QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SENSORY EVALUATION OF PROBIOTIC WHOLE GRAIN PAP

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00006900

No of Pages: 69

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$12

ABSTRACT


This study was on pap production from two varieties of maize, white and yellow maize, and starter culture in different formulations as 5: 200: 200:, 4:,150:150, 3:100:100, 2:50:50, while white maize was used as control. The proximate composition, mineral, physic-chemical, microbial, functional and sensory compositions of the samples were analysed. The result revealed the following ranges for proximate; moisture content ( 16.28 – 17.3%,), ash content ( 4.29 – 4.91%.), fat content (3.21 – 5.14%.),  protein content (3.63 – 5.51%.), fibre content (3.59 – 4.04%), carbohydrate content (63.07 – 68.48%.). in the mineral composition, UG1 had the highest value (81.80 mg/100g), because it contains 100% maize. There were no significant (p>0.05) differences between samples UG1 and UG5. The functional properties of the samples . The gelation temperature ranged from (80.75 – 85.15), The bulk density ranged from (0.64 – 0.69 g/ml.), The water absorption capacity ranged from (1.38 – 2.29 g/ml.), The swelling capacity ranged from (9.39 – 11.41 g/ml.). The physicochemical properties of the samples shows that, viscosity ranged from (103.70 – 106.80 mpa/s.),  The pH ranged from (6.20 – 6.33). The total starch ranged from (62.72 – 66.29%.). The microbial content of the samples, bacterial count (lactobacillus fermentum) was found only in samples UG4 and UG5 after 48 hrs of incubation at 37 .  There were no observable bacteria growths from the other samples. Bacteria have the potential to contaminate food products. The presence of bacterial in the samples could have evolved during processing or from the raw ingredients used. The sensory evaluation of the samples shows that, there were no significant (p>0.05) differences between samples UG2 and UG3 and UG1 and UG5.Sensory evaluation has a crucial role to play in judging the quality of a given food product.







Table Of Content

Title Page                                                                                                                    I

Declaration Page                                                                                                         Ii                                                                                                                                                        

Certification                                                                                                                Iii                                

Dedication                                                                                                                  Iv                                                                                                                                

Acknowledgement                                                                                                      V                                                                                                                    

Table of contents                                                                                                        Vi                                                                                                                   

List of tables                                                                                                               Vii                                                                                                                                  

List of figures                                                                                                            Viii                                                                                                                                 

Abstract                                                                                                                      Ix                                                                                                                                          

Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Background of the study                                                                                      1

1.2 Statement of the problem                                                                                     4 

1.3 Justification                                                                                                           4       

1.4 Aims and objectives                                                                                             5         

 

Chapter 2:

2.1 Literature review                                                                                                   6

2.2  Medicinal uses of maize grain                                                                              12       

2.3 Chemical composition                                                                                           13

 2.3.1 Carbohighdrate                                                                                                 13               

2.3.2 Protein                                                                                                                14                                                         

2.3.3 Mineral                                                                                                               14          

2.3.4 Vitamins                                                                                                             14                   

2.3.5 Lipids                                                                                                                 14                         

2.3.6 Dietary Fiber                                                                                                       15

2.4  Yoghurt                                                                                                                 15                         

 

Chapter 3: Methodology

3.1 Materials                                                                                                               18                

3.2 Raw material preparation                                                                                      18           

3.3 Physico-chemical determination                                                                           21

3.3.1 Determination of ph                                                                                           21

3.4 Microbial analysis                                                                                                 21

3.5 Proximate determination                                                                                       22

3.5.1 Determination of fat content                                                                             22

3.5.2 Determination of moisture content                                                                    22

3.5.3 Determination of crude protein                                                                         23

3.5.4 Determination of ash content                                                                            24

3.5.5 Determination of  crude fibre                                                                            24

3.5.6 Determination of carbohighdrate                                                                       25

3.6 Functional properties                                                                                            25

3.6.1 Swelling index                                                                                                   25

3.6.2 Water absorption capacity                                                                                 26

3.7 Mineral determination                                                                                           26

3.7.1 Determination of potassium                                                                               26

3.7.2 Determination of manganese                                                                             27

3.7.3 Determination of iron                                                                                        27

3.7.4 Determination of phosphorus                                                                            27

3.8 Sensory properties                                                                                                 28

