ABSTRACT
Marketing
has traditionally been viewed and treated more as an operational rather than
strategic function in companies. It has focused on decisions related to
analyzing and selecting target markets, product and brand development,
promotion, and channels of distribution. This study examined the impacts of
strategic marketing on organisation’s performance with special reference to
Doyin Group of Companies.
The
research sampled forty (40) staff of Doyin Group of Companies, Orile Iganmu
Branch from which data is been gathered. The research uses a quantitative
method with three hypotheses stated in the null form. The data gathered were
analyzed with the use of Chi-square test statistics. Findings revealed that there
exists a strong relationship between strategic marketing and organizational
performance, also market orientation is positively related to market
performance.
Recommendations
were proffered to the management of Doyin Group of Companies and other
organisations.
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Background of the Study
1.1 Statement of Problem
1.2 Purpose of the Study
1.3 Research Questions
1.4 Statement of Hypotheses
1.5 Significance of the Study
1.6 Research Methodology
1.7 Scope and Limitation of the Study
1.8 Definition of Terms
References
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Strategic Marketing
2.3 Gaining and Sustaining Competitive
Advantages
2.4 Measuring Business
Performance
2.5 Measuring Marketing
Performance
2.6 Relevance of Performance
Studies
2.7 Impacts of Strategic
Marketing
2.8 Impacts of Performance in Different
Business Environments
2.9 Conceptual Framework of the Study
References
CHAPTER
THREE
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Research
Design
3.3 Restatement
of Research Question and Hypotheses
3.4 Population
of the Study
3.5 Sample
Size and Sampling Techniques
3.6 Data
Collection Method
3.7 Data Analysis Method
3.8 Limitations of the Study
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND
ANALYSIS
4.1
Introduction
4.2
Analysis
of Respondent Bio-Data
4.3
Analysis of the Main Questions.
4.4 Analysis and Interpretation of the
Formulated Hypotheses.
CHAPTER
FIVE
SUMMARY,
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary
of Findings
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendations
5.4 Suggestion for Further
Studies
References
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
OF THE STUDY
Marketing
efforts and know-how are instrumental in commercializing ideas and inventions successfully.
Therefore, it could be fatal for companies to ignore the importance of marketing
(CF. E.G. Yli-Kovero, 2006; Salminen, 2006). Kotler (1999) emphasizes the position
of marketing to even argue that, in the future, marketing has the main
responsibility for achieving profitable revenue growth for the company. Today
cost-efficiency does not provide long-term competitive advantage for companies
whereas marketing, when well conducted, does. Especially in the field of
strategic marketing, benefits are still largely waiting for realization.
Marketing
has traditionally been viewed and treated more as an operational rather than
strategic function in companies. It has focused on decisions related to
analyzing and selecting target markets, product and brand development,
promotion, and channels of distribution (Hunt and Morgan, 2001). This perhaps
somewhat biased standpoint presents marketing as a task of creating, promoting
and delivering goods and services to consumers and businesses (Kotler, 2003).
It is generally accepted that acquiring a new customer may turn out to be
considerably more expensive than building customer loyalty among firm’s current
customers (e.g. Kotler, 2003). This strongly speaks for the need for higher
levels of customer orientation among companies. Similarly to reward systems
that base on short-term performance, short-term marketing focus may start
working against longer-term market orientation, business performance and strategic
intentions of a company.
From
strategic point of view, as Morgan, Clark and Gooner (2002) argue, marketing budgets
should be seen as capital expenditure in building revenue generating marketing assets
rather than overhead expenditure; marketing resources ultimately drive
long-term marketing performance. Despite general acceptance of value creation
of marketing activities, marketing practitioners have found it difficult to
measure and communicate to other functional executives and top management the
value created by investments in marketing (Srivastava, Shervani and Fahey,
1998). To bring light to the prevalent situation, confirmatory statistical analysis
basing on hypotheses from previous literatures is a justified method to explore
strategic marketing and its effectiveness.
At
this early phase of the project, it is necessary to conduct an international
empirical study that clarifies the links between strategic marketing practices
and business performance,
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS
The
main problem and discovered gap of strategic marketing involving
marketing-related issues that should be concentrated on in order to maximize
companies’ long-term financial performance. The primary research problem for
this study can thus be presented as follows:
·
What
kind of strategic marketing are most positively and effectively relates to
companies’ financial performance in different business environments?
·
What
is the relationship between marketing resources and business orientations, and
financial performance of a firm?
·
How is
marketing effectiveness assessed today and potentially in the future?
Further
on, this problem statement will be formulated as a research question, with
several underlying sub-questions.
1.3 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
This research work primarily aim at
examining the impacts of strategic marketing and how it affects organisation’s
performance. Other objectives of the study include;
·
Examine
strategic marketing concepts and their relationships with performance measures
·
Provide
an integrated review of the origins, insights and status of strategic
management
·
Discuss
marketing performance assessment (MPA) systems and development areas related to
them
·
Describe
the structure of performance management systems.
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Research questions are meant to
generate possible answers to different aspects of the research problem and they
should be clearly stated such that they act as guides in identification,
collection and analysis of relevant data. In order to achieve the purpose of
this research study, the study will attempt to provide answers to the following
research questions.
·
What
kind of strategic marketing are most positively and effectively relates to
companies’ financial performance in different business environments?
·
What
is the relationship between marketing resources and business orientations, and
financial performance of a firm?
·
How is
marketing effectiveness assessed today and potentially in the future?
1.5
STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESES
To provide answer to the research
questions arising from this study, the following hypotheses are postulated.
Hypothesis
One
Ho: There
is no significant relationship between strategic marketing and companies’
financial performance
H1: There
is significant relationship between strategic marketing and companies’
financial performance
Hypothesis
Two
Ho: Market
orientation does not positively relates to market performance
H1: Market
orientation positively relates to market performance
Hypothesis
Three
Ho: There
is no Relationship between marketing resources and business orientations, and
financial performance of a firm
H1: There
is Relationship between marketing resources and business orientations, and
financial performance of a firm
1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
Marketing
efforts and know-how are instrumental in commercializing ideas and inventions successfully.
Therefore, it could be fatal for companies to ignore the importance of marketing
(Yli-Kovero, 2006; Salminen, 2006). Kotler (1999) emphasizes the position of
marketing to even argue that, in the future, marketing has the main
responsibility for achieving profitable revenue growth for the company. Today
cost-efficiency does not provide long-term competitive advantage for companies
whereas marketing, when well conducted, does. Especially in the field of
strategic marketing, benefits are still largely waiting for realization. Thus,
this study will help in making companies more responsive to this change
environment.
1.7 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The
scope of the study is somewhat evident from the research problem, research
questions and objectives of the study. The study is confined only to Doyin
Group of Companies, Orile Iganmu Branch, Lagos.
In addition, developing conceptual framework of strategic marketing is at the
core of the research. Both academics and firm company audiences are being
considered in this study since, in addition to taking part to discourse of strategic
marketing, it also offers implications and even a concrete marketing
performance assessment tool for firms.
In the
course of conducting this research work, it is expected that the following will
constitute impediment to the effective conduct of this study.
·
Availability of relevant literatures and
textbooks
·
Time constrains
·
Financial constraints
·
Inaccessible and inadequate database
·
Inadequate information given by the case
study firm.
1.8 OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS
MARKETING: Marketing is
an organizational function and a set of processes for creating, communicating,
and delivering value to customers and for managing customer relationships in
ways that benefit the organization and its stakeholders
STRATEGY: It
is the approach a business takes to securing and developing profitable customer
relationships
STRATEGIC
MARKETING: The process of building and executing a
marketing campaign according to set criteria established as a result of
detailed research, evaluation and planning in the areas of target market
segmentation, positioning, product development, pricing, distribution and
promotion.
PERFORMANCE:
The act of performing; the carrying into execution or action;
execution; achievement; accomplishment; representation by action
BENCHMARKING: A measurement of the quality
of an organization's
policies,
products,
programs,
strategies,
etc., and their comparison with standard
measurements,
or similar measurements of its peers.
INTANGIBILITY: Means that services cannot be seen,
felt or tasted. They cannot be touched, in comparison with products.
Intangibility is the critical goods-services distinction from which all other
difference emerge (Bateson, 1979).
HETEROGENEITY: Concerns the potential for high
variability in the performance of services (Zeithaml, 1985).
PERISHABILITY: means services cannot be produced and
stored for later use. They will be produced and consumed at the same moment.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Login To Comment