ABSTRACT
This study investigated the effect of Cooperative learning and Advance Organizers strategies on senior secondary school students’ academic interest and achievement in Christian Religious Studies. The study which adopted a quasi-experimental, pretest posttest non-equivalent control group research design was carried out in Akwa Ibom State. A sample of 146 secondary school (SSII) students drawn from a population of 2311 was used for the study using purposive sampling technique. Data were collected using a 37-multiple choice questions titled: Christian Religious Studies Achievement Test (CRSAT) and a 10-item Christian Religious Studies Interest Rating Scale (CRSIRS). The instruments were validated by three experts. The CRSAT instrument was subjected to a reliability test analysis using Kudder Richardson (K-R20) formula to determine the internal consistency which yielded an index of 0.78 while that of CRSIRS was tested for stability and internal consistency using Pearson Product Moment Correlation and Cronbach Alpha statistic which yielded 0.83 and 0.86 respectively. The data collected were analyzed using mean and standard deviation to answer the research questions, while the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to test the null-hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The results showed, among others, that Cooperative learning and Advance Organizers instructional strategies had statistically significant and increasing effect on students’ interest and achievements in Christian Religious Studies than the lecture method. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended, among others, that teachers should use Cooperative learning and Advance Organizers strategies more regularly in teaching Christian Religious Studies to the students and de-emphasize the use of conventional lecture method all the time.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover
Page
Title
Page i
Declaration
ii
Certification iii
Dedication
iv
Acknowledgements v
Table
of Contents vii
List
of Tables ix
List
of Figures xi
List
of Appendices xii
Abstract xiii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background of the Study 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem 11
1.3 Purpose of the Study 12
1.4 Significance of the Study 13
1.5 Research Questions 14
1.6 Hypotheses 15
1.7 Scope of the Study 16
CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 17
2.1 Conceptual Framework 17
2.2 Theoretical Framework 43
2.3 Empirical Framework 48
2.4 Summary of Reviewed Literature 65
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 68
3.1 Design of the Study 68
3.2 Area of the Study 68
3.3 Population of the Study 71
3.4 Sample and Sampling Techniques 71
3.5 Instrument for Data Collection 72
3.6 Validation of the Research Instrument 73
3.7 Reliability of the Instrument 73
3.8 Method of Data Collection 74
3.9 Method of Data Analysis 80
CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 81
4.1 Results 81
4.2 Summary of the Major Findings 101
4.3
Discussion of the Findings 103
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 111
5.1 Summary of the Study 111
5.2
Conclusion 112
5.3
Educational Implications of the
Study 113
5.4 Recommendations 116
5.5 Suggestions
for Further Studies 118
References 119
Appendices 130
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1 Posttest
and Mean Interest Scores of Students taught Christian
Religious
Studies using Cooperative Learning, Advance
Organizers
Strategy and Lecture Method 81
Table
4.2: Analysis of Covariance
(ANCOVA) of Interest Mean Scores of
Students
taught Christian Religious Studies using Cooperative
Learning,
Advance Organizers Strategy and Lecture Method 83
Table
4.3: Result of Multiple Comparison
Analysis for Students Interest
Scores (x)
Teaching Strategies using Turkey Least Significant
Difference (LSD)
Strategy 84
Table
4.4: Pretest and Posttest Interest
Mean Scores of Male and Female
Students
taught Christian Religious Studies using Cooperative
Learning 85
Table
4.5: Analysis of Covariance
(ANCOVA) of Interest Scores of
Male
and Female Students taught Christian Religious Studies
using
Cooperative learning 86
Table
4.6: Pretest and Posttest Interest
Mean Scores of Male and Female
Students
taught Christian Religious Studies Using Advance
Organizer
Strategy 87
Table
4.7: Analysis of Covariance
(ANCOVA) of Interest Scores of
Male
and Female Students taught Christian Religious Studies
using
Advance Organizer Strategy 88
Table
4.8: Interaction Effect of Gender
and Teaching Strategies on Students’
Mean
Interest in Christian Religious Studies 89
Table
4.9: Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
of Interaction Effect of
Gender
and Teaching Strategies on Students’ interest in
Christian
Religious Studies 90
Table
4.10: Pretest and Posttest
Achievement Mean Scores of
Students
taught Christian Religious Studies using Cooperative
Learning,
Advance Organizers Strategy and Lecture Method 91
Table
4.11: Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
on the Mean Achievement
Scores
of Students taught Christian Religious Studies using
Cooperative
Learning, Advance Organizers Strategy and those
taught
using Lecture Method 93
Table
4.12: Result of Multiple Comparison
Analysis for Students Achievement
Scores (x)
Teaching Method using Turkey Least Significant
Difference (LSD)
Strategy 94
Table
4.13: Pretest and Posttest
Achievement Mean Scores of Male and
Female
Students taught Christian Religious Studies Using
Cooperative
Learning 95
Table
4.14: Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
of Achievement Scores of
Male
and Female Students taught Christian Religious Studies
using
Cooperative Learning 96
Table
4.15: Pretest and Posttest Achievement
Mean Scores of Male and
Female
Students taught Christian Religious Studies using
Advance
Organizers Strategy 97
Table
4.16: Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
of Achievement Scores of
Male
and Female Students taught Christian Religious Studies
using
Advance Organizer Strategy 98
Table
4.17: Interaction Effect of Gender
and Teaching Strategies on
Students’
Academic Achievements in Christian Religious Studies 99
Table
4.18: Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
of Interaction Effect of Gender
and
Teaching Strategies on Students’ Academic Achievements
in
Christian Religious Studies 101
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 An Illustration of Gagne’s Levels of
Learning 47
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page
Appendix A Map of Akwa Ibom State showing
the state capital and
the 31 Local Government Areas 130
Appendix
B Sample Size 131
Appendix
C Developed Content for
Christian Religious Studies Lesson 132
Appendix
D Lesson Plan for
Cooperative Learning Technique 156
Appendix
E Christian Religious
Studies Achievement Test (CRSAT)
Pre-Test 221
Appendix
F Model Answers for
Christian Religious Studies
Achievement Test (CRSAT) Pre-Test 227
Appendix
G Christian Religious
Studies Interest Rating Scale (CRSIRS)
Pre-Test 229
Appendix H Christian Religious Studies Achievement Test
(CRSAT)
Post-Test 230
Appendix
I Model Answers for
Christian Religious Studies Achievement
Test (CRSAT) Post-Test 236
Appendix J Christian
Religious Studies Interest Rating Scale (CRSIRS)
Post-Test 238
Appendix
K Table of Specification
for Christian Religious Studies Achievement Test (CRSAT) 239
Appendix L Item Analysis of CRS
Achievement Test 240
Appendix M Test
of Reliability of CRSAT Instrument 246
Appendix N Test of the Reliability of the CRSIRS Instrument
using
Pearson
Product Moment 248
Appendix O Test of the
Reliability of CRSIRS Instrument using
Cronbach
Alpha 249
Appendix P Raw
Score for Christian Religious Studies Achievement
Test (CRSAT) and Christian Religious Studies
Interest
Rating Scale (CRSIRS) 250
Appendix R Raw Score for Christian
Religious Studies Achievement
Test (CRSAT) and Christian Religious Studies
Interest
Rating Scale (CRSIRS) 254
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
OF THE STUDY
Christian Religious Studies is one of the subjects
categorized under humanities in the National Policy on Education by the Federal
Republic of Nigeria (FRN, 2013) and taught in Nigerian schools at various
levels, from the primary to secondary and even in the tertiary institutions.
The content delivery of the subject, however, differs at the various levels of
education in Nigeria. The subject is vertically organized to ensure that the
contents are slightly deeper and more complex at the various levels of education
in Nigeria namely; Pre-Primary education, Basic education and Senior Secondary
education (Federal Ministry of Education, 2007a; 2007b; 2009; 2012). The
diversity and complexity in content delivery is more pronounced at the tertiary
institution level as the subject is given a discipline status and it is
consequently offered by students who intend to be specialists in the field
(Akpan, 2020). In view of the perceived importance of the subject, it is
believed that the study of Christian Religious Studies and its relevance to
life could have effect on the behaviour of the recipients (students).
According to Akpan and Akpan (2020) the teaching of
Christian Religious Studies will not only impart the content of the Bible but
also moral lessons and instructions. This is buttressed by Akpan (2021) who
opined that Christian Religious Studies is intended to teach and help the
youths to improve their attitude to God, to their fellowmen and women, to their
work as well as improve themselves so that they can give dedicated services to
the nation generally. It is assumed that when the content of the subject as
stipulated in the curriculum is properly delivered, it would provide students
the opportunity to have adequate knowledge about God and grow in the
application of the concept of religion to life situation. Furthermore, a good
grasp of religious knowledge could help students apply the teaching and example
of Christ to their lives and also help develop and foster in them the Christian
attitude and values such as respect for life, respect for men, selfless service
to God and humanity among others. Notably, Christian Religious Studies is
paramount in building of attitude and morality that is why it is included in
the National Curriculum of Education at the various cadre of learning (Akpan,
2014).
The rationale for teaching Christian
Religious Studies is summed up by the Federal Republic of Nigeria, FRN (2013)
in the National Policy on Education. Accordingly, it is the belief of the
Nigerian government that the quality of instruction in Christian Religious
Studies at all levels has to be oriented toward inculcating moral and spiritual
principles in inter-personal and human relations (Federal Republic of Nigeria
FRN, 2013). This is in line with the objectives of the Joint Admission and
Matriculation Board (2017), which maintained that the study of Christian
Religious Studies could help students acquire the knowledge and understanding
of the tenets of the Christian faith as contained in the Bible. It is also
aimed at interpreting biblical teachings and themes as well as the application
of biblical teachings and tenets of life in the society. The above objectives
are in support of the opinion of Lawal (2002), who opines that the importance
of Christian Religious Studies to the individual and nation is the imparting of
moral values and behavioural change.
Christian Religious Studies is,
therefore, designed to induct each new generation into the attitudes, beliefs,
as well as the practices of the Christian religion or faith in a view to
promote the religion and at the same time provide for the individual a unifying
center for his life. Christian Religious Studies plays a prominent role in the
moral, ethical, emotional, social and academic life of a child. For instance,
Christian Religious Studies teaches a child to cultivate proper attitude to
life. The society however, is faced with a lot of problems ranging from rape,
cultism, alcoholism, child abuse and trafficking, unfaithfulness, teenage
pregnancy, sexual immorality, divorce in marriage, indecent dressing, drug
abuse, armed robbery, corruption among others. These problems would have been
reduced to the bearest minimum if all individuals imbibe the tenets of
Christian Religious Studies. This forms the essence why Christian Religious
Studies has been inculcated in the youths through schools but it is unfortunate
that this objective has not been adequately achieved.
Christian Religious Studies does not only serve as a
builder of moral values and attitude, it is also one of the prerequisites for
admission into the faculties of Arts/Humanities, Law and Education since at
least a credit pass in the Senior School Certificate Examination is required
before students can be admitted into related disciplines in the aforementioned
faculties. The poor academic achievement and interest of students in the
subject however, is detrimental to the admission process of students into the
discipline in Colleges of Education and Universities. This also accounted for
the dearth of teachers and specialists in the discipline as compared to other
subjects. Consequently, Lawal (2002) noted that the achievement in the subject
is diminishing. This posit by Lawal (2002) is buttressed by the Chief
Examiners’ report of West African Senior Secondary Certificate Examination
(WASSCE)(2015). This indicated that Christian Religious Studies was one of the
subjects that the performance of the students was poorer (West African Senior
Secondary Certificate Examination, WASSCE, 2015).
In 2017 the Chief Examiners for Christian Religious
Studies observed that most candidates exhibited poor command of the English
Language; bad grammar, poor tenses coupled with bad spellings. The Chief
Examiners for Christian Religious Studies also reported of deviations by some
of the candidates as well as points raised without explanation (WASSCE, 2017).
Furthermore, candidates were reported to have introduced a lot of irrelevant
points into their answers as well as exhibited total lack of knowledge of the
subject matter they were dealing with. The recent report is in support of Lawal
(2002) opinion, that poor performance in Christian Religious Studies occurs
yearly, thereby causing more students to lose interest and run away from the
subject while those who are offering the subject often absent themselves from
classes and even examination. The alarming rate of poor performance in the
subject and students’ poor attitude towards the subject has generated growing
concern from various quarters: the parents, teachers, schools and the
government. There are also expressed worries because of the relative importance
of the subject to education excellence and moral development.
Many reasons have been postulated for students’ poor
performance and lack of interest in the subject which include: lack of conducive
environment for learning, inadequate materials for the teaching of the subject,
insufficiency of professional teachers in the subject, parenting styles, school
administrative style, parental educational background and students’
co-curricular activities among others. However, the thrust of this study is on
the teaching methods adopted by the teachers in contents delivery because it is
believed that the teaching methods adopted by the teachers in contents delivery
have the potentials of enhancing the academic achievement and interest of the
learners in a school system (Unachukwu & Nwosu, 2018).
Teaching methods which sometimes can be
conceptualized by the utilization of different terminologies refer to the
strategy, approach or even technique that a teacher employs to deliver the
content of a lesson (Anangabor & Odu, 2021). Nwafor (2017) conceptualize it
as the representation of a pattern in which a lesson is to be presented.
According to Uya and Akpan (2019) teaching methods are those strategies which a
teacher uses to effect learning. Furthermore, teaching methods refer to the
diversity of approaches utilized by the teacher to ensure effective
interactions between teachers, students and the learning tasks. Accordingly, a
variety of teaching methods are common in schools, but some methods are more
effective and appropriate than others. The effectiveness and appropriateness of
teaching methods most especially depends on the particular subject to be
taught. This implies that the subject among other factors should be considered
before a particular teaching method is adjudged to be appropriate for
implementing a certain curriculum content. Educationists believed that learning
is dependent on the teaching methods teachers use in the classroom (Umoren,
2001; Duru, 2011; Etuk, Udosen, Emah, Edem & Afangideh, 2015).
Consequently, if the learning experiences result from the teacher’s teaching
methods, then the effectiveness of these experiences depend largely on the
appropriateness of the teaching methods the teacher has used. To this end, if
the teacher adopted the ‘wrong’ teaching method then it is likely to result in
an inappropriate experience for the learners.
Many teaching methods have been
adopted over the years in teaching Christian Religious Studies. As noted by
Akpan (2021), teaching methods such as discussion, storytelling and questioning
have been used as conventional methods in teaching Christian Religious Studies.
These methods despite its merits seem to be teacher-centered. The cotemporary
trend of teaching and learning has shifted from teacher-centered teaching
methods to learners-centered teaching methods. Recently, there have been calls
for reforming instructional strategies by considering more innovative teaching
methods, often rooted in constructivist theory, to promote learners’ conceptual
understanding (Chang, 2011; Mokhtar, Tarmizi, Ayub & Tarmizi, 2010). In
this regards, the contemporary trend of teaching and learning is entrenched in
the application of constructivism learning techniques in a view to promote
learners-centered classroom interactions.
Constructivism learning technique is
a model of learning that has been proposed as an alternative to the
transmission model implicit in all behaviourist and some cognitive approaches
(Etuk, 2014). In this model, learning is viewed as being based on the belief
that knowledge is not a thing that can be simply given by the teacher at the
front of the classroom to learners on their desks. Rather, knowledge is
constructed by the learners through active and mental process of development.
Consequently, learners are the builders and creators of meaning and knowledge (Young & Collins, 2004).
Constructivism’s central idea is that human learning is constructed, that
learners build new knowledge upon the foundation of previous learning
(Phillips, 2005). Constructivism by its very nature and structure is,
therefore, an omnibus as well as robust teaching/learning technique which
encourages knowledge construction, creativity and human relations.
This view of learning sharply
contrasts hydraulic theory of education by Davies (1969) which holds that
knowledge is a kind of liquid which resides copiously in teacher and books as
in great vessels and hardly at all anywhere else. Particularly, it is scarce in
the small vessels known as students. The purpose of education then is to
transfer this liquid from the lager to the smaller vessels. Fortunately, this
liquid has certain peculiar and mysterious properties that facilitate the
process of transfer (Davies, 1969). The hydraulic theory of education
apparently conflicts with the psychology of education notion that students are
not vessels or bottles to be filled but lamps to be lit. By the foregoing,
hydraulic theory is an anti-constructivist philosophy. The hydraulic theory of
education has become obsolete by the passage of time and revolutions in theory
and practice of education.
Two important notions orbit the
simple idea of constructed knowledge. The first is that learners construct new
understanding using what they already know. Children are no tabula rasa (empty brain), for this
would imply that the child is empty in the classroom and so the teacher is the
only one to teach the child and force him/her to acquire knowledge whereas in
constructivism, it is not so. In constructivism, the teacher makes the child
build on what he/she already knows to become a better learner and therefore
knowledge is etched. Learners come to learning situations with knowledge gained
from previous experience, and that prior knowledge influences what new or
modified knowledge they will construct from new learning experiences (Doolittle
& Camp, 2002). The second notion is that learning is active rather than
passive. Learners confront their understanding in the light of what they encounter
in the new learning situation. If what learners encounter is inconsistent with
their current understanding, their understanding can change to accommodate new
experiences.
Learners remain active throughout
the learning process. They apply current understanding, note relevant elements
in the new learning experiences, judge the consistency of prior and emerging
knowledge, and based on that judgment, they can modify knowledge (Nwagbo &
Obiekwe, 2010). Accordingly, the constructivist’s view of learning points to a
number of different teaching practices, but generally means encouraging
students to use active techniques such cooperative learning and advance
organizers among others.
Cooperative learning technique is a generic term for
small group interactive instructional procedures. According to David (2018)
cooperative learning is an instructional strategy that provides a learning
environment that allows active participation of students in the learning
process and makes it possible for the students to have control over their
learning, which may lead to improvement in their academic achievement. In this
procedure, students work together on academic tasks in small groups to help
themselves and their team mates together. In general, cooperative learning
technique ensures that students are positively independent (Etuk, 2014). As
noted by Barkley, Cross and Major (2005) in cooperative learning, students’
activities are structured so that students need each other to accomplish their
common tasks or learning activities.
Educationists believe that students seek information and
understanding through mental search. Cooperative learning therefore helps in
the mental search by helping students clarify concepts and ideas through
discussions and debates. Furthermore, cooperative learning involves students’
participation in group learning that emphasizes positive independent
interactions with different levels of abilities and engaged in learning
activities to improve their understanding of a subject matter, expose the
students to the mainstream of the subject matter and draw their undivided
attention to the topic of discussion and participation for a good result
(Enwereuzoh & Ukegbu, 2017; Olayinka, Ayanda & Adeoye, 2020).
Consequently, cooperative learning emphasizes social learning by assuming that
learning takes place better in a social learning situation and group
environment rather than in isolation.
Advance organizer is conceived as information that is
presented prior to learning that can be used by the learner to organize and interpret
new incoming material (Mayer, 2003). In the opinion of Woolfolk (2001), advance
organizer is a visual organization practice which can be used at the beginning
of a class or a new unit of study to present new information to students. It
can also set the stage for building on existing knowledge from prior learning. The use of Advance Organizer to ensure
effective teaching as well as learning in education was advocated by Ausubel
(1960) in his advance organizer learning theory. Ausubel (1960) defined an
advance organizer as a cognitive instructional strategy used to promote the
learning and retention of new information. Advance organizer therefore, helps
the students to prepare for class by providing an overview of what will be
discussed and then provide more detailed insight into the material as it is
taught. It also helps in facilitating the ability of students to make
connections between the main ideas and supplementary content throughout each
class period or unit of study.
According to Adebola (2011), advance organizers prepare
the learners for the materials they are set to learn and are equally the means
of strengthening the cognitive structure and enhancing the retention of new
information. They also provide concept and principles to the students themselves
as they help students to develop intellectual skills to raise reasonable
questions, concerning the problems for finding out answers. The advantages of
advance organizer, among others, include providing anchorage or links and
avoidance of rote memorization by students. Consequently, students taught using
advance organizer perform better in achievement test than those taught in a
conventional way (Araoye, 2009).
Interest is another factor that is likely to influence
the participation of students in Christian Religious Studies and by extension
in the cooperative and advance organizer learning techniques. Nekang (2004)
viewed interest as an emotionally oriented behavior trait, which determines
students’ energy and enthusiasm in tackling educational programmes or other
activities. Okoye (1998) looked at interest as a kind of feeling which one has
for something which is valuable and beneficial. The interest in a particular
thing is a feeling manifested in an activity. Interest is a tendency to become
absorbed in an experience and to continue in it. It is the zeal or willingness
to participate in an activity from which one derives some pleasure.
Interest according to Uroko (2010) is a necessary
ingredient before learning can take place; for a child is bound to pay
attention as a lesson goes on if such a child is interested in the particular
subject. However, Uroko (2010) reported high failure rate and relatively small
proportion of students’ interest in subjects that required reading for
comprehension. Students could be more comfortable when they interact with peers
than when they are threatened by the presence of a teacher or an adult. Working
cooperatively with peers may generate interest among students; therefore, it is
important to determine the extent cooperative and advance organizer learning
techniques, which are learner-centered instructional strategies, can affect
students’ interest in Christian Religious Studies.
The influence of gender on students’ academic achievement
in Christian Religious Studies is of interest in this study. Gender influences
students’ academic achievement and therefore a variable that plays an important
role in learning and education in general. Gender refers to the varied socially
and culturally constructed roles, qualities and behavior that are ascribed to
women and men of different societies (Olawale, 2019). Eryilmaz in Owenvbiugie
and Iyoha (2017) observed that gender contributes to poor achievement of
students in educational institutions. Ishaq in Ibrahim and Wunba (2018) maintained
that boys outperformed girls in Christian Religious Studies at external
examination. Also WAEC Chief Examiners’ report (2016) indicated that only 9.8%
female students passed Christian Religious Studies at credit level. Uroko
(2010) also found that gender has no significant influence on academic
achievement, self-efficacy and interest of students based in reciprocal peer
tutoring. With these scholastic postulations, it can be assumed that students’
interest and achievement can be enhanced or marred by the teaching method
adopted by the teachers in content delivery. In this study, the effect of
cooperative learning and advance organizers on students’ interest and
achievement in Christian Religious Studies in Akwa Ibom State is the focus.
1.2 STATEMENT
OF THE PROBLEM
Christian
Religious Studies (CRS) is included in the National Curriculum of Education
right from the primary to the tertiary level of learning and it is taught with
dual functions; development of intellectual ability and moral character. In
addition to building of attitude and morality, the subject is categorized among
the five subjects that students must score at least a credit pass before being
offered admission in certain disciplines in the faculties of Art/Humanities,
Law and Education as indicated earlier. Despite the importance of the subject
to the individuals and nation in imparting moral values and behavioural change,
the performance of students in the subject is deteriorating and the situation
affects not only their performance in the terminal/promotion examinations but
also their overall performances in the Senior Secondary School Certificate
Examination. The poor performance in the subject has resulted in lack of
interest in the subject by those students who consequently have a negative
perception about the subject. All these perhaps lead to students absconding
from the subject, while others do it as an additional subject to complete the
number of subjects required in the Senior Secondary School Certificate
Examination. Still some students claim they do it because they are Christians.
The poor academic performance and lack of interest is of concern to
researchers, who are interested in identifying the cause of poor performance in
the subject.
There seems to be limited or no
available literature on works done on the application of constructivist
approach in the implementation of Christian Religious Studies. Specifically,
there is no research evidence regarding the comparative effects of cooperative
learning and advance organizers learning techniques on students’ achievement in
Christian Religious Studies examinations that served as the focal point of the
problem for this investigation. This study therefore addresses the problem of
whether or not there is an effect of constructivism techniques of cooperative
learning and advance organizers on
students’ interest and achievement in Christian Religious Studies in Akwa Ibom
State.
1.3 PURPOSE
OF THE STUDY
The purpose of the study was to
determine the effect of cooperative
learning and advance organizers on students’ interest and achievement in Christian Religious Studies in Akwa
Ibom State. Specifically, the study sought to:
1. determine the
mean interest scores of Senior
Secondary II students taught Christian Religious Studies using
cooperative learning, advance organizers strategy and those taught using
lecture method.
2. determine the
mean interest scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students taught
Christian Religious Studies using cooperative learning.
3. find out the
mean interest scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students taught
Christian Religious Studies using advance organizer strategy.
4. find out the
interaction effect of gender and teaching strategies on the mean interest
scores of Senior
Secondary II students taught Christian Religious Studies.
5. examine the
mean achievement scores of Senior
Secondary II students taught Christian Religious Studies using
cooperative learning, advance organizers strategy and those taught using
lecture method.
6. examine the
mean achievement scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students taught
Christian Religious Studies using cooperative learning.
7. determine the
mean achievement scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students taught
Christian Religious Studies using advance organizers strategy.
8. determine the
interaction effect of gender and teaching strategies on the mean achievement
scores of Senior
Secondary II students taught Christian Religious Studies.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE
OF THE STUDY
The findings of the study may be of
benefit to Christian Religious Studies students, teachers, education
administrators, supervisors, curriculum planners, and researchers.
Specifically, the students would be availed of the
privilege to be taught with cooperative learning and advance organizers methods
which in turn will develop their interest in Christian Religious Studies. In
addition, students when taught with cooperative learning and advance organizers
will learn better and will understand the contents of the subject. This may in
turn enhance their academic achievement in Christian Religious Studies.
The findings of this study may increase the teaching
methods of Christian Religious Studies teachers as they will be exposed to
choice of appropriate methods of Christian Religious Studies contents delivery.
The findings of this investigation may also assist Christian Religious Studies
teachers in effective preparation of students for improved performance in
examinations.
The findings of this investigation may
likely constitute useful contents on which education administrators can rely
upon. Supervisors may also draw some insights from the finding of this study.
They may base their seminars and workshops for up-skilling of Christian
Religious Studies teachers.
Curriculum planners and experts may find this study
relevant as it may be helpful in the improvement of the instructional content
and strategies of Christian Religious Studies curriculum. The introduction of
constructivism techniques of cooperative learning and advance organizers would
perhaps add to the various strategies curriculum planners advance for the
furtherance of knowledge. The findings of this study would add to the plan to
offset the robust structure of constructivism (cooperative learning and advance
organizers) and perhaps contribute to the increase of students’
resourcefulness, creativity, adaptive skills and learning efficiency.
The findings of this investigation might likely
contribute towards filling the existing gaps in the literature resource with
respect to new and related information in Christian Religious Studies.
Researchers may find the instrument employed in this study apt and relevant to
their future study. They may thus, wish to adopt or adapt the instrument for
their own future research.
1.5 RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
The following research questions were
posed to guide the study:
1. What are the mean
interest scores of Senior
Secondary II students taught Christian Religious Studies using
cooperative learning, advance organizers strategy and those taught using
lecture method?
2. What are the
mean interest scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students taught
Christian Religious Studies using cooperative learning?
3. What are the
mean interest scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students taught
Christian Religious Studies using advance organizer strategy?
4. What are the
interaction effect of gender and teaching strategies on the mean interest
scores of Senior
Secondary II students taught Christian Religious Studies?
5. What are the
mean achievement scores of Senior
Secondary II students taught Christian Religious Studies using cooperative
learning, advance organizers strategy and those taught using lecture method?
6. What are the
mean achievement scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students taught
Christian Religious Studies using cooperative learning?
7. What are the
mean achievement scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students taught
Christian Religious Studies using advance organizers strategy?
8. What are the
interaction effect of gender and teaching strategies on the mean achievement
scores of Senior
Secondary II students taught Christian Religious Studies?
1.6 HYPOTHESES
The following null hypotheses tested at 0.05
level of significance were formulated to guide the study:
1. There is no
significant difference between the mean interest scores of Senior Secondary II students
taught Christian Religious Studies using cooperative learning, advance
organizer strategy and those taught using lecture method.
2. There is no
significant difference between the mean interest scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students
taught Christian Religious Studies using cooperative learning.
3. There is no
significant difference between the mean interest scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students
taught Christian Religious Studies using advance organizer strategy.
4. The
interaction effect of gender and teaching strategies on Senior Secondary II students’
interest in Christian Religious Studies is not significant.
5. There is no
significant difference among the mean achievement scores of Senior Secondary II students
taught Christian Religious Studies using cooperative learning, advance
organizers strategy and those taught using lecture method.
6. There is no
significant difference between the mean achievement scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students
taught Christian Religious Studies using cooperative learning.
7. There is no
significant difference between the mean achievement scores of male and female Senior Secondary II students
taught Christian Religious Studies using advance organizers strategy.
8. The
interaction effect of gender and teaching strategies on Senior Secondary II students’
achievement in Christian Religious Studies is not significant.
1.7 SCOPE
OF THE STUDY
The study was delimited to Senior
Secondary II students offering Christian Religious Studies in the public
secondary schools in Akwa Ibom State. The investigation was also delimited to
five topics selected from Christian Religious Studies curriculum for Senior
Secondary Two in the concurrent term scheme of work (second term). The selected
topics were; submission to the will of God, making decisions as a Christian,
the supremacy of God, Elijah at Mount Carmel and greed and its effects. The
study was also delimited to two experimental methods (cooperative learning and
advance organizers) and a conventional method (lecture method). The thrust was
to determine the effect of cooperative
learning and advance organizers on students’ interest and achievement in
Christian Religious Studies in Akwa
Ibom State.
Login To Comment