ABSTRACT
This work
takes a historical survey of military disengagement from politics in Nigeria.
In the course of this work, efforts will be made at looking into the brief
history of the Nigerian military establishment along with the beginning of the
military in Nigerian politics.
The
period of the study is from the military regime in 1966 of Major General
Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi to that of' General Sanni Abacha’s administration of
1998. The study will examine the reasons
for military intervention, military performance in office, there will be a
review of some books of relevance used for the work. The political economy of Nigeria
under the military will also be discussed. The Nigerian military and the ethnic
struggle will be analyzed, while attention will be drawn to the impact of the
military in the economic, social and political wellbeing of the country.
Military process or pattern of disengagement and withdrawal from politics will
all be discussed as this will form the major point of analysis.
The study
however, will recommend ways and means to checkmate future military incursion
into politics
TABLE OF CONTENT
PAGES
Cover Page…………………………………………………………………………….. i
Certification…………………………………………………………………………… ii
Dedication…………………………………………………………………………….. iii
Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………… iv
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. v
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background of The
Study………………………………………………………. 1
Scope of
Study……………………………………………………………………… 4
Objective
of Study………………………………………………………………… 4
Methodology………………………………………………………………………….. 5
Statement
of Problems…………………………………………………………… 5
Organization
of Study…………………………………………………………….. 6
Endnotes………………………………………………………………………………. 8
CHAPTER
TWO
Literature
Review………………………………………………………………… 9
Endnotes…………………………………………………………………………… 16
CHAPTER
THREE
BRIEF
HISTORY OF THE NIGERIAN MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT
Genesis
of the Military in Nigerian Politics…………………………….. 20
Records
of Successful and Unsuccessful Coups in Nigeria……. … 23
The
Military in Politics (Military and the Political Economy)…. 23
The
Military with Power and Ethnic Struggle………………………… 27
Endnotes……………………………………………………………………………… 31
CHAPTER
FOUR
MILITARY
DISENGAGEMENT FROM POLITICS
Ironsi and
Disengagement……………………………………………………… 36
Gowon's
Disengagement ………………………………………………………… 39
Muritala
Mohammed/0basanj0 Administration………………………. 42
Babangida's
Adminstration…………………………………………………….. 46
Sanni
Abacha’s Administration……………………………………………….. 51
Endnotes……………………………………………………………………………….. 56
CHAPTER
FIVE
SUMMARY
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………… 60
Recommendations
…………………………………………………………………. 63
Endnotes……………………………………………………………………………….. 69
Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………… 70
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
OF THE STUDY
In most
African countries, the advent of the military into politics is a common
phenomenon. Most African countries are ruled by military heads of states. Africa
in general witnessed her very first military Coup in 1952 in Egypt, and since then, various
African Countries at one point or the other have all been partakers of this
form of administration. Nigeria
is not an exception, in the 52 years of her political independence, the
military have ruled for 29 years. According to Frantz Fanon, on his reason for
military incursion into African politics considers it as one of the negative
legacies of colonialism and this is based on the fact that prior to the arrival
of' the Europeans, Africans had no standing army. The members of the
communities had to volunteer during an expedition or war. However colonialism
brought with it the need for the establishment of a standing army that was
initially employed to protect and later to quell disturbances against colonial
rule. This colonial army later constituted into an institution within the
various components that made up the state.
The
military in Nigeria
has played a major role in the country's history, often seizing control of the
country and ruling it through major periods of its history. Its last period of
rule ended in 1999 following the death of the leader of the previous military
junta, Sani Abacha in 1998.
The
history of the military intervention in government is the history of coups and
counter coups. Over the years, beneficiaries of the military rule would forcefully
argue that the military was indeed an instrument for national development.
Their reasons been issues such as state creation and the indigenisation decree
of 1972 which they benefited much from. Both military and civilian leaders have
regularly strived to sustain, with characteristic impudence and force the
democratic distortions of the “mother country". They have done this
through a series of very extra ordinary tricks, fraud, juggles, intimidation,
patronage and outright bribery. Characterized by a chain of minute intrigues
for shabby ends, the swallowing of public money and the mere show of` power and
violence, each Nigerian regime has used the half-rotten bark of the national
tree-of-life as coal while pretending to be irrigating and reviving it.
Military involvement in African politics, considering the points outlined
above, can no longer be considered an aberration. African armies were instrumental
in the forcible destruction pre-colonial society and the imposition of colonial
rule. This circumstance rooted in the class structure of the colonial society
and in, the manner with which the colonial, regime deployed military force to
protect, then to impose and finally to consolidate its occupation. It was in
the circumstances of significant instances of resistance which accompanied the
political. process that violence acquired its own dialects within the political
system.
Be that
as it may, Nigerians have come to realize that the worst democratic government
is better than the best military administration due to the havoc created by the
past military administration which has plungged the nation into oblivion.
Having intervened from time to time, the military in each case has not been
able to resolve the crisis of legitimacy and development under which civilian
regimes have crumbled. Some of the problems have become compounded by military
rule and this prompted continuous call for military disengagement.
Talking
about political and economic instability, change in rule intermittently and
many more vices which are not healthy for a young and growing nation, this work
will also concentrate on the exploitative tendencies of the military while in
office, which further under developed the Nigerian state. This study will
equally help us to identify the factors and conditions which stimulate
disengagement exercise in Nigeria,
the various patterns by which various military regimes carried out their
disengagement and thus provide an insight on how an enduring and lasting
democracy can be achieved. Nigeria's
transition to civil democracy have exhibited a recurring peculiarity, every
transition has encountered difficulties because of the principal mid wife of
the transition, the military ruler himself. As the wind of democracy is blowing
with military regimes going out of fashion in most parts of the word, people
wondered how and why military rule in Nigeria continued for such a long
time. It is against this that the work has its foundation.
SCOPE OF STUDY
The study
focuses on the activities of the military in power with emphasis on their various
patterns of disengagement. This study has been designed in such a way that it
talks about various aspects of the military and their activities. The brief
history of the Nigerian military will be discussed which will take us to the
genesis of the military in Nigerian politics. The various coups, military
regimes and their disengagement, will be intensely discussed in the course of the
study.
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
The
objective of this work is between military intervention and politics of
disengagement in Nigeria.
The spillover takes the focal point of this work. Explanations will be sought
on why the military as a self corrective regime as they claim to be, end up
over throwing one another. This will help us find out Why the military find
comfort in political leadership and those who tend to perpetuate themselves in
office which will lead to the reasons for and patterns of military
disengagement.
METHODOLOGY
The
source of fact and information to this work will rely on information obtained from
research works, libraries, news papers, magazines, books, oral traditions
observation will be used to substantiate our claims. This study will be
descriptive and explanatory.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS
For some
decades now, Nigeria
has witnessed so many different military interventions which have hindered the
proper growth and development of the country. The military in Nigeria have played a major role in
the country's history since independence. Various juntas have seized control of
the country and ruled it through most of its history. Today we recount the much
havoc that has been done by the activities of the military. As a result of
these interventions, basic questions arise as to why and how the military came
to power. Do they actually come to correct the ills of the civilian
administration or do they come for their own personal interest? What are these
factors that attract or bring the military into power? Flow has the military
being able to affect the economic, social and political wellbeing of the country?
Are they really an agent of change?
Due to
the activities of the military, the Country has witnessed diverse political,
economic and social instability, there have been changes in rules, banning and
disbanding, all of which affect the structure of the country. Also how do those
military administrations disengage from power? What patterns do they use? Do they
actually disengage freely and permanently or do they just disengage partially
only to resurface or work from underground? This writing is based on all the
above stated questions.
ORGANIZATION OF STUDY
In order
to examine the military in Nigerian politics; this work is divided into five
chapters. Chapter one covers the introduction of the work, scope of study,
objective of the work, methodology and statement of problem.
Chapter
two examines various literatures available to the topic for discussion. This
shall be a review analysis on military disengagement from politics.
Chapter
three shall be the brief history of the Nigerian military, genesis, of military
in Nigerian politics, the military in politics dealing, with the political
economy of the military, the military and the power and ethnic struggles.
The
pattern of military disengagement from politics such as lronsi's regime, Mohammed/Obasanjo's
regime, Babangida's regime will be the focus of the fourth chapter.
Finally,
the curtain of our discussion shall be the concluding chapter. There may
however be recommendations and suggestions where necessary.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment