Abstract
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
stimulates financial sector growth through the presence of foreign
participation in investment in the nation. This study explores the relationship
between foreign direct investment and financial sector growth, providing
empirical evidence from Nigeria. Annual time-series data were gathered on foreign
direct investment, capital formulation, Gross Domestic Product, local financial
market from 1980-2009. The empirical model was analyzed using the econometric
techniques of ordinary least square method, unit root test, co-integration
test, and Error correction Mechanism,. The findings suggest that the inflow of
FDI has a positive impact on the Financial Sector in the short run but fail to
translate to real long financial sector growth that could promote speedy
economic growth due to the fact that the bulk of foreign direct investment has
been channeled to other sectors of the economy namely the Oil and Gas Sector.
The study recommends that government should encourage and formulate policies
that will increase the volume and magnitude of Foreign Direct Investment into
the Financial Sector as well as implement policies that attract foreign
participation in domestic economy and create good and conducive investment
climate that assures that foreign businesses thrive, among others.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Title page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgements iv
List of Tables/ figures viii
Abstract ix
CHAPTER ONE- INTRODUCTION
Background to the Study
Statement of the Problem
Objectives of the Study
Research Questions
Hypothesis for the Study
Significance of the Study
Brief Methodology
Plan of the Study
CHAPTER TWO- LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
2.1
Introduction
2.2
Empirical review
2.3
Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth
2.4 Theories
of Foreign Direct Investment and Financial Sector Development
2.5 The
Nigerian Financial Sector
CHAPTER THREE- ANALYTICAL FRAME WORK AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Theoretical
Framework
3.3 Methodology
3.4
Re- statement of Hypothesis
3.5
Model Specification
3.6 Model
Estimation Techniques
3.7
Unit Root Test
3.8 CoIntegration
Analysis
3.9 Source
of Data
CHAPTER FOUR- EMPIRICAL RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1
Description of Statistics
4.2
Unit Root Test
4.3
Co integration Test
4.4 Long
run Static Regression Analysis
4.5 Error
Correction Model
4.6 Coefficient
of determination
4.7 Short
Run Model’s Goodness of Fit
4.8 Stability
Test
CHAPTER FIVE- SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
SUGGESTION FOR FURTHER STUDY
5.1 Summary
5.2 Recommendations
5.3 Conclusion
5.4 Suggestion
for further studies
References
Appendix
List of Tables
4.1 Summary of Statistics
4.2 Unit
Root at a level
4.3 Unit Root at First Difference
4.4 Johansen
Co integration
4.5 Static Regression Error Correction Model Estimate
List of figure
4.1 Growth of Foreign Direct Investment and GDP finance in Nigeria
4.2 Square
Test of Model Stability
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Foreign direct investment has been
referred to as a source of foreign finance urgently, needed for development by
the Third World. Indeed, Kojima (1978) as cited in Oke (2012) has indicated
that instead of conflicting with international trade, foreign direct investment
complements it.
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
usually consists of external resources, including technological, managerial and
marketing expertise, in addition to capital. These may generate considerable
impact on Nigerian real sector in general and production capabilities in
particular, since they are directly linked to productive investment (Oke
(2012), Foreign Direct Investment also facilitates transfer of technology and
managerial and marketing skills, which are indispensable in the quest for
viable solution to the problems of industrial inputs and diversification as
well as expansion of export. This implies that, the ability of Nigeria to
sustain growth and development as well as meet her external obligations,
millennium development goals (MDG) and to realize her dream of joining the
league of highly industrialize nation by the year 2020 depends on adequate
inflow of foreign investment resources.
However, the country has been
experiencing difficulties in her effort to meet these goals. According to the
researcher referred earlier, little or nothing is available for new investments
at the current level of foreign exchange earnings and high external debt
servicing obligation, As a result, traditional model of economies assumes that
average and marginal consumption propensities are high, that savings are low
and that the formation of new productive capital is restricted given the low
level of per capital real income characterizing underdeveloped economies,
It
may be noted that high population
growth, import dependency, misguided deregulation/re-regulation, lack of
incentives for investment in terms of infrastructure globalization and
political instability including mono-cultural economy are some reasons
identified in literature for the slow economic growth in Nigeria. In light of
the above scenario, it is discovered that there exists a gap between the
domestically available supply of savings, foreign exchange, government revenue
and skills and the planned level of the resources necessary to achieve
development targets (Todaro, 1977).
However, this gap necessitates the need
for external resources to augment domestic resources in the country. These
external resources could be in the form of foreign aids or grants, short-term
credit, state loans and private investments. Although, effort have been made to
investigate real sector of various economies of the world, but there exist no
concrete evidence from literature that brings out the salient problems,
findings, conclusion and recommendation with respect to financial sector FDI.
In literature, research is scarce on the contributions of FDI to Nigerian
economy. It is for this purpose that this study is aimed at filling this
literature gap.
Most arguably, it is expected “a priori”
that the impact of FDI is noticeable and felt on Services and Financial
sectors, there is still need to carry out a quantitative analysis of FDI and
financial sector variables in Nigeria to back it up. This is because of the
obvious reasons that can be attributed to Nigeria economy like inadequate power
supply, weak infrastructural facilities, inconsistent and unstable government
policies, inefficient capital market, Bank robbery and abuse, environmental
risk; such as the Niger Delta Militant activities, to mention just a few. It is
against this backdrop that the study seeks to assess the impact of Foreign
Direct Investment on financial growth in Nigeria.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) stimulates
financial sector growth through the presence of foreign participation in
investment in the nation. It appears
that Nigeria financial sector is yet to explore the potential of foreign direct
investment. However, the ability of Nigeria to sustain growth and development
as well as meet her external obligations, millennium development goals (MDG)
and to realize her dream of joining the league of highly industrialize nation
by the year 2020 depends on adequate inflow of foreign investment resources.
Unfortunately, the country has been
experiencing difficulties in her effort to meet these goals. At the current
level of foreign exchange earnings and high external debt servicing obligation,
little or nothing is available for new investments. This study seeks to explore
the relationship between foreign direct investment and financial sector growth,
providing empirical evidence from 1980-2009.
1.3 The Research Objectives
The purpose of this study is to assess the
contributions of foreign direct investment on financial sector growth in
Nigeria from 1980- 2009.
However, it will:
1.
Assess the contribution of foreign direct
investment to the financial sector growth in Nigeria.
2.
Examine the casual relationship between
foreign direct investment and financial sector growth in Nigeria.
1.4 Research Questions
1. To
what extent has foreign direct investment contributed to the country’s
financial sector growth?
2. Is
there a significant casual relationship between foreign direct investment and
growth of financial sector in Nigeria?
1.5 The Research Hypothesis
The null hypothesis stated for the study
is:
1.
There is no significant causal
relationship between foreign direct investment and financial sector growth in
Nigeria.
1.6 Significance of the study
The purpose of any research study is to
make positive contributions. This study is not a different one. This study has
identified the impact of Direct Foreign Investment on the growth of financial
sector. It will help to document the contributions of foreign direct investment
on financial sector of Nigeria. The study is relevant in the true sense that it
will make an attempt to provide concrete evidence the relationship between
foreign direct investment and financial growth since literature that brings out
the salient problems, findings, conclusion and recommendation with respect to
financial sector FDI is scarce. It will them add literature to the existing
field.
1.7 Brief Methodology
The study utilized secondary data sourced
from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and African Development Indicator (ADI).
The time series data covers the period 1980 through 2009. The study adopted and
modified the model used by Ojo (2012) which provides evidence for the
relationship between foreign Direct Investment and Labour Financial market. It
employed the technique of Simple Regressions Analysis of Ordinary Least Square
(OLS) and Cointegration analysis of Error Correction Model (ECM) using E- view
package.
1.8 Plan of Study
The study was divided into five chapters.
Chapter one covers the introduction, statement of the problem, objectives of
the study and research questions among others. The review of related and
relevant study to provide proper support to the study was conducted in Chapter
two, while Chapter three discuses the theoretical framework and the methodology
for the study. Chapter four presents the empirical result and discussion of
major findings of this study and in Chapter five, a summary, conclusion and
recommendations were made on the basis of the findings of the study.
Login To Comment