EFFECT OF BLENDED LEARNING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND RETENTION IN ECONOMICS

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009839

No of Pages: 180

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effect of blended learning strategy on students’ achievement and retention in Economics in Ebonyi State. The study was guided by six research questions and hypotheses.  The study adopted a pretest, posttest, control group quasi experimental design. Two secondary schools were purposively selected for the study. In each school, an intact class of SSII Economics students was drawn and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught Economics using blended learning strategy while the control group was taught using the lecture method. Data were collected using an Economics Achievement Test (EAT). The instrument was face and content validated by three experts. The reliability of the instrument was determined using K-R20 statistic which yielded the internal consistency index of 0.78. Data obtained were analyzed using mean and standard deviation while hypotheses were tested using the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The results of the study indicated that blended learning strategy had increasing and significant effect on the mean achievement scores of students in Economics, blended learning strategy had no significant differential effect on male and female students’ mean achievement score in Economics, method and gender had no significant interaction effects on students’ mean achievement scores in Economics, blended learning strategy had high and significant effect on the mean retention scores of students in Economics, blended learning strategy had no significant differential effect on the mean retention scores of male and female students in Economics and there was no significant interaction effect of  instructional method and gender on the mean retention scores of students in Economics. Based on these findings, it was recommended among others that blended learning strategy should always be used to teach Economics in order to facilitate students’ achievement and retention.








TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Certification                                                                                                               ii

Declaration                                                                                                                 iii

Dedication                                                                                                                  iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                    v

Table of Contents                                                                                                       vii

List of Appendices                                                                                                      viii

List of Tables                                                                                                              xii

Abstract                                                                                                                      xiv                                                        


CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background to the Study                                                                                1

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                               11

1.3       Purpose of the Study                                                                                       12

1.4       Research Questions                                                                                        12

1.5       Hypotheses                                                                                                     13

1.6       Significance of the Study                                                                               14

1.7       Scope of the Study                                                                                          15

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1       Conceptual Framework                                                                                  17

2.1.1    Nature of Economics                                                                                      17

2.1.2    Blended learning strategy                                                                               21

2.1.2.1 Benefits of blended learning strategy                                                             27

2.1.2.2 Factors hindering effective utilization of blended learning strategy                       31

2.1.2.3 Modes of blended learning                                                                             34

2.1.3    Academic achievement                                                                                  38

2.1.4    Students’ achievement in economics                                                             40

2.1.5    Gender and Students achievement                                                                 41

2.1.6    Students’ retention in Economics                                                                   43

2.2       Theoretical Framework                                                                                  45

2.2.1    Theory of social constructivism by Levy Vygotsky (1978)                           45                                                                                  2.2.2            Theory of connectivism by George Siemen (2005)                                       47

2.3       Empirical Studies                                                                                           49

4.4       Summary of Literature Reviewed                                                                  70

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1       Design of the Study                                                                                        72

3.2       Area of the Study                                                                                            73

3.3       Population of the Study                                                                                  74

3.4       Sample and Sampling Techniques                                                                 74

3.5       Instrument for Data Collection                                                                       75

3.6       Validation of the Instrument                                                                          75

3.7       Reliability of the Instrument                                                                          76

3.8       Experimental Procedure                                                                                 77

3.8.1    Control of extraneous variables                                                                      79

3.10     Method of Data Collection                                                                             80

3.11     Method of Data Analysis                                                                                81

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULT AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Results                                                                                                            82

4.2       Summary of Findings                                                                                     94

4.3       Discussion of Findings                                                                                   94


CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1       Summary of the Study                                                                                    101

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                      103

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                          104

5.4       Educational Implication of the Study                                                             105

5.5       Limitation of the Study                                                                                   106

5.6       Suggestions for Further Study                                                                        107

 REFERENCES                                                                                                        108

APPENDICES                                                                                                           119

 


 

 

 

                                                               LIST OF TABLES

 4.1      Mean and standard deviation of academic achievement of students

            in economics when taught using blended learning strategy

            and lecture method                                                                                         82

 

4.2       Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) of Effect of Blended Learning

            Strategy on the Mean Achievement Scores of Students in Economics      83                                                                                   

 

4.3       Mean and standard deviation of academic achievement of male and

            female students in economics when taught using blended learning strategy           84

 

4.4       Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) of Effect of Blended Learning

            Strategy on the Mean Achievement Scores of Male and Female

            Students in Economics                                                                                   85

 

4.5       Interaction Effect of Methods and Gender on the Mean Achievement

            Scores of Students in Economics                                                                   86

 

4.6       Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) of Interaction Effect of

            Gender and Instructional Methods on the Mean Achievement

            Scores of Students in Economics                                                                   87

 

4.7       Mean and Standard Deviation of Retention Scores of Students

            taught Economics using Blended Learning Strategy and Lecture Method            88

 

4.8       Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) of Effect of Blended Learning

            Strategy on the Mean Retention Scores of Students in Economics                        89

 

4.9       Mean and Standard Deviation of Retention Scores of Male and Female

            Students taught Economics using Blended Learning Strategy                        90

 

4.10     Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) of Effect of Blended Learning Strategy

            on the Mean Retention Scores of Male and Female Students in Economics 91

 

4.11     Interaction Effect of Methods and Gender on Mean Retention Scores of

            Students in Economics                                                                                   92

 

4.12     Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) of Interaction Effect of

            Gender and Instructional Methods on the Mean Retention Scores

            of Students in Economics                                                                               93                                                                                                                                                                                              




 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1       BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Economics is considered as an important subject that deals with the study of the behaviour of and inter-relationships of households, business firms, governments, markets and industries with appropriate and efficient allocation and utilization of economic resources in their best alternative uses. Robbins in Anyanwuocha (2010) defined Economics as a science which studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses. Nwoke (2012) described Economics as the study of efficient allocation of scarce resources among competing alternative while Jhingan in Nnachi (2014) perceived Economics as a social science concerned with the proper allocation and utilization of scarce resources for the attainment and maintenance of growth and stability. Economics is therefore, concerned with the study of how people and society efficiently allocate their scarce productive resources which have alternative uses, to produce various commodities and distribute them for consumption among persons and groups in society.

Economics as a distinct field of study was introduced in Nigeria after a protracted debate on its ability to fundamentally equip secondary school graduates with the basic knowledge and requisite skills necessary for understanding the nature of economic concepts and problems in our society, and prepare them adequately for the economic challenges of 21st century and beyond (Ede, Oleabhiele & Modebelu, 2016). Ochiaja (2015) stated that the inclusion of Economics as a senior secondary school subject stems from the quest to develop entrepreneurial and managerial skills needed for self and national consciousness as well as improving the economic well-being of individuals and society at large for the achievement of national objectives.

The curriculum content of Economics at the secondary school level is therefore designed and tailored to improve students’ interaction with their environment, and broaden their knowledge and level of involvement in economic and social activities, enhance their capacity to apply scientific knowledge on issues of personal, households, firms and governments (Aniaku, 2013). Ede et al (2016) observed that the Economics curriculum at secondary school level is properly and adequately built with an array of carefully selected learning experiences with a view to widening students’ knowledge and competence such that graduates of secondary school can become self-dependent so that in the event when no job opportunities exist, they can be productively and gainfully engaged in income generating activities because of the Economics knowledge and skills they had acquired. According to Adu (2012), Economics curriculum is an organized body of knowledge carefully selected to provide students with learning opportunities and knowledge for making rational decisions, living a meaningful life in a dynamic society, managing scarce resources efficiently and having respect for the dignity of labour.

Thus, the subject, Economics is expected to accomplish the following objectives; enabling students to understand basic economic principles and concepts as well as the tools for sound economic analysis, contribute intelligently to discourse on economic reforms and development as they affect or would affect the generality of Nigerians, understand the structure and functioning of economic institutions, appreciate the role of public policies on national economy, develop the skills and also appreciate the basis for rational economic decisions, become sensitized to participate actively in national economic advancement through entrepreneurship, capital market and so on; understand the role of and status of Nigeria and other African countries in international economic relationships; and appreciate the problems encountered by developing countries in their efforts towards economic advancement (Ede et al, 2016; Onuoha, Ochiaja, Ogbalu, Onah & Enebe, 2018; Oleabhiele & Oko, 2018).

Despite the growing importance and usefulness of Economics to Nigerian economy and the continued increase in the enrolment of students to write Economics in external examinations, Umeala (2015) lamented that there have been a persistent and exponential deterioration of students’ performance in Economics in external examinations over the years. The consistent poor achievement of senior secondary school students in Economics according to Onuoha (2015), is an indication that students who enroll in Economics for external examinations were not adequately prepared. This persistent poor achievement of students in Economics is primarily caused by the selection and utilization of inappropriate instructional strategies by Economics teachers. According to Davies (2013), students’ poor achievement and low retention in Economics can be largely attributed to the utilization of traditional instructional strategies by Economics teachers which he described as not just teacher centered methods but also ineffective in delivering Economics contents. These traditional methods according to Agba (2012), includes lecture method, discussion method, questioning method, among others.

To support the above assertion, Kwak, Meneze and Sherwood (2015) stated that the dismal failure of students in Economics is due to the fact that educational activities are predicated mainly on traditional face to face instructional strategies which confine students to “brick and mortar” schools. Under this arrangement, students are completely reduced to passive learners and must learn from teacher centered methods. This mode of teaching according to Aniaku (2013), is generalized and does not take into consideration, the individual learning needs and styles of different students as well as their prior knowledge, experiences, backgrounds and views. The method therefore discourages critical reasoning, creativity and initiative which are necessary for maximum achievement in Economics. Similarly, Poon (2013) observed that though, e-learning enjoys high rate of flexibility, the adoption of only the e-learning mode of instruction creates social isolation which negates the tenets of social learning theory which states that social interaction with more knowledgeable others including teachers and students will lead a learner to deeper and further cognitive development and understanding.

Since the traditional face to face classroom instructions are teacher centered, inflexible and prevent students from learning at their respective pace; and e-learning is accused of social isolation which are all hindrances to effective teaching and learning for maximum performance, Ojaleye and Awofala (2018) emphasized that the only way to promote greater students’ retention and achievement in Economics is the adoption of blended learning strategy which according to them is self-paced, individualized, flexible, and can overcome the limitations of both e-learning and traditional face to face classroom instructional strategies by enhancing student-teacher interaction, student-student interaction and student-content interaction. In their own contribution, Okocha, Eyiorunshe and Oguntayo (2016) asserted that blended learning strategy resolves the shortcomings of online learning and traditional learning experiences by establishing a framework which Poon (2013) suggested will provide students the very best of many possible delivery options that can suit their different learning styles.

Blended learning according to Paily (2013) is rooted in the theory of social constructivism which upholds that by interacting with others, students can achieve more and at higher levels through the strategic help of more knowledgeable people than they can on their own. Blended learning strategy is an instructional method that is promulgated as a source of collaboration; interaction and motivation to help both teachers and students create a learning community. It represents a paradigm shift and has transformed the teacher centered classroom into a student-centered classroom. Moreso, Blended learning strategy according to Yaghmour (2016), takes the responsibility of learning to students and substantially changes the role of the teacher to a facilitator.

Blended learning strategy is a pedagogical method that combines social, cognitive and teaching opportunities of face-to-face classroom instruction with the online learning environment rather than relying solely on one delivery method. Bawaneh (2011) envisioned blended learning strategy as a pedagogical strategy that helps teachers in combining technology and allows them use face to face classroom instructional strategies to meet the varying learning needs of learners. Alammary, Sheared and Carbon (2014) are of the opinion that blended learning strategy is used when students learn both in classroom and online learning environment. Blended learning strategy is a training pedagogy that combines traditional instruction and online instruction to improve knowledge and competence in Economics. Yilmaz and Orham (2010) described blended learning strategy as a mixture of different delivery models. It is an integrated learning technique that mixes traditional classroom session with online learning opportunity.

In the words of Pavla, Hana and Jan (2015), blended learning strategy is a new instructional strategy that integrates online educational materials with traditional face to face classroom instruction. Pillay and James (2014) commonly recognized blended learning strategy as a combination of face-to-face classroom component of instruction and online learning experience which takes the place of some class time. Thiele (2012) viewed blended learning strategy as the integration of traditional classroom learning with computer-mediated and usually online instruction delivered through computer. While students attend “brick and mortar” schools with a teacher present, the traditional face to face practices are combined with computer mediated activities regarding content and delivery. Thus, blended learning strategy mixes face to face classroom learning and online learning experiences, drawing on technology-mediated instruction where all participants are sometimes separated by distance.

Blended learning strategy according to Garrison and Kanuka (2013), is a thoughtful integration of classroom face to face learning experiences with online learning experiences which facilitates classroom experiences and extends learning through innovative use of information and communication technology. It tries to establish a harmonious balance between online access to knowledge and traditional face to face human interaction. Staker (2011) states that blended learning strategy is employed any time students learn partly in a supervised and confined classroom location away from home and partly through online delivery method under the guidance of an online instructor with some element of students’ control over time, place, path and/or pace. For blended learning strategy to work effectively, Thiele (2012) argued that it must use the online learning sessions to reduce the amount of time spent in the classroom face to face instruction. Specifying the ratio of traditional classroom learning time to online learning necessary to have a full blended learning, Clark in Graham, Henrie and Gibbons (2014) suggested a ratio of two hours of in-class work to one hour online session while Milheim (2014) calls for 30% to 79% of online course delivery with the rest made of traditional classroom learning.

To have a full blended learning strategy, Gambari, Shittu, Ogunlade and Osunlade (2017) suggested the integration of parts of learning which require the presence and guidance of the teacher with those aspects that do not demand the presence of the teacher. Blended learning strategy provides teachers with the prospect of designing and uploading their lecture notes, learning activities and assessments online; and requires that students attend on-site classes to receive the hands-on aspects of their learning and are then free to complete online asynchronous learning activities as long as the course works are accessible online (Poon, 2013). Course work takes the form of continuous assessment and allows learners to participate in e-portfolio development, graded discussions, assignments, online examinations and researches.

The online aspect of a blended class which can take place in the actual classroom, in a computer laboratory or even at home utilizes a wide spectrum of instruments and educational materials in order to provide an interactive learning environment synchronously or asynchronously, serve both teacher and student, improves the instructional process by offering programmes and courses electronically via different multimedia communication tools including e-mail, instant messages, mailing lists and discussion forums to surmount the conventional problems of environment (Shaowei & Zainuddin, 2020; Simpson, 2016; Achuonye, 2011). Benson and Kolsaker (2015) posited that students’ engagement and collaboration can be attained when Economics curriculum is well designed by bringing different types of learning activities and instruments together as part of the instructional process. Shibley (2014) stated that blended learning strategy requires students to access emails, e-journals, complete online assessment, collaborate using discussion forums and chat rooms to enhance student engagement and motivation and consequently, their learning outcomes and academic performance. In his contribution, Oye (2014) suggested the use of power-point presentations, video and audio clips to promote both collaborative and independent learning.

Blended learning strategy to some teachers however, places a burden on them cognitively and physically as they are compelled to redesign modules, prepare materials for uploading, provide feedback and grade online assessments. In support of this, Kwak et al (2015) stated that some of the challenges encountered by participants in the blended learning strategy centered on the need for related training, the shortage of time associated with digitizing and uploading content, lack of technical support to use the platform efficiently, high cost of acquiring some learning technologies, and poor network and internet connectivity. Beck (2010) regretted that since blended learning strategy is technologically dependent and a considerable amount of learning content is online, students may find it difficult to interact with the materials especially if they lack the requisite knowledge and skills to access or understand the material presented to them.

Notwithstanding the aforementioned limitations, blended learning strategy supports all the benefits of e-learning including cost reduction, time efficiency and location convenience for the learners as well as the essential one-on-one personal understanding and motivation that face-to-face instruction presents. Yonge (2014) stated that blended learning strategy has the potential to reduce educational expenses or costs by putting classroom in the online space and essentially replacing pricey textbooks with electronic devices. E-textbooks which can be digitally accessed help to drive down textbook budget. Instructional resources are increasingly accessible as time and location constraints are removed. Lalima and Dangwal (2017) observed that blended learning strategy connects students with the vast knowledge library of the world. It enhances collaboration within classes and between classes; and among students and their teachers throughout the world via electronic and multimedia communication tools such as Youtube, facebook, discussion forum, chat room, among others.

Since the proponents of online learning method suggested that it has the potential to provide differentiated or customized learning experiences that continuously adjust-to keep each learner within his/her zone of proximal development and the proponents of traditional face to face classroom teaching emphasized the importance of students’ interaction with more knowledgeable others including other learners and teachers in cognitive development, Ozgen and Ufuk (2017) contended that blended learning strategy combines online learning method with traditional classroom instructional strategies synergistically to provide a formidable and effective learning system that provides both personalized learning experiences and social interactions required for effective learning, retention and achievement in Economics. Blended learning strategy is therefore a pedagogical strategy that allows students to move at their own pace working as quickly as they are able and without waiting for other students in their class who occupy different zones of development. Those who are faster than other participants do not have to wait for them and those that are slow can take their time in accordance with their own preferred learning modalities and styles while obtaining more frequent feedback and providing better, less labour-intensive data to teachers (Ebert, 2015; Horn, 2013; Kelly & Harmm, 2013).

The intention of blended learning strategy is to enhance the academic achievement and retention of all students in Economics regardless of gender. Bawaneh (2011) observed however, that many researchers differ greatly in their opinions on the influence of gender on academic achievement of students when exposed to blended learning strategy. Specifically, Nisreen (2016) and Abdulkareem (2016) revealed that male students perform better than their female counterparts when exposed to blended learning as they have more freedom to explore their environment thereby developing in themselves the skills of enquiry and discovery while Ahmed and Mirna (2010) argued that female students out perform their male counterparts when taught with blended learning strategy in the areas of examination scores and using the knowledge acquired to solve life problems. Abdulkareem (2016), On the contrary, Yaghmour (2016) asserted that blended learning strategy embraces the active involvement of male and female students. Similarly, Walid and Abdulmajeed (2016) disclosed after their investigation on the factors affecting learning in a blended learning strategy, that there is no significant difference between male and female students in the aspects of examination scores and learning attitudes.

Therefore, if properly used, blended learning strategy is a promising alternative learning strategy with many possible delivery options for meeting the different learning needs when compared to conventional or e-learning approach, and can reorganize teaching and learning and their interplay, improve students’ engagement, collaboration, interaction, motivation, satisfaction, retention, progression and achievement in Economics in a learning community. It is against this backdrop, that the researcher deemed it necessary to ascertain the effect of blended learning strategy on secondary school students’ academic achievement and retention in Economics in secondary schools in Ebonyi State.


1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Economics is one of the vital subjects in the secondary school curriculum. It plays its role in ensuring that the graduates of secondary schools are equipped with knowledge and skills needed for achieving the economic well-being of individuals and society at large. Unfortunately, secondary school students’ achievement in Economics has been generally and continuously poor over the years. The consistent poor academic achievement and poor retention of secondary school students in Economics in various external examinations are indications that they have not been properly prepared, may be due to among other factors, the persistent selection and utilization of the conventional approach which is ineffective in delivery of Economics concepts and theories. Nwoke (2012) contented that the traditional approach is inappropriate in facilitating students’ achievement and retention because it does not allow them to participate actively in the learning process which the study of Economics demands. Hence, the persistent decline in students’ academic achievement and retention in Economics.

To address this abysmal situation and enhance students’ academic achievement and retention in Economics, there is a need for the adoption of a more innovative teaching approach such as blended learning strategy which provides diverse learning opportunities for students to interact with their teachers, peers and content both within and outside the school environment for greater achievement in Economics. However, the effectiveness of blended learning strategy in improving students’ achievement and retention in Economics in Ebonyi State has not been empirically established. The study is therefore confronted with the problem of determining empirically the effect of blended learning strategy on students’ achievement and retention in Economics.

 

1.3       PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of blended learning strategy on senior secondary school students’ academic achievement and retention in Economics in Ebonyi State. Specifically, the study sought to:

1.            examine the effect of blended learning strategy on students’ academic achievement in Economics.

2.            determine the effect of blended learning strategy on male and female students’ academic achievement in Economics.

3.            determine the interaction effect of instructional methods and gender on students’ achievement in Economics.

4.            determine the effect of blended learning strategy on students’ retention in Economics.

5.            determine the effect of blended learning strategy on male and female students’ retention in Economics.

6.            determine the interaction effect of instructional methods and gender on students’ retention in Economics.


1.4       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions guided the study:-

1.            What is the effect of blended learning strategy on the mean achievement scores of students in Economics?

2.            What is the effect of blended learning strategy on the mean achievement scores of male and female students in Economics?

3.            What is the interaction effect of instructional methods and gender on students’ mean achievement scores in Economics?

4.            What is the effect of blended learning strategy on the mean retention scores of students in Economics?

5.            What is the effect of blended learning strategy on the mean retention scores of male and female students in Economics?

6.            What is the interaction effect of instructional methods and gender on students’ mean retention scores in Economics?


1.5       HYPOTHESES

The following null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance:

Ho1:  Blended learning strategy has no significant effect on the mean achievement scores of students in Economics.

H02:     Blended learning strategy has no significant effect on the mean achievement scores of male and female students in Economics.

H03:     There is no significant interaction effect of instructional methods and gender on students’ mean achievement scores in Economics.

H04:        Blended learning strategy has no significant effect on the mean retention scores of students in Economics.

H05:     Blended learning strategy has no significant effect on the mean retention scores of male and female students in Economics.

H06:     There is no significant interaction effect of instructional methods and gender on students’ mean retention scores in Economics.


1.6       SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The findings of this study would be of immense significance and useful to curriculum planners, ministry of education, teachers, students and other researchers.

The findings of this study would be a useful instrument to curriculum planners as it would intimate them on the need to infuse the model in the Economics curriculum modules. The study would provide the curriculum planners with the specific guideline to plan when developing blended learning strategy.

The findings of this study would expose the ministry of education on the need to build and equip computer laboratories in schools and as well as provide other e-learning tools. The findings of the study would also expose the ministry on the need to recruit qualified teachers and trained them on the use of technologies necessary for effective use of blended learning strategy.

The findings of this study would keep teachers abreast with a more relevant instructional strategy for effective teaching of Economics. The findings of this study would provide Economics teachers with an insight on how to use blended learning strategy to improve their performance in Economics instruction by tailoring learning experience to students’ learning needs and styles. The findings of this study would also provide information on whether to use different instructional strategy for male and female Economics students or not. The findings of this study would also expose the Economics teachers on the need to acquire technical skills and knowledge required to use relevant learning technologies for effective utilization of blended learning strategy to optimize students’ achievement in Economics.

The findings of this study would enhance students’ achievement and retention in Economics by providing a more functional approach with many possible delivery modalities that can take care of different learning needs of students. This will improve teaching and learning of Economics contents and consequently, students’ achievement in both the internal and external examinations.

Furthermore, the results of this study would serve as an indispensable guide to other researchers who would deem it right to carry out research on a related aspect of the topic.

1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This research work was designed to investigate the effect of blended learning strategy on students’ academic achievement and retention in Economics. Though, there are different models of blended learning, this study was delimited to flipped model of blended learning strategy. The choice of this model was based on the fact that no study has been carried out yet on the effect of flipped model of blended learning on students’ achievement and retention in Economics to the best knowledge of the researcher. The study delimited traditional face to face method to lecture method. This is because lecture method is mostly used by Economics teachers. The study also confined its investigation to SSII students in government owned secondary schools in Abakaliki Education Zone of Ebonyi State. This is because all public secondary school within the above-mentioned zone of the state have peculiar students’ behaviuor and use the same curriculum in Economics. The choice of SSII students was due to the fact that they were not in examination class and the topics that were taught were selected from the SSII Economics core curriculum. The study was restricted to Abakaliki Education Zone. This is because students’ achievement and retention in Economics in this zone have unabatedly continued to be low which might be due to the utilization of traditional method. This study was delimited to the topics in SSII Economics scheme of work which include: cost of production, demand theory, supply theory and inflation.

 


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

8017

Total Item

Reviews (31)

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    This is so amazing and unbelievable, it’s really good and it’s exactly of what I am looking for

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Great service

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    This is truly legit, thanks so much for not disappointing

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I was so happy to helping me through my project topic thank you so much

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Just got my material... thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you for your reliability and swift service Order and delivery was within the blink of an eye.

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    It's actually good and it doesn't delay in sending. Thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I got the material without delay. The content too is okay

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you guys for the document, this will really go a long way for me. Kudos to project shelve👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    You guys have a great works here I m really glad to be one of your beneficiary hope for the best from you guys am pleased with the works and content writings it really good

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Excellent user experience and project was delivered very quickly

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    5 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you