3.9 Experimental design                                                                                             28

3.10 Statistical analysis                                                                                               28

 

Chapter 4:

4.0 Result and discussion                                                                                           29

4.1 Sample of raw material/ finished product                                                             29                                                                                                         

4.2 Proximate composition of pap                                                                              31

4.3 Physico-chemical composition mineral                                                                 35

4.4 Functional properties of pap                                                                                 37

4.5 Mineral composition of pap                                                                                  41

4.6 Microbial content of pap                                                                                       44

4.7 Sensory evaluation of pap sample                                                                         46                                                                                                                                                                                    

Chapter 5:

5.0 Conclusion and Recommendations                                                                      48

5.1 Conclusion                                                                                                            48         

5.2 Recommendation                                                                                                  48                                                                                                            

    REFERENCES

     APPENDIX

                                                       

 

 


LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1: Recipe for pap                                                                                            19


Table 3.2: Formulation table for pap                                                                           19       


Table 4.1: Proximate composition of pap sample                                                                    32


Table 4.2: Physicochemical properties                                                                         36


Table 4.3: Functional properties of pap                                                                                   39


Table 4.4: Mineral composition of pap samples                                                           43


Table 4.5: Microbial content of the pap sample                                                                       45

                                

Table 4.6: Sensory scores of pap sample                                                                                 47                      

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES


Figure 3.1 Flow chart for the production of pap                        19

                                                                    

 

 

 

LIST OF PLATE


Plate 1: Yellow whole grain pap                                                            29


Plate 2: white whole grain pap                                                                                    29


Plate 3: White sieved pap                                                                                           30


Plate 4: Yellow sieved pap                                                                                         30


Plate 5: white sieved pap (control)                                                                             30   

 

 

 

 

 CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1  BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Pap is a common traditional fermented non-alcoholic starchy food, and is a major staple food widely prepared from most common type of cereals (such as maize, wheat or sorghum) widely consumed in West Africa. They are well known in many part of the world (wakil and kazem, 2012, 2014; Adegbehingbe, 2013; Abioye and Aka, 2015). it is a sour fine paste beverage which when cooked produces a thin semi porridge Pap also known as akamu in Igbo, ogi  in Yoruba and koko in Hausa, is a common indigenous porridge which has a texture and a sour taste resembling that of yoghurt. It has been shown that pap liquor has both antibacterial (Adebolu et al, 2007) and antifungal properties (Adebayo and Aderiye, 2010). Pap is a staple cereal fermented product found predominantly in the southern part of Nigeria and is the first native food given to babies at weaning. Pap is widely used as the first native food given to babies at weaning to supplement breast milk and it is a major breakfast cereal for pre-school children and adult.  It can be diluted into solid content of 8 to 10% and boiled into pap, or cooked and turned into a stiff gel called “agidi” or” eko” before consumption. Fermented maize is widely utilized as food in African countries and in fact cereals account for as much as 77% of total caloric consumption (osungbaro, 2009).    This wide range of acceptability was found to be attributed to sensory qualities such as in terms of taste and mouth feed. It is a fine sour paste beverage which when cooked produces a thin semi-solid porridge. Pap porridge has a smooth texture and a sour taste resembling that of yoghurt. It is traditional foods that are of low nutritive value and are characterized by low protein, low energy density and high bulk. It is an extract of wet soluble carbohydrate (starch extract) from cereal grain with poor storage stability because of its high moisture level usually is prepared as thin cereal gruel. In the ancient times pap was designed specifically to suit the younger children during feeding, But later is being consumed by all groups of people. Grains are often an important part of a healthy and nutritious diet. But not all grains or grain products are created equal. Whole grains provide many health benefits and are important in the prevention of chronic disease. Research has shown that increase in the consumption of whole grains can substantially reduce heart disease (steffen et al., 2003), play an important role in maintaining a healthy weight and body mass index (BIM), and regulate blood glucose and insulin response, helping to prevent type 2 diabetes (johnalagadda et al., 2011).   Maize grains are a source of B vitamin, magnesium and phosphorus. Yellow corn is also high in carotenoids, particularly lutein+zeazanthin. Recent research suggests whole grain corn might also help increase healthy gut flora (carvalho-wells, 2010). Maize grain was known as an important cereal for producing pap because of its functional and sensory attribute. However, in Nigeria the popcorn varieties are underutilized and are often limited for the production of popcorn snacks, while other s such as the white and yellow color maize variety which was reported to be rich in vitamin A and sugar respectively, are often use for most food production such as tuwu.

On the other hand, pap was reported to be inadequate in terms of its protein content. But, most of its consumers were not aware of the consequences of malnutrition related issues of such inferior diet. There are also many people with notion that food having a good taste or taste sweet in the mouth is already an indication of being nutritious and so good for infants which is not always so. The shelf life of pap (ogi) is about 30 hours and can be extended through refrigeration. The problem associated with pap prepared using the traditional methods are irregularity in flavor and loss of nutrient. These may be attributed to the activities of undesirable microorganisms and difference in the processing conditions utilized. Pap is also a functional food because it undergoes fermentation. Fermentation technology is as old as man (ijabadeniyi, 2007), and as such is an integral traditional norms especially in most communities in tropical Africa. Badmus et al. (2014) described fermentation of food as long age culture which has been under documentation in West Africa where absence of writing culture made it original to trace. Fermentation of food typically involves the application of microorganism (either from the environment i.e. spontaneous process or inoculated in a controlled environment) that produce certain enzymes which changes the chemical attribute of the food from its original form/state. Traditional fermented foods are prepared from most common type of cereals (such as corn, wheat or sorghum). They are well known in many part of the world (wakil and Daodu, 2011).pap fermented from maize is to a large extent in the west, east and northern part of the country.

Maize is a member of is a poeceae family and it is an annual crop that is botanically referred to as zea Mays. It is an annual crop that is grown across a range of agro-ecological zones in Nigeria. Maize is grown on a wide range of soil from fairly coarse sand to clay but best performance is achieved in well drained sandy loamy soil maize is the second most important cereal crop in Nigeria ranking behind sorghum and on the number of people it feeds. The maize grain contains an average of about 61.50 to 77.40% starch (dry basis). This high starch quantity provide a good raw material for the production of starch and different sweeteners, starch is very versatile and has a wide variety of uses. In food industries, starch is use to impart functional properties to processed food because it affects the physical characteristics of many foods.   Maize is rich in carbohydrate and minerals, including potassium and magnesium. It contains a trace amount of lysine and tryptophan, contributing to low content of protein, and trace amount of B-vitamins (USDA, 2012). Protein deficiency in infants and young children has been shown to have longer term effects on brain function (Omemu & fanirang, 2011).  

It serves as a source of income to farmers and marketers. A maize grain is primarily an energy giving food, because of its high content starch content. It is also rich in oil, but has fairly low level of high quality protein. It is a valuable source of food for human and feed for poultry and other livestock. Maze is among the crop with a variety of valued chain derivatives when processed which are known in many localities by native or local means such as ogi in Yoruba, koko in Hausa, and akamu in Igbo. Pap is the paste obtained after fermentation, preparation of pap through fermentation of maize grain is influenced by processing techniques employed and this could affect the color, taste, odor, microbial load and consumers’ acceptability of the product, (ijabadeniyi, 2007).


1.2  STATEMENT OF  PROBLEM

The traditional method of processing pap (soaking, fermentation, sieving) is accompanied by several nutrient loss that comes with sieving, the processing of whole grain pap will help restore the nutrient lost during sieving.


1.3 JUSTIFICATIONS OF STUDY

Quality evaluation of whole grain pap is determined by processing the grain without removing the husk. The processing of probiotic whole grain pap will solve the problem of indigestion and lack of certain nutrient in the life of the consumer both children and adult. Procedures used in the processing of whole grain pap do not involve any heat treatment which will cause loss of nutrient so the manual procedure will retain the nutrient contained in the food product.

Hence, the production and quality evaluation of whole grain pap contains the necessary nutrient contained in the pap.

1.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Major objectives

The major objective of the study was to carry out a quality evaluation on the production of probiotic whole grain pap

Specific objectives

1.      To produce whole grain pap

2.      To determine the physical properties of whole grain pap.

3.      To determine the proximate composition.

4.      To improve the quality by retaining the nutrient.

5.      To access the microbial and physicochemical properties of the whole grain pap

 

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment