ABSTRACT
This study evaluated the antibiotic resistance profile of lactic acid bacteria isolated from some selected animal faeces. A total of Twelve (12) faecal samples were collected from some pigs and poultry in Umudike, Ikwuano local government of Abia state and each sample was put into different polyethene bags. All samples were cultured using the spread plate method on MRS agar and incubated. A total of 14 Lactic acid bacteria comprising of 3 different species were isolated from the poultry faeces. The details of these lactic acid bacterial isolate comprises of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus reuteri. it was observed that Lactobacillus fermentum is the most frequently occurring isolates with a percentage occurrence of 8(57.1%), followed by Lactobacillus reuteri with a percentage occurrence of 4(28.6%), then Lactococcus lactis with a percentage occurrence of 2(14.3%). The antibiotic profile of the isolates reviewed that LAB regardless of species obtained from faecal samples showed high sensitivity to Levofloxacin (92.9%) followed by Ofloxacin (85.7%), Ciprofloxacin (78.6%) then, Gentamicin (71.4%) whereas the resistance profile of Lactic acid bacteria isolates to antibiotics reviewed that the Lactic acid bacteria isolates exhibited high rate of resistance to Augmentin and Ceftaxidime with percentage resistance of (100%), this is followed by Cefotaxime (92.9%), Erythromycin (85.7%), Cetriaxone (71.4%) and Azithromycin (71.4%). These results indicate that LAB may develop resistance against antibiotic that may result from the horizontal transferring of resistant gene to other microflora in the gut. The development of resistance to antibiotic can be attributed to long term usage of antibiotic as therapeutics and growth promoter. Thus, it is important and essential to advise the farmer a proper way of antibiotic use as therapeutic and growth promoter agents. Additionally, supplementation of unknown source of probiotic as feed additive needs to be monitored closely in animal feeding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Title
Page i
Certification iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgement v
Table
of Contents vi
List
of Tables viii
Abstract ix
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Aims and Objectives 2
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Literature Review 3
2.1 Lactic
Acid Bacteria 3
2.1.1 Classification and physiology of LAB 4
2.1.2 Antimicrobial mechanisms of LAB 5
2.1.2.1 Bacteriocins 6
2.1.3 LAB as food preservatives 7
2.1.4 Application of the Inhibitory Activity of
LAB to Pathogens 7
2.1.5 Safety and regulation of lactic acid
bacteria 9
2.2 Prevalence
of Antibiotic Resistance in Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From the
Faeces of Broiler Chicken 11
2.3 Characterization of
Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From Poultry Farms 13
2.4 Antibiotic
Resistance of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Canine Faeces 14
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Materials and Methods 16
3.1 Collection
of Samples 16
3.2 Sterilization of Materials 16
3.3 Normal Saline Preparation 16
3.4 Media Preparation 17
3.5 Isolation
of Lactic Acid Bacteria 17
3.6 Sub-Culturing 17
3.7 Characterization
and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacterial Isolates 18
3.7.1 Gram Staining Techniques 18
3.7.2 Biochemical Test 18
3.7.2.1 Motility test 18
3.7.2.2 Catalase test 19
3.7.2.3 Coagulase test 19
3.7.2.4 Methyl red test 19
3.7.2.5 Voges-proskaeur test 19
3.7.2.6 Indole test 20
3.7.2.7 Citrate test 20
3.7.2.8 Oxidase test 20
3.8 Antibiotic Resistance Testing 21
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Results 22
4.1 Total Lactic acid Bacteria counts of pig
and bird fecal samples 22
4.2 Morphological and Biochemical
Characterization of Isolated Lactic acid
Bacteria 22
4.3 Percentage Occurrence of the Lactic Acid
Bacteria Isolates 22
4.4 Distribution
of Lactic Acid Bacteria from the Samples 22
4.5 Antibiotics Profile of the Lactic Acid Bacterial Isolates 23
4.6 Resistance Profile of the Isolates 23
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Discussion Conclusion and Recommendation 31
5.1 Discussion 31
5.2 Conclusion 33
5.3 Recommendation 33
References 34
LIST
OF TABLES
TABLE
|
TITLE
|
PAGE
|
4.1
|
Total Lactic acid
Bacteria counts of pig and bird fecal samples
|
24
|
4.2
|
Morphological and
Biochemical Characterization of Isolated Lactic acid Bacteria
|
25
|
4.3
|
Percentage occurrence of
the Lactic acid bacteria isolates
|
26
|
4.4
|
Distribution of Lactic acid
Bacteria from the samples
|
27
|
4.5
4.6
|
Antibiotics profile of
the isolates
|
28
|
Resistance profile of
the isolates
|
29
|
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Antibiotic are normally used to treat
microbial diseases since 50 years ago. However, excessive use of antibiotic may
lead to the development of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria. The
report of antibiotic resistance is significantly increased due to the overuse
and misuse of antibiotics, which has created an enormous selective pressure on
the recessive bacteria. Antibiotic resistant bacteria have the ability to
resist toward the actions of naturally occurring or synthetically produced
compounds inimical to their survival (WHO, 2007).
Scott
(2002) reported the identical resistance gene present in bacterial species
isolated from different hosts. Antibiotic resistant may acquires through the
in-vivo gene transfer between normal flora of gastrointestinal and antibiotic resistant
pathogenic bacteria (Schjørring and Krogfelt, 2011). In fact, the antibiotic
resistant pathogenic bacteria pose a great potential threat to human health,
especially when the immunity system is not functioning well. Most of the
developed countries have prohibited the use of antibiotic as animal growth
promoter. Thus, various alternatives have been explored to replace antibiotic
as growth promoter. One of the most common and popular alternatives is the
application of probiotic as growth promoter in livestock animals.
In
addition, the probiotic effects of postbiotic metabolites produced by probiotic
strains have been shown in various animal species, such as rats, broilers,
laying hens and post weaning piglets, suggesting they havegreat potential to be
used as growth promoter for livestock animals.
Probiotic comprises of beneficial bacteria
such as lactic acid bacteria (LAB). LAB is a group of gram-positive anaerobic
bacteria which produce predominantly lactic acid from carbohydrate
fermentation. Many farmers use probiotic extensively and those bacteria have
potential to serve as a host of antibiotic resistance genes with a risk of
transferring those genes into many LAB and other pathogens (Gueimonde et al., 2013).
The
antibiotic resistant LAB has been detected by using DNA sequences which is
responsible for antibiotic resistance traits. Egervärn et al. (2009) reported
the emergence of antibiotic resistant in Lactobacillus
reuteri and Lactobacillus plantarum.
Moreover, Lactobacilli, Pediococci and Leuconostoc spp. have been reported to be highly resistant to
vancomycin and some Lactobacilli have
high resistance to bacitracin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, fusidic acid,
streptomycin, sulphadiazine, teicoplanin and vancomycin(Danielsen and Wind,
2003). Most of the reported LAB that resistant to antibiotics was isolated from
food sources. These include the most commonly used probiotic species such as Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. reuteri, or Lactobacillus rhamnosus, among others, or the yogurt starter
bacteria Lactobacillus delbrueckii(Ammoret al., 2008).
1.1 AIM AND OBJECTIVES
The
aimof this study is to investigate the antibiotic resistance profile of Lactic Acid
Bacteriaisolated from some selected animal feaces.
The
objectives are;
1. To
isolate Lactic Acid Bacteria isolates from some selected animal feaces.
2. To
determine the percentage frequency distribution of Lactic Acid Bacteria
isolates from some selected animal samples.
3. To
determine the antibiotic resistance profile of the Lactic Acid Bacterial
isolates.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment