MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES AND EFFECT OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS ON MICROBIAL LOAD

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00008867

No of Pages: 60

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$12

Abstract

Fresh fruits and vegetables promote good health but harbour a wide range of microbial contaminants. To assess the microbial quality of fruits and vegetables, twenty-eight (28) samples of different fruits and vegetables were purchased from various vendors. Samples were analyzed to study the density of microorganisms. The spread plate method was used for the isolation of bacteria on nutrient media. Mean bacterial load ranged from 4.4x106cfu/g to 1.07x107cfu/g with garden eggs recording the lowest count and cabbage samples harbouring more bacteria than the rest of the samples. Sliced watermelon samples recorded a mean viable count of 9.2x106cfu/g. Mean coliform count was highest in cabbage (7.4x104cfu/g) and lowest in pineapple (1.1x104cfu/g).  Six bacteria belonging to eight genera were identified. Staphylococcus aureus (82.1%) was the most frequently isolated followed by Salmonella species 13(46.4%), Bacillus species 12(42.9%), Enterobacter aerogenes 9(32.1%). Micrococcus species 6(21.4%) and Escherichia coli (25%) were the least frequently isolated. Resistance to a wide range of antibiotics was observed. Resistance to augmentin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone was observed as 100%, 100%, 100% and 69.2% respectively for the Salmonella isolates. Drug susceptibility assay revealed that 84.6%, 69.2%, 61.5% and 30.8% of the Salmonella isolates investigated were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin, gentamicin and ceftriaxone respectively. Eighty-seven percent of the S. aureus isolates were resistant against erythromycin whereas 82.6% and 73.9% of the isolates were resistant to augmentin and ceftriaxone respectively. Resistance to ofloxacin was seen in 14.3% while 100% were resistant to Augmentin for the Ecoli isolates. The presence of potential food-borne pathogens makes the fruits to be microbiologically unsafe and they should be pre- treated thoroughly before human consumption, so as to reduce the risk of food- borne outbreaks.




TABLE OF CONTENT

Cover page                                                                                                         i

Title page                                                                                                           ii

Certification                                                                                                       iii

Declaration                                                                                                         iv

Dedication                                                                                                          v

Acknowledgments                                                                                              vi

Table of contents                                                                                                vii

List of Tables                                                                                                     x

Abstracts                                                                                                             xi

CHAPTER ONE

1.1     Introduction                                                                                              1

1.2     Aims and Objectives                                                                                6

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1     An Overview of Fruits                                                                             7

2.2     Bacteria in Fruits as a cause of Disease                                                   8

2.2.1  Risk associated with consumption of fruits (Microbial hazards)                  9

2.3     Microbial Contamination                                                                         11

2.3.1  Soft Rot                                                                                                    12

2.4     Contamination Sources of Vegetables                                                     12

2.4.1  Pre-Harvest Contamination                                                                     13

2.4.2  Quality of Irrigation Water                                                                      14

2.4.3  Post-Harvest Contamination                                                                    15

2.5     Common Fruits and Vegetable Spoilage Organisms                                16

2.5.1  Listeria Monocytogenes                                                                          16

2.6     Global Relevance of Food Safety and Foodborne Illness                                17

2.7     Food Poisoning                                                                                        20

2.8     Antibiotics Resistance                                                                              21

CHAPTER THREE: MATERIAL AND METHODS

3.1     Sample Collection                                                                                    23

3.2     Media Preparation                                                                                    23

3.3     Preparation of Sample Homogenate                                                        23

3.3.1  For The Isolation Of Salmonella Species                                                24

3.4     Gram Staining                                                                                          25

3.5     Biochemical Tests                                                                                    25

3.5.1  Catalase Test                                                                                            25

3.5.2  Methyl Red Test                                                                                      26

 3.5.3 Voges- Proskauer Test                                                                             26

3.5.4  Indole Test                                                                                               26

3.5.5  Citrate Utilization Test                                                                            27

3.5.6  Hydrogen Sulphide (H2s) Production Test                                              27

3.6     Antibiotics Sensitivity Test                                                                     27

CHAPTER FOUR

Results                                                                                                                29

CHAPTER FIVE

5.1     Discussion                                                                                                35

5.2     Conclusion                                                                                               40

REFERENCES                                                                                                 41

 


 




LIST OF TABLES


Table 4.1:    Mean Bacterial and Fungal Load in cfu/g of the Samples                 30

Table 4.3     Frequency of Isolation of the Microorganisms                               31

Table 4.2:    Colonial Morphology and Biochemical Tests for

Identification of the Bacterial Isolates                                           32

Table 4.5: Distribution of the Isolates across the various Samples                 33

Table 4.4: Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of the Isolates                                          34

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER ONE


1.1    INTRODUCTION

The sales of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables have considerably increased in Nigeria over the last two decades (Gorny, 2005; James and Ngarmsak, 2010). The increase in consumption of fresh-cut fruit is mostly because people are more aware of the importance and benefits of healthy eating habits and have less time for food preparation. Fresh-cut produce fit the many needs of a modern lifestyle as they serve colourful, flavourful and nutritional (energy, vitamins, minerals, and dietary fibre) compounds and are also convenient to use and consume (Kader and Barrett, 2005).

However, fresh-cut fruit and vegetables are highly perishable products and have a very short shelf-life, even at chill temperatures mainly due to water loss, translucency, browning, softening, surface dehydration, off-flavour and off-odour development, and microbial spoilage (Rojas-Grau et al., 2009). The fast deterioration of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables results mostly from the damage caused to the cells and tissues by cutting and trimming and the removal of their natural protective barriers (Olivas et al., 2005). Cutting and/or peeling may induce ripening, cause senescence and aid the rapid growth of contaminating microorganisms due to the release of nutrients from the damaged cells and tissues. Therefore, the spoilage phenomena on fresh-cut fruit are related to biochemical processes, both in microorganisms and in the fruit tissue itself.

Food safety is the assurance that food will not cause any harm to the consumer when it is prepared and/or consumed according to its intended use. Ready to eat (RTE) fruit constitute a suitable and convenient meal for today’s lifestyles, because they need no cooking or further preparation. As well as being considered low-calorie food, they are rich in fiber and provide a great variety of vitamins, minerals, and other phyto-chemicals (Sarjo et al., 2006). However fruits are widely exposed to microbial contamination through contact with soil/dust and water and poor handling at harvest or during postharvest processing. They, therefore create favorable condition for diverse range of microorganisms including plant and human pathogens (Nguyen and Carlin, 1994).

The causative agents of microbiological spoilage in fruits can be bacteria, as well as yeasts and molds. The main spoilage agents can be considered as due to the low pH of most fruits. Some bacteria such as Campylobacter spp., E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella spp, Erwinia spp., Enterobacter spp., Alicyclobacillus spp., Propionibacterium cyclohexanicum, Pseudomonas spp., and lactic acid bacteria can cause spoilage in fruit (Walker and Phillips, 2008). Certain common molds such as Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., Eurotium spp., Alternaria spp., Cladosporium spp., Paecilomyces spp., and Botrytis spp. have been shown to be involved in the spoilage of fresh fruits (Lund and Snowdon, 2000).

Most microorganisms that are initially observed on whole fruit or vegetable surfaces are soil inhabitants, members of a very large and diverse community of microbes that collectively are responsible for maintaining a dynamic ecological balance within most agricultural systems. Vectors for disseminating these microbes include soil particles, airborne spores, and irrigation water. Most bacteria and fungi that arrive on the developing crop plant either are completely benign to the crop’s health or, in many instances, provide a natural biological barrier to infestation by the subset of microorganisms responsible for crop damage (Andrews and Harris, 2000). Microbial profile of fruits and vegetables are direct reflection of the sanitary quality of the cultivation, harvesting, transportation, storage, and processing of the produce (Janisiewicz and Korsten, 2002; Andrew and Harris, 2000). The difference in the microbial profiles of fruits also result largely from unrelated factors like resident micro-flora in the soil and nonresident micro-flora through animal manures, sewage or irrigation water, transportation and handling by sellers (Ray and Bhunia, 2007; Ofor et al., 2009).

Microbial infections of food borne origin are a major public-health problem internationally and a significant cause of death in developing countries (WHO, 2006). Food safety in developing countries is influenced by a number of factors.

There is a high risk of contamination at all stages of production, processing and distribution which are very difficult to control through regulations given the common constraints in supporting infrastructure and institutional capacities. Quantitative microbial risk assessment can help in identifying critical control points (Seidu et al., 2008). These microorganisms are carried on hands, wiping cloths and utensils, especially chopping boards. The slightest contact can transfer them to food and cause food borne disease.

The majority of microorganisms associated with raw vegetables are non-pathogenic and gram negative organisms tend to dominant the bacterial population including Enterobacter spp. and other coliforms (Janisiewicz and Korsten, 2002). Microbiological contamination of fruit can occur directly or indirectly from animals or insects, soil, manures, water and equipment used to grow the horticultural commodities as well as human handling along the food chain. The microbiological contaminants may have an adverse health effect.

Fresh vegetables normally carry natural non-pathogenic epiphytic microorganisms, however, during growth, harvest, transportation, and further handling the produce can be contaminated with pathogens from animal and human sources (Morgante et al., 2008). As most of these produce are eating without further processing, their microbial content may represent a risk factor for the consumer’s health (Ragaert et al., 2007).

Consumption of fruit and vegetable products is commonly viewed as a potential risk factor for infection with enteropathogens such as Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157, with recent outbreaks linked to lettuce, spinach and tomatoes.

More than 90 percent of the cases of food poisoning each year are caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella, Clostridium perfringens, Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Bacillus cereus, and Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Proteus. Fresh vegetables can be a vehicle for transmission of bacterial, parasitic and viral pathogens capable of causing human illness and a number of reports refer to raw vegetables, harboring potential food borne pathogens Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Sallmonella was isolated from raw vegetables (Nweze, 2010).

It has been shown that Street-vended foods have been implicated in outbreaks of foodborne illnesses all around the world (Bryan et al., 1992). Most food-related illnesses have historically been attributed to one of five major groups of pathogenic bacteria (Mboto et al., 2012). These five groups are Salmonella, Shigella, Clostridium botulinum, Clostridium perfringens, Bacillus cereus, and Staphylococcus aureus. These have been joined by the emerging pathogens such as Yersinia enterocolitica, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogens, and Campylobacter jejuni (Mboto et al., 2012).

Foodborne diseases of microbiological origin can be caused by a variety of agents, which gain entry by the gastrointestinal tract. However the symptoms are often mild and self-limiting. Symptoms of foodborne disease, which are not necessarily confined to diarrhoea and vomiting, are caused by viable organisms and/or by the toxins that they produce. The risk of disease from these agents varies depending on the pathogen, the dose, the host and the properties of the food matrix. Host risk factors include age, immune status, underlying debilitating disease or stress factors, and the physiological state of the stomach and upper small intestine at the time of exposure to the agent. For these reasons a minimum infectious dose cannot be defined, although the risk of disease at low exposure for some agents is small (Nweze, 2010). The presence of foodborne agents that may cause illness in ready-to-eat foods is a significant risk to consumer health and their absence is of paramount importance.

With the exception of the aerobic and anaerobic bacterial spores, detection of foodborne pathogenic agents at any level is of concern and should be investigated with an urgency of response proportionate to the level of contamination and risk to consumers. Although low numbers of pathogens, such as coagulase-positive staphylococci, C. perfringens, B. cereus, and L. monocytogenes, in ready-to-eat products probably represent a very low risk to immunocompetent people, they are more significant for the immunocompromised and vulnerable groups. Low levels may be due to natural contamination of raw materials used in those foods, but usually their presence suggests faults in the production or subsequent handling of food which could lead to an unacceptable increase in risk. There may also be a need for action when detecting low numbers of these organisms in ready-to-eat foods because there is variation in host susceptibility and inter strain differences in the pathogenicity of these bacteria.

In developing countries because of inadequate or even non existing systems for routine diagnosis and monitoring or reporting for many of the food-borne pathogens, most outbreaks caused by contaminated fruit and vegetables go undetected and the incidence of their occurrence in food during pre and postharvest is underestimated (Dorny et al., 2009). This is even exacerbated by the increasing trend of antibiotics resistance. The excessive use of over-the counter antibiotics has led to an increase in antibiotic-resistant microbes in the environment (Silbergeld et al., 2008). These antibiotic-resistant bacteria have made their way into the food chain, and clinical treatment for infections caused by these bacteria has become crucial, especially for immunocompromised patients (Silbergeld et al., 2008).

The recurrent episodes of food borne illnesses with symptoms of gastro intestinal distress like diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal cramp and nausea has remained a major cause of mortality and morbidity in Nigeria.

 

1.2       Aims and Objectives

a.     To evaluate the total heterotrophic bacterial load on vegetable and fruits surfaces.

b.     To isolate, identify and characterize the food-borne pathogens associated with vegetable and fruits surfaces.

c.     To determine the antibiotics susceptibility profile of the isolates that will be isolated from the vegetable and fruits surfaces.


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment