ABSTRACT
The study
tried to find out if laboratory facilities are available and used in teaching
biology. In carrying out this study, 60 respondents were selected from
different schools and Questionnaire on Science Practical
Facilities in Schools (QSPFS)
was developed Percentage, mean and chi-square at 0.05 level of significant were
used to test the hypotheses. The results of the study showed that there are inadequate laboratory facilities in senior
secondary schools in Lagos State and teachers have a positive attitude towards
the conduct of practical activities. The implication for policy and practice respectively drawn from the
study are that: inadequate science laboratory facilities will hamper
teachers’ job performance; teaching
without laboratory facilities is an abstract teaching which can cause poor
academic achievement among students in biology.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PAGES
|
Title Page
|
i
|
Certification
|
ii
|
Approval Page
Dedication
|
iii
iv
|
Acknowledgements
|
v
|
Abstract
|
vi
|
Table of Contents
|
vii
|
CHAPTER
ONE: INTRODUCTION
|
1.1
|
Background of the study
|
1
|
1.2
|
Statement of Problem
|
5
|
1.3
|
Purpose of study
|
6
|
1.4
|
Research Questions
|
6
|
1.5
|
Research Hypothesis
|
6
|
1.6
|
Significance of study
|
6
|
1.7
|
Scope of the study
|
7
|
1.8
|
Definition of Terms
|
7
|
CHAPTER
TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
|
2.0
|
Introduction
|
8
|
2.1
|
The concept of practical work in science
|
8
|
2.2
|
Origins of Experimental Science
|
9
|
2.3
|
Importance of Biology Practical work
|
11
|
2.4
|
Availability of Laboratory facilities in
Secondary Schools
|
13
|
2.5
|
Practical class and students’ interest
|
15
|
2.6
|
Teachers perception to the conduct of
practical class
|
17
|
2.7
|
Alternatives to Laboratory work
|
18
|
2.8
|
Summary of the Literature Review
|
21
|
CHAPTER
THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
|
3.0
|
Introduction
|
23
|
3.1
|
Research Design
|
23
|
3.2
3.3
|
Area of Study
Population of Study
|
23
23
|
3.4
|
Sample and Sampling Technique
|
24
|
3.5
|
Research Instrument
|
24
|
3.5.1
|
Validation of Instrument
|
24
|
3.5.2
|
Reliability of Instrument
|
25
|
3.6
|
Data Collection Procedures
|
25
|
3.7
|
Data Analysis
|
25
|
CHAPTER
FOUR: PRESENTATION AND DATA ANALYSIS
|
4.1
4.2
|
Introduction
Presentation of Results
|
26
26-30
|
CHAPTER
FIVE: DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
|
5.1
|
Discussion of Results
|
31
|
5.2
|
Conclusions
|
32
|
5.3
|
Educational Implication of the findings
|
33
|
5.4
|
Recommendations
|
33
|
5.5
|
Limitations of the study
|
33
|
5.6
|
Suggestions for further research
|
34
|
5.7
|
Summary of the Work
|
34
|
|
REFERENCE
APPENDICES
|
36
41
|
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the
Study
Within the science education
community and beyond practical work is carried out by students as an essential
component of science education program (Bajah, 2004). Questions have, however,
been raised by some science educators about its effectiveness as a teaching and
learning strategy. Practical work was generally effective in getting students
to do what is intended with physical objects, but much less effective in
getting them to use the intended scientific ideas to guide their actions and
reflect upon the data they collect.
According to Abimbola (2008), the
use of the laboratory method of teaching science in general, Biology in
particular has become a dogma among science educators and teachers. On the one
hand, they extolled the importance of the use of the laboratory method in
science teaching while on the other hand, they only pay "lip service"
to its use in practice. Science teachers do not usually find it convenient to
make laboratory work the centre of their instruction. They usually complain of
lack of materials and equipment to carry out practical work. At the same time,
it is possible that some of these materials and equipment may be locked up in
the school laboratory store without teachers being aware of their existence.
The conditions under which many
teachers function do not engender any enthusiasm to use the laboratory method
of teaching science even where they know that these materials and equipment are
available. Class size in urban schools is getting larger and this does not
usually encourage teachers to use the laboratory method to teach Biology. In
some states of the country, teachers go for months without salary owing to
shortage of funds (Daramola, 2004). Biology teachers who fall in this category
cannot reasonably be expected to give off their best to their students (Ndu,
2008).
Higher institutions in Nigeria
charged with the responsibility of training science teachers at all levels, are
increasingly turning out teachers without requisite laboratory experience. In
the view of Abimbola (2008), a common reason usually given is shortage of
laboratory facilities. Such trained science teachers especially the Biology
teachers usually lack the necessary confidence to conduct practical classes
with their students. Peirce (2008) opines that government seems to have given
up on their capacity to equip all school laboratories. They have therefore
resorted to designating selected schools as "science schools" that
they equipped with their meager resources. They usually use the traditional
help received from the Federal Government in equipping school laboratories for
these science schools.
According to international standard,
science laboratory for junior secondary science labs should provide a minimum
of 1,000 net square feet, while secondary school labs should provide a minimum
of 1,100 net square feet. Each laboratory and each science classroom should be
provided with an instructor’s or demonstration desk with acid resistant top,
sink and utility connections; however, when a science classroom is provided and
laboratory work only is planned for the laboratory, the instructor’s or
demonstration desk may be omitted from the science classroom.
Fume hoods should be installed in
all laboratories where flammable or toxic vapors or airborne particulates are
generated. Eye wash facilities, fire blanket, and safety deluge shower,
portable ABC rated fire extinguishers, and master shutoff controls for gas and
electricity should be provided in all laboratories.
Gas outlets should be placed in
science rooms where required by the program. Middle and high science rooms
should provide gas only to the demonstration table.
Each science laboratory should have
at least one fixed or portable work station that provides access to students in
wheelchairs and all areas should be adequately ventilated so that exposure to
hazardous or toxic materials is eliminated. Hoods shall exhaust directly to the
outside and should be located away from building air intake or other openings.
In Nigeria settings, the white
paper on science laboratory requires secondary school laboratory to have a
standard room size /dimension Lab size-36.5ft.x20ft with capacity to
accommodate a group of 25 students in a practical class with entrance
hydrolytic door. Laboratory stools at least 25 Stackable seminar chairs should
be of suitable height to provide ample leg space under the table and should
have broad leg area for stability. Floor with non-skid tiling resist strong
acid and alkali, but also resist scratch, fading, ageing, and strain resistant.
It is free from solvent and non-toxic. Teacher’s table and chair must be
slightly higher in height than routine school furniture for better monitoring
and demonstrations. Marble plate and ceramic plate not only resist strong acid
and alkali but also resist starch, fading, ageing, high temperature(below1200c)
and stain resistant. Proper drainage with covered dustbins below the table with
proper electric points, fitted with water supply. Water supply Lab must have at
least four outlets and four wash basins. Fire Extinguisher at least one meant
for all types of fires. White boards and magnetic white boards located at
suitable height to be easily visible.
In
1988, a report published in the Florida Science Teachers Magazine, Spring
Edition, 1988, by Phillip Horton entitled "Class Size and Lab Safety in
Florida" documented that over 55% of the science classes had enrollments
teachers considered to be "potentially unsafe" for lab work. The
average class size in these "unsafe" classrooms was 31 students. Of
the 45% of the science classrooms teachers considered to be "safe",
the average class size was 23 students. One high school teacher surveyed had
two classes where the number of students was within the designed enrollment
capacity and three classes where enrollments exceeded the room capacity.
Contrasting the number of accidents between
the first two periods and the last three class size does make a significant
difference in traffic flow, individual monitoring, and understanding of the
students!" The facts are clear, increasing the number of students in a
science laboratory increases the likelihood of accidents. A high pupil/teacher
ratio constitutes a threat to laboratory safety.
There was little evidence
that the cognitive challenge of linking observables to ideas is recognized by
those who design practical activities for science lessons.
Tasks rarely incorporated
explicit strategies to help students to make such links, or were presented in
class in ways that reflected the size of the learning demand. The analytical
framework used in this study offers a means of assessing the learning demand of
practical tasks, and the effects on students’ academic performance.
1.2 Statement of Problem
The roles of practical class
in science subjects during teaching and learning process are often been
overlooked in secondary education. The attitude of schools towards science
practical have not been positive in the recent times as a lot of schools have
science equipment which have never been used or are hardly used. In some cases,
school laboratories are underequipped while some schools do not even have
science laboratories and this may be the reason for general poor performance in
science related courses (Esan, 2005).
Practical work follows the basic principle of Learning by
doing. Students get opportunity to actively participate in the learning
process. But difficulties in organizing practical
classes for students have made the learning abstract (Ojo, 2009). Some teachers
have been discovered to be good in theoretical aspect of teaching but they
often fall short of expectation when it comes to practical aspect due to their
unfamiliarity with nature of the work.
1.3 Purpose of Study
The purpose of this study is to find out if:
1. Practical facilities are adequate in senior secondary schools
based on Nigerian minimum standard.
2. Teachers have a positive attitude towards the conduct of
practicals.
1.4 Research Questions
The following questions guided the study:
1. Are there adequate laboratory facilities in senior secondary
schools?
2. What are the teachers’ attitudes towards the conduct of
practicals?
1.5 Research Hypotheses
The following hypotheses guided the study:
1. There are inadequate laboratory facilities in senior secondary
schools
2. Teachers have a negative attitude towards the conduct of practicals
1.6 Significance of Study
The finding of this study should be taking as positive
contribution to plant planning in secondary school. The study will also
encourage the state ministry of education, state primary education board, the
Heads of private schools and school managers in provision of science facilities
that will stimulate a high level of participation in the students in practicals
and increase their knowledge of the subject matter since knowledge is better
appreciated from active participation.
This study will also allow students know the importance of
practicals in biology and this will help to improve their participation in the
class.
The curriculum planners will use the result of this study to
evaluate the existing curriculum in line with the available facilities in the
biology laboratory, with a view of reviewing same to meet the realities on
ground and setting obtainable curriculum for biology practicals in senior
secondary school.
This study will bring to fore the attitude (positive or negative)
of teachers towards the conduct of biology praticals in senior secondary
schools.
1.7 Scope
of the Study
The study covered senior secondary schools in Orile Agege Local
Council Development Area of Lagos State. Both secondary and primary source of
data were available for use.
1.8 Definition
of Terms
The following terms have been defined operationally as follows:
Perception:
the
way you think about or understand something
Laboratory: has to do with
performing experiment
Attitude: a state of mind or
disposition
Practical: of
or concerned with the actual doing or use of something rather than with theory
and ideas.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment