EFFECT OF PRETREATMENT AND STORAGE PERIOD ON THE PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND MICROBIAL QUALITY OF FLOUR FROM ORANGE-FLESHED SWEET POTATO VARIETY

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007210

No of Pages: 119

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT


Orange-fleshed sweet potato flour was processed from UMUSPO1, a well-known orange- fleshed sweet potato varieties from National root crop research institute Umudike. The effect of processing pretreatments and storage on total carotenoid content, proximate composition, functional properties and microbial quality of the flour samples were investigated. Three pretreatment methods; blanching, boiling and treating with 0.5% metabisulphite solution for 10mins were employed and the flour samples were either sun dried or oven dried. Significant percentage decreases (P<0.05) were observed in the total carotenoid content of the samples after storage which ranged from 5.47% - 27.3%, however blanched oven dried flour samples retained higher percentage total carotenoid content of53.83% while the untreated sun dried sample had 15% retention which is the lowest after 3months of storage. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in the proximate composition of the samples during storage and this varied among pretreatment methods. Moisture content of the flour samples ranged from 8.23% - 12.01% which is within the acceptable limit. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in carbohydrate (75.36%-83.62%), crude fiber (1.7% -2.65%), protein (6.50% - 8.00%), fat (0.47% -1.7%) and ash (1.63% - 1.89) content of the flour samples. The functional properties of the flour samples showed significant differences (P<0.05) in their values with Swelling power ranging from 13.12% - 15.54ml/g, OAC 1.45-3.55g/ml, WAC 2.40-3.05%, Gelatinization temperature 76.500C-830C and Bulk density 0.61g/ml – 0.70g/ml. There were significant increases (P<0.05) in the bacterial load of the samples during storage with boiled sundried sample having the highest increase from 10.00 - 14.00 × 104CFU/g while metabisulphite treated oven dried maintained the lowest values from 5.50-8.50 × 104CFU/g from 0 month to 3rd month. However, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the fungal load of the flour samples.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                   i

Declaration                                                                                                                ii

Certification                                                                                                               iii

Dedication                                                                                                                  iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                     v

Table of Content                                                                                                       vi

List of Tables                                                                                                             vii

List of Figure                                                                                                             viii

Abstract                                                                                                                     ix

 

CHAPTER 1:    INTRODUCTION

1.0       Background of the Study                                                                               1

1.1       Statement of the Problem                                                                               2

1.2       Objective of the Study                                                                                   3         

1.2.1    The Main Objectives of the Study                                                                  3

1.2.2    Specific Objectives of the Study                                                                    4

1.3       Justification of the Study                                                                               4

 

CHAPTER 2:  LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1       Varieties of Sweet Potato                                                                               5

2.2       Nutritional Composition of Sweet Potato                                                      5

2.3       Provitamin A and Antioxidant Activities of Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato 6

2.4       Carotenoids                                                                                                     7

2.5       Retinol Equivalent                                                                                          8

2.6       Effect of Processing on the Beta Carotene Content of Orange Fleshed

Sweet Potato                                                                                                   8

2.7       Degradation of Carotenoids in Sweet Potato during Processing                   9

2.8       Carotene Retention                                                                                         10

 

 

 

CHAPTER 3:  MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1       Sources of Materials/Sample Collection                                                         11

3.2       Sample Preparation for Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Flour                         11

3.2.1    Blanched samples (treatment I)                                                                      11

3.2.2    Boiled sample (treatment 2)                                                                            12

3.2.3    Pretreatment with sodium metabisulphite (treatment 3)                                 12

3.2.4    Preparation of the control sample (untreated sample)                        12

3.2.5    Preparation of the fresh sample for proximate composition and

carotenoid content analysis                                                                             12

 

3.3       Physiochemical Composition Analyses                                                          14

3.3.1    Determination of moisture content                                                                 14

3.3.2    Determination of crude fiber content                                                             14

3.3.3    Determination of fat content                                                                          15

3.3.4    Determination of protein content                                                                   16                                                                              

3.3.5   Determination of carbohydrate content                                                           17       

3.3.6   Determination of ash content                                                                         17        

3.3.7   Energy value                                                                                                    18       

3.4       Determination of the Total Carotenoid Content                                           18

3.4.1    Measurement of absorbance                                                                           19

3.5       Functional Properties                                                                                      20

3.5.1    Bulk density                                                                                                    20

3.5.2    Gelatinization temperature                                                                              20       

3.5.3    Determination of swelling power                                                                   20

3.5.4    Determination of water/oil absorption capacity                                              21

3.6       Determination of Microbial Load                                                                   22

3.7       Statistical Analysis                                                                                          23

 

 

CHAPTER FOUR:   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Proximate Composition                                                                                  24

4.2       Total Carotenoid Content Composition                                                         27

4.3       Functional Properties                                                                                      29


 

4.4       Microbial Content                                                                                           32

4.5       Effect of Storage on Proximate Composition of OFSP flour                        33

4.6       Effect of Storage on Functional Properties of OFSP flour                            44

 

 

 

CHAPTER 5:    CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1       Conclusion                                                                                                      54

5.2       Recommendations                                                                                          55

 

REFERENCES                                                                                                        56






 

LIST OF TABLES

 

                                                                                                                                    PAGES

 

4.1       Effect of pretreatment on the proximate composition (%) of the

flour samples                                                                                                   24

 

4.2       Effect of pretreatment on the total carotenoid content of the

            flour samples                                                                                                   27

 

4.3       Effect of pretreatment on the functional properties of OFSP flour               29

4.4       Effect of pretreatment on the microbial load of OFSP flour                         32

4.5       Effect of storage on the moisture content (%) of flour                                  33

4.6       Effect of storage on carbohydrate composition (%) of OFSP flour               35

4.7       Effect of storage on the fiber content (%) fiber of OFSP flour                     36

4.8       Effect of storage on the protein content (%) of OFSP flour                          37

4.9       Effect of storage on the fat content (%) of OFSP flour                                 39

4.10     Effect of storage on the Ash content (%) of OFSP flour                               40

4. 11    Effect of storage period (Months) in total carotenoid content

(µg/100g) of flour samples.                                                                             42

 

4.12     Effect of storage on the swelling power (g/ml) of the OFSP flour                44

4.13     Effect of storage on the oil absorption capacity (ml/g) of OFSP flour          45

4.14     Effect of storage on water absorption of capacity (%) of OFSP flour           47

4.15     Effect of storage on gelation temperature (°C) of OFSP flour                      48

4.16     Effect of storage on Bulk Density (g/ml) of OFSP flour                               49

4.17     Effect of storage on bacterial load (x 102CFU/g) of OFSP flour                   51

4.18     Effect of storage on fungi load of (x 104CFU/g) OFSP flour                                    52





 

 


 

LIST OF FIGURES

 

                                                                                                                                    PAGES

 

1:         Processing flow chart for orange fleshed sweet potato flour                        13

2:         Sketch for dilution of orange-fleshed sweet potato flour for microbial

content estimation.                                                                                          22








 

LIST OF APPENDICES

 

                                                                                                                                    PAGES

1: Peeled orange fleshed sweet potato sample                                                           65

2:  Flour samples of processed OFSP                                                                          66

 


 



 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.0       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

 

Sweet potato (Ipomea batatas) is a very important and unique staple crop in southern and eastern part of the African continent (Tumwegamire et al., 2007) grown for its economic importance (Woolfe, 1992). According to FAOSTAT (2019), China is the leading producer of sweet potato, followed by Nigeria, Tanzania, Indonesia and Uganda with an average production rate of 112.8million tons from these five countries. Sweet potato is one of the staple root crops abundantly grown in Africa and according to International Potato Center (2017) is the third most vital food crop in eastern and seven other central Africa being the 4th most important crop in about six southern African nations and 8th priority in four Western African countries. It is usually cultivated and propagated by vegetative method and they are drought resistant. The tuberous root and the leaves are also eaten (Bovell-Benjamin, 2007).These characteristics and qualities make Orange fleshed sweet potato a dependable crop for food security. It requires less labour to maintain once it is established and can be stored over a broad range of time in the soil without considerable loss if not harvested immediately at maturity (Woolfe, 1992). Harvest Plus was the very first to release conventionally bred Vitamin A bio-fortified sweet potato varieties (Andrade et al., 2013). Sweet potato has become a sustainable low-input/low-out crop to a significantly important cash crop, reliable revenue and food source to low income farmers as it can be gradually harvested on demand (Tairo et al., 2005). It has helped to improve the health of poor families in Sub-Saharan Africa due to its high pro-vitamin A content (Ganiyat et al., 2013). Efforts have been made to preserve these crops after harvest in order to make them more available through the process of moisture removal using different methods of drying and pretreatments. Processing sweet potato into dry form helps to reduce the moisture content and converts the roots into a product that is more stable and transportable (FAO, 1990). Despite its versatility, it is still among the world’s most underutilized crop in many underdeveloped and developing countries after rice, wheat, maize and cassava (Owori et al., 2007; Ezeano, 2010). Sweet potato and its products have different roles they play. They act as supplement in the human diets and also luxury food besides being a staple crop. Due to the improved drying techniques and technology that have evolved in recent times, different kinds of dried sweet potato chips and flour are popular in the market shelves. Flours processed from these sweet potatoes dried chips are used to produce end products such as ready to eat foods like noodles and snacks.

 

1.1       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) is a very good source of provitamin A used in many developing countries to combat blindness and vitamin A deficiency because of its rich beta-carotene content. Sweet potato is considered a secondary staple food in Sub-Saharan Africa where it plays an important role in controlling malnutrition (Jaarsveld et al., 2005). It is usually planted as an intervention crop after disasters because it matures early and gives bountiful amount of food supply to the populace (Katz and Weaver, 2003). However, the short life due to its perishability is a great challenge in developing countries. Sweet potatoes are generally in abundance during harvesting period, but due to their very high water content, they are faced with the challenges of storage owing to their high perishability. They are therefore consumed as boiled, steamed or fried potato for only a limited period after harvest. Hence processing it into products such as flour which are then, packaged and stored would help to increase the shelf life of sweet potato. This can be used to develop composite flour with wheat to produce several confectionaries like bread, cake etc.

Functional properties of flours have been shown to be affected by different processing methods e.g taro flour being affected by heat process (Tagodoe and Nip, 1994) and gelatinization profiles of cassava flour being affected by drying temperature, milling procedure and particle size (Fernmandez et al., 1996). Factors such as variety, processing step, processing method (parboiling and blanching) have been reported to influence the beta carotene quality of sweet potato flour (Osundahunse et al., 2003; Van Hal, 2000; Jangchud et al., 2003). Beta-carotene content of sweet potato is also affected as a result of the drying technique, drying temperatures, peeling, and the pretreatment method applied (Yadav et al., 2006; Maruf et al.,2010).                   

 

1.2       OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

1.2.1    The main objectives of the study

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the changes in the proximate, functional properties, microbial quality and the extent of losses on the total carotenoid content of flour processed from UMUSPO 1 orange fleshed sweet potato variety as a result of pretreatment, drying methods applied storage period.

1.2.2    Specific objectives of the study

The specific objectives of this study are;

  i.      To determine the total carotenoid content of orange fleshed sweet potato roots

ii.      To determine the nutrient composition/total carotenoid content of Orange fleshed sweet potato flour during and after storage.

iii.       To determine the functional properties of the flour samples during and after storage.

iv.       To determine the microbial quality of the flour samples during and after storage


1.3       JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

Due to high moisture content of sweet potatoes, they do not store for a long time. They are usually processed into more shelf stable products like flour which are used in making composite flour used in baking products like cake, bread and chin chin. Orange-fleshed sweet potatoes are known for their high beta-carotene content. However, losses of beta carotene are observed during the processing of sweet potato tubers into flour and more is lost during storage. This is usually observed especially if kept for a long period of time, hence it is expedient to determine the actual quantity of the total carotenoid/nutrients lost during processing of these orange fleshed sweet potato roots into flour and how much is retained after storage for a period of 3months, and hence this research study. The results obtained from the study will guide processors as to the better processing methods that will reduce losses of these nutrients and carotenoids.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment