ABSTRACT
This study
attempted to examine the effect of punishment and reward on the performance of
secondary school students and to determine the gender difference in the
students’ performance in schools.
The participants
for this study comprised 120 respondents made up of 60 male and 60 female
students. The instruments used were questionnaires and multiple choice test,
based on Mathematics and English Language which were administered to the
selected respondents.
The Pearson Product
Moment Correlational Coefficient and the t-test were used to analyse three null
hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The results showed that there is a
significant relationship between reward and academic performance of students,
that a significant relationship exists between punishment and academic
performance of students in secondary schools.
Also, it was
revealed that there is significant gender difference in the academic
performance of students in secondary schools.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
page i
Certification
ii
Dedication
iii
Acknowledgements
iv
Abstract
v
Table
of contents vi
Chapter One: Introduction 1
1.1
Introduction to the Background 1
1.2
Statement of the Problem 4
1.3
Purpose of the Study 5
1.4
Research Questions 5
1.5
Research Hypotheses 6
1.6
Scope of the Study 6
1.7
Significance of Study 6
1.8
Definition of Terms 7
Chapter Two: Literature Review 8
1.1
Causes of Indiscipline in Schools
1.2
Guidelines on the Proper Use of
Punishment and Reward
1.3
Behaviour Modification as a Remedy for
Improving Academic Performance
1.4
Technique for Increasing Performance
1.5
Methods of Decreasing Maladaptive
Behaviour that leads into inadequate performance
1.6
Punishment
1.7
Guidelines for using seclusion time out
Chapter Three: Research Methodology 36
1.1
Research Design 36
1.2
Population of the Study 36
1.3
Sample and Sampling Technique 37
1.4
Instrument and Validation 37
1.5
Administration of Instrument Sample 37
1.6
Statistical Method of Data Analysis 38
Chapter Four: Data Analysis and
Presentation of Results 39
4.1
Introduction 39
4.2
Testing of Hypothesis 39
Chapter Five: Discussion and Conclusion
42
5.1
Discussion 42
5.2
Conclusion 43
5.3
Recommendation 43
References
46
Appendix
49
CHAPTER ONE
1.1 Introduction to the Background
Punishment according
to Ilogu (2004) is defined “as the presentation of any annoying (aversive)
stimulus as a result of the performance of a response”.
Reward is that which is given in return
for performance or service. Reinforcement is compensation. It is the fruit of
men’s labour or work. Often, the term reward is used as a synonym for positive
reinforcement.
Punishment is the act of inflicting
penalty for an offence or fault. Punishment is chastisement or castigation for
an offence or fault. Punishment and reinforcement are two concepts used in
educational context to maintain a good discipline in the classroom, and the
school at large. Psychologists have systematically investigated the effect of
number of reinforcement variables on the course of learning.
The greater the amount of reinforcement
the more rapid the rate of learning. Punishment and reinforcement can be of
good advantage to the teacher, in the sense that they promote good discipline
in the school. One aim of maintaining discipline in school is to teach the
child that there is moral orderliness in the world, and that certain behaviour
and performance call for praise (reinforcement) and some call for blame
(punishment).
For the child, reinforcement and
punishment are both essential for regulation of good performance. One important
aspect of the child development is that he becomes responsive to social praises
and blame (reward and punishment). This implies that in the process of growth
of the child, social control is necessary as to enable him or her acquire
positive habits necessary for growth and development of character and ethical
standards.
As punishment is effective in producing
submission, so reinforcement are used to produce desirable behaviour which
leads to good performance in learning in schools. Punishment makes the child
realises his mistakes and so avoid it in future. It makes the child to respect
the authority. Punishment for wrong doing is part of a child’s training, this
gives room to good performance in their academic activities. The student should
be encouraged to cultivate the habit of self discipline rather than
authoritarian methods of controlling their performance (Nwanna, 1975).
To be of any use to the child, both
punishment and reinforcement must be understood and deserved by the child being
punished or rewarded or else according to Awoniyi (1985) the child will be
confused, he may not even value it and so make jest of it, thereby making it
loose its usefulness which it is intended.
Although reinforcement should be more
employed than punishment, yet they both serve the same purpose of maintaining
good discipline in the classroom. Punishment serves as a warning, so that a
particular act that leads to poor performance should not be repeated by the
child. Reinforcement on the other hand is meant to build up pleasant memories
for acting desirably, which can lead to good performance which a child will
some how like to maintain if possible in his learning.
For the child, punishment and reward
are both essential for regulation of good performance. For punishment and
reinforcement to work effectively, they must be used together. While punishment
is a warning or corrective measure reward is a sign of approval of a good
performance in the school or classroom. They exist in close relationship. The problem
of classroom situation towards learning activities which can lead to good
performance is largely solved through punishment and reinforcement. Hence, the
need to justify and straighten out its use for effectiveness in maintaining
good performance in schools.
1.2
Statement of the
Problem
It has been
discovered that indiscipline among youths of Nigerian schools have become a
source of worry in the school system. These have resulted to poor performance
of the students in the schools. Students in schools are involved in
indisciplinary behaviour which rages from noise making, rioting, truancy,
creating confusion, examination malpractice, drug abuse, sexual harassment,
rape, stealing, truancy, absenteeism etc.
Even the teachers
are not playing their own roles. Some teachers are involved in trading instead
of teaching the students. While some come to the classroom only when they fill
like coming rather than using minor punishment and reinforcement in order to
get the best performance from the students.
1.3
Purpose of the
Study
The purpose of this
study is to examine the effect of punishment and reward on the performance of
secondary school students in Bariga Local Government Area of Lagos State. Also
to determine whether there is gender difference in the students performance in
school.
1.4
Research Questions
The following
questions were raised in this study:
1.
Is there any relationship between punishment and students’
performance in school?
2.
Is there any relationship between reward and students’
performance in schools?
3.
To what extent will there be any gender difference in the
students’ performance in schools?
1.5
Research Hypotheses
The following
hypotheses were formulated in this study:
2.
There is no significant relationship between punishment and
student’ academic performance in school.
3.
There is no significant relationship between reward and
academic performance of students in schools.
4.
There is no significant gender difference in the performance
of students in schools.
1.6
Scope of the Study
The study is
limited to selected schools. The study examines the effect of punishment and
reward on the academic performance of students in selected secondary schools in
Bariga Local Government Area of Lagos State.
1.7
Significance of the
Study
Just as students
tend to learn fast under a conducive environment. The use of punishment and
reward will bring forth:
1.
Useful result in the learning process of the students.
2.
Punishment can effectively eliminate an undesirable
responses.
3.
In learning it is most effective to reward or punish the
student immediately after the desired response occur.
4.
The more reinforcement is delayed the less effective it
becomes.
1.8
Definition of Terms
1.
Punishment: According to Ilogu
(2004) punishment is defined as the presentation of any annoying (aversive)
stimulus as a result of the performance of a response.
2.
Reinforcement: According to
Hilgard and Atkinson (1972), reinforcement is defined as any event that increases
the probability of a response.
3.
Positive
Reinforcement:
Ilogu (2004), positive reinforcement is defined as a presentation of a
reinforcing stimulus so as to increase
or maintain the rate of response or frequency of behaviour.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment