
This research work
was undertaken in order to evaluate the role of Fiscal policies in the
development of Nigeria economy. A major issue in Nigerian economy recovery
relates to the prospect of adoption of the most relevant fiscal policies in its
economy. In view of this, the researcher addressed the following problems to be
curbed in this research study.
i.
Lack of required component of fiscal policies
ii.
Inconsistency in the use of fiscal policies.
iii.
Improper implementation of fiscal policies
iv.
Inability of the country to improve on existing fiscal policies.
Due to the nature of this research
work, ordinary method of data analysis and interval method were used. Both
primary and secondary data were used. Secondary data were gotten from
Newspapers and magazines, textbooks, journals and periodicals etc.
questionnaires were used in generating primary data.
From the analysis made, the researcher
discovered that between 1998 and 2000 fiscal years, the country has witnessed
many changes in its fiscal policies which are hinged on the combination
techniques applied on the components of fiscal policies, the mode of
implementation of fiscal policies and the degree of success in the implementation of process.
Based on the findings
made in this research study, the researcher recommends that the country should
embark on the following in order to develop its economy.
i.
The depreciation of naira must be urgently considered.
ii.
There should be stream – lining of activities of certain government amend
agencies
iii.
The government should make further fiscal adjustments.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page
Declaration of page
Certification
Abstract
Table of content.
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
of the study
1.2
Statement
of the problem
1.3
Objectives
of the study
1.4
Major
research hypothesis
1.5
Scope
and limitation of the study
1.6
Significance
of the study
1.7
Definition
of terms.
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1
History
of fiscal policies in the Nigeria pre-independence
2.2
Definition
and meaning of fiscal policies
2.3
Difference
between fiscal and monetary policies
2.4
Tax
as a tool of fiscal policy
2.5
Expenditure
in fiscal policy
2.6
Tax
and expenditure in fiscal policy
2.7
Limitation
of fiscal policy implementation
2.8
The
role of the central bank in the formulation and implementation of fiscal
policy.
CHAPTER THREE
3.1
Introduction
3.2
Research
design for the study
3.3
Sources
of data
3.4
Methods
of data analysis
3.5
Population
and sample size
3.6
Design
and administration of questionnaires
CHAPTER FOUR: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1
Introduction
4.2
Presentation
of data for 1998 fiscal year
4.3
Analysis
of data for 1997 through 1998 fiscal year
4.4
Analysis
of the federal government revenue and expenditure of 1999– 2000
4.5
Analysis
of the state of the economy (1999 – 2000)
4.6
Interpretation
of data.
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
5.1
Introduction
5.2
Discussion
of findings
5.3
Summary
of findings
5.4
Conclusion
5.5
Recommendation
Questionnaire sample.
Bibliography
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
OF THE STUDY
The economy of any country, irrespective of its structure
is regulated by certain policies developed by the government. Some of these
include economic policies, social policies, monetary policies etc. however of
all these policies economic policies are most fundamental. The economic factors
are cynical because they serve as a foundation for the success of the other
policies of government. The constituent element of these economic policies need
to be manipulated simultaneously to achieve the desired results. The techniques
of manipulating the economic factors play an important role two. One of the
essential arms of economic policies – the fiscal policy, serve as a means of
planning, organizing, controlling and coordinating the tempo of activities in
the economy. Fiscal policy in itself can be said to be made up of specific
course of action involving the formulation of tax structure and expenditure
patterns. The direction of these expenditures and taxes are specific in nature
for results or changes. Before the world war, fiscal policy as a key to
economic restructuring and development has been in existence. Many economists
had propounded theories as a means to economic prosperity from the destruction
of the world war, but in the early 20the century, Lord John Keynes put forward
on articulated and constructive solution to solving economic problem. Lord
Keynes in his book explain that the revamping of an economy could be achieved
through the redirection of government expenditures from war machines to soft
loans to increase investment, generate employment and consequently increase
aggregate demand as a means of getting hold on the hyperinflation that existed
after the Second World War.
In Nigeria, the earliest known forms of fiscal policies
were used. It was established as far back as 19th century by the British
Administration. Then the political system became complex due to the existence
of the indigenous government under Emirs, Obas, Obongs, Obis etc. along with
the colonial masters. In effect, payment for the administration of the country
were made to the British government.
The government policy used by the colonial masters on
revenue for development was adopted from Dr. Earl Grey report (1852) in which
he advocated economic development amongst civilized people. Through self
determination under the British supervision. Because of the existence of local
authorities which led to indirect rule policy, the policy suited Nigeria. The
revenue generation method which was based on duties paid on imported goods was
pursued because it avoided disruption of the indigenous social and economic
system and its incidence did not directly affect the average Nigerian. Besides,
revenue from duties the British government support however, began to dwindle
due to increase public criticism in Britain against spreading of Brutish
influence in West Africa. 1870, the government supplement stopped and was
reduced from #5,000.00 to #2,000.00 to #1,000.00 in 1862, 1863 and 1865
respectively. The expenditure was solely directed towards improving the comfort
of the British officers and the maintenance of law and orders. These and then.
The revenue and expenditure volume also increase considerably well into the
20th century. Considering this modern time, fiscal policy as a means of
economic development are not developed in isolation. They are formulated and
implemented simultaneously with monetary policies, foreign policies by the
government with the aim of having a synchronized approach in tackling economic
problems. The generally accepted fiscal policy measure incorporates welfare
economics as a means of reducing adverse effects that may arise thus reducing
the standard of living of the citizens of the country.
From the foregoing, this research is aimed at identifying
the role of fiscal policies in the development of Nigerian economy.
1.2 STATEMENT
OF THE PROBLEMS.
Fiscal policies can be valuable tool for economic growth
and development if accurately and timely implemented. Therefore by the end of
this project the following questions will be answered.
a.
Do Nigeria fiscal
policies posses the required components and impact needed to fiscal economic
growth?
b.
Are the fiscal policies
consistent or not?
c.
Are they properly
implemented?
d.
Can any improvement be
made
1.3 OBJECTIVES
OF THE STUDY
a.
To examine the fiscal
policies formulation in Nigeria from 1998 – 2000
b.
To identify the role
they play in the development of Nigerian economy
c.
To determine if these
roles have been consistent with stated objectives of the government.
d.
To determine the extent
of implementation of formulated fiscal policies.
e.
To make recommendation
where appropriate.
1.4 MAJOR
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS.
In order to interpret
the result of this research study, the following hypothesis are formulated
1.
Ho: Fiscal policies have not
helped in the development of Nigerian economy
H1: Fiscal policies have helped
in the development of Nigerian economy.
2.
Ho: For some years now, fiscal
policies have not been properly implemented.
H1: For some years now, fiscal
policies have been properly implemented.
1.5 SCOPE
AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
The scope of this research work has been limited to
fiscal policy formulations and implementation in Nigeria between 1998 and 2000.
it also includes the relationship between fiscal policies and other government
economic policies how it is used to fight inflation, unemployment, encourage,
investment/production of goods and services and generally encourage private
participation in economy building.
This study further highlights the relevance of fiscal
policies in the Nigeria economy. Its emphasis, encompasses the component of
fiscal policies. Its relationship with other disciplines, how it is used in the
economy. It does not however include comparison with other countries since
economic structure and system differ and therefore would amount to unfair
comparison. Constraints faced during this research work include.
a.
Limitation of cost and
time
b.
Restricted access to
some classified documents
c.
Fiscal disability and
scarcity of related items.
1.6 SIGNIFICANCE
OF THE STUDY
As a result of unequal importance of a stable and
unstable economy to both the public and private sectors, this research work
will be of benefits to
a.
Government for better
planning of all policies related to their responsibilities to the economy in
particular and the country as a whole.
b.
The professional – who
analyze the economic system and whom this study will give an insight into
further research and application in their academic fields.
c.
Students – as part of
their academic pursuit.
d.
The entrepreneurs and
Business men who also need to understand the implications and effects of
certain fiscal policies that can have on their fortunes directly or indirectly.
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS.
STATUTORY ALLOCATION: A
fund established by the federal government for pooling of extra – budgetary
revenue of unexpected income especially from oil exports. It also provided a
sources of fund for emergency purpose
TAX: Compulsory
payments by individuals corporate organization and partnership into the pursue
of government for running of its activities.
TAX AVOIDANCE: A
legitimate way of not paying tax by engaging in non-taxable activities.
TAX EVATION: An illegal
way of not paying tax, one is liable to pay to the government. It is a criminal
offence.
PER CAPITAL INCOME: A
method of assessing the standard of living in any country. It involves determining
potential income per person in an economy.
MULTINATIONALS: Large
firms in Nigerian that are one of the numerous subsidiaries of the parent
companies aboard.
FOREIGN POLICY:
Articulated course of action that defines Nigeria’s relationship with other countries
and its stand and attitude towards certain international issues.
BUDGET: An economic
tool used by government to estimate its expected revenue and project
expenditure over a period of time usually a year.
MARGINAL PROPENSITY OF
INVESTMENT: That degree of increase in investment due to increase in income.
INFLATION RATE: The
rate or speed at which the general price level are increasing.
MARGINAL PROPENSITY TO
CONSUME: That degree of increase in consumption level as a result of increase
income.
DEBT CONVERSION
PROGRAMME: A system initiated by the federal government through the central
bank in which the country’s external debts are sold through auction to
interested parties.
NATIONAL ROLLING PLAN:
A kind of fiscal policy adopted by government especially during 198 – 2000 year
which aimed at achieving real economic growth and macroeconomic stability in
order to fight the problems of unemployment and poverty in the society.
Login To Comment