CONTROL OF FUNGAL PATHOGENS OF POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM .L.) USING BOTANICALS AND TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009768

No of Pages: 89

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

Laboratory experiments were carried out to investigate the fungitoxic potentials of some plant extracts and Trichoderma harzianum in the management of post-harvest fungal deterioration of potato. The experiments were laid out in Completely Randomized Design (CRD) and replicated three times and data collected were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Genstat discovery edition 1.Significant treatment means were seperated using Fisher’s least Significance Difference L.S.D at 5% level of probability. Pathogenicity test revealed that Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus stolonifer Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria solani caused rot on potato tubers by utilizing the substrate for their growth development. A. niger was found to be more virolent having the highest rot incidence of 77.5%, followed by R. stolonifer, A .flavus and F. oxysporum with rot incidence of 66.5%, 59.7%, 53.3% respectively, whereas the A. solani depicted a lower pathogenic effect with rot incidence of 33.6%. The result of the inhibitory potentials of the extracts of A. indica, M. oleifera (stem), M. oleifera (leaves) and C. odorata against the five fungal pathogens showed significant differences (P<0.5) in  their rates of fungitoxicity on A. niger, A. flavus, R. stolonifer, F. oxysporum and A. solani. The effect of A. indica extract gave the highest means inhibitory effect of 65.4% on A. niger while the least means growth inhibition of 18.4% was recorded by C. odorata extract on R. stolonifer. The results obtained when plant extracts were applied after inoculation with spore suspension fungi isolates showed high significant effect in rot incidence and severity. C. odorata was less effective in controlling the mycelial growth and thus, had the highest percentage diseases incidence of 50.2% .The lowest incidence of rot (21.6%) was recorded with A. indica extract. R. stolonifer showed a stronger resistance to the plant extracts than A. niger, A. flavus, F. oxysporum and A. solani. Results obtained from laboratory screening of T. harzianum for antagonism towards fungal isolates of potato tuber rot, showed that mutual inhibition was observed whenT. harzianum was co-inoculated with -A. solani, A. niger, A. flavus  and F. oxysporum, while  R. stolonifer overgrew the mycelium of T. harzianum on a PDA. The results of this study have shown the fungitoxic potential of these plants materials and antagonistic effects of T. harzianum in the control of the postharvest rot of potato which could be exploited as alternative to synthetic fungicide in the control of potato rot incited by fungal rot organisms.






TABLE OF CONTENTS


Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Declaration                                                                                                                 ii

Certification                                                                                                                iii

Dedication                                                                                                                  iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                    v

Table of Contents                                                                                                       vi

List of Tables                                                                                                              vii

List of Figures                                                                                                             viii

Abstract                                                                                                                      ix

 

CHAPTER   1:          INTRODUCTION

 

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                                1

1.2       Economic Importance of Potato                                                                     2

1.3       Diseases and Other Constraints in Potato Production                                                4

1.4       Post-Harvest Losses                                                                                        4

1.5      Aims and Objectives                                                                                        5


CHAPTER  2:           LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1       History of Potato Production in Nigeria                                                         6

2.2       Classsifiction of Potato                                                                                   7

2.3       Diseases of Potato                                                                                          8

2.3.1    Fungal diseases                                                                                               8

2.3.2    Early blight                                                                                                     8

2.3.3    Late blight                                                                                                      8

2.3.4    Wart disease                                                                                                   9

2.3.5    Stem canker and black scurf                                                                           9

2.3.6    Pink rot                                                                                                           10

2.3.7    Watery wound rot                                                                                           10

2.3.8    Dry Rot                                                                                                           11

2.3.9    Charcoal rot                                                                                                    11

2.4       Bacterial disease                                                                                             12

2.4.1    Bacterial wilt                                                                                                  12

2.4.2    Bacterial soft-rot                                                                                             12

2.5       Viral Diseases of Potato                                                                                 13

2.6       Control of Postharvest Tuber Rot Diseases                                                    15

2.6.1   Biological control of rot organisms                                                                 15

2.6.2    Chemical Control                                                                                           15

of fruits while the growth and 2.6.3    Use of resistant varieties                                                                                17

2.6.4    The use of plant extracts                                                                                 18

2.6.4.1. Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam)                                                                  19

2.6.4.2 Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata .L)                                                           20

2.6.4.3 Neem (Azadirachta indica. Jus)                                                                    21

2.7       Phytochemicals                                                                                              21

2.7.1    Flavonoids                                                                                                      22

2.7.2    Phenols                                                                                                           22

2.7.3    Saponins                                                                                                        23

2.7.4    Tannins                                                                                                           23

2.7.5    Alkaloids                                                                                                        24

2.7.6    Mechanism of action of phytochemicals                                                       24

 

CHAPTER      3:        MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1       Experimental Location                                                                                   26

3.2       Sources of Materials                                                                                       26

3.3       Sterilization of Materials                                                                                27

3.4      Preparation of Culture Media                                                                          27

3.5       Isolation of Fungal Rot Organisms from Diseased Potatoes                          27

3.6       Subculturing and Purification of Fungi Isolates                                             28

3.7       Identification and Characterization of Purified Fungal Isolates                             29

3.8       Pathogenicity Test for Fungal Isolates                                                           29

3.9       Preparation of Plant Extracts                                                                          30

3.10      Evaluation of Extract Purity                                                                          31

3.11     Effect of Plant Extracts on Fungal Growth                                                    31

3.12     In Vivo Screening of Plant Extracts against the Fungal Isolates on Potato  32

3.13     Dual Culture Method                                                                                      34

3.14     Microscopic Observation                                                                               34

3.15     Experimental Design                                                                                      35

3.16     Data Analysis                                                                                                  35

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

4.1       Results                                                                                                            36

4.1.1    Isolation of fungal pathogens from diseased potato tubers                            36

 

 

4.1.2    Pathogenicity Test                                                                                          38

4.1.4    Effect of plant extracts on the radial mycelia growth of the isolates                        40

4.1.5    Effect of different plant extracts on the incidence and severity of potato

tuber rot caused by fungi                                                                                42

4.2       Discussion                                                                                                       49

 

CHAPTER FIVE:     CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS                        54

 

REFERENCES                                                                                                         56

 

APPENDICES                                                                                                           69






 

LIST OF TABLES

 

1:         Percentage Frequency occurrence of isolated fungi from

Diseased potato tubers on PDA at 25-27±20C                                               36

 

2:         Pathogenicity Test and mean percentage rot of fungal isolates                               inoculated on healthy potato after 7 days, incubated at 25-27±20C                        38

 

 

 

3:         Percentage inhibition of the radial mycelia growth of four fungal

isolates by various plant extracts at different concentrations,            41

 

4:         Effect of plant extracts on rot incidence of potato tubers inoculated

with A. niger, A. flavus, R. stolonifer, F. oxysporum and A. solani

and incubated for 7 days at 25-27±20C                                                          43

 

5:         Effect of  plant extract on the  severity of rot on potato tubers

inoculated with A. niger, A. flavus, R. stolonifer, P. oxysporium

 and A solani and incubated for 7 days at 25-27±20C                                                44

 

6:         Reaction between Trichoderma harzianum and some fungi

isolates from diseased Potato tubers co-inoculated on PDA at

25-27±20C for 3days.                                                                                      45

 

 

 


 


 

LIST OF FIGURES


1:         Healthy potato tubers                                                                                      37

 

2:         Diseased potato                                                                                              37

 

3:         9cm Petri dishes inoculated with diseased potato slices, showing

emerging fungal mycelium after 5days incubation at 25-27±20C                        37

 

4:         Pure culture of isolated Aspergillus niger after 5days growth in a

petri dish incubated at 25-27±20C.                                                                       37

                  

5:         Potato tubers inoculated isolated fungi organisms                                         37

 

6:         Cross section of potato tubers inoculated with isolated

Aspergillus niger                                                                                            37

 

7-12:    Pathogenicity test with fungal isolates after 7days inoculation in

healthy potato tubers incubated at 25-27±20C                                                39

 

13:       Mycelium of Trichoderma harzianum (A) alone (control)                            46

 

14:       Mycelium of T. harzianum (A) invaded by mycelium (G) on PDA,

            indicating the outer marging of the antagonists (arrowed)                            46

 

15:       Mycelium colony of T. harzianum (A- aggressor) overgrowing

colony of Aspergillus flavus (D victim) on PDA with spores of (A)

formed mainly over the colony of (D)                                                            47

 

16:       Mycelium of T. harzianum (A) overgrowing colony of Aspergillus

niger (C) on PDA with spores of (A) formed mainly over the

colony of (C)                                                                                                   47

 

17:       Mycelium of T. harzianum (A-aggressor) overgrowing colony

of Fusarium oxysporium (E-victim) on PDA, with spores of (A)

formed mainly over the colony of (E)                                                                        48

 

18:       Mutual inhibition between mycelial colonies of T. harzianum (A)

and Alternaria solani (H) on PDA between the two colonies                      48

 


 





 

CHAPTER   1

INTRODUCTION


1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) belongs to the solanaceae family.It is a temperate crop, requiring low minimum temperatures of 150C or lower for tuberization (Okalebo et al., 2002).It can grow upto 60cm high depending on the variety (Kudi et al., 2008).It is a native of theWestern Hemisphere and is believed to have originated somewhere between Mexico and Chile, possibly in the Andes highlands of Bolivia and Peru. It later spread to other places like England and Ireland.  Potato was introduced into Nigeria in the later part of the 19th century and early 20th century by Europeans notably the tin miners in the Jos Plateau (Demign et al., 2004).It isnow an important and fast growing tuber crop in Nigeria. Although it is ranked 4th after cassava, yam, sweet potato, irish potato and cocoyam among the major root and tuber crops in Nigeria.It is by far the most efficient tuber crop in the country in terms of tuber yield and days of maturity (Thornton, et al., 2007).Under tropical conditions, potato matures in about 75 to 90 days as compared to 9 and 12 months for yam and cassava respectively.Because of the short maturity two or more crops of potato are possible in a year.It has the highest productivity among the tropical root crops.

The world total production is about 324.4 million tons planted on 18.6 million hectares of land (FAO, 2010). China is the worldlargest producer of potato with about 74.8 million tons, followed by India and Russia (FAO, 2013).

The current potato production in Nigeria is 800,000 tones per annum. In terms of tuber yield, 10-15 times per hectare have been reported in Jos under farmers conditions (Demign et al., 2004).Most important potato producing areas of Nigeria are Jos, Plateau, Kano, Zaria, Mambila, Biu and Obudu highlands. About 95% of the total production comes from Jos plateau. It is a major source of income among the rural farmers in the designated areas in Nigeria and many African communities (Wug, 2012).

The production and marketing of potato in the highland zones of Plateau State has become an integral part of rural economy, both at the rainy and dry season as it is cultivated as a rain-fed and dry season crop. According to Okonkwo et al.,(2009), planting of rain-fed potato takes place from late March to August depending on local conditions while harvest occurs three to four months later, from July to November. Irrigated production starts from late October through January with harvest in January, February, March or April.

 

1.2       ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF POTATO

To underscore the importance of potato in addressing the world food crises, the United Nations declared 2008 as the international year of the potato in order to raise its profile in developing nations calling the crop “hidden treasure” (FAO, 2008a).  Potatoes are of great importance nutritively and industrially. Nutritionally, potatoes is one of  the world's most nutritive sources of food for both humans and animals, the crop can be processed into portage with palm oil, chips, flour and use for feeding animals, (Dale, et al.,2003). The ratio of protein to carbohydrates is higher in potato than in many cereals and other root crops. Industrially, fresh potato tubers are sliced and sieved to produce starch, various use of starch include laundry purposes, hardening of textures, this starch is used in the pharmaceutical industries and in the production of alcohol and wines. Even the so called potato waste could be liquefied and fermented to produce fuel-grade ethanol. Potato starch is also a completely biodegradable alternative to polystyrene and can be use to create plastic items such as plastic dish, forks and spoons. Potato starch is also being developed as a biodegradable packaging material (Zealand, 2008)

Potato contains higher crude fibre than any other root and tuber crops and because of the low calorie and high vitamin C content it is an important nutritive food (Weaver and Marr, 2013). The tubers contain carbohydrates 14.2%, protein 4.7%,ash 5%, fat 07%, Fibre 0.8% vitamin 69%, Calcium 1%, Iron 14%, Magnissium 6%, Phosphorus 8%, Potassium 9% and Sodium 6% (Odebumni et al., 2007), Potatoes are eaten boiled fried and in stews and it is also grown for livestock feed and industrial purposes (Dale, et al.,2003)

In a more recent study, Storey and Anderson (2010) reviewed that individuals who consumed potato had significantly higher vegetable and potassium intakes than non-consumers. In adddition, the proportion of potassium and dietary fibre contributed by potato was higher than the proportion they contributed to total energy.Among potato consumers aged 14-18 years, potatoes provided 23 percent of dietary fibre and 20 percent of potassium but only 11 percent of total energy in the diet. Potatoes are also one of the best nutritional values in the produce department, providing significantly better nutritional value per dollar than many other raw vegetables (Drewnowski and Rehm, (2013) examined the nutrient density per unit cost of the 46 most frequently consumed vegetables as part of the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), and found that potatoes and beans were the least expensive sources of not only potassium but also fibre. Specifically, potassium-rich potatoes were almost half the cost of most other vegetables, making it moreaffordable to meet key dietary guidelines for good health (Achike, 2004).

 

1.3       DISEASES AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS IN POTATO PRODUCTION

Potato production is characterized by rapid and significant fluctuations in demand and supply.While average potato yield in North America andWestern Europe often reach 40 tonnes per hectare,yields in developing countries are usually below 20 tonnes per hectare. The national average potato yields for Kenya has been reported at 7.7 tons/ha, butthis figure has fluctuated considerably over recent years, from over 9.5 ton/ha to around 7.5 ton/ha (FAO, 2008). The low yields have been attributed to poor agronomic practices, low use of inputs especially fertilizers, low soil fertility, limited access to good quality seeds, diseases (especially bacterial, fungal, and viruses) and insect pests (Nganga, et al., 2002).The most serious fungal diseases include late blight (Phytophthora infestans), early blight (Alternaria solani) and watery rot (Pythium ultimum),dry rot (Fusarium oxysporum).Farmers attempt to plant as early as possible in the season to escape the blight attacks (Chuwang,2010).  Late blight attacks usually occur during mid-July through August (Chuwang, et al., 2007).  Viral diseases, particularly leaf roll, X and Y viruses can cause severe local damage.Bacterial wilt (Pseudomonas solanacearum) is a major constraint of potato production in Jos Plateau State, for which farmers have no effective control.Important pests include nematodes (Meloidogyne javanicus) and mealy bugs (Planococcus citri) (Chuwang,et al., 2007).Fertilizers and pesticides are being used at rates below economic optimum since farmers direct theirresources to other high value ‘important’ crops such, onions, tomatoes, barley, tea, coffee, maize, beans and wheat (Nganga, et al., 2002).


1.4       POST-HARVEST LOSSES

Post-harvest losses of potato tubers are high and it could be due to poor storage facilities and attack by fungal pathogens and Post-harvest Physiological Deterioration., PPD (Udoudoh, 2011).Enormouspost-harvest losses have been attributed to fungal deteriorations. Post-harvest fungal pathogens either infect the produce on farm or develop during storage (Okigbo,2002, 2003,Shukla et al.,2012) .Wounds and bruises which occur mostly during processes of  harvesting and transportation constitute  points of entry for these microorganisms (Arya, 2010).In  East Africa, Potato tubers  infected with storage fungi have been reported to cause loss of nutrients, discoloration, mouldy smell and taste and presence of mycotoxins (Natural Resources International LTD,2004).In Southeast Nigeria, several fungal pathogens  have been associated with potato tuber rot and include: Botryodiplodia theobromae, Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus stolonifer, Cylindrium clandestrium, Macrophemina phaseolina, Penicillium oxalicum.The most virulent were P. oxalicum and A. niger (Okigbo et al.,2009a;2009b).

 

  1.5     AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Were to;

·       determine some fungal pathogens causing potato tubers rot of potato

·       determine the incidence  and severity of each fungal agent

·       evaluate the efficacy of three  plant extracts;Neem (Azadirachta indica),Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata), Moringa leaf and stem (Moringa oleifera) and Trichoderma harzianum on tuber rot of  potato

.


 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7958

Total Item

Reviews (31)

  • Anonymous

    1 day ago

    This is so amazing and unbelievable, it’s really good and it’s exactly of what I am looking for

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Great service

  • Anonymous

    4 weeks ago

    This is truly legit, thanks so much for not disappointing

  • Anonymous

    4 weeks ago

    I was so happy to helping me through my project topic thank you so much

  • Anonymous

    4 weeks ago

    Just got my material... thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you for your reliability and swift service Order and delivery was within the blink of an eye.

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    It's actually good and it doesn't delay in sending. Thanks

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I got the material without delay. The content too is okay

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Thank you guys for the document, this will really go a long way for me. Kudos to project shelve👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    You guys have a great works here I m really glad to be one of your beneficiary hope for the best from you guys am pleased with the works and content writings it really good

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Excellent user experience and project was delivered very quickly

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    2 months ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    3 months ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    5 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you