SOIL SURVEY AND LAND EVALUATION FOR SELECTED CROPS IN IBIONO IBOM LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF AKWA IBOM STATE, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009814

No of Pages: 158

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to evaluate the soils of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria, through a comprehensive soil survey and land suitability analysis for selected arable and tree crops. The main aim was to characterize, classify, and assess the suitability of the soils for the cultivation of cassava, maize, plantain/banana, rice, cocoa, oil palm, and rubber. Fieldwork involved delineating three major soil mapping units based on topography and elevation gradients: 0–50 m (unit 1), 51–100 m (unit 2), and above 100 m (unit 3). Soil profile pits were excavated in representative locations, and samples were collected for detailed laboratory analysis. Laboratory procedures included both physical and chemical analyses. Particle size was determined using the Bouyoucos hydrometer method; chemical properties such as pH, total nitrogen, organic carbon, available phosphorus, exchangeable acidity, and total exchangeable bases were analyzed using standard procedures. Results indicated significant variations in soil properties across the mapping units, reflecting differences in drainage, texture, fertility status, and topographic position. Soil mapping unit 1 was classified as Typic Epiaquept (Gleyic Cambisol), unit 2 as Aeric Epiaquept (also Gleyic Cambisol), and unit 3 as Typic Hapludult (Haplic Acrisol). Land evaluation based on the parametric method revealed that all mapping units were marginally suitable (S3) for plantain/banana and oil palm. Cocoa was not suitable (N1) in any of the units due to acidity and fertility limitations. Cassava was moderately suitable (S2) in unit 3 and marginally suitable (S3) in units 1 and 2. Maize was highly suitable (S1) in unit 3, moderately suitable (S2) in unit 2, and marginally suitable (S3) in unit 1. Wetland rice was best suited to unit 1 (S2), marginal in unit 2 (S3), and not suitable (N1) in unit 3. Rubber was only marginally suitable (S3) in unit 3. The major limitations affecting suitability included poor soil fertility, drainage challenges, and soil physical constraints, although climatic conditions were generally favorable for crop production. It is recommended that soil fertility management practices, including organic and inorganic amendments, be adopted to improve crop performance. Strategic land use planning based on the suitability classes can enhance sustainable agricultural productivity in the region.






TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1           Background of the Study

1.2       Justification of the Study

1.3       Objective

 

CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1       Concept of Soil Survey

2.2       Brief History on Soil Survey Development In Nigeria

2.2.1    Purposes and uses of soil survey

2.2.1.2 Types of soil survey

2.2.1.3 Exploratory soil survey:

2.2.1.4 Reconnaissance soil survey

2.2.1.5 Detailed soil survey: Detailed soil surveys identify more of the variation in soil

2.2.1.6 Intensive soil survey (Very detailed survey)

2.2.1.7 Soil survey and mapping

2.2       Concept of Land and Landuse.

2.2.3    Land use planning

2.2.4    Land utilization type

2.3       Soil Classification

2.3.1    Purpose of soil classification

2.3.2    Soil classification in Nigeria

2.3.3    Soil classification in Akwa Ibom State

2.3.4    Land classification and land use

2.4       Characterization Of Soil

2.5       Land Evaluation

2.5.1    Methods of land evaluation

2.5.2    Parametric method

2.5.3    Qualitative land evaluation

2.6       Soil Suitability Evaluation

2.6.1   Methods of evaluating land suitability

2.7       Land Evaluation And Land Suitability

2.8       Physico-Chemical Properties Of The Soil As Influenced By Different Land Use Systems

2.9.1    Soil texture

2.9.2    Soil bulk and particle densities

2.9.3    Total porosity

2.10     Soil Chemical Properties

2.10.1  Soil reaction (pH) and electrical conductivity

2.10.2  Soil organic matter and carbon

2.10.3 Total nitrogen and carbon-nitrogen ratio

2.10.4 Available phosphorus

2.10.5  Exchangeable bases

2.10.6 Cations exchange capacity

2.10.7 Percentage base saturation

2.10.8  Selected micronutrients

 

CHAPTER 3

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1       Description Of The Study Area

3.1.1    Location of the study area:

3.1.2    Physiography of the study area

3.1.3   Geology and land forms of study area

3.1.4    Drainage

3.1.5    Climate

3.2       Vegetation And Land Use

3.3       Preliminary Soil Mapping/Field Work

3.3       Sample Preparation

3.4       Laboratory Analyses

3.6       Soil Classification

3.7       Data Analysis

 

CHAPTER 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1.      Morphological Characteristics of Soils of the Mapping Units

4.2.      Physical Properties of Soils of the Mapping Units

4.3       Chemical Characteristics of Soils of the Mapping Units

4.4       Soil Classification of the Mapping Units

4.10:    Taxonomic Classification of Soils of the Study Area

4.11     Land Evaluation

 

CHAPTER 5

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Conclusion

5.2       Recommendations

References

Appendix 1: Profile Pit Description

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1:     Monthly Rainfall of the Study Area (mm) 2006 to 2016

Table 3.2:     Monthly Mean Temperature (oC) of the Study Area (mm) 2006 to 2016

Table 3.3:     Monthly and Annual Solar Radiation (MJm2 day-1) of the Study Area 

                       (2006 -2016)

Table 3.4:     Monthly and Annual Relative Humidity (%) of the Study (2006 – 2016)

Table 3.6:     Land quality and factor rating for Cassava (Manihot Esculenta crantz)

Table 3.7:     Land quality and factor rating for maize (Zea Mays)

Table 3.8:     Land quality and factor rating for Plantain/Banana (Musa spp) cultivation

Table3.9:      Land quality and factor rating for wetland rice (Oryza sativa)

Table 3.10:   Land quality and factor rating for cocoa (Theobroma cacao) cultivation

Table3.11:    Land quality and factor rating for oil palm (Elaeis guinensis) cultivation

Table 3.12:   Land quality and factor rating for Rubber (Havea brasiliensis) cultivation

Table 4.1:     Morphological characteristics of soils of mapping unit 1 (IBOM 1)

Table 4.2:     Morphological characteristics of soils of mapping unit 2 (IBOM 2)

Table 4.3:     Morphological characteristics of soils of mapping unit 3 (IBOM 3)

Table 4.4:     Physical characteristics of soils of mapping unit 1 (IBOM 1)

Table 4.5:     Physical characteristics of soils of mapping unit 2 (IBOM 2)

Table 4.6:     Physical characteristics of soils of mapping unit 3 (IBOM 3)  

Table:4.7:     Chemical characteristics of soils of mapping unit 1 (IBOM 1)

Table 4.8:     Chemical characteristics of soils of mapping unit 2 (IBOM 2)

Table 4.9:     Chemical characteristics of soils of mapping unit 3 (IBOM 3)

Table 4.11:   Land characteristics of the mapping units

Table 4.12:   Suitability Class Scores of the Soil Mapping Units for Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) Cultivation

Table 4.13:   Suitability Class Scores of the Soil Mapping Units for Plantain/Banana (Musa spp) Cultivation

Table 4.14:   Suitability Class Scores of the Soil Mapping Units for Rubber (Havea brasiliensis) Cultivation

Table 4.15:   Suitability Class Scores of the Soil Mapping Units for oil palm (Elaeis guinensis) Cultivation

Table 4.16:   Suitability Class Scores of the Soil Mapping Units for cassava (Manihot Esculenta crantz) Cultivation

Table 4.17: Suitability Class Scores of the Soil Mapping Units for maize (Zea Mays) cultivation

Table 4.18:   Suitability Class Scores of the Soil Mapping Units for wetland rice (Oryza sativa) cultivation

  

 

 

 

 

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 3.1: Map of Akwa Ibom State Showing the Study Area

Figure 3.2: Map of Ibiono Local Government Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

 

1.1        BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Soil survey involves soil characterization, evaluation and soil mapping which provides a powerful resource for the benefit of mankind especially in the area of food security and environmental sustainability (Esu, 2004). Soil classification is the systematic arrangement of soils into groups or categories on the basis of their characteristics. Soil characterization studies are major building blocks for understanding the soil, classifying it and getting the best understanding of the environment. Characterization provides the information for our understanding of the physical, chemical, mineralogical and microbiological properties of the soil. Early soil surveys were made to help farmers locate soils responsive to different management practices and to help them decide what crops and management practices were most suitable for the particular kinds of soil on their farms (Soil Survey Staff, 1999).

A sustainable land management is the one that does not degrade the soil. The success in land management to maintain soil quality depends on the understanding of how the soil responds to land use. This is because the rate of soil quality degradation depends on land use, the soil types, topography and climatic condition among these factors, inappropriate land use system aggravates degradation of soil physico-chemical and biological properties. In Akwa Ibom State, soil degradation due to inappropriate land use is threatening the livelihood of millions of people (Udo, 2008). This is because soil is a critically important component of the earth’s biosphere.

Land evaluation is mainly the analysis of data about land containing soils, climate, vegetation, and so forth, in terms of realistic alternatives for improving the use of the land. The role of land evaluation and, more recently, the quantification of soil quality are highly important for good land management and sustainable use of land resources. Although ‘soil quality assessment’ is often used as a misnomer for ‘land evaluation,’ both could be regarded as the interpretative phase of soil survey. While land evaluation is concerned with the assessment of land performance when used for specified purposes, soil quality is defined as ‘the capacity of a specific kind of soil to function, within natural or managed ecosystem boundaries, to sustain plant and animal productivity, maintain or enhance water and air quality, and support human health and habitation.’ In considering productivity, environmental quality, and health as major functions of soil, this definition requires that values be placed on specific soil functions as they relate to the overall sustainability of alternate land-use decisions.

The basic needs of man such as food, clean water, fuel, clothing, shelter etc are provided by land, which is in limited supply (Doran, 2012). Land is the part of the earth's surface which includes all physical elements such as climate, soil, forests, minerals, mountains, lakes and animals (Meyer and Turner, 1992). Soil, a major and essential component of land supplies water and nutrients to plants and provides stability for roots. Soil acts as a store of minerals, organic matter, water and energy and diverse chemical compounds. Soil provides an important habitat for organisms, spending either whole or part of their life cycles in the soil (Lal, 2002).  Soil acts as natural filter for groundwater/drinking water. During the process of filtration, solid substances are mechanically filters out of the percolating water, and binds to soil solid (humus and clay) (UEIS, 2012). Soil serves as the foundation for building and act as an aquifer recharge. Soil function as a transformer of substances as can be seen in the transformation of heavy metals within the soil (UEIS, 2012).

Conversion of natural forest land into cultivated land decreases organic matter content and affects the soil physical and chemical properties. Improper land-use and soil management systems cause soil degradation (Saraswathy  et al., 2017). Many researchers reported that conversion of natural forest land to cultivated farmland, deforestation, overgrazing and excessive mineral fertilization caused significant changes in soil properties (Conant  et al., 2013; Tate  et al., 2014; Fraterrigo  et al., 2015, Saraswathy  et al., 2017). Therefore, improper land-use and poor soil management resulted in land degradation, soil deterioration and reduction in crop productivity.

Proper land-use systems and soil management practices play significant roles in the reduction of soil loss and restoration of soil fertility (Lal, 2010). Land-use change from annual crops to permanent crops reduces the detrimental effect of soil tillage and agrochemical usage. Permanent crops bring a valuable number of benefits such as water conservation, nitrogen cycling and carbon sequestration of more than 50% when compared to conventional crops (Liu  et al., 2010). Land use and soil management practices influence the soil nutrients and related soil processes, such as erosion, oxidation, mineralization, and leaching, etc (Celik, 2005).  It modifies the processes of transport and redistribution of nutrients. In non-cultivated land, the type of vegetative cover is a factor influencing the soil organic carbon content (Liu et al., 2010). Thus, land use and type of vegetation must be taken into account when relating soil nutrients with environmental conditions (Liu  et al., 2010). Low crop yield and environmental degradation caused by improper land use is a worldwide problem that has attracted attention in sustainable agricultural production systems (Vangen et al., 2006). Based on these findings, the land should be evaluated based on physical and environmental conditions such as quality and characteristics.

Suitability is a measure of how well the qualities of the land unit match the requirement of a particular form of land use. Land evaluation indicates to the degree of suitability for a land use without respect to economic condition. It emphasizes of a relatively permanent aspect of suitability, such as climate and soil condition rather than changeable ones, such as prices, therefore the evaluation of land qualities for suitability for crops emphasizes the land suitability evaluation, and component of land unit for each agricultural crop. (Liu  et al., 2010).This has necessitated a yearning for decision leading to the most beneficial use of limited land recourses. Evidence based decision made for optimal benefits of land recourses have considerable implication for conserving land resources for the future (Abah, 2013).

Land use evaluation determines land use option which is important for land use planning. In Akwa Ibom state in general, and in Ibiono Ibom in particular, increasing demographic pressure, ecological problems, particularly soil erosion, in addition to oil spillage and accelerated rural urban industrialization diminish available good agricultural land. 

Ibiono Ibom local government area in Akwa Ibom State is located within the tropical rain forest belt which is often evergreen in nature, and is characterized by tall trees and hard tropical trees with thick ground cover. But on the contrary, urbanization and unsustainable environmental practices have resulted in the disappearance of this ideal vegetation type. Few of the tropical trees encountered in the suburbs are either planted in homestead gardens or in abandoned farmlands. The area is now in the modified rain forest locally known as the oil palm bush (Okon, 2018). This vegetation type is dominated by wild growing palm trees, tall grasses and secondary re-growth in abandoned farmlands for soil fertility restoration. Even this vegetation type is fast disappearing as it is constantly being cleared for road construction, building of houses and other land requirements of urbanization. In fact, more than 70% of vegetation has disappeared while the remaining 30% is found in small areas especially the periphery of the city (Okon, 2018). Compound farmland is common in the area and is characterized by annual farming with mixed and sequential cropping or monoculture (CRBDA, 1978).

This form of land use is found mostly in Ibiono and Itu axis of the area, scattered trees including cocoa, oil palm, mango and papaya make up this land use type. The area is used for annual cropping with very short fallow periods. Crops planted include maize, plantain, yam, banana, cassava and sweet potato (Ituen, 2017). Fresh water swamp forests are largely found but not restricted to watercourses, which are made up of a mosaic of grass plains, palm swamp, scrub and forest on water logged and seasonally flooded soil. The prominent land use in this area is farming; human intervention through agriculture, construction, environmental modification and quest for fuel wood, timber, no timber forest product has greatly altered the vegetation. This system has led to serious soil erosion particularly gully development, hence, decline in soil productivity due to degradation of soil physical and chemical property. It affects the soil structure and structural indices including bulk density, total porosity and pore size distributions, infiltration rate, aggregate stability among others. Therefore, there is special need for soil survey and land evaluation in Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area to ensure sustainable crop cultivation, high crop productivity, reduction in land degradation and increased in environmental safety. Such evaluation may be for selected arable and permanent crops commonly cultivated in the area. This would promote effective land-use planning.


1.2       JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

Improper land-use and soil management systems cause’ soil degradation and inability of soil to perform effectively its ecosystem functions (Saraswathy  et al., 2017). Rapid decrease in agricultural lands due to urbanization and industrialization is a phenomenon which is observed worldwide, including Akwa Ibom State. The construction of industrial establishments, roads, sports facilities and entertainment centres etc, on fertile agricultural lands resulted in rapid decrease in agricultural lands. The use of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes generally takes place on the fertile agricultural lands which are generally Class I to Class IV agricultural lands. In these classes of given land-use where any plant can grow, they are plain, well-drained, and the soil depth is high. In this way, urbanization, one of the most serious threats for the world’s biodiversity, permanently alters land use in Nigeria. Also, agricultural land-use and soil management systems have been generally adopted without recognizing consequences on soil properties, soil fertility and environmental quality, and therefore significant decline in agricultural soil quality has occurred (Imeson  et al., 2016).

The results of exploiting land-use systems without consideration of the consequences on soil quality have cause much environmental degradation. Other non-agricultural uses, such as industrial and urban uses, also have important negative consequences on soil quality, due to local contamination, soil sealing, and changes in the dynamics of the landscape systems (Imeson  et al., 2016). The preservation of soil quality lies in practicing sustainable land use and soil management systems, to balance productivity and environmental protection. Hence, there is need to investigate the suitability of soils of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area for selected arable and tree crops cultivations for effective land-use planning select and adopt the best land-use options.


1.3       OBJECTIVE

The main objective of the study is to conduct soil survey and land evaluation of Ibiono Ibom L.G.A for arable and tree crop production.

Specific objectives were to:

(i)        characterize and classify soils of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area of Akwa

            Ibom State

 (ii)      evaluate the suitability of the soils for production of four arable crops (cassava,

            maize, plantain/banana, rice) and three tree crops (cocoa, oil palm and rubpber)


 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7979

Total Item

Reviews (31)

  • Anonymous

    5 days ago

    This is so amazing and unbelievable, it’s really good and it’s exactly of what I am looking for

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    Great service

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    This is truly legit, thanks so much for not disappointing

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I was so happy to helping me through my project topic thank you so much

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Just got my material... thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you for your reliability and swift service Order and delivery was within the blink of an eye.

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    It's actually good and it doesn't delay in sending. Thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I got the material without delay. The content too is okay

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you guys for the document, this will really go a long way for me. Kudos to project shelve👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    You guys have a great works here I m really glad to be one of your beneficiary hope for the best from you guys am pleased with the works and content writings it really good

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Excellent user experience and project was delivered very quickly

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    5 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you