ABSTRACT
Mechanical and morphological properties of pure
polypropylene (PP) polypropylene/calcium carbonate (PP/CaCO3)
and polypropylene/cashew nutshell powder (PP/CNSP)are reported in this work.
The composites were prepared by compression moulding technique. The compressed
moulded articles that is the PP, (PP/CaCO3)
and (PP/CNSP) of different compositions (10/90, 20/80, 30/70, 40/60, 50/50,
60/40, 70/30, 80/20) were characterised for mechanical properties, water
absorption capacity, structural characterisation and morphological
arrangements. Comparative studies was made on the mechanical properties of the
pure polypropylene (PP), polypropylene/calcium carbonate (PP/CaCO3)
and polypropylene/cashew nutshell powder (PP/CNSP). Mechanical properties such
as tensile strength, Young‟s modulus and percentage elongation at break,
Hardness behaviour and Impact resistance of both PP/CaCO3
and PP/CNSP composites increased with increment of filler weight content
(10-50g). It was noted that the specimen samples of ratio50/40
PP/CaCO3 and PP/CNSP had the highest
tensile strength, when compared with other sample. These specimens could bear
loads of 1075N and 468N with extensions of 4.44mm and 6.12mm respectively.
Decrease in the mechanical properties were noted on continuous addition of both
fillers, with drastic reduction of the mechanical properties at (70g and 80g)
fillers weight except hardness that slightly increased at all the filler
loading (10-80g). The surface sorption characteristics of calcium carbonate and
cashew nutshell powder have been investigated and the highest percentage was
recorded at 20/80 of PP/CNSP (100%). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
revealed that, both 60/40 PP/CaCO3,
PP/CNSP and 50/50 PP/CaCO3,
PP/CNSP are completely compatible at which there are no phases that are grossly
separated. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that, the incorporation of the two
fillers into the neat polypropylene decreased the crystallinity of the
polypropylene and the crystallinity decreases with increasing
filler‟s loading.
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE PAGE
ABSTRACT
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Research
problem
1.3 Aim and
objectives
1.4 Justification
1.5 Scope of the
study
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE
REVIEW
2.1 Background of
Literature
2.2 Components of Composite Material
2.2.1 Matrix
2.2.1.1Polypropylene
2.2.2 Polymerization
2.2.3 Properties
2.2.4 Applications
2.3 Reinforcements
functions on polymer composite
2.3.1 Classification
and types of fillers
2.3.2 Types of
fillers
2.3.3 Physical properties, uses and health effects
2.3.4 Environmental impact
2.3.5 Classification of CaCO3
2.3.6 Uses of CaCO3 as filler
2.3.7 Cashew tree
2.3.8 Distribution
2.3.9 Constituents
cashew
2.3.10 Polymers and polymer composites
2.3.11 Polymer composites modification
2.3.12 Types and components of polymer composites
2.3.13 Parameters affecting properties of composites
2.3.14 Applications, trends, and challenges of fillers
2.3.15 Compounding and mixing processes
2.4.1 Plasticizers
2.4.2 Stabilizers
2.4.3 Colourants
2.4.4 Flame retardants
2.5 Thermoplastics processing techniques
2.5.1 Extrusion
2.5.2 Types of
extrusion
2.5.3 Moulding
2.5.4 Compression
moulding
2.5.5 Injection
moulding
2.5.6 Blow moulding
2.5.7 Reaction-injection
moulding (RIM)
2.5.8 Rotational
moulding
2.5.9 Calendaring
2.6.1 Mechanical
properties of plastics
2.6.2 Hardness
2.6.3 Abrasion
resistance
2.6.4 Compression set
and flex fatigue resistance
2.6.5 Flex fatigue
resistance
2.6.6 Tensile
strength, elongation at break and modulus
2.6.7 Resilience
2.7 Morphological Characterisation
of Composites
2.7.1 Spectroscopic
tests
2.7.2 Microscopic
techniques
2.7.3 Thermodynamic
methods
2.7.4 X-ray
diffraction (XRD)
2.7.5 Basics of
crystallography
2.7.6 Production of
X-rays
2.7.7 Bragg’s law and
diffraction
2.7.8 Applications of
XRD
2.7.9 Scanning
electron microscopy (SEM)
2.7.10 Thermoforming/solid phase forming
2.8 Physical
Method of Characterising Composites
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 MATERIALS AND
METHODS
3.1 Materials
3.2 Apparatus Used
3.3 Equipment Used
and their Sources
3.4 Preparation of
Sample
3.4.1 Filler
Preparation
3.4.2 Mixing of the
Compound
3.5 Determination
of Mechanical Properties of the Prepared Polypropylene Composites
3.5.1 Determination of Tensile strength
3.5.2 Determination of Hardness of the prepared composites
3.5.5 Determination of Impact Strength of the prepared
samples
3.5.6 Determination of microstructure of the prepared
composites byScanning Electron Microscopy
3.5.7 Determination of the crystallinity of the prepared
composites by X-ray Diffraction
3.5.8 Determination of water absorption behaviour of
composites
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESULTS
4.1 Result of Tensile Strength
4.2 Effect of Filler Loading on the Stress of the Composites
Prepared
4.2 Result of Elongation at break
4.4 Result of Young’s Modulus
4.5 Impact strength results
4.6 Hardness Results
4.7 Sorption Result
4.7 Morphology Results
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
5.1 Structural Characterisation of Cashew Nutshell Powder
5.2 Tensile Strength
5.3 The impact strength
5.4 Hardness
5.5 Statistical Analysis of Impact Strength
5.6 Effects of modification of unfilled and filled PP,
PP/CaCO3 and PP/CNSP Composites on equilibrium sorption
5.6.4 Morphological studies on the PP, PP/CaCO3 and PP/CNSP
composites
5.6.5 Structural Characterisation of the Polypropylene
Composites prepared
CHAPTER SIX
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Summary of Results
6.3 Conclusion
6.3 Recommendations
REFERENCES:
APPENDIX
LIST
OF ABBREVIATIONS
ABS Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene
AFM Atomic Force
Microscope
ASTM American
Society for Testing Materials
CaCO3 Calcium
Carbonate
CNSP Cashew
Nutshell Powder
CRH Chopped Rice
Husk
EVA Ethylene
vinyl acetate
HDT Heat
Distortion Temperature
HPP homogeneous
polypropylene
IM Initial
modulus
LDPE Low density
polyethylene
LLDPE Linear low
density polyethylene
LOE Linseed Oil
Epoxide
NR Natural
Rubber
OM Optical
Microscope
PE Polyethylene
PEMA Poly (ethyl
methacrylate)
PET Polyethyleneteraphthalate
PIB Polyisobuthylene
PMMA Polymethamethylacrylate
PP Polypropylene
PPC Polypropylene
copolymer
PRPCs Particle
reinforced plastics composites
PS Polystyrine
PVAc Polyvinyl
acetate
PVC Polyvinylchloride
SALS Small angle
light scattering
SAXD Small-Angle
X-ray diffraction
SAXS Small-Angle
X-ray Scattering
SD Spinodal
decomposition
SEM Scanning
Electron Microscopy
TS Tensile
strength
UTM Universal
Testing Machine
WAXD Wide Angle
X-ray Diffraction
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Particle reinforced plastics composites (PRPCs) are
composites to which fillers (discrete particles) have been added to modify or
improve the properties of the matrix and/or replace some of the matrix volume
with a less expensive material. Common applications of PRPCs include structural
materials in construction, packaging, automobile tires, medicine, etc.
Determination of effective properties of composites is an essential problem in
many engineering applications (Van, 2003 and Love, 2004).
These properties are influenced
by the size, shape, properties and spatial distributions of the reinforcement
(Liu, 1995 and Lee, 1998).
Modification of organic polymers through incorporation of
additives yield, with few exceptions, multiphase systems containing the
additive embedded in a continuous polymeric matrix. The resulting mixtures are
characterised by unique microstructures that are responsible for their
properties. Polymer composites are mixtures of polymers with inorganic or
organic additives having certain geometries. Thus, they consist of two or more
components and two or more phases. In addition to polymer composites, other
important types of modified polymer systems include polymer-polymer blends and
polymeric forms. Blending procedures had been employed since time immemorial.
The principle of blending is geared towards achieving property averaging. A
blend is therefore the physical mixture of two or more substances, without a
chemical bond, (Mamza, 2011).
Among the various studies carried out with particle filled
PP worth mentioning, are works by Maiti and Mahapatro (1992 and 2011) on the
tensile and impact behaviour of nickel powder-filled PP and CaCO3
filled PP composites. It was discovered that the addition of nickel-powder
causes decrease in tensile modulus, tensile strength and elongation-at-break
with increasing filler. In the case of the addition of CaCO3,
tensile modulus increased while tensile strength and elongation-at-break
decreased with increasing filler. Izod impact strength for the composites at
first application of filler loading increased up to a critical filler content,
beyond which the value decreased inappreciably.
1.2
Research problem
The filler cashew nutshell powder (CNSP) has been under
utilised, in composite formulation, as it is considered as waste material
especially in the Northern part of Nigeria. Thus, there is need to convert this
waste to wealth meanwhile this conversion would serve as an environmental waste
control.
1.3
Aim and objectives
The main aim of
this work was to determine the impact resistance of cashew nutshell powder and
calcium carbonate used as fillers for polypropylene.
The
specific objectives of the study are;
1.
Collection of samples from the outlet centre and preparation
of samples.
2.
Determination and characterisation
of cashew nutshell powder using X-ray diffraction analysis.
3.
To carryout mechanical tests such as
hardness, tensile strength, elongation at break, impact resistance and to carry
out sorption test on the produced samples,
4.
Determination of microstructure of
the processed samples using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
1.4
Justification
Cashew nut shell powder as one of the fillers used in this
research can reduce the cost of production of articles compared to the
commercially available fillers. It can create job opportunity locally, by
paying people supplying it for the researchers. The use of cashew nutshell
powder as filler can help to reduce environmental pollution caused by the
shell, this is because, it is biodegradable and it can decay and becomes a
pollutant to the society.
1.5
Scope of the study
1.
To prepare and characterise CNSP filler
2.
To fill cashew nutshell powder in polypropylene
3.
To fill calcium carbonate in polypropylelene
4.
To carry out mechanical tests on the
prepared composite, such as hardness, tensile strength, elongation at break,
sorption test, and impact resistance
5.
To compare the impact resistance of
cashew nutshell powder and calcium carbonate filled polypropylene
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment